CIOPORA International Community of Breeders of Asexually Reproduced Ornamental and Fruit Tree Varieties Regional Seminar on Enforcement of Plant Variety.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
4th Poverty Reduction Strategies Forum Athens, June 27 th, 2007 Regional Energy market in Southeast Europe: Prospects and challenges for the SEE countries.
Advertisements

A vision is…. NOT a dream NOT a forecast NOT an objective.
Managing Intellectual Property Assets in International Business Anil Sinha, Counsellor, SMEs Division World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)
Discrimination and victimisation challenges for migrant integration ‘Integration is a dynamic, two-way process of mutual interaction requiring a greater.
Sport The fight against homophobia the EU Dimension and the role of sport Bart Ooijen Sport Unit DG Education and Culture European Commission Utrecht,
1 What is the Actual State of CSR in the EU-10? Summary of experiences on the situation of CSR in the EU-10 Pavel Franc Programme GARDE The Environmental.
1 Rule of Law: Implementing a Comprehensive and Integrated Approach in Prevention and Fight against Corruption in the Danube Region, Pravetz May.
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Information exchange and law enforcement agencies LEGISLATION AND PRACTICE Jinan, China, June 2013.
Information culture – cultural information Partner in the creative industry Katalin Hegedűs Hungarian Institute for Culture and Arts 04/05/ 2007 Berlin.
Our education, employment and youth entrepreneurship Wiesbaden, November 2008 The future belongs to us – how shall we handle it? Working group 2.
Introduction What is the issue? What do people say for/against the issue? What do people say for/against the issue? How I researched the topic What results.
Ornamental plant production and varieties legal protection in Poland Mieczysław Grzesik, Adam Marosz Research Institute of Pomology and Floriculture, Skierniewice,
The involvement of patients in Health Technology Assessment Andrzej Rys Director Health and Consumers Directorate-General Brussels 18 May 2010.
Intellectual Property in the Context of Growth and Development of the World Economy Luciano Daffarra, Attorney at Law Daffarra, d’Addio & Partners China-Italy.
Slovenia One of very few EU countries without a special legal regulation of that topic  Why? Other possibilities? EU Directive on AR for Consumer Disputes.
Ministerstwo Gospodarki Counterfeiting and other problems in plant protection products marketing (presentation of ) Zbigniew Barszcz Department.
Eli Mufisovski SNB-REACT Balkan Skopje 1 April 2009 European Anti – Counterfeiting Network.
IP Policy and its linkages with Economic, Science & Technology Policies Muhammad Ismail Deputy Director IPO-Pakistan October 09, 2013 IN THE NAME OF ALLAH,
Subregional Capacity-Building Seminar on the Commercialization and Enforcement of Intellectual Property Skopje, FYR Macedonia, 1-3 April 2009 Prepared.
IP LAW AND ADMINISTRATION IN TANZANIA Presented by: Leonila Kishebuka Deputy Registrar, Business Registrations and Licensing Agency [BRELA],
Equality Authority Input to Congress Seminar on funding for education and training Carole Sullivan Head of the Equality Mainstreaming Unit, Equality Authority.
 Subventions from state or commune  Assistance measures (run by western countries to support less developed countries)  Funds from budget of European.
C ONSUMER LAW IN S ERBIA : FROM L AW ON PAPER TO L AW IN ACTION Prof. Dr. Thierry B OURGOIGNIE Team Leader, Key Legal Expert Belgrade, December 14, 2011.
1 THE THIRD ENERGY PACKAGE – THE ENERGY COMMUNITY APPROACH Energy Community Secretariat 20 th Forum of the Croatian Energy Association and WEC National.
NOIP: Challenges and Strategies IPRTA forum Mexico City, July 9-11, 2008 Pham Phi Anh Deputy Director General National Office of Intellectual Property.
A project implemented by the HTSPE consortium This project is funded by the European Union SECURITY AND CITIZENSHIP JUSTICE
University of Leicester Careers Service Student Engagement Team PR session Sponsorship for Amateur Community Sports Clubs Louise Holland Holland Alexander.
A high-level and hands-on approach for organizations to deal with counterfeiting and piracy. Jan Corstens WIPO Moscow
Competition, consumers & affordable prices in liberalised energy markets J. Minor, European Commission, Director, Consumer Affairs IV World Forum on Energy.
Fair competition commission 1 Fifth Annual African Dialogue Consumer Protection Conference September 10-12, 2013 ● Livingstone, Zambia Empowering and Educating.
European Commission Taxation and Customs Union Background of the initiatives on electronic data exchange in WB Region Karel De Greve DGTAXIUD SEED and.
