August 28, 2015 Long Island Independent and Peer Evaluation: Making the Work Matter.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Through Instructional Rounds
Advertisements

Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research & Literature From Session 1 Homework Video Exercise Summative Conferences.
Webinar on Instructional Rounds
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research & Literature From Session 1 Homework Video Exercise Mid-Year Conferences.
Rationale for CI 2300 Teaching and Learning in the Digital Age.
Differentiated Supervision
Day 3. Agenda [always] Aligning RTTT Growth and Value-Added Update 21 st Century Readiness and APPR Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement.
Reaching and Preparing 21st Century Learners
Session Materials  Wiki
A New Era Begins Common Core: The Future Begins Now.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Successful Practices Network Annual Professional Performance Review and CTE Carol Ann Zygo, Field Team Associate of Central And Northern.
Day 9. Agenda Research Update Evidence Collection SLO Summative Help Summative Evaluation Growth-Producing Feedback The Start of the Second.
Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin
Lead Evaluator Training
Ongoing Training Day 1. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
School Improvement Improving what’s happening in the classroom for students with disabilities: instruction & its impact on student learning Systems that.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Day 6. Agenda Just how is this thing supposed to go? Math! Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement and reliability.
Arkansas Teacher Evaluation Pilot Program
Day 8. Agenda Aligning RTTT Growth and Value-Added Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement and reliability Growth-Producing Feedback.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
New Teacher Introduction to Evaluation 08/28/2012.
Ongoing Training Day 4. Agenda Growth and Value-Added Update 21 st Century Readiness and APPR Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement and.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review SLOs: Lessons Learned A Look at Some Evidence Planning School Visits Supporting Principals Closure.
TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING November 1 st, 2012 General Admin Meeting BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources John McKelvey– Teachscape November.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
August 25, 2015 Albany, New York Independent and Peer Evaluation: Making the Work Matter.
Evaluator Workshop for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Rhode Island Model The contents of this training were developed under a Race to the Top grant from.
Day 8. Agenda Aligning RTTT Growth and Value-Added Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement and reliability Growth-Producing Feedback.
August 18, 2015 Rochester, New York Independent and Peer Evaluation: Making the Work Matter.
Evidence-Based Observations Training for Observers of Teachers Module 5 Dr. Marijo Pearson Dr. Mike Doughty Mr. John Schiess Spring 2012.
Ongoing Training Day 3. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Background Agenda Review.
Ongoing Training Day 2. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
This program is supported by a grant awarded by the U.S. Department of Education under Title II, Part D of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (NCLB)
K-12 Technology Literacy Curriculum and Assessment.
Ongoing Training Day 2. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
Day 3. Here We Are: 9 Components 1.New York State Teaching Standards and Leadership Standards 2.Evidence-based observation 3.Application and.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Principal Evaluation: Different? One Year Later Coaching Principals Collect evidence Support your local.
Day 6. Agenda Just how is this thing supposed to go? Math! Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement and reliability “Specific considerations.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research Review Taking Stock Collect evidence Principal Practices & the Rubric End-of-the-Year Looking.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Messaging Research & Literature Article Read Planning Visits (and HW) Artifact Review Support your local.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
It’s Tech Time! Time to review the equipment that you currently have in your classroom. Look through the following files to learn new ways to use this.
Put Your Classroom On A 21 st Century DI-IT Create Engaging Technology Rich Differentiated Classroom Environments Create Engaging Technology Rich Differentiated.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
PlusDelta Panelist -- dynamic, great, like the variety of speakers, good delivery, experienced, related to audience Focus on “what is known, not what is.
APPR: Ready or Not Joan Townley & Andy Greene October 20 and 21, 2011.
Day 9. Agenda Research Update Evidence Collection SLO Summative Help Summative Evaluation Growth-Producing Feedback The Start of the Second.
Day 4. Here We Are: 9 Components 1.New York State Teaching Standards and Leadership Standards 2.Evidence-based observation 3.Application and.
Adapted from guidance presented on August 2013 by Alexandra Pressley, Associate in Education Improvement Services NYSED Local Assistance Plan Schools:
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Principal Evaluation: So far Revised resources Collect evidence from a “faculty meeting” Debrief Planning.
Enumclaw High School August 30, 31 and September 1, 2011.
Mission The Center for Educational Leadership (CEL) is dedicated to eliminating the achievement gap that continues to divide our nation’s children along.
Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013.
Tri City United Public Schools August 6, 2013 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Defining 21st Century Skills: A Frameworks for Norfolk Public Schools NORFOLK BOARD OF EDUCATION Fall 2009.
Learning Management System
Mission Erie 1 BOCES commits to those we serve students, staff and communities by understanding, anticipating and responding to their needs. Administrative.
Middle School Training: Ensuring a Strong Foundation of Supports
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Texts Worth Reading Problems Worth Solving Tests Worth Taking
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Presentation transcript:

August 28, 2015 Long Island Independent and Peer Evaluation: Making the Work Matter

Today’s Plan Making the Work Matter The NYS Teaching and Leadership Standards Inter-rater Reliability Evidenced based observations Application and use of rubrics

A Look to the Future

Surprised meConcerned me Implications for what we do What needs to be a amplified to your staff? 2028

5

Bolman and Deal’s Four Frames

StructuralHuman Resource Political Symbolic The Changes

9 APPR Growth Scores Common Core Budget Opt Out Cuomo SLO’s

10

11

12

13

CULTURECULTURE

15 What can you do to quiet the noise? What can you do to keep the focus on student learning? How will you change what you say and do? How will you change your culture?

