Workshop: Reactive Power Testing:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Summary of Second Draft of the NERC Standard PRC Disturbance Monitoring and Reporting JSIS Meeting August 10, 2010 Salt Lake City, UT.
Advertisements

IMPACT TO FREQUENCY CONTROL DURING STARTUP AND SHUT DOWN OF UNITS
New Energy Horizons Opportunities and Challenges Fault Current Contributions from Wind Plants Dean Miller PacifiCorp July 25,
PER
Testing Workshop: Reactive Capability Testing
1 New Generation Commissioning Emal Latifzai Operations Support Engineer New Generation Information Forum ERCOT Public November 4, 2014.
1. 11/26/2012: NERC Board of Trustees adopted CIP v5 CIP thru CIP CIP and CIP Version 5 Filing FERC requested filing by 3/31/2013.
Discussion of MOD Comparison to ERCOT Requirements Luminant OWG, May 21,
1 New Resource Qualification Testing Sandip Sharma Supervisor, Operations Analysis New Generation Information Forum ERCOT Public November 4, 2014.
NERC LTRA Update / CDR Capacity Counting Issues
A Partial Interim Report To WMS Guidance on Implementing Protocol Implementation Plan (PIP) 102 Reactive Power Task Force.
Generator Data Submittals 5/8/ Transmission Customer Forum Bob Jones Transmission Planning Southern Company Transmission 5/8/ Transmission.
Audit & Compliance Tips Jagan Mandavilli Senior Compliance Engineer.
PLWG Report to ROS July 9, PGRRs needing vote PGRR043 – FIS Scoping Amendment – PGRR043 moves the Subsynchronous Resonance (SSR) Study out of the.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 1 Network Operating Committee (NOC) June 12 th, 2014.
ERCOT SOL Methodology for the Planning and Operations Horizons Stephen Solis 2014 OTS 1.
June 12, 2008 ROS SEM Go-Live procedure Linda Clarke.
RTWG Report to TAC August 5, 2010 Howard Daniels.
April 23 rd OWG UFLS Survey & Power Factor Review.
Generator Test Data, Generator Capability Curve, and NPRR 366 Terms March 14, 2012 Mike Noth & Bracy Nesbit 1.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Resource Entity Owned Transmission Asset Data Collection Feb 27, 2009 Kick Off Meeting.
RARF Frequently Asked Questions from Resource Entities Ed Geer RARF Workshop III 8/29/2013.
Demand Side Working Group Load Resource Performance Subgroup April 9, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Registration Market Call Apr 10, 2009.
PRR835 – Reactive Power Capability Requirement
SPS policy – Information Presentation Presentation to ROS June 16, 2004.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Registration Market Call Mar 13, 2009.
August 17, 2012 Solar PV Inverters Anuj Dixit Planning Engineer Resource Integration RPG Meeting.
NPRR514, Seasonal Generation Resource Wholesale Market Subcommittee April 12, 2013 Amanda Frazier.
Texas Nodal 1 Nodal Operations Model Posting Confirmation TAC May 7, 2009 Matt Mereness, ERCOT.
WGR Ramp Rate in Nodal: “As High as Possible” Mike Grimes for QMWG Meeting 10 August 2009.
NPRR425 - Creation of a WGR Group for GREDP and Base Point Deviation Evaluation and Mixing Turbine Types Within a WGR Art Deller, P.E. RARF Workshop 8/29/13.
RCWG Update to WMS July 11, Alternatives to Address Negative Prices At its June meeting, WMS directed RCWG to bring back something to vote on. RCWG.