By Renata Jaruseviciute 1 ©Renata Jaruseviciute.  Financial Crime definition & types  Regulatory body  Legislation  Questions to be asked yourself.
Moving Forward With the African Dialogue Cross-Border Principles By Mary Gurure Manager, Legal Services and Compliance COMESA Competition Commission Lilongwe,
Key Barriers for the ICT Research Sector in Serbia, and Recommendations for Future EU- Serbia Collaboration Miodrag Ivkovic, ISS Milorad Bjeletic, BOS.
Chapter 6 International crime. In this chapter, you will study the concept of international crime. You will be introduced to the main categories of international.
“Commercialization and enforcement of intellectual property rights” - Skopje, April 2009 UNECE ‘Recommendation M’ on the Use of Market Surveillance.
A project implemented by the HTSPE consortium This project is funded by the European Union SECURITY AND CITIZENS SECURITY AND CITIZENSHIP CONSUMER
EuropeAid CoR seminar Brussels, 24 September 2008 Thematic Programme Non State Actors & Local Authorities in Development (Art. 14 DCI Regulation) EuropeAid.
8. Annual WIPO Forum on Intellectual Property and SMEs for Intellectual Property Offices and Other Relevant Institutions in the OECD Countries 04-05/10/2010,
European Commission Camilla SANDVIK DG SANCO / G/ 3 The European Union and Nutrition Presentation at European Health Forum, Gastein 26 September 2002 Camilla.
EU perspective on occupational health and safety - role and place of unions Károly György Kiev, December December Károly György, MSZOSZ.
POLICE OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC NATIONAL DRUG HEADQUARTERS CRIMINAL POLICE AND INVESTIGATION SERVICE Beograd,
EU Funding opportunities : Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme Justice Programme Jose Ortega European Commission DG Justice.
1 Building the Privacy culture, starts with the youngsters and their education 20 th and 21 st June 2013 Zagreb, Croatia.
A project implemented by the HTSPE consortium This project is funded by the European Union SECURITY AND CITIZENSHIP PERICLES
Chapter 2 Legal Aspects of Investigation © 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. LEARNING OBJECTIVES Explain the historical evolution.
COMPARABLE EU STATISTICS ON CRIME, VICTIMISATION AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE Political Background Elements of an Action Plan European Commission Directorate-General.
Public awareness initiatives by the UOKiK Warsaw,
SNB - REACT Business Perspective IPR Protection April 1, 2009 Presentation Eli Mufisovski.
16-17 November 2005 COSCAP – NA Project Steering Group Guangzhou, China 1 Co-operating with the European Aviation safety Agency.
Public Administration Reform and Anti-Corruption Community of Practice SURVEY RESULTS Europe and the CIS May 2005.
WARSAW May 2006 Seminar on Enforcement of Property Variety Rights.
Vienna Music Business Research Days The Proposal of the EU Commission for a Directive on Collecting Societies and Cultural Diversity – a Missed Opportunity.
Slovenian Intellectual Property Office helping you protect your intellectual property Enforcement of IPR in Slovenia at present (as seen from the Slovenian.
PROSAFE Project: Best Practice Market Surveillance Dirk Meijer Chairman of PROSAFE PROSAFE PROJECT Best Practice Market Surveillance Funded by the European.
IPeuropAware and Sectoral IPR Guides Dr Agnieszka Turynska University of Alicante 1 Geneva, 15 th September 2009, WIPO.
A policy must be Realistic Within control Within resources (sustainable) Measurable Owned by the organisation (ownership)
Enforcement of PVR in the Ornamental Sector The Growers Point of View Balázs Hamar Hungarian Chamber of Agriculture AIPH Warsaw, 12.May 2006.
Unit 3 Seminar International Issues in IP Law. Unit 3 – International Issues in IP Law Unit 3 will focus on Chapters 8, 16 & 21 –Make sure to download.
Competition Law and its Application: European Union
Patent Office Responsibilities in Technology Transfer
The OHIM Sabina Rusconi, institutional affairs and external relations department, OHIM Roving Seminar on the Conmunity Trade Mark System in China,
IP Awareness and Enforcement: Modular Based Actions for SMEs
Business benefits and advantages of protecting intellectual property
SafeSurfing Module 5 September 2016.
Regional Seminar on Enforcement of Plant Variety Rights
Securing free and fair European elections
The European Anti-Corruption Report
Improving information exchange:
Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights in the Community Benoît Lory European Commission, DG Internal Market and Services Enforcement of Intellectual.
Presentation transcript:

CIOPORA International Community of Breeders of Asexually Reproduced Ornamental and Fruit Tree Varieties Regional Seminar on Enforcement of Plant Variety Rights Warsaw, Poland 11 and 12 May 2006

THE NEEDS OF THE BREEDERS IN THE ENFORCEMENT OF THEIR RIGHTS Andrea Mansuino Chairman of the Anti-Infringement CIOPORA Working Group

THE NEEDS OF THE BREEDERS IN THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE RIGHTS TOPICS: 1- Enforcement of P.B.Rights in the EU, general comments 2- What breeders are doing individually 3- What breeders are doing collectively (CIOPORA Anti Infringement Working Group) 4- Main types of infringement 5- The main needs of the breeders

THE NEEDS OF THE BREEDERS IN THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE RIGHTS GENERAL COMMENTS:  The registration and maintenance of the breeders’ rights is, of course, responsibility of the breeders  The active defense of own IP rights is, of course, responsibility of the titleholders  The active and efficient enforcement of the breeders’ rights legislation is, of course, responsibility of the competent authorities  Titleholders must be (more) pro-active in the protection of their rights, but the Protection Offices, the customs authorities, the police authorities and investigation services, the judicial authorities, in two words ALL AUTHORITIES ENVOLVED IN THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE LAW should at all levels create the perfect conditions for making the PBR enforcement really effective.  Therefore, we believe that the enforcement of the rights is a SHARED RESPONSABILITY between titleholders and authorities.

THE NEEDS OF THE BREEDERS IN THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE RIGHTS Is the European Union a paradise for the breeders? In fact, the EU can be considered one of the places, maybe THE PLACE all over the world, where breeders’ rights are best protected and enforced. We do have good PBR directives, good customs directives, a (very) efficient registration office, a reasonable dialogue between all parties involved, a strong historic background in favour of IP rights (especially in western countries), a reasonable culture of IP also in the field of agriculture (s.a.a.), an increasing awareness of PBR rights in the ornamentals and fruit industry. But, of course, there is still a lot of room for improvement. Let me briefly explain what we, breeders, are doing for the protection of our rights and what needs do we have in order to improve this activity.

THE NEEDS OF THE BREEDERS IN THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE RIGHTS What we,individual breeders, are doing for the protection of our rights: 1. Real genetic improvement 2. Registration of IP rights 3. Advertisement and promotion of our products and our rights 4. Fair competition and fair licensing 5. Monitoring and control in the market (at customs, auctions and markets, growers and nurseries, traders, etc.) 6. Active protection and fight against infringement, by chasing, warning, summoning, attacking infringers, out of court and in court when necessary.

THE NEEDS OF THE BREEDERS IN THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE RIGHTS What we,breeders, are doing collectively in our organisation: the Anti Infringement activity of CIOPORA.  CIOPORA has established an Anti Infringement Working Group in April,  The WG has raised extremely high interest and participation among the members: the enforcement of rights is definitely a top priority for the breeders today.  On such basis, CIOPORA has decided to add Anti Infringement to its top priorities.

THE NEEDS OF THE BREEDERS IN THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE RIGHTS MAIN LINES OF ACTION OF THE ANTI INFRINGEMENT ACTIVITY OF CIOPORA ANTI PIRACY FUND: CIOPORA will fund Anti Infringement activities of the organisation; also specific funds will be raised for targeted activities. COMMUNICATION CAMPAIGN: CIOPORA will start a campaign at different communication levels in order to create awareness and involvement in the industry for the plants’ breeders rights and their enforcement. INTERNAL NETWORK: CIOPORA intends to establish a specific address and an internal forum on the website, in order to establish and develop an information flow among breeders and between the breeders’ community and the industry. WHITE PAPER ON INFRINGEMENT: CIOPORA will develop a vademecum for its members including juridical analysis and information on the state of PBRs worldwide and practical indications on the enforcement of rights. JOINT ACTIONS: CIOPORA will develop a strategy for the coordination and facilitation of actions against infringers to be undertaken by groups of members having specific common targets.

