Roberto GemmeIII Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati, 12-14/11/2007 Reaction plane determination with the neutron Zero Degree Calorimeters.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PID v2 and v4 from Au+Au Collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV at RHIC
Advertisements

NDVCS measurement with BoNuS RTPC M. Osipenko December 2, 2009, CLAS12 Central Detector Collaboration meeting.
Mass, Quark-number, Energy Dependence of v 2 and v 4 in Relativistic Nucleus- Nucleus Collisions Yan Lu University of Science and Technology of China Many.
III Convegno sulla Fisica di ALICE. Frascati 1 Vertex reconstruction and selection strategies for D s detection in Pb-Pb collisions Sergey Senyukov,
Roberta Arnaldi AFTER meeting, Grenoble 10 May 2012
The performance of Strip-Fiber EM Calorimeter response uniformity, spatial resolution The 7th ACFA Workshop on Physics and Detector at Future Linear Collider.
Measurements of long-range angular correlation and identified particle v 2 in 200 GeV d+Au collisions from PHENIX Shengli Huang Vanderbilt University for.
Ultra Peripheral Collisions at RHIC Coherent Coupling Coherent Coupling to both nuclei: photon~Z 2, Pomeron~A 4/3 Small transverse momentum p t ~ 2h 
1 How to measure flow and the reaction plane? N. N. Ajitanand Nuclear Chemistry, SUNY, Stony Brook.
Track Timing at e + e - Linear Collider with the Silicon Drift Detector Main Tracker R. Bellwied, D. Cinabro, V. L. Rykov Wayne State University Detroit,
1 The CMS Heavy Ion Program Michael Murray Kansas.
TIME-LIKE BARYON FORM FACTORS: EXPERIMENTAL SITUATION AND POSSIBILITIES FOR PEP-N Roberto Calabrese Dipartimento di Fisica and I.N.F.N. Ferrara, Italy.
The LHCf experiment Hiroaki MENJO INFN Firenze on behalf for the LHCf collaboration at 29 March 2010, MC4LHC.
Gang Wang (WWND2010)1 Search for local parity violation with STAR ZDC-SMD Gang Wang (UCLA) for STAR Collaboration.
Elastic Scattering at s=1.96 TeV Using the DØ Forward Proton Detector
J/  azimuthal anisotropy relative to the reaction plane in Pb-Pb collisions at 158 AGeV/c Francesco Prino INFN – Sezione di Torino for the NA50 collaboration.
Jornadas LIP 2008 – Pedro Ramalhete. 17 m hadron absorber vertex region 8 MWPCs 4 trigger hodoscopes toroidal magnet dipole magnet hadron absorber targets.
Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin Presented by A.Litvinenko.
Centrality Determination and Reaction plane reconstruction with MPD D.Dryablov, V. Zhezher, M.Kapishin, G.Musulmanbekov XIV GDRE Workshop, Dubna
Large Magnetic Calorimeters Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) in a Nufact Nufact04 (Osaka, 1/8/2004)
Ronald Bruijn – 10 th APP Symposium Antares results and status Ronald Bruijn.
PHENIX Local Polarimeter PSTP 2007 at BNL September 11, 2007 Yuji Goto (RIKEN/RBRC)
S.A. Voloshin STAR QM’06: Energy and system size dependence of elliptic flow and v 2 /  scaling page1 Sergei A. Voloshin Wayne State University, Detroit,
C. Oppedisano for the ALICE Collaboration. 5 Jun 2012 C. Oppedisano 2/10 Centrality in p-A interactions can be defined through the number of collisions.
Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade Drift Chamber Review Jefferson Lab March 6- 8, 2007 CLAS12 Drift Chambers Simulation and Event Reconstruction.
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
Incident-energy and system-size dependence of directed flow Gang Wang (UCLA) for STAR Collaboration  Introduction to directed flow  Detectors: ZDC-SMD,
LHCf Report Takashi SAKO for the LHCf Collaboration 18-Dec-2009 CERN Main Auditorium.
Positional and Angular Resolution of the CALICE Pre-Prototype ECAL Hakan Yilmaz.
C. Oppedisano, 9 October 2007, ALICE Offline Week 1 RECONSTRUCTION ALGORITHM CALIBRATION OBJECT ESD STRUCTURE ONGOING TASKS.
WWND 2011, Winter Park, CO, 7/Feb/2011ShinIchi Esumi, Univ. of Tsukuba1 v n {EP} measurements with forward rapidity  n in 200GeV Au+Au collisions at RHIC-PHENIX.