1 Energy Storage Settlements Consistent with PUCT Project & NPRR461 ERCOT Commercial Market Operations May 8, 2012 – COPS Meeting May 9, 2012 – WMS.
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services Resmi Surendran.
– 1Texas Nodal Texas Nodal Electrical Buses – 2Texas Nodal Electrical Bus Definition as Proposed in NPRR 63 Electrical Bus A physical transmission element.
NERC Project S ystem Protection Coordination - PRC-027​ Presentation to the NSRS Conference Call April 20, 2015 Sam Francis Oncor Electric Delivery.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Registration Market Call Mar 27, 2009.
1 Update to NATF on Resource Registration Feb 2, 2010.
1 Submitting a RARF Art Deller, P.E. Supervisor, Model Administration New Generation Workshop November 4, 2014.
May 11, 2012 RPG meeting YTP Scope and Process – RPG Comments.
ERS Update – DSWG Presentation September 21, 2012.
1Texas Nodal Texas Nodal NMMS/RARF Data Discussion By John Moseley, ERCOT, Network Modeling Group.
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
Distributed Generation Registration June 30, 2008.
Steady-State Working Group: Resource Modeling Discussion Wes Woitt September 27 th, 2011.
Review of Integration of the Requirements of MOD Standard with ERCOT Protocols and Operating Guides S. Looney, Luminant Energy Company For Presentation.
October 29, 2012 RARF Workshop 2 Introduction to ERCOT Modeling Process Jay Teixeira Manager, Model Administration.
Scheduling and Operating Transmission Devices in the Nodal Environment.
ROS Report to TAC October 5, Outline  General Items  Nodal Operating Guides  OGRR192  Document control issues  Proposed revisions to Texas.
Texas Nodal 1 Nodal Operations Model Posting NATF Sep 29, 2009 Matt Mereness, ERCOT.
© CONSTELLATION ENERGY GROUP, INC. THE OFFERING DESCRIBED IN THIS PRESENTATION IS SOLD AND CONTRACTED BY CONSTELLATION NEWENERGY, INC., A SUBSIDIARY.
Capacity, Demand and Reserves Report Bill Bojorquez May 4, 2007.
Capacity, Demand and Reserves Report Bill Bojorquez Board of Directors Meeting May 16, 2007.
Demand Side Working Group March 5, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
Transition Plan Network Operations Model Change Requests 5/26/2010.
Current Nodal OS Design 1.The NMMS database will have an OWNER and an OPERATOR designation for each piece of equipment in the model. The OWNER and OPERATOR.
Voltage Control Brad Calhoun Consultant, Sr. Trainer Spring 2016.
NPRRs 705NPRR Provides Consistency for References to the End Date of the Generation Interconnection Process. In the Resource Interconnection Handbook,
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes November 12, 2008 VCWG Meeting.
October 15, 2012 PV & Storage Workshop ERCOT’s Interconnection Process John Adams Principal Engineer.
Remedial Action Scheme Workshop RAS Workshop May 9, 2016.
Current Nodal OS Design 1.The NMMS database will have an OWNER and an OPERATOR designation for each piece of equipment in the model. The OWNER and OPERATOR.
Nodal COMS Additional Items Update
PLWG Review 6.9 and the Interconnection process
Current FRRS Language & Explanation of Posted Data
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services
Reactive Power Task Force
PRC Implementation Plan and Summary of Devices
DEC System Voltage Planning - June 2018
Presentation transcript:

