1 FOCUS Degradation Kinetics Training course 26-27 January 2005 Regulatory use of degradation endpoints Sylvia Karlsson Swedish Chemicals Inspectorate.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Slide 1 Workshop on NAPs and IPM – Brussels, January 2009 FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE ON THE SUSTAINABLE USE OF PESTICIDES - What is new for Member States.

Advertisements

Chapter 9 Normalisation of Field Half-lives

Chapter 10 Water-Sediment Studies Jeremy Dyson Basel, Switzerland.

Data handling Sabine Beulke, CSL, York, UK FOCUS Work Group on Degradation Kinetics Estimating Persistence and Degradation Kinetics from Environmental.

Theory Metabolites Karin Aden (BVL, Germany)

30 Jan 2006 Page 1 FOCUS Kinetics training workshop Chapter 7 Recommended Procedures to Derive Endpoints for Parent Compounds Ralph L. Warren, Ph.D. DuPont.

Claude Beigel, PhD. Exposure Assessment Senior Scientist Research Triangle Park, USA Practical session metabolites Part II: goodness of fit and decision.

26-27 Jan 2005 Page 1 FOCUS Kinetics training workshop Chapter 7 Recommended Procedures to Derive Endpoints for Parent Compounds Ralph L. Warren, Ph.D.

Claude Beigel, PhD. Exposure Assessment Senior Scientist Research Triangle Park, USA Practical session metabolites Part I: curve fitting.

FOCUS Kinetics Training: Parameter Estimation with MatLab

Introduction to parameter optimization

26-27 Jan 2005 Page 1 FOCUS Kinetics training workshop Chapter 7 Recommended Procedures to Derive Endpoints for Parent Compounds Practical Exercise Ralph.

Outline Introduction Kinetic endpoints General fitting recommendations

Demonstration of fitting with Berkeley Madonna FOCUS Degradation Kinetics, Ton van der Linden, January 27, 2005.

Introduction to FOCUS Degradation Kinetics training course

Introduction to ModelMaker

Introduction and Project Definition Russell L. Jones January 26, 2005.

Kinetic Models Considered Jeremy Dyson Basel, Switzerland.

An Introduction to the Kinetic Evaluation Software KinGUI

Introduction and Project Definition Russell L. Jones January 30, 2006.

Presented to: Minnesota Chamber of Commerce October 1, 2012.

A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012.

DSS Decision Support System Tutorial: An Instructional Tool for Using the DSS.

Francesca Arena European Commission Health and Consumers Directorate General Future data requirements related to bees for the authorisation of plant protection.

Materials for Lecture 11 Chapters 3 and 6 Chapter 16 Section 4.0 and 5.0 Lecture 11 Pseudo Random LHC.xls Lecture 11 Validation Tests.xls Next 4 slides.

Centre for Ecology & Hydrology - Lancaster 1 st – 3 rd April 2014 David Copplestone & Nick Beresford.

© 2014 Carl Lund, all rights reserved A First Course on Kinetics and Reaction Engineering Class 15.

Training session File Note and Registration Report, 23 rd October Registration report : Partim Fate and Behavior in the environment 23 rd October.

Overview of EFSA’s work on opinions and guidance

1 Development & Evaluation of Ecotoxicity Predictive Tools EPA Development Team Regional Stakeholder Meetings January 11-22, 2010.

Methods for Incorporating Aquatic Plant Effects into Community Level Benchmarks EPA Development Team Regional Stakeholder Meetings January 11-22, 2010.

Software Quality Assurance Inspection by Ross Simmerman Software developers follow a method of software quality assurance and try to eliminate bugs prior.

Ideal solutions and excess functions

Lecture 11 Chemical Reaction Engineering (CRE) is the field that studies the rates and mechanisms of chemical reactions and the design of the reactors.

“to provide and apply an integrated approach of addressing scientific, managerial and societal issues surrounding environmental effects of ionising.

Lecture 11 Chemical Reaction Engineering (CRE) is the field that studies the rates and mechanisms of chemical reactions and the design of the reactors.

Introduction to the ERICA Tool Radiation Protection of the Environment (Environment Agency Course, July 2015)

1 Using Excel to Implement Software Reliability Models Norman F. Schneidewind Naval Postgraduate School 2822 Racoon Trail, Pebble Beach, California, 93953,

Surveillance monitoring Operational and investigative monitoring Chemical fate fugacity model QSAR Select substance Are physical data and toxicity information.

GHS CLASSIFICATION ONLINE. Registration: Click on “Register”

American Association for Laboratory Accreditation Practical Solutions to Traceability and Uncertainty in Accreditation Presented to CITAC-NCSLI Joint Workshop.

6top paper updates Kazushi Muraoka. 2 updates Current evaluation results – Obtained 8 curves which are combination of w/ or w/o 6top housekeeping Removing.

Development of an integrated database for the management of accidental spills (DIMAS) Katrien Arijs Bram Versonnen Marnix Vangheluwe Jan Mees Ward Vandenberghe.

