Exotic Heavy Quarkonium States Alex Bondar BINP, Novosibirsk Belle Collaboration (INR, May 15, 2015, Moscow, Russia)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Phi-Psi, Feb.-Mar., 2006, S.Uehara1 Experimental studies of charmonia in two-photon collisions at Belle S.Uehara (KEK) for the Belle Collaboration e +
Advertisements

1 Charged Z’s at Ruslan Chistov (ITEP, Moscow) Representing the Belle Collaboration Quarkonium Working Group Workshop (Nara, NWU, December 2-5/2008) ●
H b and other  (5S) results at Belle D. Santel Rencontres de Blois June 1, Introduction to h b and  (5S) 2.Search for the h b 3. Observation of.
Measurement of non BB Decays of Y(4S) to Y(1S)     and Y(2S)     Silvano Tosi Università & INFN Genova.
Study of B  D S ( * )  D*  *   and D ( * ) (4  )   at CLEO Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing The CLEO Collaboration DPF 2000 Aug 9.
R Measurement at charm resonant region Haiming HU BES Collaboration Charm 2007 Cornell University Ithaca, NY. US.
Spectroscopy of Heavy Quarkonia Holger Stöck University of Florida Representing the CLEO Collaboration 6 th International Conference on Hyperons, Charm.
Sep. 29, 2006 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin 1 Hadronic Charm Decays From B Factories Henry Band University of Wisconsin 11th International Conference on.
DPF Victor Pavlunin on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration DPF-2006 Results from four CLEO Y (5S) analyses:  Exclusive B s and B Reconstruction at.
Heavy Flavor Production at the Tevatron Jennifer Pursley The Johns Hopkins University on behalf of the CDF and D0 Collaborations Beauty University.
New Particles at BELLE Beauty 2005 Assisi Spectroscopy and new Particles F. Mandl There is an impressive list of new particles in the charm sector discovered.
New Particles X(3872) Y(4260) X(3940) University of Hawai’i Future of Heavy Flavors ИТЗФ 7/23-24/06 Z(3930) Y(3940) Ѕтефан Олавич ????
I. Shipsey Heavy Quark Physics ICHEP06 7/27/06 1 The Y(5S) at CLEO Introduction Bs Reconstruction at the Y(5S) CLEO PRL 96, (2006) B Reconstruction.
Measurement of R at CLEO - Jim Libby1 Measurement of R at CLEO Jim Libby University of Oxford.
Charmonium Decays in CLEO Tomasz Skwarnicki Syracuse University I will concentrate on the recent results. Separate talk covering Y(4260).
Measurement of B (  (nS)   +   ) at CLEO István Dankó Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute representing the CLEO Collaboration 1 st Meeting of the APS.
Study of e + e  collisions with a hard initial state photon at BaBar Michel Davier (LAL-Orsay) for the BaBar collaboration TM.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 New Charmonium-like States Arafat Gabareen Mokhtar SLAC Group-EC (B A B AR ) DOE Review Meeting July 8 th,
EXOTIC MESONS WITH HIDDEN BOTTOM NEAR THRESHOLDS D2 S. OHKODA (RCNP) IN COLLABORATION WITH Y. YAMAGUCHI (RCNP) S. YASUI (KEK) K. SUDOH (NISHOGAKUSHA) A.
Charmonium Production at BaBar Jamie Boyd University of Bristol Photon 2003, Frascati 7 th -11 th April 2003 On behalf of the Collaboration.
Recent Results of Light Hadron Spectroscopy at BESIII Yutie LIANG (On behalf of the BESIII Collaboration) Justus-Liebig-Universität, Gieβen, Germany MESON.
1 Bottomonium and bottomonium–like states Alex Bondar On behalf of Belle Collaboration Cracow Epiphany Conference “Present and Future B-physics” (9 - 11,
“Exotic” bottomonium states Alex Bondar BINP, Novosibirsk Belle Collaboration (Hadrons from Quarks and Gluons, January 16, 2014, Hirschegg, Austria)
Quarkonium and quarkonium-like states Alex Bondar BINP, Novosibirsk Belle Collaboration (KEK, December 13, 2013, Tsukuba, Japan)
Moriond QCD, Mar., 2007, S.Uehara 1 New Results on Two-Photon Physics from Belle S.Uehara (KEK) for the Belle Collaboration Rencontres de Moriond, QCD.
Rare B  baryon decays Jana Thayer University of Rochester CLEO Collaboration EPS 2003 July 19, 2003 Motivation Baryon production in B decays Semileptonic.
Kraków, June 9th, 2015 Exotic quarkonium-like states Andrzej Kupsc Positronium – quarkonia XYZ studies at BESIII Zc states: Zc 0± (3900), Zc 0± (4020)
BaBar physics, recent highlights and future prospects Owen Long, BaBar physics analysis coordinator U. C. Riverside & SLAC December 5, 2008.