Workshop: Reactive Power Testing: Bill Blevins Sandip Sharma

NERC Implementation of MOD-025-2 Two calendar years following approval at least 40 percent of its applicable Facilities. Three calendar years following approval at least 60 percent of Four calendar years following approval at least 80 percent of Five calendar years following approval at least 100 percent of

Requirements Verify the Real Power and Reactive Power capability Submit a completed test to its Transmission Planner within 90 calendar days of either (i) the date the data is recorded for a staged test; or (ii) the date the data is selected for verification using historical operational data. It is intended that Real Power testing be performed at the same time as full load Reactive Power testing, however separate testing is allowed for this standard.

NERC Adds requirement for Transmission Owners Transmission Owner that owns synchronous condenser(s) Synchronous condenser greater than 20 MVA (gross nameplate rating) directly connected to the Bulk Electric System. For synchronous condensers, perform only the Reactive Power capability verifications.

Requirements For staged verification; verify each applicable Facility at least every five years (with no more than 66 calendar months between verifications), or within 12 calendar months of the discovery of a change that affects its Real Power or Reactive Power capability by more than 10 percent of the last reported verified capability and is expected to last more than six months. For verification using operational data; verify each applicable Facility at least every five years (with no more than 66 calendar months between verifications), or within 12 calendar months following the discovery that its Real Power or Reactive Power capability has changed by more than 10 percent of the last reported verified capability and is expected to last more than six months. For either verification method, verify each new applicable Facility within 12 calendar months of its commercial operation date. Existing units that have been in long term shut down and have not been tested for more than five years shall be verified within 12 calendar months.

Steps For generating units of 20 MVA or less that are part of a plant greater than 75 MVA in aggregate, record data either on an individual unit basis or as a group. Perform verification individually for every generating unit or synchronous condenser greater than 20 MVA (gross nameplate rating). Verify with all auxiliary equipment needed for expected normal operation in service for both the Real Power and Reactive Power capability verification. Perform verification with the automatic voltage regulator in service for the Reactive Power capability verification.

Notes on verification Operational data from within the two years prior to the verification date is acceptable for the verification of either the Real Power or the Reactive Power capability, as long as a) that operational data meets the criteria in 2.1 through 2.4 below and b) the operational data demonstrates at least 90 percent of a previously staged test that demonstrated at least 50 percent of the Reactive capability shown on the associated thermal capability curve (D-curve). If the previously staged test was unduly restricted (so that it did not demonstrate at least 50 percent of the associated thermal capability curve) by unusual generation or equipment limitations (e.g., capacitor or reactor banks out of service), then the next verification will be by another staged test, not operational data:

Verify Real and Reactive Lagging(synchronous generator) Verify synchronous generating unit’s maximum real power and lagging reactive power for a minimum of one hour.

Verify Reactive Power capability At the minimum Real Power output at which they are normally expected to operate collect maximum leading and lagging reactive values as soon as a limit is reached. At maximum Real Power output collect maximum leading reactive values as soon as a limit is reached. For hydrogen-cooled generators, perform the verification at normal operating hydrogen pressure. Nuclear Units are not required to perform Reactive Power verification at minimum Real Power output. Calculate the Generator Step-Up (GSU) transformer losses if the verification measurements are taken from the high side of the GSU transformer.(GSU transformer real and reactive losses may be estimated, based on the GSU impedance, if necessary.)

NERC form

NERC Form

NERC form

Differences between MOD-025 and ERCOT testing Every 5 years(66 months) vs 2 years Within 12 months of commercial operations vs prior to commercial operations Allows for staged test or operational data vs staged test 1 hour test vs 15 minute for reactive test. Expect that this was due to preforming the real power verification Does not check for ERCOT VSS criteria

NERC-Terms Thermal capability curve (D-curve) thermal units except nuclear Curve defined by Manufacturer (D-Curve) or CURL as updated by testing after commercial operations begins Armature Current Constraint (Typical limit) Under Excitation Constraint(Typical limit) Field Current Constraint (Typical limit) Maximum Gross power output typically limited by the Turbine(Generators are typically sized greater than the Turbine) Test must fall within 90% of prior test and must demonstrate at least 50% of D-curve. Test must fall within 90% of prior test and must demonstrate at least 50% of D-curve. synchronous generating unit’s maximum real power and lagging reactive power for a minimum of one hour Lag +MVAR At minimum Real Power output at which they are normally expected to operate collect maximum leading/lagging as soon as a limit is reached. At maximum Real Power output collect maximum leading reactive values as soon as a limit is reached. Gross MW Lead -MVAR Test must fall within 90% of prior test and must demonstrate at least 50% of D-curve. Test must fall within 90% of prior test and must demonstrate at least 50% of D-curve.

