Larry L. Johnson Federal Transition Framework.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Portfolio Management, according to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-16 Supplemental Guidance, is the coordination of Federal geospatial.
Advertisements

Program Management Office (PMO) Design
Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B5AStandards & Certification Project Management.
National Geospatial Data Set Assets: Status on Validation Process Wendy Blake Coleman U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
October 22, Wednesday, October 22, 2008 Records Management Integrated Project Team Kick-Off Session 1:30 pm – 3:00 pm HHS Auditorium.
Enterprise Content Management Pre-Proposal Conference for RFP No. ISD2006ECM-SS December 6, 2006 California Administrative Office of the Courts Information.
Architecture-Driven Modernization Platform SIG KDM RFP.
UNCLASSIFIED 1 Enterprise Architecture Career Path Working Group Walt Okon Senior Architect Engineer Architecture & Infrastructure Directorate Office of.
Enterprise Architecture. 2 Agenda What is Enterprise Architecture (EA)? Roles in EA? Why is EA Important? Tangible Benefits from EA? What Do We Need to.
CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES OFFICE OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES John Teeter Deputy Chief Information.
Enterprise Architecture The Arkansas Approach. Key Areas What is enterprise architecture? Why is it important? How you can participate Current status.
Model Driven Architecture (MDA) Partha Kuchana. Agenda What is MDA Modeling Approaches MDA in a NutShell MDA Models SDLC MDA Models (an Example) MDA -
EEN [Canada] Forum Shelley Borys Director, Evaluation September 30, 2010 Developing Evaluation Capacity.
Considering an Enterprise Architecture for the NSDI
April 2, 2013 Longitudinal Data system Governance: Status Report Alan Phillips Deputy Director, Fiscal Affairs, Budgeting and IT Illinois Board of Higher.
Developing Enterprise Architecture
Proposed EA Assessment Framework 2.0 Chief Architect’s Forum (CAF) Dick Burk Chief Architect and Director of Federal Enterprise Architecture Program, OMB.
Project Management COE Helen Schmitz, Chief IT Architect (Acting)
Enterprise NASA Will Peters August, 2010.
WGPD’s Administrative Matters Roberto José Domínguez Moro Superior Audit Office of Mexico INTOSAI Working Group on Public Debt.
National Preparedness All Hazards Consortium Corey Gruber Assistant Deputy Administrator, National Preparedness National Preparedness.
Federal Geographic Data Committee: Coordination Group Meeting Proposal: FGDC Annual Planning Process & Monthly Performance Management Reviews Submitted.
Importance of a Geospatial Architecture Geospatial Best Practices for Architects Workshop April 11, 2007 Dick Burk Chief Architect and Manager, Federal.
Information Assurance The Coordinated Approach To Improving Enterprise Data Quality.
ConnectMe Authority Strategic Plan May Broadband Strategy – Healthcare For the healthcare industry: The Authority will work with decision makers.
Introduction to MDA (Model Driven Architecture) CYT.
IT PMB: Executive Oversight and Decision Authority for Application and Infrastructure Projects at NASA Larry Sweet Chair, IT PMB JSC CIO August 2010.
“FEA: Beyond Reference Models” September 07, 2006 Dick Burk Chief Architect and Manager, Federal Enterprise Architecture Program Management Office – OMB.
AHIMA & PHDSC A Transformational Alliance. CONFIDENTIAL AHIMA Background  Professional association founded in 1928 as the Association of Record Librarians.
GBA IT Project Management Final Project - Establishment of a Project Management Management Office 10 July, 2003.
Elements of a Data Management Plan Bill Michener University Libraries University of New Mexico Data Management Practices for.
Your Financial Work Defense Finance and Accounting Service DFAS Transformation Update March 2003.
Copyright © 2004 by The Web Services Interoperability Organization (WS-I). All Rights Reserved 1 Interoperability: Ensuring the Success of Web Services.
C W3C Government Linked Data Working Group Cory Casanave 06/30/2011 Cory Casanave Cory-c at modeldriven dot com CEO, Model Driven Solutions Founder,
1 What’s Next for Financial Management Line of Business (FMLoB)? AGA/GWSCPA 6 th Annual Conference Dianne Copeland, Director, FSIO May 8, 2007.
SEARCH Membership Group Systems & Technology PAC Global Justice XML Data Model (GJXDM) Update January 29, 2005.
Federal XML Naming and Design Rules and Guidelines Mark Crawford.
Page 1 Federal Information and Records Managers (FIRM) Council 2007 OMG Government Domain Task Force National Archives and Records Administration.
Enterprise Architecture, Enterprise Data Management, and Data Standardization Efforts at the U.S. Department of Education May 2006 Joe Rose, Chief Architect.
FEA DRM Management Strategy Presented by : Mary McCaffery, US EPA.
Department of Defense Knowledge Fair Tim Young Office of Management and Budget September 27, 2007.
EPA Geospatial Segment United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Information Enterprise Architecture Program Segment Architecture.
NOAA Cooperative Institutes John Cortinas, Ph.D. OAR Cooperative Institute Program, Program Manager NOAA Cooperative Institute Committee, Chairperson.
EGovOS Panel Discussion CIO Council Architecture & Infrastructure Committee Subcommittee Co-Chairs March 15, 2004.
Common Terminology Services 2 CTS 2 Submission Team Status Update HL7 Vocabulary Working Group May 17, 2011.
1 Geospatial Line of Business Update FGDC Coordination Group April 14, 2009.
List of Decisions #Decision for the Board 1 Does the Board agree to its composition? The Board requested that its composition be considered “proposed”
EPA Plans for Moving Forward with Electronic Reporting David Hindin, US EPA May 31, 2012 General Session for the Exchange Network National Meeting May.
NASA ARAC Meeting Update on Next Generation Air Transportation System May 3, 2005 Robert Pearce Deputy Director, Joint Planning & Development Office.
Federal Geographic Data Committee Update Ivan DeLoatch NGAC Meeting August 26, 2009.
Federal Geographic Data Committee Update Karen Siderelis, Acting Chair Ivan B. DeLoatch, Executive Director NGAC Meeting March 24, 2010.
Government and Industry IT: one vision, one community Vice Chairs April Meeting Agenda Welcome and Introductions GAPs welcome meeting with ACT Board (John.
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program eDeployment Kickoff August 26, 2003.
March 24, 2007 SOA CoP Demo Model Driven Enterprise SOA GSA Financial Management Enterprise Architecture Cory Casanave cory-c (at) modeldriven.com Oct.
National Geospatial Enterprise Architecture N S D I National Spatial Data Infrastructure An Architectural Process Overview Presented by Eliot Christian.
National Geospatial Advisory Committee NGAC Action Plan Discussion October 16, 2008.
Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA) Architecture Plus Meeting December 4, 2007 Kshemendra Paul (Acting) Chief Architect.
Financial Services Sector Coordinating Council (FSSCC) 2011 KEY FSSCC INITIATIVES 2011 Key FSSCC Initiatives Project Name: Project Description: All-Hazards.
Geospatial Line of Business FGDC Steering Committee Meeting October 23, 2006.
Information Architecture WG: Report of the Fall 2004 Meeting November 16th, 2004 Dan Crichton, NASA/JPL.
SysML Modelica Integration Working Group Report (SE DSIG Meeting, San Antonio, TX, 9/15/2009) Chris Paredis Georgia Tech 1.
International Planetary Data Alliance Registry Project Update September 16, 2011.
Geospatial Line of Business FGDC Steering Committee Meeting October 24, 2007.
Work Plan Work Plan Management (Document 21)
Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA)
Proposed SysML v2 Submission Plan
Tennessee Longitudinal Data system (TLDS)
About The Federal Data Architecture Subcommittee (DAS) 2008
CAF Quarterly Meeting Measuring the Value of an EA Practice
Presentation transcript:

Larry L. Johnson Federal Transition Framework

Event Place – Date2 Introduction The Federal Transition Framework (FTF) is a single information source for cross-agency information technology (IT) initiatives using a simple, familiar and organized structure. It contains government-wide IT policy objectives and cross-agency initiatives including: OMB-sponsored initiatives, e.g., E-Gov and LoB initiatives Government-wide initiatives, e.g., Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPV6), Homeland Security Presidential Directive 12 (HSPD 12)

Event Place – Date3 Why is the FTF Important? Information published in the FTF Catalog is provided to support the following goals: Increase the alignment of agency enterprise architecture with federal IT policy decisions or other forms of official guidance Increase sharing and reuse of common, cross- agency business processes, service components and technology standards Increase collaboration through agency participation in cross-agency communities of practice

Event Place – Date4 What are the Benefits of the FTF? There are a number of benefits from the FTF, both for agencies and government-wide. Agencies can: Receive more consistent, complete and detailed information about cross-agency initiatives more quickly to inform their EA, capital planning and implementation activities Use cross-agency initiative information to make better decisions about their IT investments Improve the effectiveness and efficiency of IT investments to realize service improvements and cost savings The Federal Government can: Communicate more consistent, complete and detailed information about cross-agency initiatives more efficiently Increase the level and speed of adoption of cross-agency initiatives Improve the overall effectiveness and efficiency of IT investments related to cross-agency initiatives

Event Place – Date5 How is the FTF Used? The FTF Catalog is used to provide information to agency decision makers in support of cross-agency initiative implementation, and to provide guidance to working groups developing cross-agency initiative architectures. A major release of the FTF Catalog is published each year with the OMB EA Assessment Framework. Publication of the FTF Catalog is the first step in a three-step process to simplify the packaging and dissemination of information describing cross-agency IT initiatives.

