Town of Plymouth Solid Waste Management Town of Plymouth Department of Public Works November 26, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Resource and Energy Recovery Facility A technological breakthrough that redefines the waste-to-energy category June 26, 2009.
Advertisements

Pay-As-You-Throw Boiler Green Initiative (BGI) EPICS.
Eliot’s PAYT Program July 16 th, 2013 August 13 th, 2013 September 3 rd, 2013.
Barnstable County Commissioners Summary Report Municipal Solid Waste Disposal Alternatives Analysis April 7, 2010.
Jfkdlsafjkdljflkajfklasjfkldsjflkjflksdjflkdsjfldsjfl kjflkjflkdsajflkdsjflkdsjflkdsjflksjfdlksjfdkslfjkl dsjfkldsjfldksjdsklfjkdlsfjdklsjaflkdjskdjfkdlsjk.
Single Stream Recycling Brown-Outagamie-Winnebago Counties City of Oshkosh Common Council, June 10, 2008.
January 20 th, BudgetActual% YTDChange from prior year Ad Valorem Taxes $ 36,469,256$ 27,782, %$ 1,020,143 Sales Taxes 10,781,313 2,638,615.
Prepared by Denese Ballew and Brian Taylor from Land-of-Sky Regional Council Solid Waste Management Study for the Town of Waynesville.
WAUKESHA COUNTY RECYCLING Waukesha County Department of Parks & Land Use.
Wake County Experience with Alternative Landfill Land Use Presented by: John Roberson, P.E. Director of Solid Waste Management Division.
Town of Cape Elizabeth Recycling and Municipal Solid Waste Overview.
San Juan County Solid Waste: Funding. Solid Waste Funding Current Solid Waste Revenue Current Solid Waste Revenue Rate Structure used to collect revenue.
Presented to SWAC February 16, 2012 City of Cleveland Automated Waste Collection And Curbside Recycling Program.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
1.  Purchased 9 Garbage and Recycling Trucks in 2001 for $1.012 million. (Loan paid off in 2006)  $251,440 in Yearly Fleet Maintenance Costs.  City.
Building a Recycling Program Through Innovation and Creativity instead of Big Budgets Financial Sustainability – Recycling in the City.
SMART Waste Management Changing the way Americans value trash.
1 Bringing Curbside Recycling to Delaware A Proposal by: The Recycling Public Advisory Council (RPAC) The Delaware Solid Waste Authority (DSWA) The Department.
Solid Waste Management in Lincoln & Lancaster Co.  Private Waste Collection  Residential Menu of Service  Once or twice/week waste collection  Seasonal.
Property of the Township of Madawaska Valley 2015 MUNICIPAL BUDGET.
Wheelabrator Technologies Inc. A Waste Management Company.
Rural Waste Collection Options Department of Budget and Management 01/21/2014.
PaintCare Paint Stewardship Program Alison Keane, VP, Government Affairs, ACA General Counsel, PaintCare.
City of Loveland Solid Waste Division Diversion Versus Disposal: Determining the Costs Diversion Versus Disposal: Determining the Costs.
Funding Discussion State of Vermont Solid Waste Management Districts and State Programs.
Westford’s Current Solid Waste Program Total costs in FY10 : $1.56 million Trash collection contract with ACME Waste Systems until August 2010 at annual.
City of Fort Collins Department of Natural Resources The Role of Solid Waste Reduction Programs in Climate Protection Plans Annual Conference of Colorado.
1 FY09 Diversion Rates. 2 University City 3 Implementation - Feasibility 5,579 (74%) of University City properties receive municipal trash service $118.
Changing the Way South Carolina Values Trash Kristen Brown – Green Waste Solutions April 10, 2013 Turning waste into new products that can be sold to consumers.
Pay As You Throw – An Incentive Based System Town of West Boylston, MA.
Environmental Science: Toward a Sustainable Future Richard T. Wright
WASTE TAXES Past Taxes and Projected Changes. Solid Waste Operators of Solid Waste facilities and Transfer facilities pay a $6 per ton tipping fee. Vermonters.