NERC-Terms Thermal capability curve (D-curve) Nuclear Curve defined by Manufacturer (D-Curve) or CURL as updated by testing after commercial operations begins Armature Current Constraint (Typical limit) Under Excitation Constraint(Typical limit) Field Current Constraint (Typical limit) Maximum Gross power output typically limited by the Turbine(Generators are typically sized greater than the Turbine) Test must fall within 90% of prior test and must demonstrate at least 50% of D-curve. synchronous generating unit’s maximum real power and lagging reactive power for a minimum of one hour Lag +MVAR At maximum Real Power output collect maximum leading reactive values as soon as a limit is reached. Gross MW Lead -MVAR Test must fall within 90% of prior test and must demonstrate at least 50% of D-curve.

NERC-Terms Thermal capability curve (D-curve) Variable Generation Curve defined by Manufacturer (D-Curve) or CURL as updated by testing after commercial operations begins Armature Current Constraint (Typical limit) Under Excitation Constraint(Typical limit) Field Current Constraint (Typical limit) Maximum Gross power output typically limited by the Turbine(Generators are typically sized greater than the Turbine) Test must fall within 90% of prior test and must demonstrate at least 50% of D-curve. Lag +MVAR Perform verification of Reactive Power capability of wind turbines and photovoltaic inverters with at least 90 percent of the wind turbines or photovoltaic inverters at a site on-line. Gross MW Lead -MVAR

NOGRR 142 Requires verification vs the RARF Includes requirements for NERC staged test for either Coordinated or non-coordinated testing. Includes a CURL verification (reduced from 15 minutes to 1 minute) for lagging for all units. Includes a CURL verification (reduced from 15 minutes to 1 minute) for leading for all non NERC exempted units.

Comments Comments are to include he requirement for AVR in service. Requirements within ERCOT need to capture all units not just BES. Include scheduled voltage for the test. Test for lagging need to be done in summer months. Confusion about how the 1 minute test is done vs the NERC required 1 hour test. VSS check is not being documented. Variable generation leading capability should be checked. What operational data can be used? 15 minute test is needed to verify that the unit can sustain the reactive capability curve NDCRC application form be updated to clarify certain requirements, specifically the requirements to provide net injection and power factor data with respect to the Point of Interconnection (POI) with the TSPs

Information from 2013 Reactive Testing workshop Appendix Information from 2013 Reactive Testing workshop

Outline Clarify how Nodal Protocols for Voltage Support and Unit Reactive Test are related and dependent Define CURL and URL Review telemetry requirements for Unit Reactive Testing for Conventional and IRR units Discuss Coordinated Vs. Non-Coordinated Testing Review NDCRC Form Demonstrate CURL data use in ERCOT ISO Grid Operations Feedback from Market Participants Identify topics which still require additional clarification Suggested changes to NDCRC tool

Nodal Protocols – Reactive Capability NP 3.15 (2): Units Required to Provide VSS All Generation Resources (including self-serve generating units) that have a gross generating unit rating greater than 20 MVA or those units connected at the same Point of Interconnection (POI) that have gross generating unit ratings aggregating to greater than 20 MVA, that supply power to the ERCOT Transmission Grid, shall provide Voltage Support Service (VSS). Nodal Protocol 3.15 Voltage Support Service Requirements {POI} +/- 0.95 power factor (lead/lag) at Maximum Net MW Output URL Nodal Protocol 8.1.1.2.1.4 Maximum Reactive Capability of the Unit CURL Validation {Generator Terminals/Gross} “How to Guide”: Nodal Operating Guide 3.3.2 NP 3.15 (3): Reactive Requirement (POI) An over-excited (lagging or producing) power factor capability of 0.95 or less determined at the generating unit's maximum net power to be supplied to the ERCOT Transmission Grid and at the transmission system Voltage Profile established by ERCOT, both measured at the POI; (b) An under-excited (leading or absorbing) power factor capability of 0.95 or less, determined at the generating unit's maximum net power to be supplied to the ERCOT Transmission Grid and at the transmission system Voltage Profile established by ERCOT, both measured at the POI; NP 8.1.1.2.1.4 (2): Reactive Testing Requirement The Resource Entity shall conduct reactive capacity qualification tests to verify the maximum leading and lagging reactive capability of all Generation Resources required to provide VSS. Reactive capability tests are performed on initial qualification and at a minimum of once every two years. ERCOT may require additional testing if it has information indicating that current data is inaccurate. The Resource Entity is not obligated to place Generation Resources On-Line solely for the purposes of testing. The reactive capability tests must be conducted at a time agreed to in advance by the Resource Entity, its QSE, the applicable TSP, and ERCOT. To review please preview this slide.

