Care and Risk Management (CARM) in Practice Stewart Simpson Practice Development Advisor Centre for Youth and Criminal Justice (CYCJ) www.cycj.org.uk developing,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MANAGING PERSONALITY DISORDERED SEXUAL OFFENDERS IN THE COMMUNITY A model for providing clinical input to support criminal justice agencies Dr Rajan Darjee.
Advertisements

 Nationally Children’s Services work within a legislative framework. Two pivotal pieces of legislation are the Children Act 1989 and the Children and.
Improving outcomes for young people Jamie Callaghan & Fiona Muir Community Justice.
New Halton Levels of Need Framework Denise Roberts – Deputy Designated Nurse Mark Grady – Principal Children’s Officer.
Learning from Serious Case Reviews Child B.
Donna Monk MAPPA Co-ordinator.  Understand the purpose and function of MAPPA  Understand the language and terminology of MAPPA  Explore the framework.
Pathways to care in the absence of a local specialist Forensic Service, what we do in York. By Bekki Whisker.
Youth Justice Management Unit Early & Effective Intervention - EEI Mary Stephen - Youth Crime Co-ordinator - Moray.
1 Disclosing Student Personal Information to the Queensland Police Service 1-2 July 2008 RED/EDS Business Meeting.
Preventing offending: getting it right for children and young people
Lancashire Assessment and Planning Framework Victoria Gent.
Nurturing Change: National Guidance & Support Getting it right for every child in Practice Assessment & Planning Jane Aldgate – Wendy Rose Getting it right.
The New Inspection Framework The Multi agency arrangements for protecting children The multi-agency arrangements for the protection of children The multi-agency.
Overview of MASH MASH training. What is a MASH?  Multi Agency Safeguarding Hub  A MASH is a centre which brings together agencies (and their information)
MASH Understanding Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hubs 1.
Family/Whānau Caregiver Assessment and Approval Engaging with families to achieve better outcomes for children and young people.
Hertfordshire Safeguarding Children Board December 2013 Prevention and early intervention: Teenage pregnancy. Lindsay Edwards, Services for Young People.
DRM PPANI TRAINING. What is the purpose of a LAPPP The collection, analysis and interpretation of all relevant available facts and information to assess.
Child Protection Conferences Caroline Alexander Service Coordinator for Child Protection.
NSW Interagency Guidelines for Child Protection Intervention 2006 Briefing Information Session Child Protection Senior Officers Group.
OffendingChargeCustodyCourtMeasures It was recognised that the revolving door of offending, charges, court and reoffending wasn’t having an impact on.
Early Help for Shropshire Children & Families Children’s Trust Area Forum.
Thresholds & Referring in to Social Care Simon Harrison Group Manager Referral and Assessment Service.
Blackpool Safeguarding Children Board Core Group Training Trainers: Ian Wheeler Jo Edwards.
Being Part of a Core Group Jacqui Westbury – CP Chair/IRO Team Manager Kate Lawson - Safeguarding Nurse Specialist.
Common Assessment Framework Awareness. Victoria’s Web.
Whole Systems Approach to GIRFEC 25 th February 2014.
Joint Area Review Overview. What is a JAR? Q. What is a Joint Area Review (JAR)? A. A JAR provides a comprehensive report on the outcomes for children.
PROTECT Julie Moss Head of Service Child Protection and Child in Need.
Case Reviews With thanks to Stuart Smith, CAIU Essex Police.
Female Genital Mutilation
Framework for Risk Assessment Management and Evaluation (FRAME) for Local Authorities and partners - incorporating Care and Risk Management Guidance Chris.
Learning from MAPPA Significant Case Reviews Bob Thomson.
NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Child Sex Offender Disclosure Scheme Detective Sergeant Louise Wall National Coordinator for the Child Sex Offender Disclosure.
Early Help and CART Barbara Egan – Principal Manager IWST Sandra Douglas – Principal Manager CART.
Annex A ASBOs are a powerful tool for protecting victims and stopping anti-social behaviour. Much effort goes into getting the ASBO by the agencies involved.
Case Study - Background Joe (14) resides with maternal grandparent – attends mainstream education. Nan Mary (59) - Unemployed Residency Order Referral.
Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) in Scotland 1.
Getting it Right for Every Child The Child and Young Person’s Record Stella Perrott Scottish Executive Symposium 30 th January 2007.
Level 3 - Integrated Assessment Liz Gajjar Principal Educational Psychologist.
Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements In Practice Neil Prunnell MAPPA Strategy Manager - Greater Manchester Shelley Scott National Head of MAPPA.
KEEPING CHILDREN SAFE Key reminders from the document Keeping Children Safe Part 1 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE SEE CUMBRIA LSCB WEBSITE NSPCC LINKS.
Sharon Hubber (AMA) Linda Richardson Allegations Management Adviser (AMA) Supporting a Safer Workforce 17 th October 2008.
The Duties and Responsibility of Southend-on-Sea Borough Council Fieldwork Services Report to Children & Learning Scrutiny Committee 15 th October 2007.
The inspection of arrangements for the protection of children and young people Ofsted unannounced inspections from May 2012.
Standard Circular 57 The purpose of this circular is to clearly set out the responsibility of educational establishments and services in the matter of.
Managing Allegations: The Role of the Local Authority Designated Officer.
Multi-Agency Case File Audits (MACFA) Learning Briefing Nicki Pettitt, Independent MACFA Auditor 18 th September 2015.
Disclosure & record keeping February
The Early Years Designated Safeguarding Leads Programme has been designed to correspond with the following priority from the Early Years Training Strategy.
The Caledonian System An integrated approach to address men's domestic abuse and to improve the lives of women, children and men. Developed for the Effective.
Integrated Case Management: Reducing Risk, Promoting Desistance.
Education Queensland SMS-PR-021: Safe, Supportive and Disciplined School Environment pr/students/smspr021/
To Learn & Develop Christine Johnson Lead Nurse Safeguarding (named nurse) - STFT Health Visitors Roles and Responsibilities in Domestic Abuse.
Maltreatment. Theories of Maltreatment Medical –linked to Bowlby’s theory of attachment, whereby lack of bonding can lead to a cycle of poor attachment.
Adolescents who cause Harmful Sexual Behaviour & the Criminal Justice System Yvonne Adair 8th June 2016.
3-MINUTE READ WORKING TOGETHER TO SAFEGUARD CHILDREN.
3-MINUTE READ WORKING TOGETHER TO SAFEGUARD CHILDREN.
SEFTON MASH The Decision Making Process of MASH and how the current restructure will affect MASH.
Effective Support for Children & Families in Essex
Safeguarding Update for Pharmacists
Inspecting to provide assurance and promote improvement
How to undertake an Early Help Strength based conversation
JIM MCBRIDE & LIZ MCSHERRY
Management of Allegations Against Adults who work with Children Linda Evans (Head of Quality Assurance for Safeguarding) and Majella O’Hagan (Local Authority.
West Mercia MAPPA PROCESS.
How to undertake an Early Help Strength based conversation
Managing Allegations Lead
How to undertake an Early Help Strength based conversation
Presentation transcript:

Care and Risk Management (CARM) in Practice Stewart Simpson Practice Development Advisor Centre for Youth and Criminal Justice (CYCJ) developing, supporting & understanding youth justice

1. The Purpose of CARM To provide a consistent national framework for the assessment, management and evaluation of young people aged years,who pose a serious risk of harm to others. Referrals to CARM will likely be young people involved in violent or harmful sexual behaviour, although referrals for other concerning behaviours may also be appropriate The CARM process should run parallel and compliment the GIRFEC process and Childs Plan. Risk Management meetings should be multi-agency and local processes should be “signed off” by local child protection committees.

developing, supporting & understanding youth justice 2. What should a CARM meeting consider? highlight to appropriate agencies those who present a risk of serious harm to others; ensure relevant risk assessments are undertaken; share information in a multi-agency forum about risk of harm; clarify the nature of the harm and to whom; undertake scenario planning; identify safety factors which can reduce risk; Ensure robust, but age and stage appropriate risk management plans are in place.

developing, supporting & understanding youth justice 3. Referrals to CARM Referrals should be made to a central point of contact who has knowledge of legislative and policy frameworks and experience of relevant processes, such as child protection processes. Referrals may be made by a range of partners of agencies including; Police, receipt of the concern, lead professional or others aware of the concern e.g. EEI co-ordinator.

developing, supporting & understanding youth justice Referrals to CARM (cont) Where a child is thought to meet the criteria a referral discussion should take place with 24 hours and no more than 72 hours after the incident. A referral discussion should include information that allows the person co-ordinating referrals to make a decision on whether a CARM meeting should be convened and a summary of immediate actions required to ensure the safety of others.

developing, supporting & understanding youth justice 4.Taking Immediate Action Immediate actions agreed to protect others should be noted on an outcome recording form and recorded in the local case management system (Frameworki, Swift etc) Immediate actions could include; Review living or education arrangements, consider actions to protect the community or consider arrangements to address interest from the media.

developing, supporting & understanding youth justice 5. Initial CARM meetings Initial meeting within 21 calendar days of referral and will likely include, Social Work, Police, Education, CAHMS colleagues. Referrer should follow up discussion with a written referral form and include any current assessments or supporting documents e.g. IAF, CAHMS assessments. Consideration should then be given to whether the young person and parents are informed of the meeting.

developing, supporting & understanding youth justice 6. Making Decisions Decision making should be grounded with evidence base practice and where a risk assessment has been undertaken the meeting should scrutinise this in terms of the content and if further information is required. The meeting should consider risks associated with the young person, their family and the community Additionally, what levels of supervision or monitoring are required and whether community disclosure is required.

developing, supporting & understanding youth justice 7.Managing Risk Where a Childs plan exists, the outcome and actions from the CARM meeting should be reflected in this by the lead professional Where a plan is required, the lead professional should include these points when drafting the plan. In terms of defensible decision making, the meeting should agree a risk classification of Aware, attentive or Active and Alert.

developing, supporting & understanding youth justice 8. Reviewing the Risk The Chair will ask attendees to consider; a.Further offences or relevant incidents b.Are further assessments required? c.Review progress within the Childs Plan d.Evaluate progress or deterioration e.Consider additional actions. f.Re assess risk classification

developing, supporting & understanding youth justice 9. Transition and Exit Planning In accordance with minimum intervention a young person should not be involved in the process unless necessary to manage risk Available systems, young person’s engagement, evidence of risk reduction and goal achievement will evidence progress Interface will MAPPA is important in transition planning.

developing, supporting & understanding youth justice Case Example - Simon Offending History Age 14- Simon charged with 6 x lewd and libidinous practices against his younger brother and made subject to a Supervision Order including a condition that he engage in therapeutic work. Age 15, Simon charged with a sexual assault on a female neighbour, aged 12. Concerns reported that Simon would no longer leave the house due to harassment from peers and refusing to attend School. Simon’s mother reported that local people had been verbally threatening to her in the shop where she worked.

developing, supporting & understanding youth justice The CARM process and Simon Referred to CARM by Social Worker following 2 nd offence. Initial actions included Simon’s step father working from home due to backlash in the local community. Initial CARM meeting would have considered concerns re Simon’s sister age 11, given the nature of his second offence.

developing, supporting & understanding youth justice Questions?