Lecture 9: Inelastic Scattering and Excited States 2/10/2003 Inelastic scattering refers to the process in which energy is transferred to the target,
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
Luminosity Monitoring Issues  ZDC  what’s the advantage?  problems  BBC  can they do it? A. Drees QCD critical point workshop, Mar
First measurements in Pb—Pb collisions at  s NN =2.76 TeV with ALICE at the LHC M. Nicassio (University and INFN Bari) for the ALICE Collaboration Rencontres.
Muon detection in NA60  Experiment setup and operation principle  Coping with background R.Shahoyan, IST (Lisbon)
D 0 reconstruction: 15 AGeV – 25 AGeV – 35 AGeV M.Deveaux, C.Dritsa, F.Rami IPHC Strasbourg / GSI Darmstadt Outline Motivation Simulation Tools Results.
Dhevan Gangadharan (for the STAR Collaboration) Postdoctoral Researcher at CERN--Ohio State University.
29/08/2008ALICE Italia Analysis of the D + s  K + K - π + channel in the ALICE experiment Serhiy Senyukov Università & INFN di Torino (4050 m. asl)
Test beam results on the Proton Zero Degree Calorimeter for the ALICE experiment R. Gemme for the ALICE Collaboration  Universita’ del Piemonte Orientale.
ANGULAR CORRELATION OF NEUTRONS EMITTED FROM DECAY OF GIANT DIPOLE RESONANCE IN ULTRA-PERIPHERAL COLLISIONS AT RHIC In an ultra peripheral collision the.
PHOBOS at RHIC 2000 XIV Symposium of Nuclear Physics Taxco, Mexico January 2001 Edmundo Garcia, University of Maryland.
July 27, 2002CMS Heavy Ions Bolek Wyslouch1 Heavy Ion Physics with the CMS Experiment at the Large Hadron Collider Bolek Wyslouch MIT for the CMS Collaboration.
S.A. Voloshin STAR ICHEP 2006, Moscow, RUSSIA, July 26 – August 2, 2006page1 Sergei A. Voloshin Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan for the STAR.
Inclusive cross section and single transverse-spin asymmetry of very forward neutron production at PHENIX Spin2012 in Dubna September 17 th, 2012 Yuji.
Study of Charged Hadrons in Au-Au Collisions at with the PHENIX Time Expansion Chamber Dmitri Kotchetkov for the PHENIX Collaboration Department of Physics,
P. E. Christakoglou HEP Centrality Dependence of the Balance Function in Pb–Pb Collisions (NA49) P. CHRISTAKOGLOU – M. FARANTATOS A. PETRIDIS –
Performance Study of Pair-monitor 2009/06/30 Yutaro Sato Tohoku Univ.
Jet Production in Au+Au Collisions at STAR Alexander Schmah for the STAR Collaboration Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Hard Probes 2015 in Montreal/Canada.
V. Pozdnyakov Direct photon and photon-jet measurement capability of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC Valery Pozdnyakov (JINR, Dubna) on behalf of the HI.
1 Status of Zero Degree Calorimeter for CMS Experiment O.Grachov, M.Murray University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS A.S.Ayan, P.Debbins, E.Norbeck, Y.Onel University.
E.C. AschenauerEIC INT Program, Seattle Week 81.
FP-CCD GLD VERTEX GROUP Presenting by Tadashi Nagamine Tohoku University ILC VTX Ringberg Castle, May 2006.
1 Azimuthal angle fluctuations (draft of NA49 publication) NA61/SHINE and NA49 Software/Analysis meeting February 15 th – 18 th, WUT Katarzyna Grebieszkow.
Effect of TCTVB collimator on ZDC A fraction of the spectator neutrons will hit the jaws Two physic parameters/measurements are affected –The energy mean.
Elena Bruna Yale University
Status of Zero Degree Calorimeter for CMS Experiment
Directed flow of identified particles from Au+Au Collisions at RHIC
The ATLAS Zero Degree Calorimeter Brookhaven National Laboratory, USA
Directed flow of identified particles from Au+Au Collisions at RHIC
Huagen Xu IKP: T. Randriamalala, J. Ritman and T. Stockmanns
NA61 and NA49 Collaboration Meeting May 14-19, 2012, Budapest
How to detect protons from exclusive processes
STAR Geometry and Detectors
NUCLEUS-NUCLEUS COLLISION Centrality Determination For NICA/MPD
ShinIchi Esumi, Univ. of Tsukuba
Analisi del flow con il metodo dei coefficienti di Fourier
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
Hiroshi Masui For the PHENIX Collaboration Quark Matter 2004
Presentation transcript:

Roberto GemmeIII Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati, 12-14/11/2007 Reaction plane determination with the neutron Zero Degree Calorimeters Outline Comparison between Event Plane resolution using 1 or 2 ZN. Distance between the centroids of spectator neutrons spot on ZN1 and ZN2: a way to select events with a better Event Plane resolution.

Roberto GemmeIII Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati, 12-14/11/2007 ALICE Zero Degree Calorimeters ZDCs are placed at 116 m from IP at 0º relative to LHC beam axis, where the circulating beams are spatially separated in two different pipes. Spectator neutrons and protons separated by magnetic elements of the LHC beam line Two identical sets of ZDCs, one on each side relative to the interaction point (I.P.):  reduce background  improve resolution on centrality ZDC will measure the centrality of the nucleus-nucleus collision through the detection of the energy carried by non- interacting (spectators) nucleons. outgoing beam ZP ZN 2 distinct detectors: 1 for protons (ZP), 1 for neutrons (ZN)

Roberto GemmeIII Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati, 12-14/11/2007 The neutron Zero Degree Calorimeter (ZN) Each ZN is made by 44 grooved W-alloy slabs, each of them 1.6 mm thick, stacked to form a parallelepiped of 7.2 x 7.2 x 100 cm 3. The active part is made of 1936 quartz fibers, embedded in the absorber with a pitch of 1.6 mm. The fibers, hosted in the slab grooves, are placed at 0 0 with respect to the incident particle direction and come out from the rear face of the calorimeter, directly bringing the light to the photomultipliers.

Roberto GemmeIII Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati, 12-14/11/2007 ZN as rough position sensitive device One out of two fiber is sent to a photomultiplier (PMTc), while the remaining fibers are collected in bundles and sent to four different photomultipliers (PMT1 to PMT4) forming four indipendent towers. This segmentation gives a rough localization of the spectator neutron’s spot on the front face of the calorimeter. PMT 1 PMT 2 PMT 3 PMT 4 PMT c

Roberto GemmeIII Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati, 12-14/11/2007 ZDC acceptances No losses of neutrons along the beam line. For the spectator neutrons only the transverse component of the Fermi momentum plays a role in determining the spot size at the ZDC location, which is of the order of 0.6  0.6 cm 2 at 1  level. The momentum spread of spectator protons results in a large horizontal dispersion after separator dipole D1: ~30% of protons interact along the beam line 7.04 cm Beam exiting IP cm 12 cm ~ 15 cm Proton ZDC Neutron ZDC 90% of detected protons hit a 12.6  2.8 cm 2 area. Experimentally possible the estimate of the centroid of the spectator neutrons spot using the responses coming from the four ZN towers.