Molecular Charmonium. A new Spectroscopy? II Russian-Spanish Congress Particle and Nuclear Physics at all Scales and Cosmology F. Fernandez D.R. Entem,
V.L. Kashevarov. Crystal Collaboration Meeting, Mainz, September 2008 Photoproduction of    on protons ► Introduction ► Data analysis.
New Frontiers in QCD (QCD-2011) Yonsei University, Seoul Korea, October 27 ~ 28, 2011 Observation of charged bottomonium-like states -and a few other items-
cc spectroscopy at elle S.L.Olsen Hawaii QWG 2004 Worksop IHEP Beijing _.
New Observations on Light Hadron Spectroscopy at BESIII Yanping HUANG For BESIII Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) ICHEP2010, Paris,
New hadrons BaBar Maurizio Lo Vetere University of Genova & INFN Representing the Collaboration Particles and Nuclei International Conference.
1 Тяжелый кварконий, эксперимент Р.В. Мизюк (ИТЭФ) Сессия-конференция секции ЯФ ОФН РАН "Физика фундаментальных взаимодействий“ 23 ноября 2011г., ИТЭФ.
P.Pakhlov ITEP, Moscow (for Belle collaboration) e+e- collision from  to  Novosibirsk, BINP, 2006.
1 Y(5S) spectroscopy at Belle Alex Bondar BINP, Novosibirsk (On behalf of Belle Collaboration) International Conference on High Energy Physics, ,
Scalar and pseudoscalar mesons at BESII Xiaoyan SHEN (Representing BES Collaboration) Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS, China Charm06, June 5-7, 2006,
Φ→Ψ, BINP, Novosibirsk.2011P. Pakhlov Phys. Lett. B702, 139 (2011) Charged charmonium-like states as rescattering effects in B  D sJ D (*) P. Pakhlov.
Observation of the Z c (3900) — a charged charmoniumlike structure — Changzheng Yuan [ 苑长征 ] (for the BESIII Collaboration) March 27, 2013.
Study of e+e- annihilation at low energies Vladimir Druzhinin Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (Novosibirsk, Russia) SND - BaBar Lepton-Photon, August,
Properties of B c Meson On behalf of DØ Collaboration Dmitri Tsybychev, SUNY at Stony Brook, PANIC05, Santa Fe, New Mexico B c is ground state of bc system.
1 ITEP Winter School 2012, Feb Roman Mizuk ITEP, Moscow Quarkonium, experiment BELLE Collaboration.
Stephen Lars Olsen Seoul National University February 10, 2014 A New Spectroscopy of Hadrons High-1 Gangwando.
Light Hadron Spectroscopy at BESIII Haolai TIAN (On behalf of the BESIII Collaboration) Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing 23rd Rencontre de Blois.
E. Robutti Enrico Robutti I.N.F.N. Genova HEP 2003 Europhysics Conference July 17-23, Aachen, Germany Recent BABAR results in Charmonium and Charm Spectroscopy.
1 Recent Results on J/  Decays Shuangshi FANG Representing BES Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS International Conference on QCD and.
B→ X(3872)K and Z(4430)K at Belle Kenkichi Miyabayashi Nara Women’s Univ. For Belle collaboration QWG2007 at DESY 2007/Oct./19th.
Charm Mixing and D Dalitz analysis at BESIII SUN Shengsen Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing (for BESIII Collaboration) 37 th International Conference.
Baryon Spectroscopy and Decays using the Belle Detector John Yelton University of Florida I review recent results on charmed baryon decay,
Charm Form Factors from from B -Factories A. Oyanguren BaBar Collaboration (IFIC –U. Valencia)
QCHS 2010 Lei Zhang1 Lei Zhang (on behalf of BESIII Collaboration) Physics School of Nanjing University Recent.
Hadron Physics at Belle
Spectroscopy Today BaBar’s Contributions
from Belle, BaBar and CLEO
Light particle searches at Belle
Recent results on light hadron spectroscopy at BES
Quarkonia & XYZ at e+e– colliders
Zb states (All Results from Belle)
Study of New Hadron Spectroscopy at BESIII
Decoding the riddle of Y(4260) and Zc(3900) Qiang Zhao
charm baryon spectroscopy and decays at Belle
University of Minnesota on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration
Hidden charm spectroscopy from B-factories
e+e−→ open charm via ISR X(4160) in J/ recoil
e+e−→ J/ D(*)D(*) & ψ(4160) → DD
Study of e+e collisions with a hard initial state photon at BaBar
Exotic Hadron spectroscopy at Belle and BaBar
New States Containing Charm at BABAR
New Spectroscopy with Charm quarks at B factories.
Presentation transcript:

