Printed by www.postersession.com Investigating Rapid Storm Intensification Mechanisms Including the Role of Storm Mergers in the 22 May 2011 Joplin, MO.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tornadogenesis within a Simulated Supercell Storm Ming Xue School of Meteorology and Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms University of Oklahoma.
Advertisements

The 4 Sep 2011 Tornado in Eastern New York: An Example for Updating Tornado Warning Strategies Brian J. Frugis NOAA/NWS Albany, NY NROW XIII 2-3 November.
Lemon and Doswell (1979) Lemon, L. R., and C. A. Doswell III, 1979: Severe thunderstorm evolution and mesoscyclone structure as related to tornadogenesis.
Bow Echoes: A Review of Conceptual Models WITH SPECIAL THANKS TO: GEORGE BRYAN, NOLAN ATKINS,STAN TRIER Matthew Dux NWS-Pleasant Hill/Kansas City March.
Convective Dynamics Squall Lines Adapted from material from the COMET Program.
The Impact of Gravity Wave/Undular Bore Dissipation on the June 22, 2003 Deshler and Aurora Nebraska Tornadic Supercells AARON W. JOHNSON NOAA/NWS Weather.
Characteristics of Isolated Convective Storms
Weismann (1992) Weisman, M. L., 1992: The role of convectively generated rear- inflow jets in the evolution of long-lived mesoconvective systems. J. Atmos.
Issues in Very High Resolution Numerical Weather Prediction Over Complex Terrain in Juneau, Alaska Don Morton 1,2, Delia Arnold 3,4, Irene Schicker 3,
Severe Convection and Mesoscale Convective Systems R. A. Houze Lecture, Summer School on Severe and Convective Weather, Nanjing, 11 July 2011.
Structure of mid-latitude cyclones crossing the California Sierra Nevada as seen by vertically pointing radar Socorro Medina, Robert Houze, Christopher.
More Thunderstorms. Today Homework in Wind shear More multicellular storms.
Documentation of a Tornadic Supercell Thunderstorm in the San Joaquin Valley, California Ted B. Schlaepfer Department of Geosciences San Francisco State.
Supercell Tornadoes, Non- Supercell Tornadoes, and Gustnadoes.
Severe Squall Line over Quebec August 18th 2008 Robert Michaud QSPC – Montreal October 29th 2008.
Synoptic, Thermodynamic, Shear Setting May 7, 2002 Tornadic Thunderstorm in Southwestern Kansas Michele Blazek May 15, 2005.
The 4 August 2004 Central Pennsylvania Severe Weather Event – Environmental and Topographical Influences on Storm Structure Evolution Joe Villani NOAA/NWS,
Characteristics of Isolated Convective Storms Meteorology 515/815 Spring 2006 Christopher Meherin.
Impact of the 4D-Var Assimilation of Airborne Doppler Radar Data on Numerical Simulations of the Genesis of Typhoon Nuri (2008) Zhan Li and Zhaoxia Pu.
Bow Echoes By Matthieu Desorcy.
Ensemble Numerical Prediction of the 4 May 2007 Greensburg, Kansas Tornadic Supercell using EnKF Radar Data Assimilation Dr. Daniel T. Dawson II NRC Postdoc,
Simulating Supercell Thunderstorms in a Horizontally-Heterogeneous Convective Boundary Layer Christopher Nowotarski, Paul Markowski, Yvette Richardson.
National Weather Service Weather Forecast Office – Taunton, MA (BOX)
Thunderstorms and Tornadoes Last Lecture: We looked at severe weather events in the lower latitudes Principal weather event is the formation and movement.
A Study on the Environments Associated with Significant Tornadoes Occurring Within the Warm Sector versus Those Occurring Along Boundaries Jonathan Garner.
Radar in aLMo Assimilation of Radar Information in the Alpine Model of MeteoSwiss Daniel Leuenberger and Andrea Rossa MeteoSwiss.
Earth-Sun System Division National Aeronautics and Space Administration SPoRT SAC Nov 21-22, 2005 Regional Modeling using MODIS SST composites Prepared.
Severe Convection and Mesoscale Convective Systems R. A. Houze Lecture, Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology, Pune, 5 August 2010.
Experiences with 0-36 h Explicit Convective Forecasting with the WRF-ARW Model Morris Weisman (Wei Wang, Chris Davis) NCAR/MMM WSN05 September 8, 2005.
Comparison of Evaporation and Cold Pool Development between Single- Moment (SM) and Multi-moment (MM) Bulk Microphysics Schemes In Idealized Simulations.
Preliminary Radar Observations of Convective Initiation and Mesocyclone Interactions with Atmospheric Waves on 27 April 2011 Todd A. Murphy, Timothy A.
Tornadoes.