Roberto GemmeIII Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati, 12-14/11/2007 Neutron multiplicity vs impact parameter Therefore the monotonic correlation between the neutron multiplicity and the centrality variables is partially destroyed. The information provided by two forward e.m. calorimeters (ZEM) will be used to identify very peripheral collisions and to remove the ambiguity. Pb-Pb 2.7 TeVA Hijing+fragmentation In peripheral collisions many nucleons remain bound in large nuclear fragments, that are not detected by the ZDC. Pb-Pb 2.7 TeVA Hijing+fragmentation

Roberto GemmeIII Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati, 12-14/11/2007 Centroid reconstructed by ZN - true Centroid = Centroid Resolution Reconstruction of the centroid of the spectator neutrons spot neutron multiplicity = 20

Roberto GemmeIII Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati, 12-14/11/2007 ZN and the Reaction Plane Reaction Plane defined by beam direction and impact parameter The centroid measurement allows to reconstruct the 1st order event plane. Thanks to its localizing capability ZN can measure, event by event, the centroid of the spectator neutrons spot, which is sensitive to the sideward deflection (“bounce off”) of the spectator neutrons. V1 = Directed Flow of spectator neutrons occurs when the spectator neutrons are deflected by the expanding fireball into the reaction plane Reaction plane x z y

Roberto GemmeIII Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati, 12-14/11/2007 Reaction Plane Estimate Spectator neutrons (2.76 TeV) on one side of I.P. (OLD STUDY) and on the two sides of I.P. (NEW STUDY) are generated with a momentum distribution taking into account Fermi momentum, transverse Pb beam divergence = 30  rad, beam transverse size at I.P. = 16  m. A random reaction plane azimuth (phiRP) is assigned to each event and a directed flow of spectator neutrons v 1 is introduced following standard prescriptions (Poskanzer and Voloshin, Phys. Rev. C58, 1998), same as in AliGenAfterBurnerFlow. phiZDC0 = event plane azimuth from spectator neutrons true centroid phiZDC = event plane azimuth from spectator neutrons reconstructed centroid Two estimators of the event plane resolution: -The mean cosine of the angular difference - the variance of the gaussian fit of the distribution phiZDC – phiRP

Roberto GemmeIII Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati, 12-14/11/2007 Reaction Plane estimate for Neutron Multiplicity = 30 on one side of IP v 1 = 5% v 1 = 20%

Roberto GemmeIII Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati, 12-14/11/2007 Event Plane Resolution – 1 one side of I.P. The event plane resolution depends on the magnitude of v 1 among spectator neutrons and on a lesser extent on the neutron multiplicity. Neutron Multiplicity up to 60, maximum number of detected neutrons in one ZN, when the production of nuclear fragments in Pb-Pb collisions is taken into account. Event Plane resolution expressed as

Roberto GemmeIII Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati, 12-14/11/2007 Event Plane Resolution – 2 one side of I.P. Advantages of using the reaction plane from v 1 of spectator neutrons: direction of the impact parameter vector in the range 0-2  -> v 1 of produced particles, sign of v 2 less sensitivity to non-flow effects (originating from jets …) thanks to the large rapidity gap less sensitivity to flow fluctuations Event Plane resolution expressed as σ(phiZDC-phiRP) (from gaussian fit)

Roberto GemmeIII Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati, 12-14/11/2007 LHC beam parameters contribution to event plane resolution V 1 =20% Transverse Pb beam divergence at IP2 = 30 μrad This value depends on the LHC beam parameters: - transverse normalised emittance ε n - twiss function β* - relativistic gamma factor γ - ε n = 1.5 μm rad - β* at IP2 = 0.5 m - γ = > Event plane resolution is dominated by the bias due to beam divergence

Roberto GemmeIII Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati, 12-14/11/2007 Shift of the centroid of spectator neutrons spot on the ZN front face vs Directed Flow v 1 reaction plane azimuth = 0. Neutron multiplicity = 40 The centroid position does not depend on the neutron multiplicity V 1 =0 % V 1 =20% -> 1.7 mm