Exotic Heavy Quarkonium States Alex Bondar BINP, Novosibirsk Belle Collaboration (INR, May 15, 2015, Moscow, Russia)

2 mesons are bound states of a of quark and anti-quark: baryons are bound state of 3 quarks: Constituent Quark Model

3

4 cc hchc cc

5

6  ( 5S ) Belle took data at E=10867  1 MэВ 2M(B s ) BaBar PRL 102, (2009)  ( 6S )  ( 4S ) e + e - hadronic cross-section main motivation for taking data at  (5S)  ( 1S )  ( 2S )  ( 3S )  ( 4S ) 2M(B) e + e - ->  (4S) -> BB, where B is B + or B 0 e + e - -> bb (  (5S)) -> B ( * ) B ( * ), B ( * ) B ( * ) , BB , B s ( * ) B s ( * ) _ _____

7 Puzzles of  (5S) decays RbRb PRL100,112001(2008)  (MeV) 10 2 PRD82,091106R(2010) Anomalous production of  (nS)  +  - with 21.7 fb -1 (1)Rescattering  (5S)  BB  (nS)  (2) Exotic resonance Y b near  (5S) Simonov JETP Lett 87,147(2008) analogue of Y(4260) resonance with anomalous  (J/   +  - ) Dedicated energy scan  shapes of R b and  (  ) different (2  )  (5S) is very interesting and not yet understood Finally Belle recorded 121.4fb -1 data set at  (5S)

8 Ryan CHARM2010  Belle search for h b in  (5S) data Motivation Energy dependence of the cross section Enhancement of  (h c  +  - Y(4260)  (h b  +  - ) is Y b ? Observation of e + e - →  +  - h c by CLEO arXiv:

9 e + e -   (5S)  h b (nP)  +  –  M HF (1P) = +0.8  1.1 MeV  M HF (2P) = +0.5  1.2 MeV consistent with zero, as expected reconstructed, use M miss (  +  - )  b (3S)  b (2S)  b (1S)  b (2P)  b (1P) (0,1,2) ++ J PC = h b (2P) h b (1P)  (3S)  (2S)  (1S)  (4S)  (10860)  (11020) M(B) +-+-  M HF (1P) PRL108,032001(2012) residuals c.f. CLEO e + e -   (4170)  h c  +  - Belle arxiv:  (P e+e- – P  +  - ) 2 h b (2P) h b (1P) raw distribution Large h b (1,2P) production rates Observation of h b (1P,2P)