It’s all about attitude…

Peer and Outside Evaluator

Welcome to APPR! Which blob best represents you?

New York State Teaching Standards and Leadership Standards Evidence-based observation Application and use of Student Growth Percentile and VA Growth Model data Application and use of the State-approved teacher or principal rubrics Application and use of any assessment tools used to evaluate teachers and principals Application and use of State-approved locally selected measures of student achievement Use of the Statewide Instructional Reporting System Scoring methodology used to evaluate teachers and principals Specific considerations in evaluating teachers and principals of ELLs and students with disabilities Lead Evaluator Training

The observer is NOT the evaluator. The RUBRIC is the evaluator. The observer COLLECTS EVIDENCE. Evidence Based Observation

Specific Objective Data, Data, Data Evidence Based Observation

Description with Judgment “The teacher read from the book, The Giver, which was not at the appropriate level for the class.” “There was too much time on discussion, not enough time on individual work.” “The students conducted a sophisticated lab experiment.”

Specificity of Evidence “Students followed directions in the text to make circuit boards.” What data might make this more specific?

Objectivity/Specificity Matrix Specific and JudgmentalGeneral and Judgmental Specific and DescriptiveGeneral and Descriptive Judgmental Objectivity Descriptive Specific Specificity General Adapted from Learning Walkthrough Guide, MA Dept. of Elementary & Secondary Education.

Objectivity/Specificity Matrix Specific and Judgmental “The teacher read from the book, The Giver, which was not at the appropriate level for the class.” General and Judgmental “There was too much time on discussion, not enough time on individual work.” Specific and Descriptive “Student 1 asked student 2: ‘What are we supposed to write down?’ Student 2 said, ‘I don’t know.’” General and Descriptive “Students followed directions in the text to make circuit boards.” Judgmental Objectivity Descriptive Adapted from Learning Walkthrough Guide, MA Dept. of Elementary & Secondary Education. Specific Specificity General

Opportunity for Practice # EVIDENCE ERROR AMENDED EX: Teacher circulates Not specific Teacher moved to the back of the room and spoke to four students. 1. Teacher responded to off-task behavior respectfully

Mini-Observation

Your Job Write specific and descriptive notes about what you see in the following classroom video, particularly things that align with Standards III, IV, and V.1 OR Domains 2 and 3.

Observation Classroom 1: Classroom 2: DVD

Tuning our Observations Reread your notes from this first classroom observation. Choose three pieces of data and write a correlating evidence statement for each one on three separate sticky notes. Share with a neighbor. Help each other tune the data as necessary.

StandardEvidence Statement III.1 III.2 Evidence Statements

Cognitive Engagement Constructivism 21st Century Skills Rubric Tenets

Creativity and Innovation Critical Thinking and Problem Solving Communication and Collaboration Meet the 21 st Century Skills

Information Literacy Media Literacy ICT (Information, Communications, and Technology) Literacy Meet the 21 st Century Skills

Flexibility and Adaptability Initiative and Self Direction Social and Cross-Cultural Skills Productivity and Accountability Leadership and Responsibility Meet the 21 st Century Skills

I doModeling Direct Instruction We doGuided practice You do together Collaboration You doIndependent Practice Gradual Release of Responsibility and the Rubrics

The Gradual Release of Responsibility: 1.I DO 2.WE DO 3.YOU DO TOGETHER 4.YOU DO Measuring Student Autonomy

Who bares the cognitive burden? The Rubrics Ask:

Use your pen or highlighter to mark words or concepts that delineate between the performance levels. Rubric Analysis

Using your evidence statements and notes, apply the rubric to your observation evidence. Rate the videos

Where does the learning experience fall on the rubric? Evaluate the Learning

Specific and Objective Student Centered Autonomy Opportunity for Practice of 21 st Century Skills Last Thoughts

New York State Standards Jigsaw Activity Groups of 4 #1 Read Knowledge of Content and Instructional Planning #2 Read Instructional Practice and Learning Environment #3 Read Assessment for Student Learning, Professional Responsibilities and Collaboration, and Professional Growth #4 Read Standards for Building and District Leaders

Surprised mePleased me Concerned me Needs to be amplified NYS Standards

Inter-rater Reliability

Perspective Matters

Inter-rater Reliability Requires: ▫ Consistent definition of good teaching ▫ A shared understanding of the definition ▫ Skilled evaluators (Danielson)

Inter-rater Reliability Discuss and reach consensus: ▫ What constitutes great student engagement? ▫ What does quality assessment look like in a lesson? ▫ What makes for strong questioning and discussion prompts?

Inter-rater Reliability Process: ▫ Work on the consistent definition as a school/district, using the rubric ▫ Observe and rate classroom videos together ▫ Use “instructional rounds”, identifying two or three areas only ▫ Conduct joint observations and compare findings

Wrapping it up Need to rememberMust share with others Want to learn more What else? Our Two Days