Principal Professional Learning Team August 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
March 6-7, 2012 Waterfront Hotel - Morgantown, WV Federal Programs Spring Directors Conference Developing Federal Programs of Excellence.
Advertisements

In August, the historic CORE district waiver was approved allowing these districts to pursue a new robust and holistic accountability model for schools.
AYP to AMO – 2012 ESEA Update January 20, 2013 Thank you to Nancy Katims- Edmonds School District for much of the content of this presentation Ben Gauyan.
IMPLICATIONS FOR KENTUCKY’S SCHOOLS AND DISTRICTS SUPERINTENDENTS’ WEBCAST MARCH 6, 2012 NCLB Waiver Flexibility 1.
BIE Flexibility Request Summary of Key Provisions Bureau of Indian Education U.S. Department of the Interior.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
State and Federal Accountability Directors of Special Education October 10, 2013 Region One Education Service Center Office of School Improvement, Accountability,
MSIP 5 Becky Odneal October 27, Education Link Consulting2 Background on MSIP 5 Rule  , first MSIP 5  March 2011, MSIP 5 rule approved.
Franklin Public Schools MCAS Presentation November 27, 2012 Joyce Edwards Director of Instructional Services.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER RENEWAL Overview of Proposed Renewal March 6, 2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Monthly Conference Call With Superintendents and Charter School Administrators.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVERS Gayle Pauley Assistant Superintendent Special Programs and Federal Accountability
Alaska’s New Accountability System for Schools 1.
Kansas accreditation is:  1.A school improvement plan  2.An external assistance team  3.Local assessments aligned with state standards  4.Teachers.
A New School Accountability Model. Draft – March Check for Updates to this Presentationhttp://
Overview of the Idaho Five Star Rating System Dr. TJ Bliss Director of Assessment and Accountability
Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.
January 19, :00 – 10:00 a.m. ET 1. Changes to Kentucky’s ESEA Waiver Request Required by USDOE Affecting 703 KAR 5:222, Categories for Recognition,
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
Teacher Development and Evaluation Model October 22, 2012.
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
School Progress Index 2012 Results Mary Gable- Assistant State Superintendent Division of Academic Policy Carolyn Wood - Assistant State Superintendent.
LOUISIANA STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION JOHN WHITE Tracking Readiness: Measuring High School Effectiveness in Louisiana National Conference on Student.
WBCSD District Strategic Goals Update August 10, 2015.
STATE CONSORTIUM ON EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS September 10, 2013.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
Spring 2015 Smarter Balanced (SBA) and Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) update September
2012 MASSP SPRING CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1 March 27, 2012.
Wisconsin’s School Report Cards October Agenda 2017 Standards & Instruction –W–What and how should kids learn? Assessments and Data Systems –H–How.
End of Course Assessments School Year English Language Arts, Math, Biology, and Government.
Marshall Public Schools World’s Best Workforce September 2014.
The Professional Learning and Evaluation Model. Missouri Essential Principles of Effective Evaluation Measures educator performance against research-based,
Program Improvement/ Title I Parent Involvement Meeting October 9, :00 p.m. Redwood City School District.
July,  Congress hasn’t reauthorized Elementary & Secondary Education Act (ESEA), currently known as No Child Left Behind (NCLB)  U.S. Department.
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING OVERVIEW IU 5. CHAPTER 4 - STANDARDS Effective March 1, 2014 PA Core Standards English Language Arts (ELA) Mathematics Reading.
1 Requirements for Focus Schools Contractors’ Meeting March 4, 2013 Presenter: Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D.
ESEA Flexibility Waiver Florida’s Proposal November 14,
SIGNIFICANCE OF MAP SCORES PRESENTED BY DR. LEIGH ANNE TAYLOR KNIGHT SOURCE: Linda Lacy – Consultant UMKC Regional Professional Development Center SEPTEMBER.
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
Building Capacity to Support High Quality Instruction Ryan Saxe, Title I Coordinator Office of Federal Programs.
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
Public School Accountability System. Background One year ago One year ago –100 percent proficiency required in –AMOs set to increase 7-12 points.
Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting
Welcome to Abbett Elementary! Curriculum Night 2015.
1 1 Next Generation School Assessment and Accountability Thursday, November 17, 2011 Draft - July 13, 2011.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
2012 MOASBO SPRING CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1 April 26, 2012.
March 30, 2012 Marriott Hotel- Charleston, WV Committee of Practitioners Developing Federal Programs of Excellence.
Updates from the Office of Human Resources/Accountability September 13, 2011.
Tift County High School ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING SY16 Tap Knowledge – Capture Wisdom - Harness Talents -Sculpt Minds.
APR 2014 Report: Data, Analysis and Action Plan for Full Accreditation.
Erlanger-Elsmere Independent Schools Assessment Results.
Assessment and Accountability Update Longbranch Elementary School September 27,
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
State of Alaska House Finance Subcommittee Department of Education and Early Development July 25, 2013.
1 1 Assessment and Accountability Tuesday, November 1, 2011 Draft - July 13, 2011.
Objectives Define what Title I is and why it is important to be a Title I school Highlight your rights as a Title I parent Describe ways you can be involved.
Where Are We Now? ESSA signed into law December 10, 2015
Indiana Area School District
TESTING, RESEARCH & ACCOUNTABILITY
Bennett County School District
Erie 2 Regional Curriculum Council March 14, 2012
Accountability in ESSA: Setting the Context
KAESP 2012 Spring Retreat April 2, /15/2018.
Inaugural Meeting - September 14, 2012
2013 RCAS Summative Assessment Report
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
WAVE Presentation on Draft ESSA Plan.
Maryland State Board of Education October 25, 2011
Presentation transcript:

Principal Professional Learning Team August 2012

Welcome The mission of the Parkway School District is to ensure all students are capable, curious and confident learners who understand and respond to the challenges of an ever- changing world.