10 e + e -   (5S)  h b (nP)  +  –  M HF (1P) = +0.8  1.1 MeV  M HF (2P) = +0.5  1.2 MeV consistent with zero, as expected reconstructed, use M miss (  +  - )  b (3S)  b (2S)  b (1S)  b (2P)  b (1P) (0,1,2) ++ J PC = h b (2P) h b (1P)  (3S)  (2S)  (1S)  (4S)  (10860)  (11020) M(B) +-+- PRL108,032001(2012) residuals c.f. CLEO e + e -   (4170)  h c  +  - Belle arxiv:  (P e+e- – P  +  - ) 2 h b (2P) h b (1P) raw distribution Large h b (1,2P) production rates h b (nP) decays are a source of  b (mS) 41% 19% 13%  Observation of h b (1P,2P)

Observation of h b (1P,2P)   b (1S)  LQCDpNRQCD Kniehl et al, PRL92,242001(2004) Meinel, PRD82,114502(2010) M miss (  +  -  ) (n) Belle : 57.9  2.3 MeV PDG’12 : 69.3  2.8 MeV  M HF (1S) 33 e + e -  (5S)  h b (nP)  +  –   b (1S)  arxiv:  b (3S)  b (2S)  b (1S)  b (2P)  b (1P) (0,1,2) ++ J PC = h b (2P) h b (1P)  (3S)  (2S)  (1S)  (4S)  (10860)  (11020) M(B) +-+-   BaBar  (3S) BaBar  (2S) CLEO  (3S)  b (1S) h b (2P) h b (1P) reconstruct  M HF (1S) Belle result decreases tension with theory First measurement  = MeV –3.7–2.0 as expected 11 Mizuk et al. Belle PRL 109 (2012)

12 Observation of h b (1P,2P)   b (1S)  LQCDpNRQCD Kniehl et al, PRL92,242001(2004) Meinel, PRD82,114502(2010) M miss (  +  -  ) (n) Belle : 57.9  2.3 MeV PDG’12 : 69.3  2.8 MeV  M HF (1S) 33 e + e -  (5S)  h b (nP)  +  –   b (1S)  arxiv: BaBar  (3S) BaBar  (2S) CLEO  (3S)  b (1S) h b (2P) h b (1P) reconstruct Belle result decreases tension with theory First measurement  = MeV –3.7–2.0 as expected ISR  b (1S)  b (1P) PRL101, (2008) BaBar  (3S)  b (1S) ISR  b (1S) BaBar  (2S)  b (1S) PRL103, (2009) CLEO  (3S) PRD81, (2010) Mizuk et al. Belle PRL 109 (2012)

 M HF (2S) = MeV –4.5 First evidence for  b (2S) arxiv:  PRL M miss (  +  -  ) (2) First measurement In agreement with theory  (2S) = 4  8 MeV, < 90% C.L. LQCD pNRQCD –3.3 BF[h b (1P)   b (1S)  ] = 49.2  % BF[h b (2P)   b (1S)  ] = 22.3  % BF[h b (2P)   b (2S)  ] = 47.5  % Belle –7.7 expect  4MeV 41% 13% 19% Expectations Godfrey Rosner PRD66,014012(2002) 4.2  w/ syst c.f. BESIII BF[h c (1P)   c (1S)  ] = 54.3  8.5 % 39% Branching fractions  b (2S) e + e -  (5S)  h b (2P)  +  –   b (2S)  13 Mizuk et al. Belle PRL 109 (2012)

Anomalies in  (5S)  (bb)  +  – transitions _  [  (5S)  (1,2,3S)  +  – ] >>  [  (4,3,2S)  (1S)  +  – ]  Rescattering of on-shell B ( * ) B ( * ) ? _  (5S)  h b (1,2P)  +  – are not suppressed Belle: PRL100, (2008)  100 spin-flip expect suppression  QCD /m b Heavy Quark Symmetry  (3S) h b (2P) h b (1P)  (2S)  (1S)  b (2S)  b (1S)  (4S)  (10860)  (11020) J PC = Mass, GeV/c 2 2M(B) +–+– partial  (keV) 14 Belle: PRL108, (2012) h b production mechanism?  Study resonant structure in h b (mP)  +  –

