Status Brussels GANTRY Ê Recovered from the Gantry PC crash during Pilot Run R6 4 same situation as before the Pilot Run is achieved for R6 Ë Comparison.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lyon Gantry Status TEC meeting Dec D. Contardo Module production in Lyon Rigidifier test on R4 Frame tolerance effect on assembly plates Short term.
Advertisements

Beam-plug under M2 and HCAL shielding studies Robert Paluch, Burkhard Schmidt October 9,
R. Lee CMS EMU Alignment: 28 Feb, COCOA Simulation and Study of the EMU Alignment System Robert Lee CMS Endcap Alignment Muon EDR 28 February 2002.
Status Brussels GANTRY Ê We have observed a significant influence due to temperature 4 we had a lot of problems with our cooling system (ventilation) Ë.
Module Production Brussels Ê Problems with vacuum chambers in plate solved 4 Almost all plates back in Brussels (repaired in Aachen) Ë Problem with rotation.
Design Ash finished electric hybrid tracing to connector fields –Changes to allow for HCC-less and HCC running on one hybrid awaiting final confirmation.
Tracker Week – UCSB Gantry Status – April 20, 2004 – Dean White 1 Gantry Report University of California Santa Barbara Dean White.
Tracker Week – UCSB Gantry Status – July 20, 2004 – Dean White 1 Gantry Report University of California Santa Barbara UCSB Gantry Team: Andrea Allen Dave.
1 UCSB Module Assembly Week of 5/16-5/20. 2 UCSB Parts Inventory 5/23/05 Hybrids Sensors Frames STHPKITSTHPKIT L12pu L12pd
CMS Tracker Week – Gantry Meeting – 21 st October 2003 – Dean White 1 Status of the UCSB Gantry Dean White University of California Santa Barbara October.
DOE REVIEW 1/20/04 – Dean White 1 Gantry Module Assembly TOB & TEC Dean White University of California, Santa Barbara.
Slide 1X-Calibration Common Testing Issues-Anthony AffolderModule Testing Meeting, June 3, 2003 X-Calibration Common Testing Issues: Grounding, Environmental.
Tracker Week – UCSB Gantry Status – Febuary 10, 2004 – Dean White 1 Gantry Status University of California Santa Barbara UCSB Gantry Team: Andrea Allen.
1 UCSB Module Assembly Week of 4/11 – 4/15. 2 UCSB Parts Inventory 4/4/05 Hybrids Sensors Frames STHPKITSTHPKIT L12pu ST193 L12pd ST193.
1 UCSB Module Assembly Week of 5/9-5/13. 2 UCSB Parts Inventory 5/9/05 Hybrids Sensors Frames STHPKITSTHPKIT L12pu L12pd L12su
US Module and Rod Production Overview and Plan For the US CMS Tracker Group.
US Tracker Group Status Sep. 1, 2005 J. Incandela For the US CMS Tracker Group.
Slide 1Rod Production presented by Jim Lamb (UCSB)April 9, 2004 Rod Production Rod Production, April , presented by Jim Lamb (UCSB)
CMS Week – UCSB Gantry Status – June 8, 2004 – Dean White 1 Gantry Report University of California Santa Barbara UCSB Gantry Team: Andrea Allen Dave Staszak.
DAST 2005 Week 4 – Some Helpful Material Randomized Quick Sort & Lower bound & General remarks…
US Module Production June 2, 2005 J. Incandela For the US CMS Tracker Group.
Uli Schäfer 1 Production modules Status Plans JEM: Status and plans.
1 Comparison of One-Hole Die Shape Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL) Department of Mechanical Engineering Northern Illinois University Northern.
VISPS Overview Capture visual data from two cameras Find laser Triangulate to find X, Y, Z coordinates of laser Output coordinates to RS-232 serial output.
HV system migration to USB interface Presented by Korolev M.
Status Brussels GANTRY Ê Overview of the pilot run (second week of October) 4 aims and achievements 4 accuracy on position and angles 4 residual features.
1 TEC pilot run status Goal : test TEC module production rate capabilities - 15 R6 modules assembled on Brussels Gantry and bonded in Aachen I - 15 R7.
SVD Mechanics 21th B2GM Florian Buchsteiner (HEPHY Vienna)
Status Brussels GANTRY Ê Assembly of R3 modules (36 modules) 4 precision of the modules 4 problems with DataBase (not adapted for single sensor modules)