Norms for Working Together  Listen to understand  Mission focused  Well-planned agenda  Active and respectful participation

Essential Question Mission Accomplished - Parkway 2016 “How do we get from here to there?”

Agenda  Welcome  Review Norms  Professional Learning Communities  Evaluation Model  Attendance Policy  NCLB Waiver

Building Community Stand Up, Hand Up, Pair Up Find someone you don’t usually work with Share your favorite summer vacation memory OR what you did this summer

Starting a Movement Movement

Focus Question: Question Storm  Write 3 – 5 Questions on Post-It Notes  With your table sort your questions into categories and label the categories  What is the most important question your table would like answered?

Professional Learning and Evaluation Model

Attendance Policy

NCLB Waiver  Implements higher academic standards  Creates one state system of accountability  Allows for flexible Title 1 spending  Focuses on school improvement  Improves teacher evaluation system

ESEA Flexibility Waiver Principle 1: College and Career Ready Expectations for All Students Principle 2: State Developed Differentiated Recognition, Accountability and Support Principle 3: Supporting Effective Instruction and Leadership

Principle 1: College and Career Readiness Core Academic Standards  Common Core State Standards  Next Generation Science Standards  Career Education Standards  Updated Standards Health/PE Health/PE World Language World Language Fine Arts Fine Arts Guidance and Counseling Guidance and Counseling Social Studies Social Studies

Assessment Consortiums  Smarter Balance  Dynamic Learning MAPS (replacing MAP A)  ASSETS  Technology Readiness * State Funding * State Funding

Prior AYP AMOs - ALL MathematicsEnglish Language Arts Year AMO %83.7% %91.8% %

Flexibility from Ineffectual Identification of Schools

2012 Annual Measurable Objectives  Gap Group  Reporting as Gap Group for accountability  Reporting of student groups for district/school planning  Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs)  Set through 2020  Increase by 25% *Complete chart on assessment webpage

AMO for 2012 AMO for 2012  ELA  Total 56.2%  Gap Group 44.21%  Math  Total 56.4%  Gap Group 44.78%

School Classifications  Based on Gap Group scores  Reward  Focus  Priority  Support

Schools Receiving Title 1 Funds  School Choice  Supplemental Educational Services  School Improvement Plans  Flexibility of funds  School Improvement Plan

EOC Testing in Middle School  End-of-course scores used for accountability the year test is administered  Proficient Algebra I score prior to 9 th grade = must take Algebra II end-of-course  Non-proficient Algebra I prior to 9 th grade = must participate in Algebra I or Algebra II in high school  Algebra I end-of-course prior to 9 th grade may replace grade-level assessment (timing will be tricky)

Principle 3: Supporting Effective Instruction and Leadership

Essential Principles of Effective Evaluation  Measure educator against research-based proven practices associated with the improvement of student performance.  Use multiple ratings to differentiate levels of performance.  Highlights a probationary period of adequate duration to ensure sufficient induction and socialization support for new teachers and leaders.  Includes measures of growth in student learning as a significant part of the evaluation of professional practice at all levels.

Essential Principles of Effective Evaluation  Provides ongoing, timely, deliberate and meaningful feedback on performance relative to research-based targets.  Requires standardized, periodic training for evaluators to ensure reliability and accuracy  Utilizes the results and data to inform decisions regarding personnel, employment determinations and policy regarding employment

Next Steps  Committee to evaluate alignment and make recommendation  Participate in state level evaluation of state model  Finalize plan this coming winter

Connection to MSIP Cycle 5  August 1st (today): MSIP 4 th Cycle APR (SECURE)  August 8th: Re-publish refreshed MSIP 4 th Cycle APR  August 14 th : Final MSIP 4 th Cycle APR Public  October 1 st (tentative): MSIP Cycle 5 Draft  December 3 rd : Draft MSIP Cycle 5 publicly posted

Highlights of MSIP Cycle 5  Academic Achievement  Subgroup Achievement  College and Career Readiness  Attendance Rate  Graduation Rate

Academic Achievement  Multiple Measures  Status – 3 Year  Progress – Gap Group Reduction  Growth Model  Goal: Cut Gap Group in Half by 2020

College and Career Ready  Percentage of students at or above state standard on ACT, SAT, ASVAB, COMPASS  District’s average composite on above assessments  Percent of graduates who participate  Percentage of students who earned qualifying score on AP, IB, Technical Skills Assessment and/or receive college credit  Percentage of students who attend post secondary or military within 6 months  Percentage of students who complete career education programs within 6 months All require to meet or exceed standard or demonstrates required growth

 Graduate File  Unduplicated Count  Highest Score  No Full-Academic Year  Status  Progress

Attendance  Individual Student Attendance Rate  90% personal attendance to get points in formula  3 year rolling average  Progress - % increase

Graduation Rate  Five Year Adjusted Cohort Rate for accountability  Status  Progress  Four Year Adjusted Cohort for reporting

Accreditation Levels  Accredited with Distinction: 90 – 100%  Estimated 109 districts (20.9%)  Accredited : 70 – 89%  Estimated 355 districts (68.1%)  Provisional: 50 – 69%  Estimated 50 districts (9.6%)  Unaccredited: 0 -49%  Estimated 7 districts (1.4%)

Want more?  Let Nathan and me know… we will offer some sessions!  I know you can’t wait!

Next Steps  Review of Data  Public Relations

Questions