15  = degree Resonant substructure of  (5S)  h b (1P)  +  - P(h b ) = P  (5S) – P(  +  - )  M(h b  + ) = MM(  - )  measure  (5S)  h b  yield in bins of MM(  ) phase-space MC combine data Results MeV/c 2 M 1 = MeV/c 2 M 2 = MeV  2 = MeV  1 = non-res. amplitude ~0 a = Significances 2 vs.1 : 2 vs.0 : (6.6  w/ syst) (16  w/ syst) 7.4  18  Fit function PHSP ~BB* threshold _ ~B*B* threshold __ [preliminary]

16 Resonant substructure of  (5S)  h b (2P)  +  - phase-space MC combine data Significances 2 vs.1 : 2 vs.0 : (1.9  w/ syst) (4.7  w/ syst) 2.7  6.3  MeV/c 2 M 1 = MeV/c 2 M 2 = MeV  2 = MeV  1 = a =  = degree h b (1P)  +  - h b (2P)  +  - degree MeV/c 2 MeV MeV/c 2 MeV c o n s i s t e n t PHSP [preliminary]

17  (5S)   (nS)  +  -  (nS)   +  - (n = 1,2,3)  (1S)  (2S)  (3S) reflections Exclusive  (5S) ->  (nS)    -

Resonant structure of  (5S)→(bb)  +  – _  (5S)  (1S)  +  -  (5S)  (2S)  +  -  (5S)  (3S)  +  -  (5S)  h b (1P)  +  -  (5S)  h b (2P)  +  - Two peaks are observed in all modes! phsp note different scales phsp no non-res. contribution Dalitz plot analysis M[ h b (1P) π  ]M[ h b (2P) π  ] Z b (10610) and Z b (10650) should be multiquark states Belle: PRL108, (2012) 18

Anomalies in  (5S)  (bb)  +  – transitions _  [  (5S)  (1,2,3S)  +  – ] >>  [  (4,3,2S)  (1S)  +  – ]  Rescattering of on-shell B ( * ) B ( * ) ? _  (5S)  h b (1,2P)  +  – are not suppressed Belle: PRL100, (2008)  100 spin-flip expect suppression  QCD /m b Heavy Quark Symmetry 19 Belle: PRL108, (2012) J PC =

 (5S) →  (2S)π + π – : J P Results 20  (2S)π + π Data Toy MC with various J P J P = 1 + J P = 1 - J P = 2 + J P =

21

Heavy quark structure in Z b Wave func. at large distance – B(*)B* A.B.,A.Garmash,A.Milstein,R.Mizuk,M.Voloshin PRD (arXiv: ) Why h b  is unsuppressed relative to  Relative phase ~0 for  and ~180 0 for h b Production rates of Z b (10610) and Z b (10650) are similar Widths –”– Dominant decays to B(*)B* Explains Other Possible Explanations Coupled channel resonances (I.V.Danilkin et al, arXiv: ) Cusp (D.Bugg Europhys.Lett.96 (2011),arXiv: ) Tetraquark (M.Karliner, H.Lipkin, arXiv: ) 23

 (5S)→B * B (*) π: B Selection 24 2-body  (5S) decays BB BB* B*B* 3-body  (5S) -> B(*)B(*)π decays & rad. return to  (4S): P(B)<0.9 GeV/c Data (B signal) Data (B side bands)

 (5S)→B * B (*) π: Data 25 Red histogram – right sign Bπ combinations; Hatched histogram – wrong sign Bπ combinations; Solid line – fit to right sign data. B*B*π BB*π Fit yields: N(BBπ) = 0.3 ± 14 N(BB*π) = 184 ± 19 (9.3σ) N(B*B*π) = 82 ± 11 (5.7σ) MC: B*Bπ MC: B*B*π Data (shifted by 45MeV) Belle PRELIMINARY