© 2014 Carl Lund, all rights reserved A First Course on Kinetics and Reaction Engineering Class 14.

SynTech Research Spain SynTech Research Spain Regulatory Affairs.

Pesticide Spray Drift Conference September 5 and 6, 2001 AgDRIFT® Dave Esterly Environmental Focus, Inc

1 Pesticide Program Dialogue Committee Meeting State Lead Agency Presentation Chuck Andrews, Chair AAPCO Worker Protection Committee California Department.

Experimental Data Analysis Prof. Terry A. Ring, Ph. D. Dept. Chemical & Fuels Engineering University of Utah

Training session File Note and Registration Report, 23 rd October File Note : Partim Fate and Behavior in the environment 23 rd October 2006S. Vanhiesbecq.

Chapter 2 Modeling Approaches  Physical/chemical (fundamental, global) Model structure by theoretical analysis  Material/energy balances  Heat, mass,

IMPACT 3-5th November 20044th IMPACT Project Workshop Zaragoza 1 Investigation of extreme flood Processes and uncertainty IMPACT Investigation of Extreme.

Christian Drobniewski, BfS Regulatory Working Group IAEA Headquarters, Vienna

© 2014 Carl Lund, all rights reserved A First Course on Kinetics and Reaction Engineering Class 14.

A Global Review of Methodologies for Aquatic Ecological Risk Assessment.

Data handling Sabine Beulke, Central Science Laboratory, York, UK Kinetic Evaluation according to Recommendations by the FOCUS Work Group on Degradation.

© 2014 Carl Lund, all rights reserved A First Course on Kinetics and Reaction Engineering Class 9.

Database Overview What is a database? What types of databases are there? How are databases more powerful than spreadsheets?

International Office for Water Alice James - WG E (6), Brussels, 6 July 2009 International Office for Water Alice James - WG E (6), Brussels, 6 July 2009.

General Concepts in QSAR for Using the QSAR Application Toolbox

Fraunhofer IME InversePELMO - a specific software to perform inverse modelling simulations with FOCUSPELMO Peter Gallien*, Romeo Herr* and Michael Klein**

The Pricing of Stock Options Using Black-Scholes Chapter 12

Outdoor Water Sediment Study – Adding Effects of Sunlight to Aquatic System Exposure Assessment Cecilia Mucha Hirata (DuPont Crop Protection, Newark DE,

Rochelle F.H. Bohaty, William P. Eckel, Katrina White, Dirk F. Young

Environmental Engg II.

Monte Carlo Simulation Managing uncertainty in complex environments.

Inferences and Conclusions from Data

WG-E(1) Meeting, CCAB, Brussels, 06/03/2007

Modeling Approaches Chapter 2 Physical/chemical (fundamental, global)

Statistical Data Analysis

EAF (9) Meeting, CCAB, Brussels, 02/10/2006

Presentation transcript:

1 FOCUS Degradation Kinetics Training course January 2005 Regulatory use of degradation endpoints Sylvia Karlsson Swedish Chemicals Inspectorate

2 What are the kinetic endpoints? Parent compounds, soil: DT 50, DT 90 or rate constant, kinetic model Metabolites, soil: DT 50, DT 90 or rate constant, kinetic model, formation fraction Parent and metabolites, water/sediment: DT 50, DT 90 or rate constant, kinetic model, (formation fraction) – for overall system, water column and sediment

3 What are the kinetic endpoints used for? To compare with criteria, triggers for further studies, as provided in Annex II, III and VI of Dir. 91/414/EEC and in Guidance Documents on Aquatic and Terrestrial Ecotoxicology As input to calculations of PECsoil, PECgw, PECsw and PECsed

4 What endpoints are used for different purposes (triggers/PEC)? Use against triggers (parents & metabolites): DT 50 and DT 90 derived by best-fit kinetics (unless deviation from first order kinetics can be attributed to experimental artefact!) Degradation or dissipation endpoints? - Mainly left to users to decide.

5 PECgw, PECsw and PECsed – calculated e.g. by FOCUS simulation tools: DT 50 or rate constant, for metabolites also formation fraction, derived by first order kinetics (1st tier). Data from lab or field studies. Endpoints from field studies must be normalised.

6 PECsoil calculated by spreadsheets or parameter estimation software: DT 50 or rate constant, for metabolites also formation fraction, Endpoints derived by best-fit kinetics. Data from lab or field studies.

7 Average or representative worst-case values? For use against triggers and to calculate PECsoil: Values not averaged (normally!) To calculate PECgw, PECsw and PECsed: Averaged values (normally!)

8 Geometric or arithmetic mean? Rate constants and DT 50 s: Geometric – pragmatic reason: produces equal results Other parameters (e.g., formation fractions): Arithmetic

9 Finally, DT 50 and DT 90 obtained by different kinetic models can be averaged. Specific recommendations are provided for metabolite endpoints and for use of endpoints for calculation of PECgw, PECsw and PECsed when first order kinetics does not provide an adequate fit.