Nodal Protocol Definitions and Acronyms URL and CURL Defined Unit Reactive Limit - URL Corrected Unit Reactive Limits - CURL Nodal Protocol Definitions and Acronyms The maximum quantity of Reactive Power that a Generation Resource is capable of providing at a 0.95 power factor at its maximum real power capability. Leading and lagging Net MVAR Defined in Nodal Operating Guides 3.3.2 The corrected reactive capability curve establishes the Corrected Unit Reactive Limits (CURL) at the unit terminals that ERCOT Planning and ERCOT Operations will use for their studies. Leading and lagging reactive gross output

CURL and URL Typically limited by prime mover. Generator is sized greater than turbine.

CURL Components “Typical Generator Capability Curve and Operating Limits for a cylindrical rotor generator” from IEEE PES-PSRC Paper “COORDINATION OF GENERATOR PROTECTION WITH GENERATOR EXCITATION CONTROL AND GENERATOR CAPABILITY”

Static and Dynamic Reactive Devices (Power World Example) Each component is capable of providing reactive but is modeled separately.

Tested Reactive Capability Measured and Telemetered Gross Real and Reactive Power should be Telemetered during the Reactive Capability Test.

Typical IRR physical arrangement

Gross MW and MVAR Telemetered for IRR Testing IRR units are modeled at the collector bus on the low side of the GSU The gross reactive output is the measured value at the collector bus with no static reactive devices included CB 138 kV/ 34.5 kV 34.5 kV Collector Bus Feeders Static or Dynamic Reactive Devices POI GSU GROSS MW & MVAR (CT and PTs)

Coordinated Vs. Non-Coordinated Reactive Capability Tests Non-Coordinated Test Coordinated Test ERCOT and TSP given a minimum of 48 hour notice of testing. ( An “ERCOT Operating Procedure Document Request for Unit Testing” should be submitted) Included in the notice: Date of Testing Net MVAR Leading and/or Lagging that will be experienced on the TSPs transmission system during the test CURL Estimated MW output   TSP given confirmation prior to test date that system conditions can be made favorable for a specified  leading or lagging reactive test on the requested test date TSP approves reactive testing ERCOT approves reactive testing 2 Hours Notice Required for all parties No assistance from TSP or ERCOT needed to adjust voltage at the POI No Adjusting Transformer Taps No Switching nearby Transmission Static Reactive Devices Not Recommended for Units testing as a requirement of Part 3 of the COD Checklist

When should a Resource Entity conduct a Coordinated Reactive Test? If a RE is unable to test within 90% of the URL/CURL with a “non-coordinated” test then a “coordinated” test should be performed. For initial testing the RE determines whether “coordinated” or “non-coordinated” reactive capability testing is appropriate. For additional information for “coordinated” and “non-coordinated” refer to Nodal Operating Guides section 3.3.2.3 and 3.3.2.2.