 (5S)→B * B (*) π: Signal Region 26 B*B*π BB*π points – right sign Bπ combinations (data); lines – fit to data with various models (times PHSP, convolved with resolution function = Gaussian with σ=6MeV). hatched histogram – background component BB*π data fits (almost) equally well to a sum of Z b (10610) and Z b (10650) or to a sum of Z b (10610) and non-resonant. B*B*π signal is well fit to just Z b (10650) signal alone Belle PRELIMINARY PhSp Z b (10650) alone Z b (10650)+ PhSp Z b (10610) + Z b (10650) Z b (10610)+ PhSp Z b (10610) + Z b (10650) + PhSp 88 Z b (10610) Z b (10650) 6.8 

 (5S)→B * B (*) π: Results 27 Assuming Z b decays are saturated by the already observed  (nS)π, h b (mP)π and B(*)B* channels, one can calculate complete table of relative branching fractions: B(*)B* channels dominate Z b decays ! Belle PRELIMINARY Branching fractions of  (10680) decays (including neutral modes): BB  < 0.60% (90%CL) BB*  = 4.25 ± 0.44 ± 0.69% B*B*  = 2.12 ± 0.29 ± 0.36%

28 Observation of Z c (3900) at BESIII

29 Observation of Z c (3885) in e + e - ->  - (D*D) +

30 Observation of Z c (4020) in e + e - -> h c  +  -

31 Observation of Z c (4025) in e + e - ->  - (D*D*) +

32 Summary of the Z c states

33 Bottomonium-like vs Charmonium-like states

Damping ring Low emittance gun Positron source New beam pipe & bellows Belle II New IR TiN-coated beam pipe with antechambers Redesign the lattices of HER & LER to squeeze the emittance Add / modify RF systems for higher beam current New positron target / capture section New superconducting /permanent final focusing quads near the IP Low emittance electrons to inject Low emittance positrons to inject Replace short dipoles with longer ones (LER) e+e+ e-e- SuperKEKB To aim ×40 luminosity 34

First measurements 35 Measurements of the  (nS)  +  -, h b  +  - cross-section vs energy Z b ’s cross-section Radiative and hadronic transitions  (5S) fb -1  (6S) 5 fb -1

Heavy quark structure in Z b Wave func. at large distance – B(*)B* A.B.,A.Garmash,A.Milstein,R.Mizuk,M.Voloshin PRD (arXiv: ) Why h b  is unsuppressed relative to  Relative phase ~0 for  and ~180 0 for h b Production rates of Z b (10610) and Z b (10650) are similar Widths –”– Existence of other similar states Explains Predicts 36

 (5S)  (6S)  (?S) I G (J P ) B*B* BB* BB 0 - (1 + ) 1 + (1 + ) 0 + (0 + )1 - (0 + )0 + (1 + )1 - (1 + )0 + (2 + )1 - (2 + )         12GeV 11.5GeV  ZbZb W b0 W b1 W b2     h b   b    b    b    b      arXiv: XbXb 0 - (1 - ) 37

Summary Studies of Z b ’s properties may help us to understand exotic states in charm sector 38 The first exotic bottomonium-like Z b + states were discovered in decays to  (1S)  +,  (2S)  +,  (3S)  +, h b (1P)  +, h b (2P)  + Z b (10610) dominantly decays to BB*, but Z b (10650) to B*B* Decay fraction of Z b (10650) to BB* is currently not statistically significant, but at least less than to B*B* Phase space of Y(5S)->B(*)B*  is tiny, relative motion B(*)B*is small, which is favorable to the formation of the molecular type states Zbs mainly decay to BB* and B*B*final states Y(5S) [and possible Y(6S)] is ideal factory of molecular states Spin parity of Zbs is 1 + In heavy quark limit we can expect more molecular states in vicinity of the BB, BB* and B*B*. To study the new states we need the energy up to 12GeV