Roberto GemmeIII Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati, 12-14/11/2007 Event Plane Resolution – ZN1+2 ZN1 ZN2 IP2 No Fermi momentum of spectator neutrons Transverse Pb beam divergence at I.P. = 0 μrad Beam transverse size at I.P. = 0 No detector smearing -> same shift of the centroid of spectator neutrons spot on ZN1 and ZN2 front face Fermi momentum of spectator neutrons Transverse Pb beam divergence at I.P. = 30 μrad Beam transverse size at I.P. = 16 μm Detector smearing -> the position of the centroid of spectator neutrons spot on ZN1 and ZN2 is different -> event plane azimuth from the mean of the 2 centroids ZN1 ZN2

Roberto GemmeIII Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati, 12-14/11/2007 Event Plane Resolution – ZN1+2 Neutron Multiplicity = 30 on ZN1 and ZN2, v1 = 20% Single ZN ZN1+2 event plane azimuth from the mean of the 2 centroids 48,

Roberto GemmeIII Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati, 12-14/11/2007 Event Plane Resolution – ZN1+2 Parametric study as a function of Neutron Multiplicity assumed equal on the 2 ZN.

Roberto GemmeIII Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati, 12-14/11/2007 Distance between the 2 centroids Distance between true centroids No Fermi momentum Beam transverse size at I.P. = 0 Transverse Pb beam divergence at I.P. = 0 μrad Distance between reconstructed centroids No Fermi momentum Beam transverse size at I.P. = 0 Transverse Pb beam divergence at I.P. = 0 μrad Distance between reconstructed centroids Beam transverse size at I.P. = 0 Transverse Pb beam divergence at I.P. = 0 μrad Distance between reconstructed centroids Transverse Pb beam divergence at I.P. = 0 μrad (m)

Roberto GemmeIII Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati, 12-14/11/2007 Distance between the 2 centroids Also with beam divergence=0 the reconstructed distance between the 2 centroids is not zero, because of Fermi momentum of spectator neutrons and detector smearing. But the distance is significantly bigger when the beam divergence is switched on. -> The distance between the 2 centroids can be a tool to select events with a better event plane resolution? theta_div ZN1 (rad) vs reconstructed centroid distance (m) Distance between reconstructed centroids Transverse Pb beam divergence at I.P.= 0 μrad Distance between reconstructed centroids Transverse Pb beam divergence at I.P.= 30 μrad (m)

Roberto GemmeIII Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati, 12-14/11/2007 Event Plane Resolution vs Centroid Distance Single ZN ZN1+2 No cut on the distance between the 2 centroids Distance between the 2 centroids < 5 mm Neutron Multiplicity = 30 on ZN1 and ZN2, v1 = 20% 48,

Roberto GemmeIII Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati, 12-14/11/2007 Event Plane Resolution vs Centroid Distance Single ZN ZN1+2 No cut on the distance between the 2 centroids Distance between the 2 centroids < 5 mm Neutron Multiplicity = 30 on ZN1 and ZN2, v1 = 20%

Roberto GemmeIII Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati, 12-14/11/2007 Event Plane Resolution vs Centroid Distance No cut Transverse Pb beam divergence at IP2=0 μrad Neutron Multiplicity = 30 on ZN1 and ZN2, v1 = 20% Transverse Pb beam divergence at IP2=0 μrad No cut

Roberto GemmeIII Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati, 12-14/11/2007 Percentage of events vs cut Percentage of events which survive after the different cuts on the distance between the 2 centroids Neutron Multiplicity = 30 on ZN1 and ZN2, v1 = 20% No cut

Roberto GemmeIII Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati, 12-14/11/2007 Summary The neutron zero degree calorimeter ZN of ALICE allows to reconstruct the 1 st -order event plane from the directed flow (“bounce off”) of spectator neutrons. The event plane resolution depends on the magnitude of v 1 among spectator neutrons and on a lesser extent on the neutron multiplicity. The event plane resolution predicted for the ALICE ZN is dominated by the bias due to the transverse beam divergence. The second arm has been inserted and a parametric study as a function of Neutron Multiplicity, assumed equal on the 2 ZN, has been done. The distance between the centroids of spectator neutrons spot on ZN1 and ZN2 front face could be a tool to select events with a better event plane resolution.