NDCRC Unit Reactive Test Form Process & timeframe for ERCOT to review & respond is between 2 weeks to a month

NDCRC Unit Reactive Test Form

NDCRC Unit Reactive Test Form Tested Reactive Capability Section is were Gross and Net MW and MVAR values are entered These values must align with historical telemetered data to be considered valid

NDCRC Typical Unit Reactive Test – Data Points 6 Points which could be used to recreate the attached CURL These values should be the remain constant for a given unit Those entering the Test Form Should now receive automatic notifications that a review is complete whether the test is approved or rejected

NDCRC IRR Unit Reactive Test The Max Capability is the capacity of commissioned reactive devices at the site. The Tested Capability is the magnitude of MVAR contributed from the commissioned reactive devices during the test.

NDCRC IRR Unit Reactive Test

CURL DATA USE Process for CURL Data Retrieval: Perform Reactive Capability Test Submit Test Results and CURL in NDCRC Test Results are Reviewed When Approved, the RARF should be updated (as needed) to reflect the CURL which was submitted in NDCRC within 10 business days Nodal Protocol 3.7 (b): “ The QSE or Resource Entity must update any Resource Parameter for a specific Resource…(b) Within ten Business Days of completion of a reactive capability test to reflect the results of the test” Four Data Points submitted in the RARF are: Incorporated in EMS model Real Time VSAT Incorporated in Seasonal Studies Planning Models

FEEDBACK Identify topics which still require additional clarification Additional Detail? Examples? Suggested changes to NDCRC tool Changes to HELP documentation? Add/Remove Fields? More User-Friendly format? Point of contact. Bill Blevins bblevins@ercot.com

Four basic WTG types Type 1: Wound rotor induction generator Type 2: Wound rotor induction generator with variable rotor resistance Type 3: Doubly-fed induction generator (DFIG) Type 4: Full back-to-back converter interface between grid and turbine

Protocol Language 3.15 (4) Generation Resources required to provide VSS whose installations initially began operations on or after September 1, 1999, except as noted below, must have and maintain a URL which has an over-excited (lagging) power factor capability of 0.95 or less and an under-excited (leading) power factor capability of 0.95 or less, both determined at the generating unit's maximum net power to be supplied to the transmission grid and at the transmission system Voltage Profile established by ERCOT, and both measured at the point of interconnection to the TSP. April

Other Protocol defined terms High Emergency Limit (HEL) - Limit established by the QSE describing the maximum temporary unsustainable energy production capability of the Resource. This limit must be achievable for a time stated by the QSE, but not less than 30 minutes. High Sustained Limit-(HSL for a Generation Resource)- Limit established by the QSE, continuously updated in Real Time, that describes the maximum sustained energy production capability of the Resource. Net Dependable Capability - The maximum sustained capability of a Resource as demonstrated by performance testing. Unit Reactive Limit - The maximum quantity of Reactive Power that a Generation Resource is capable of providing at a 0.95 power factor at its maximum real power capability.

URL and HSL Lag +MVAR Lead -MVAR Net or Gross MW Curve defined by Manufacturer (D-Curve) or CURL as updated by testing after commercial operations begins Armature Current Constraint (Typical limit) Under Excitation Constraint(Typical limit) Field Current Constraint (Typical limit) Unit Reactive Limit (URL) Lag Maximum Gross power output typically limited by the Turbine(Generators are typically sized greater than the Turbine) Test must fall within 90% of the Curve provided by the Resource Lag +MVAR .95 pf Lagging Real Power Test loading for Leading Test done at <60% HSL for IRR or at typical loading for low load conditions for Thermal Unit Real Power Test loading for Lagging Test done at >60% HSL for IRR or above 95% HSL for Thermal Unit Maximum Net power output HSL typically Net or Gross MW Lead -MVAR .95 pf Leading Unit Reactive Limit (URL) Lead Test must fall within 90% of the Curve provided by the Resource

The Question Is the “maximum net power to be supplied to the transmission grid” the HSL?