Event Place – Date6 The FTF Process

Event Place – Date7 The FTF Process (2) Step 1 The FTF Catalog is published in September of the current year (CY) with the latest version of the OMB EA Assessment Framework. The catalog describes cross-agency initiatives required to be included as an element of agency enterprise architecture. Step 2 Agency EA self-assessments are submitted to OMB to be reviewed and assessed in March (CY+1). Submission packages include enterprise architecture work products and an EA Transition Strategy including mandatory cross-agency initiatives related to the agency mission. Step 3 Agency budget submissions are submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in September (CY+1). Budget submissions are verified to ensure they reflect the agency EA Transition Strategy including relevant cross- agency initiatives.

Event Place – Date8 Evolution to Model Driven Architecture The original FTF started as a handcrafted XML Schema To make it more accessible and understandable, a UML model was derived from the XML Schema The FEA PMO brought the work to the OMG for transition to the OMG’s MDA and maintenance under the OMG’s open, voluntary consensus process

Event Place – Date9 OMB/OMG Collaboration “The FEA PMO is working with the Object Management Group (OMG), a voluntary consensus standards body, to implement further refinements to the FTF Metamodel, including both UML and XML Schema representations. This is being performed through the OMG Government Domain Task Force (GovDTF) and has established the Federal Transition Framework Metamodel Working Group. Participation in the FTF Metamodel Working Group is welcomed. For further information, please visit Federal Transition Framework Metamodel Reference, Version 1.0 December 2006, page 4

Event Place – Date10 OMG/Government Process in a Nutshell RFP – Request for Proposal RFP – Request for Proposal Requirements are captured by Government Domain Task Force (GovDTF) participants drawn from Government, Industry, Vendors, and Academia. Submission Outside the OMG Process submission teams write a specification meeting the RFP Requirements. The submission team must have vendors who have filed a Letter of Intent to build to the specification if it is approved. GovDTF Approval A vote is taken to select a submission and recommend it for adoption OMG Architecture Board (AB) Both the RFP and the Submission are vetted by the AB for conformance with MDA principals and completeness. Domain Technology Committee Members of the DTC vote on recommending the submission for adoption based on the recommendation of the GovDTF and AB. Board of Directors After validating that implementation plans are in place the Board votes to adopt the specification Revision Task Force There is always a Revision Task Force seated to address any residual errors in the specification discovered during implementation.

Event Place – Date11 From Pictures to a Platform Independent Model to a Platform Specific Model The original FTF UML model that was rendered in a drawing tool, was entered into an MDA Tool. The submission team refined the model in weekly “screen share” teleconferences. The MDA Tool was then used to automatically generate the XML Schema as a Platform Specific Model The UML model is now the master, and the XML Schema an automatically rendered derivative.

Event Place – Date12 Model Driven Architecture

Event Place – Date13 MDA Mapping Provides specifications for transformation of a PIM into a PSM for a particular platform. These are built into the MDA Tool.

Event Place – Date14 MDA Tools Support Multiple Languages

Event Place – Date15 Expanding the Effective Budget FTF Submission Team Included: Government Contributors Office of Management and Budget Social Security Administration National Archives Treasury Industry Contributors Adaptive Everware CBDI MEGA International Telelogic AB TethersEnd Consulting Troux Technologies

Event Place – Date16 FTF Finalization Task Force (the FTF FTF) Continued Maintenance FTF FTF Membership Government Participants OMB/Vangent US Dept of Treasury National Archives Industry Participants Adaptive Everware-CBD Mega International Model Driven Solutions RedHat Telelogic TethersEnd Consulting Troux Technologies Finalization Task Force is the first Revision Task Force. There is always a Revision Task Force seated to address any mistakes or ambiguities in the specification discovered in the course of implementation. Life-cycle Management of a specification is built into the OMG Process.

Event Place – Date17 Benefits of the OMB/OMG Collaboration Open Collaboration in a Pre-competitive Environment As an open, voluntary, consensus based organization, the OMG provides a forum in which government personnel can work with Industry, Vendors and Academia to discuss government requirements for specifications in a pre- competitive environment outside of any procurement. Effective Expansion of Budget In working with OMG members, the OMB could avail itself of industry experts to apply to the task at no cost beyond their own participation. Life-cycle Maintenance The OMG has a built in process for maintaining a specification over its life time, providing further cost leverage through the efforts of OMG Membership.

Event Place – Date18 Going Forward The OMB and OMG are in the process of forging an OMB/OMG Collaboration Agenda. Other work items are under consideration for execution under the OMG Community Process and Model Driven Architecture.

Event Place – Date19 Resources EGov Federal Transition Framework Object Management Group OMG Government Domain Task Force