39 We enter the new region – Physics of Highly Excited Quarkonium or/and Chemistry of Heavy Flavor We can expect much more from Super B factory

Back up slides

Tetraquark? M ~ 10.5 – 10.8 GeV Tao Guo, Lu Cao, Ming-Zhen Zhou, Hong Chen, ( ) M ~ 10.2 – 10.3 GeV Ying Cui, Xiao-lin Chen, Wei-Zhen Deng, Shi-Lin Zhu, High Energy Phys.Nucl.Phys.31:7-13, 2007 (hep-ph/ ) M ~ 9.4, 11 GeV M.Karliner, H.Lipkin, ( ) 41

Coupled channel resonance? I.V.Danilkin, V.D.Orlovsky, Yu.Simonov arXiv: No interaction between B(*)B* or  is needed to form resonance No other resonances predicted B(*)B* interaction switched on  individual mass in every channel? 42

Cusp? D.Bugg Europhys.Lett.96 (2011) (arXiv: ) Amplitude Line-shape Not a resonance 43

44

 (5S)  (nS)  0  0  (1,2,3S)  +  -, e + e -,  (2S)  (1S)  +  - +-00+-00 e+e-00e+e-00 Y(1S)[l + l - ]  +  -  0  0 reflection  (2S)  (3S)  (1S)  (2S)  [e + e -  (5S)  (1S)  0  0 ] = (1.16  0.06  0.10) pb  [e + e -  (5S)  (2S)  0  0 ] = (1.87  0.11  0.23) pb  [e + e -  (5S)  (3S)  0  0 ] = (0.98  0.24  0.19) pb Consistent with ½ of Y(nS)  +  - 45 arXiv: , accepted for publication in Phys. Rev. D

46

with Z b 0 w/o Z b 0 47 Z b 0 resonant structure has been observed in  (2S)π 0 π 0 and  (3S)π 0 π 0 Statistical significance of Z b 0 (10610) signal is 6.5σ including systematics Z b 0 (10650) signal is not significant (~2σ), not contradicting with its existence Z b 0 (10610) mass from the fit M=10609 ± 4 ± 4 MeV/c 2 M(Z b + )=10607 ± 2 MeV/c 2  (2S)  0  0 Dalitz analysis with Z b 0 w/o Z b 0 arXiv:

 (5S)→B * B (*) π: B Reconstruction 48 B candidate invariant mass distribution. All modes combined. Select B signal within MeV (depending on B decay mode) around B nominal mass. Charged B: – D 0 [Kπ,Kπππ]π - – J/ψ[μμ] K - Neutral B: – D + [Kππ]π - – D* + [Kπ,Kππ,Kπππ]π - – J/ψ[μμ] K* 0 Effective B fraction: Br[B→f] = (143±15) x Data –

Selection Require intermediate Z b : < MM(  ) < GeV ZbZb Hadronic event selection; continuum suppression using event shape;  0 veto. R 2 <0.3 reconstruct   b (mS)   (5S)  Z b  - +  h b (nP)  + Decay chain bg. suppression 

50 M miss (  +  - ) spectrum requirement of intermediate Z b Update of M [h b (1P)] : Previous Belle meas.: h b (1P) 3S  1S  (2S)  M HF [h b (1P)] = (+0.8  1.1)MeV/c 2  M HF [h b (1P)] = (+1.6  1.5)MeV/c 2 arXiv:

51 Results of fits to M miss (  +  - ) spectra no significant structures  b (1S) h b (1P) yield Reflection yield  (2S) yield Peaking background? MC simulation  none.