Roberto GemmeIII Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati, 12-14/11/2007 Backup Slides

Roberto GemmeIII Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati, 12-14/11/2007 Reconstruction of the centroid of the spectator neutrons spot - 1 where x i t and y i t are the coordinates of the centre of the i-th tower and E i is the light in the i-th tower.  and const are free parameters introduced in order to get an accurate reconstructed impact coordinate. Spectator neutrons (2.76 TeV) are generated with a momentum distribution taking into account Fermi momentum and a transverse Pb beam divergence at I.P.2 =30  rad. A GEANT based simulation code tracks the neutrons in the calorimeter, where the hadronic shower deposits light in the four towers. The centroid of the spectator neutrons spot on the ZN front-face is estimated by means of the relations:

Roberto GemmeIII Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati, 12-14/11/2007 Event Plane Resolution – 3 one side of I.P. STAR ZDC-SMD simulation (G. Wang, private communication) ALICE ZN simulation High segmentation: 8x7 slats but multiplicity shower sampling at only one position (~ 2 i ) -> big fluctuations in the signal amplitude in each slat Low segmentation: 2x2 towers but full shower energy measurement -> fluctuations in the signal amplitude in each tower smaller than those in STAR ZDC-SMD

Roberto GemmeIII Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati, 12-14/11/2007 STAR ZDC-SMD SMD is 8 horizontal slats & 7 vertical slats located at 1/3 of the depth of the ZDC New knowledge of the direction of the impact ~parameter vector Minimal, if any, non-flow effects Minimal, if any, effects from flow fluctuations Worse resolution than from TPC, but that ~disadvantage is minor ZDC side view Scintillator slats of Shower Max Detector Transverse plane of ZDC

Roberto GemmeIII Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati, 12-14/11/2007 Comparison between 2x2 and 4x4 ZN segmentation - 1 PMT 1 PMT 2 PMT 3 PMT 4 PMT c PMT 1,3,9,11 PMT 2,4,10,12 PMT 5,7,13,15 PMT 6,8,14,16 PMT c

Roberto GemmeIII Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati, 12-14/11/2007 Comparison between 2x2 and 4x4 ZN segmentation - 2 PMT 1 PMT 2 PMT 3 PMT 4 PMT c PMT 1,3,9,11 PMT 2,4,10,12 PMT 5,7,13,15 PMT 6,8,14,16 PMT c 2x2 segm Full marker 4x4 segm Open marker -> Small difference, why ?

Roberto GemmeIII Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati, 12-14/11/2007 Reconstruction of the centroid of the spectator neutrons spot for different ZN position -> Centroid coordinate, reconstructed by ZN, is accurate up to 1 cm of ZN displacement from the nominal position 80  rad beam crossing angle 20  rad beam crossing angle Centroid reconstructed by ZN and true centroid versus ZN vertical position

Roberto GemmeIII Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati, 12-14/11/2007 Event Plane Resolution – ZN1+2 No Fermi momentum of spectator neutrons Transverse Pb beam divergence at I.P. = 0 μrad Beam transverse size at I.P. = 0 No detector smearing -> same shift of the centroid of spectator neutrons spot on ZN1 and ZN2 front face V 1 =20% ZN1 ZN2 Reaction plane x z y

Roberto GemmeIII Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati, 12-14/11/2007 Event Plane Resolution – ZN1+2 ZN1 If we take into account: Fermi momentum of spectator neutrons Transverse Pb beam divergence at I.P. = 30 μrad Beam transverse size at I.P. = 16 μm Detector smearing -> the position of the centroid of spectator neutrons spot on ZN1 and ZN2 is different -> event plane azimuth from the mean of the 2 centroids ZN2

Roberto GemmeIII Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati, 12-14/11/2007 Charged hadrons : v 1 in 62 GeV Au +Au STAR preliminary directed flow of charged particles is opposite to spectator bounce-off at all centralities, and three methods agree.