THE NEEDS OF THE BREEDERS IN THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE RIGHTS MAIN AREAS OF PBR INFRINGEMENT:  COMMERCIAL INTRODUCTION OF EDVs BY SPORT FINDERS without the consent of the titleholder of the initial variety  UNAUTHORISED PROPAGATION, PRODUCTION AND/OR SALE OF PLANTS OR PARTS OF PLANTS OF PROTECTED VARIETIES  IMPORT OF PLANTS OR PARTS OF PLANTS INTO THE EU COMING FROM UNAUTHORISED SOURCES  TRADE OF PLANTS OR PARTS OF PLANTS INSIDE THE EU COMING FROM UNAUTHORISED SOURCES

THE NEEDS OF THE BREEDERS IN THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE RIGHTS What are the main needs of the breeders : 1. LESS BUREAUCRACY, MORE EFFICIENCY A more concrete and practical approach from the authorities involved in the registration and enforcement of IP rights is fundamental. Too many times, still, breeders face a theoretical and bureaucratic attitude that increases the distance between the rights on paper and their effectiveness in everyday‘s business. We must be in the position to make efficient controls, fast actions, effective seizures.

THE NEEDS OF THE BREEDERS IN THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE RIGHTS 2. ADEQUATE ATTENTION TO OUR RIGHTS Still too many times we face situations where the people in charge of the enforcement of the rights don‘t take us seriously enough- „here are those flower guys..“ We understand that IP infringement, especially on flowers, is obviously felt as a „minor“ crime when compared to theft, drugs and „mafia activities“ (at least we hear this in Italy...) but no doubt that the phenomenon is increasing and becoming a problem for the international horticulture business, and also one of the main fields of investment and money laundry for the big criminal organizations worldwide. It should not be underestimated. We need to get a resolute and proactive spirit of service and support from the competent authorities for our fight against infringement.

THE NEEDS OF THE BREEDERS IN THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE RIGHTS 3. AWARENESS AND KNOWLEDGE Still the flower business and especially the fact that flowers and fruits are „protected by a sort of patent“ is not well known and understood. For sure, there is a strong need of more awareness and acknowledgement of the specific problems of the breeders‘ rights at all levels, from the investigation and judicial authorities to the whole flower industry including the final consumers. The same as in shoes, software and many other IP added value products, also in flowers and fruits breeders expect to find adequate sensibilization and authoritative divulgation of the culture of IP rights in the flower world, especially from those national or community authorities that specifically deal with IP rights, breeders‘ rights and horticulture.

THE NEEDS OF THE BREEDERS IN THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE RIGHTS 4. TO SET UP A SYSTEM One of the main problems encountered by breeders in the fight against infringement is that the size of individual infringing episodes is relatively small (one shipment of 3000 roses, one illegal grower with carnation plants, etc.). Neither titleholders nor the authorities can reasonably detect and chase such a diffused and fragmented phenomenon of illegality, unless specific systems and procedures are set up and executed by the competent authorities. This is possible and actual with the customs authorities, we‘ve done it in e.g. Portugal and UK, but it should be developed in all EU countries.

THE NEEDS OF THE BREEDERS IN THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE RIGHTS CONCLUSIONS: 1. The enforcement of breeders’ rights is a shared responsibility between breeders and authorities 2. Breeders’ rights in the EU are quite safe, on paper 3. The breeders, both individually and through their organization (CIOPORA) are more and more active in the protection of their rights 4. There are still many areas of infringement to be defeated 5. Breeders ask the competent authorities to have a less bureaucratic approach, to be more practical and proactive, to devote higher and more adequate attention to breeders’ rights, to increase their knowledge and to support awareness of the breeders’ rights, to set up a common and effective system throughout the EU for the enforcement of breeders’ rights. 6. FOR BREEDERS, BREEDERS’ RIGHTS ARE NOT JUST A PIECE OF PAPER. I AM SURE THAT YOU ALL SHARE OUR VIEW AND TOGETHER WE WILL WORK IN ORDER TO ACTUALLY ENFORCE THE RIGHTS THAT HAVE BEEN GRANTED UNDER THE SKIES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION.

THANK YOU HELP US CREATING FLOWERS AND FRUITS FOR YOUR HAPPINESS!