52 Calibration B +   c1 K +  (J/   ) K + Use decays  match  energy of signal & callibration channelscos  Hel (  c1 )> – 0.2 h b (1P)   b (1S)  cos  Hel > – 0.2 MC simulation  c1  J/   Photon energy spectrum

53 Calibration (2) data  Correction of MC  E s.b. subtracted fudge-factor for resolution M(J/  ), GeV/c 2 –0.4 mass shift –0.7  MeV 1.15  0.06  0.06 Resolution: double-sided CrystalBall function with asymmetric core

54 BsBs Integrated Luminosity at B-factories > 1 ab -1 On resonance:  (5S): 121 fb -1  (4S): 711 fb -1  (3S): 3 fb -1  (2S): 24 fb -1  (1S): 6 fb -1 Off reson./scan : ~100 fb fb -1 On resonance:  (4S): 433 fb -1  (3S): 30 fb -1  (2S): 14 fb -1 Off reson./scan : ~54 fb-1 (fb -1 ) asymmetric e + e - collisions

55 Residuals  (1S) Example of fit Description of fit to MM(  +  - ) Three fit regions 123 Ks generic  (3S) kinematic boundary MM(  +  -) M(  +  -) MM(  +  -) BG: Chebyshev polynomial, 6 th or 7 th order Signal: shape is fixed from  +  -  +  - data “Residuals” – subtract polynomial from data points K S contribution: subtract bin-by-bin

Y(5S) → Y(2S)π + π - Results: Y(5S) → Y(2S)π + π - 56

Y(5S) → Y(2S)π + π - Results: Y(5S) → Y(2S)π + π - 57

58 Results:  (1S)π + π - M(  (1 S)π + ), GeV M(  (1S)π - ), GeV signals reflections

59 Results:  (2S)π + π - reflections signals M(  (2S)π + ), GeV M(  (2S)π - ), GeV

60 Results:  (3S)π + π - M(  (3S)π + ), GeV M(  (3S)π - ), GeV

61  M 1  =  2.0 MeV   1  = 18.4  2.4 MeV  M 2  =  1.5 MeV   2  = 11.5  2.2 MeV Z b (10610) yield ~ Z b (10650) yield in every channel Relative phases: 0 o for  and 180 o for h b  Summary of Z b parameters Average over 5 channels

62  M 1  =  2.0 MeV   1  = 18.4  2.4 MeV  M 2  =  1.5 MeV   2  = 11.5  2.2 MeV Z b (10610) yield ~ Z b (10650) yield in every channel Relative phases: 0 o for  and 180 o for h b  Summary of Z b parameters Average over 5 channels M(h b  ), GeV/c 2 h b (1P) yield / 10MeV  = 180 o  = 0 o

63 h b reconstruction Missing mass to  system Simple selection : : good quality, positively identified Suppression of continuum events FW R2<0.3  Search for h b (nP) peaks in MM(  +  - ) spectrum +-+-  (1S) h b (1P)  (2S)  (3S) h b (2P) fb -1 M hb(nP) =  ( P  (5S) – P  +  - ) 2  MM(  +  -)

Branching Fractions sqrt(s) = GeV  (nS)π + π - production cross section (corrected for the ISR) at sqrt(s) = GeV: σ(e + e - →  (1S) π + π - = [2.27 ± 0.12(stat.) ± 0.09(syst.)] pb σ(e + e - →  (2S) π + π - = [4.07 ± 0.16(stat.) ± 0.45(syst.)] pb σ(e + e - →  (3S) π + π - = [1.46 ± 0.09(stat.) ± 0.16(syst.)] pb 64 Fractions of individual sub-modes: Belle PRELIMINARY

65

The X(3872) in B  K     J/  discovered by Belle (140/fb) M(  J  ) – M(J/  )  ’      J/  X(3872)      J/  PRL 91, (2003)

What about other color-singlet combinations? Pentaquark:H-diBaryon Glueball Tetraquark mesons qq-gluon hybrid mesons u c u c cc u d u s d Other possible “white” combinations of quarks & gluons: _ _ _ _ u d u s d s _ _ u c u c _ _ _  D0D0 D* 0 _ S=+1 Baryon tightly bound 6-quark state Color-singlet multi- gluon bound state tightly bound diquark-diantiquark loosely bound meson-antimeson “molecule”