The structure and evolution of vortex lines in supercell thunderstorms
Relationships between Lightning and Radar Parameters in the Mid-Atlantic Region Scott D. Rudlosky Cooperative Institute of Climate and Satellites University.
Performance of the Experimental 4.5 km WRF-NMM Model During Recent Severe Weather Outbreaks Steven Weiss, John Kain, David Bright, Matthew Pyle, Zavisa.
Steve Koch National Severe Storms Laboratory Steve Koch National Severe Storms Laboratory WELCOME to the WoF – HiW Workshop of 2014.
The EnKF Analyses and Forecasts of the 8 May 2003 Oklahoma City Tornadic Supercell Storm By Nusrat Yussouf 1,2 Edward Mansell 2, Louis Wicker 2, Dustan.
Severe Weather: Tornadoes Harold E. Brooks NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory Norman, Oklahoma
Tornadoes Name:______________ () Class:_______________ Date : _______________.
Deep Convection Ordinary Cells Multicell storms Supercells.
Tropical Severe Local Storms Nicole Hartford. How do thunderstorms form?  Thunderstorms result from moist warm air that rises due to being less dense.
The Garden City, Kansas, storm during VORTEX 95. Part I: Overview of the Storm’s life cycle and mesocyclogenesis Roger M. Wakimoto, Chinghwang Liu, Huaquing.
Copyright © 2003 WGN-TV Computer Models are the Primary Source of Information for All Weather & Climate Predictions.
Spatial Verification Methods for Ensemble Forecasts of Low-Level Rotation in Supercells Patrick S. Skinner 1, Louis J. Wicker 1, Dustan M. Wheatley 1,2,
Norman Weather Forecast Office Gabe Garfield 2/23/11.
Numerical Simulation and Prediction of Supercell Tornadoes Ming Xue School of Meteorology and Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms University of.
A Rare Severe Weather and Tornado Event in Central New York and Northeast Pennsylvania: July 8, 2014 Presented by Mike Evans 1.
Kenneth R. Cook James Caruso Mickey McGuire National Weather Service, Wichita, KS.
The 1 November 2004 tornadic QLCS event over southwest Illinois Ron W. Przybylinski Science and Operations Officer National Weather Service – St. Louis.
Supercells Eric A. Pani The University of Louisiana at Monroe.
The Effect of Downdraft Strength on Tornado Intensity and Path Length Dylan R. Card and Ross A. Lazear Department of Atmospheric & Environmental Sciences,
2. WRF model configuration and initial conditions  Three sets of initial and lateral boundary conditions for Katrina are used, including the output from.
Mesoscale Convective Systems. Definition Mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) refer to all organized convective systems larger than supercells Some classic.
龙卷, 龙卷生成机制和特高分辨率数值模拟 薛明 美国俄克拉荷马大学 气象系与风暴分析预报中心
Supercell storms: In-class demo and Experiment 3
Reflections on Radar Observations of Mesoscale Precipitation
Daniel M. Alrick 14th Cyclone Workshop Monday, September 22, 2008
WRF model runs of 2 and 3 August
Characteristics of Isolated Convective Storms
Alan F. Srock and Lance F. Bosart
Ted B. Schlaepfer Department of Geosciences
Hiding under a freeway overpass will protect me from a tornado.
Bodine, D. J., and K. L. Rasmussen, 2017
Daniel M. Alrick 14th Cyclone Workshop Monday, September 22, 2008
Rita Roberts and Jim Wilson National Center for Atmospheric Research
Thunderstorms Features Cumulonimbus clouds Heavy rainfall Lightning
William Flamholtz, Brian Tang, and Lance Bosart
Dawson, D. T. II, M. Xue, J. A. Milbrandt, and A. Shapiro, 2015
Sensitivity of idealized squall-line simulations to the level of complexity used in two-moment bulk microphysics schemes. Speaker: Huan Chen Professor:
Tropical Cyclone Supercells and Tornadoes: Gaps in the Knowledge Base
Presentation transcript:

printed by Investigating Rapid Storm Intensification Mechanisms Including the Role of Storm Mergers in the 22 May 2011 Joplin, MO Tornadic Storm Kevin Van Leer*, Brian Jewett, Robert Wilhelmson University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; National Center for Supercomputing Applications Rapid intensification of low-level vertical shear due to mechanisms such as storm mergers can result in local environments more favorable for tornadogenesis than the surroundings. Lemon 1976 and Lee et al 2006 noted the significance of cell mergers in the intensification of the mesocyclone. In the case of the Joplin tornado, the surroundings were a high CAPE, low shear environment, not favorable for the violent, EF-5 tornado which eventually occurred. This study utilizes high resolution WRF real-data simulations of the event to observe the storm mergers and subsequent intensification of the mesocyclone, as well as idealized runs using soundings from the model environment to test the effects from the resulting near-storm thermodynamic and shear profiles. Near-Storm Environment Vertical Profiles Model soundings are retrieved from the near-storm environment indicated by the picket-line of black dots. These soundings indicate the production of an excessively strong cold pool over a larger areal extent than the observed event. This cold pool may play a role in limiting the surface vertical vorticity peak intensity and duration in the real-data simulations. Significant cooling below 950mb and localized shear is present in the example inflow profile. Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model ARW version km outer grid 2 nests (1 km and 333 meter grid spacings) Future nests will have < 100 meter grid spacing 10 second outer grid time step 61 vertical levels North American Mesoscale (NAM) Initialization Run from 12Z 22 May 2011 to 03Z 23 May 2011 Morrison 2-moment Microphysics Mellor-Yamada-Janjic PBL Unified Noah LSM Goddard Longwave and Shortwave Radiation Current Results Successfully reproduced strong rotation and mesocyclone near time of observed tornado formation. Simulated storm formation and decay closely mimics observed behavior, including storm mergers. Problems currently being addressed Highly sensitive to simulation approach (timing and placement of nests, microphysics, radiation scheme and call frequency). Highly sensitive to environment (storm merger timing and location, synoptic front proximity). Tests to improve results will include Slight alterations of the microphysics scheme to reduce the strength and extent of excessively strong cold pool (i.e. changes in hail density or drop size distributions). A decrease in grid spacing to sizes suggested by previous literature (i.e. < 100 meters). Idealized simulations to isolate role of ambient shear and thermodynamic profiles o o Investigation of storm morphology (e.g. duration of rapid rotation) without mesoscale boundaries or mergers. o o Quantification of response to minor changes in shear and buoyancy. Present goals Numerical study aims to reproduce and understand the rapid intensification of the Joplin tornadic storm. Identify and understand modifications in the near-storm environment that made an EF-5 tornado possible on this day. Study results will aid in the forecasting of tornadic events in similar high CAPE, low shear environments. Violent EF-5 tornado that struck Joplin, MO o o 22.1 mile path, up to 1 mile wide o o 38 minutes on the ground ( Z) o o 159 fatalities, injured (Deadliest since 1947) o o $2.8 billion in damage 3 cell mergers during evolution of tornado o o First 2 rapidly intensified mesocyclone o o Third resulted in weakening of the mesocyclone o o Forecasters properly issued tornado warning due to presence of vorticity couplet and cell merger Tornado occurred in a high CAPE, low shear environment Information primarily from Joplin NWS Service Assessment MOTIVATION JOPLIN TORNADO MODEL CONFIGURATION RESULTS DISCUSSION AND GOALS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Storm Mergers and Vertical Vorticity in Real-Data Simulations Rapid intensification of the mesocyclone from storm mergers has been reproduced in real-data simulations. Vertical vorticity throughout the column increases during instances of early storm mergers, until one occurs along the rear flank of the main storm. The peak of deep rotation occurs shortly after a merging event. Surface temperature is provided to display the cold pool and its rapid propagation out in front of the mesocyclone. Simulated 2km AGL Vertical 1km AGL Surface Temperature (°F) 936 km (3 km) 490 km (1 km) 300 km (0.333km) 792 km (3 km) 469 km (1 km) 300 km (0.333 km) 2219Z Merger #1 Merger #2 Merger #3 2248Z 2219Z Vorticity Couplet 2234Z Intensified Couplet 2248Z 2258Z Weakening Couplet Merger #3 2258Z Domain for Real-Data WRF runs. Grid sizes with grid spacing in parentheses WSR-88D NEXRAD Radar Data retrieved from NCDC This work is funded by the NSF Grant AGS All computational time resources are from Xsede Award TG-ATM050014N. Special thanks goes to the help desks at the Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center (PSC), National Institute of Computational Science (NICS), National Center for Supercomputing Applications, and WRF help. Also, to my advisor, Dr. Brian Jewett, and his extensive help with WRF and other computational problems. 2234Z Merger #2 50 km 2200Z Early Stages 2220ZIntensification 2240Z Peak Rotation 2305Z Decaying Stage 333 meter output from Real-Data Simulations. Black dots indicate locations of vertical profiles. In vertical vorticity plots, light grey and dark grey represent 30 and 50 dBz respectively. 333m WRF output Simulated 2km AGL and Sounding retrieved from noted location at 2220Z *Contact Information: Merging Cells Hook Echo Merging Cells IsolatedRotation Intensifying Rotation Maximum Deep Rotation Decaying Rotation FFD Strong Cold Pool FFD Intensifying Cold Pool Hook Echo Merging Cells Rear Flank Merger Forward Flank Downdraft (FFD)