Presented by: Pechanga Environmental Department Designing and Managing a Recycling Program Source Reduction Strategies for Tribal Solid Waste Programs.
SOLID WASTE ADVISORY COMMITTEE March 23-24, 2010 What is a Waste Reduction Program?
WTE & Recycling in Massachusetts Municipal Waste Management Association October 22, 2003 Shawn Worster Executive Director, NESWC Director, KEMA- Xenergy,
Let’s Talk Trash Reducing Solid Waste and Increasing Recycling LVW Public Forum November 20, 2008 Presented by Brooke Nash, MassDEP.
Department of Solid Waste Management FY11 Budget Update Mayor’s Report Harry J. Hayes, Director January 19, 2011.
DSM E NVIRONMENTAL S ERVICES, I NC. Analysis of Enhanced Residential Recycling System for New Castle County Prepared for the Delaware Recycling Public.
Recycling Revenue Fund Department of Solid Waste Management.
ENTERPRISE FUND City of Springfield Trash Fee. FY12 Solid Waste Services Includes: Weekly Trash Collection Bi-Weekly Recycling Collection Bi-Weekly Curbside.
The Future of HHW: How Collection, Education and Product Stewardship Can Work Together Jim Quinn Metro Solid Waste and Recycling Department Portland, Oregon.
Utilities Department Solid Waste Transfer Station Update December 1, 2009.
County and Municipal Solid Waste Programs in Colorado David Snapp Environmental Protection Specialist Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment.
1 11/8/ Waste Pro of South Carolina and Greenspace Louis J. Diaz Region Vice President South Carolina and Coastal Georgia.
Show Me the Measures: Performance Measures for Environmental Services City of San Diego, CA Elmer Heap, Director Environmental Services Department.
Board of County Commissioners October 16, 2012 Solid Waste Study Update.
Kindersley Waste & Recycle: Landfill Impacts SWANA Regional Waste Management Workshop November 16, 2015 – Saskatoon, SK.
Department Mission 2 The mission of the Department of Solid Waste Management is to provide cost effective environmentally sound and safe solid waste management.
California Integrated Waste Management Board January 12, 2009 Long-Term Postclosure Maintenance And Corrective Action AB 2296 Consulting Group Workshop.
Region 2000 Solid Waste Management Initiative January 18, 2007 Virginia’s Region 2000 Local Government Council Briefing Region 2000 Solid Waste Management.
FY 2015/16 Financial Overview Revenues: Operating revenues for FY 2015/16 are projected to be approximately $116,550 or 1.6% higher than operating revenues.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall, Inc.. From Landfill to School.
G enesee County: Material Recovery Facility Feasibility Study Michigan State University UP 494: Planning Practicum April 29th, 2016 Vincent Chen Hank Hong.
Solid Waste Study Board of County Commissioners March 20, 2012 Orange County.
1 REFUSE AND RECYCLING STUDY COLLECTION ALTERNATIVES AND COST COMPARISONS May 18, 2009.
Solid Waste Proposal Options Council Workshop March 5, 2014.
Solid Waste Draft AMP 2018/2021.
Portsmouth Solid Waste Disposal Critical Decisions
Division of Solid Waste
Pay-as-You-Throw for Kingston MA
Annual Round Up Recycling Events
Curbside Waste Collection on Private Roads
Developing a MRF Public-Private Partnership in the City of Dallas
Mecklenburg County Solid Waste FY 2018.
2017 Total Revenues were: $9,165, Revenues by program:
Central Elgin Waste Management Service Delivery
Solid Waste Department Rate Stabilization Plan Recommendation
Public Works Department October 2016
SWAC – Agenda 10/23/18 Chapter 6 – Alternative Technology – Draft Findings 2. Chapter 7 – Draft Landfill Disposal Existing Disposal System Disposal Options.
City of Chelan Recycling Options
Presentation transcript:

Town of Plymouth Solid Waste Management Town of Plymouth Department of Public Works November 26, 2012

Solid Waste Management Town Management’s Goals Are To: Reduce Tonnage Increase Recycling Provide Superior Customer Service to Users Sustain the Environment Greatest Net Effect on users

Historical Perspective - Evolution The ‘old days’ - Incinerated trash in your barrel(s) in your backyard Installation of designated dump sites Mandatory ‘capping’ of dumpsite(s) Conversion of dump sites to transfer station facilities

Historical Perspective - Evolution {Continued …} Expansion of transfer station services - Addition of Cedarville to serve residents, affording three (3) waste disposal destinations-Go where you want to go! Fast Forward to  Introduction / Acceptance / Rescinding a Pay-As-You- Throw (PAYT) Initiative - “Kicking the proverbial can down the street”

Today - Existing Program Logistics - Physical Plant The Town owns and operates three (3) residential transfer stations (sticker required): – South Street/Long Pond Road *(90 Tons/day) – Manomet/Beaver Dam Road *(50 Tons/day) – Cedarville/Hedges Pond Road *(49 Tons/day) NOTE: The Town operates all recycling. Southeastern Massachusetts Resource Recovery Facility (SEMASS) operates South Street trash.

Today - Existing Program Service - Fee Base Users Transfer Stations – Sticker Fees - Trending Down (see Financials) – Recycling - Minimal Effectiveness – Capital Improvements/Environmental Needs

Today - Existing Program Waste Disposal - Tonnage Transfer Stations - Aggregate Trash Tonnage Calendar Year 2011= 10, Tons ($228,000) 2015= 10, Tons ($657,000) Recycling - Current Levels … Future Efforts

Why Now? South Street Landfill/Transfer Station Disposition  MADEP - ‘Capping’  County - Lease Expiration Tipping Fees – SEMASS Contract Expiration Service Provision - Inadequate Environmental/Financial Goals  Reduce Tonnage  Increase Recycling

Why Now? {Continued …} Changing Solid Waste Climate  Regulatory Constraints  Rapid Technology Advancement Reduction in Total Usage  Declining Number(s) of Users - Fewer Stickers Sold

Options for Managing Solid Waste & Recycling Option 1: Curbside Pickup Option 2: Three Transfer Stations – Status Quo Option 3: Three Transfer Stations – with PAYT Option 4: One Combined Transfer Station – with PAYT Option 5: Curbside Pickup Private Subscription - Plymouth gets out of solid waste business Note: For purposes of this presentation we are not demonstrating the cost / revenues of the Difficult to Manage Facility and / or keeping one site open for recycling only.

Options for Managing Solid Waste & Recycling – Assumptions & Estimates Curbside: – # Households Serviced – 10,000 gradually increasing to 18,000 in year 7 of a 10 year contract – New Tipping Fee – Starting at $65 per ton in 2015 and increasing every year by $5 to a max of $100 per ton – Disposal Tons decreasing 10% annually from 1.29 to.79 per household due to single stream recycling – a 40% overall decrease – Curbside Contract Escalator 3% – Budget Multiplier 2.5% for Costs to Provide Program

Options for Managing Solid Waste & Recycling – Assumptions & Estimates Three Transfer Stations – Status Quo: – Replace South Street with new Transfer Station for $1 million in 2015 amortized over a 10 year period – Budget Increase for Labor and Equipment due to SEMASS Contract Expiring – # Households – Decreasing based on historical trends from 9,166 to 7,138 over the 10 year period – New Tipping Fee – Starting at $65 per ton in 2015 and increasing every year by $5 to a max of $100 per ton – Disposal Tonnage will remain consistent – Recycling Revenues will remain consistent – Budget Multiplier 2.5%

Options for Managing Solid Waste & Recycling – Assumptions & Estimates – Three Transfer Stations - PAYT: – Replace South Street with new Transfer Station for $1 million in 2015 amortized over a 10 year period – Budget Increase for Labor and Equipment due to SEMASS Contract Expiring – # Households – Decreasing based on historical trends from 9,166 to 7,138 over the 10 year period – New Tipping Fee – Starting at $65 per ton in 2015 and increasing every year by $5 to a max of $100 per ton – Disposal Tons decreasing 10% annually from 1.29 to.79 per household due to recycling – a 40% overall decrease – Average User – Recycling Revenues will increase based on Increased Recycling – Budget Multiplier 2.5% – PAYT Bags – Price is designed to cover the cost of the bag and the tipping fee; therefore starts out at $1.25 per 30 gallon bag with 2 incremental increases in the 10 year period up to $1.75 per bag.

Status of South St. Landfill South Street Transfer Station accepts 60% of Town’s municipal solid waste. South Street is centrally located, traffic and safety (corner lot no longer option) January 1, 2015 – County negotiations/SEMASS DEP-Draft Administrative Consent Order Conclusion – temporary or permanent – closing is imminent

Environmental Goals Waste prevention Increasing recycling rates Reducing illegal dumping Litter cleanup Protecting our natural resources through environmental stewardship Carbon Footprint

Coming to a Recommendation Find a Solution with no Preconceived Notion Staff research leans to Curbside Independent opinion is Curbside Selectmen, Town Meeting, users Town Manager’s Advisory Group “Convey a message so people can make an informed decision” Full understanding of all assumptions, data, and costs to compare and contrast options, convey information Educational Outreach – looking for feedback

Curbside Pickup Question & Answer Sheet (long driveway, icy conditions, rural roads) Brochure Further outreach (group or individual) Ancillary Benefits – Estimated savings to each resident of $125-$252/year* in costs for transportation to the transfer stations. – Provide solution to problem of South St transfer station closure due to landfill capping and expiring lease – Staff from closed transfer stations will be reassigned within DPW. – *based on 5 – 10 miles round trip and 48.5 cents/mile

Final Goal – Provide You with the Best Option that Most Closely Meets Goals Reduction in what goes into the solid waste stream Increase in recycling Customer Service and Satisfaction Sustain the Environment Provide service to the greatest number of residents