Warm Up 1. How many miles is 870,655 in? (Hint: There are 5,280 ft in 1 mile). 2. Do you weigh yourself? Which scale would you use? Why? How do you know.
Malte HildebrandtDC Status Report, Dear MEG Committee,PSI, April 14 th 2009 this is the first report concerning the drift chamber status as.
CMS Tracker Week, CERN, October Oct 2004CMS Tracker Week - Module ProductionSalvatore Costa - Catania Report from Module Bonding Working.
Partial Disassembly of the alignment devices on each ME11transfer plate, ME1/1 chamber and ME1/2 chamber. (6 on +Z and 6 on –Z side of the CMS)
Status Brussels GANTRY Ê Try to assemble modules with good precision 4 different calibration plates (Karlsruhe and Bari) 4 determination of pin positions.
Calibration software for the HADES electromagnetic calorimeter (EMC) Dimitar Mihaylov Excellence Cluster ‘Universe’, TU Munich HADES collaboration meeting.
Brussels Gantry Ê Problem with vacuum chambers in plate 4 leaks in plates with gives communication between positions Ë Problem with rotation motor (U-motor)
Status of the PSD upgrade - Status of production of new temperature, HV control systems MAPD gain monitoring system. -Status of the PSD temperature stabilization.
Fermilab PMG - Results from module testing - April 9, 2004 – E.Chabalina (UIC) 1 Results from module testing E.Chabalina University of Illinois (Chicago)
Brussels Module Production Ê We have producted 57 R6 modules and 26 R5N modules 4 of which 67 grade A and 9 grade B and 7 outside specifications Ë We have.
Zian Zhu The Tension/Pitch Machine Status and Anode Panel Measurements The Strip Capacitance Meter Status and Measurements Production Readiness Review.
STATUS OF MUV3 CONSTRUCTION A joint IHEP Protvino – Mainz – Pisa project MUV3  Proposed by Italo Mannelli: Thick scintillator tiles with direct light.
Update on the Triple GEM Detectors for Muon Tomography K. Gnanvo, M. Hohlmann, L. Grasso, A. Quintero Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL.
CMS Tracker Week, CERN, Oct Oct 2005CMS Tracker Week - Module ProductionSalvatore Costa - Catania Report from Module Bonding Working Group.
Status Brussels GANTRY Ê New measurements of pin positions 4 using short pins rather than long ones 4 improved the precision Ë Cross-check of precision.
Lyon Gantry Status CERN 15 Sept D. Contardo Calibration Plates and Tools Readiness for production.
Module Assembly Jig Status Cambridge and DESY came to Liverpool Nov. 15 th -16 th for training on module assembly – A complete jig set was sent back with.
Hybrid and Module Status 1. Hybrid Delivery First hybrids over-etched and shrunk due to changes in design and mistakes in manufacturing – Shrinkage for.
Brussels Gantry Ê Problems with vacuum chambers in plate 4 mostly solved by the workshop in Aachen (thanks) Ë Problem with rotation motor (U-motor) 4 motor.
BM&N STS ladders assembly in VLHEP
DRY TREATMENT STANDARD
Sector 002 Assembly status report
Grid Pix Field Simulations and precision needed for a module
Status Brussels GANTRY
Status Brussels GANTRY
Hamburg Bonding Report
Vienna Module Production
CMS Perugia Modules Production Review
TEC Module Production Overview
Station and Module Support Frames
UCSB Module Assembly Week of 11/28 – 12/2/05 Week of 11/28 – 12/2/2005.
Module Production in Brussels
OGP Surveying & DB Entry
CMS Perugia Gantry Status Report
L.Fiore Gantry Meeting during the CMS TK week
Anthony Affolder UC Santa Barbara
Module Production in Brussels
UCSB Module Assembly Week of 12/5 – 12/9/05 Week of 12/5 – 12/9/2005.
TEC module quality overview
Status of Bonding R1N, R1S, R3 of TEC University of Hamburg
Hardware needs (ARCS) Current ARCS capabilities at both sites should be able to keep up with production assuming software changes Automatic I-V curves,
Presentation transcript:

Status Brussels GANTRY Ê Recovered from the Gantry PC crash during Pilot Run R6 4 same situation as before the Pilot Run is achieved for R6 Ë Comparison of modules measured in Aachen and Brussels 4 completely independent measurements (test of Gantry !!) 4 large differences partially understood (calibration & pin positions) Ì Position of reference markers on assembly plate Í Hard-ware adaptations for the assembly plate Î Plans for the near and further future O.Bouhali, J.D’Hondt, L.Van Lancker CMS week – December 2003

Comparison modules measured in Aachen and Brussels Ê Pilot run modules R6 were re-measured in Aachen ï large differences between nominal and measured marker positions on average of ~30-40  m (with extremes up to 150  m) ï not observed in Brussels 4 independent measurements  test of Gantry precision 4 try to understand the difference calibration plates ï calibration plates pin positions ï pin positions

Comparison modules measured in Aachen and Brussels Brussels Aachen Sensor 1 Sensor 2 only plate R6.1 plate R6.1 and R6.2

Comparison modules measured in Aachen and Brussels Ê Pilot run modules R6 were re-measured in Aachen ï large differences between nominal and measured marker positions on average of ~30-40  m (with extremes up to 150  m) ï not observed in Brussels 4 independent measurements  test of Gantry precision 4 try to understand the difference calibration plates ï calibration plates pin positions ï pin positions Ë The shifts from the nominal marker positions measured in Aachen are different for position 1 and 2 on plate R6.1 Ì On the Gantry modules were measured in the 3 positions…  differences were observed also at the level of ~20  m at the level of ~20  m

Pin positions on assembly plate Mod1Mod2 Mod3 Supply plate ++ Assembly plate good module input true Far from the pins the shift should be larger … exactly what we observe ~21cm ~7cm

Reference markers on the assembly plate The calibration plate from Karlsruhe doesn’t cover the full Gantry plate … Bari plate is even smaller (comparison between both plates will be made) … Mod1Mod2 Mod3 ++ Frame ref. Pin Ass. Ref. mark R6 situation

Reference markers on the assembly plate The calibration plate from Karlsruhe doesn’t cover the full Gantry plate Mod1Mod2 Mod3 ++ R5 situation Frame ref. Pin Ass. Ref. mark

Reference markers on the assembly plate Solved by using another reference marker in the calibration region … it has been tested and it works with a significant improvement … Mod1Mod2 Mod3 ++ Frame ref. Pin Ass. Ref. mark R6 situation + new

Hard-ware adaptations for the assembly plates frame level capton level sensor level 900  m 700  m Ê The thickness of the carbon frames isn’t invariant 4 this and the capton level could induce vaccuum problems (if frame is to thick) Ë Thick frames will not be used, until thin ones are used Ì We will use special paper (with vaccuum holes) to increase the sensor level after having used all thin frames CF level height 40  m R6 / R5 R3

Outlook for the near future Ê Test the use of the stiffeners when plate (R6) comes back from Aachen (then all other plates for same modifications) from Aachen (then all other plates for same modifications) Ë Re-calibrate Gantry and measure pin positions (all R6 plates) Ì Assemble three R6 modules with the remaining three hybrids ( final test of the Gantry precision ) ( final test of the Gantry precision ) Í With the experience accumulated with R6 plates we can define the assembly parameters for R5 plates define the assembly parameters for R5 plates Î Issues : pick-up tool, pin positions, reference markers, …

Outlook for the further future (January) Ê Start full production of R6 modules when hybrids arrive 4 max. 6 modules/day (only 2 plates) 4 before arrival of hybrids we will only use one R6 plate Ë Pilot run for R5N and R5S 4 when parameters are modified and tested (dry assembly) Ì Start full production of R5 modules Í Determine the parameters for the R3 assembly plates è able to produce R6 and R5 modules when hybrids arrive somewhere late January somewhere late January 4 nominally 6 modules for R6 / day 4 nominally 6 modules for R5(S or N) / day è hence in total 4 plates / day ( ≡ nominal proposal )