NSF Portfolio for FY07 Vancouver ILC Workshop 19-22 July, 2006 M. Goldberg, J. Kotcher, M. Pripstein, R. Ruchti, J. Stone.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Restructuring of the Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (MRSEC) Program Creating New Opportunities for Collaborations and Partnerships in.
Advertisements

Presented by: Jerry Legge Associate Provost for Academic Planning (Interim), and Professor of Public Administration and Policy (SPIA) Provost Advisory.
NSF Experience with Management of Research Infrastructure
1 Performance Assessment An NSF Perspective MJ Suiter Budget, Finance and Awards NSF.
National Science Foundation & Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences Celeste M. Rohlfing Head, Office of Multidisciplinary Activities
Position of the Czech Republic on the European Strategy in Particle Physics Current main activities in particle physics * Plans for the future Recommendations.
European Strategy for Particle Physics 2013 Preparatory group->Strategy group Individual town meetings Town meeting in Krakow: september 2012 Drafting.
Conversation with ACCORD on GSMT 21 January 2005 Michael S. Turner, Assistant Director Directorate for Mathematical & Physics Sciences National Science.
DOE Neutrino Program Plans
1 AAAS Meeting: February 2008  Particle Physics and the Responsible Use of Public Resources.
Beyond the ALCPG David B. MacFarlane Associate Laboratory Director for PPA.
EPP Program at NSF M. Goldberg, J. Kotcher, M. Pripstein, J. Stone, R. Ruchti.
1 ADVERTISEMENT Program Manager In Search of NSF EPP Rotator A year working in our Nation’s Capitol! (well, real close by) For 1 Year starting ~ 1 September.
Committee on Science, Engineering and Public Policy Board on Physics and Astronomy Committee on Setting Priorities for NSF’s Large Research Facility Projects.
HEPAP SUBPANEL Synopsis of the Long Range Plan for U.S. High Energy Physics Jon Bagger / Barry Barish Presentation to HEPAP October 29, 2001.
Sept. 18, 2008SLUO 2008 Annual Meeting Vision for SLAC Science Persis S. Drell Director SLAC.
Department of Energy Office of Science Yet Another Report from DOE Office of High Energy Physics Presented to SLUO September 10, 2006 Dr. Robin.
February 19, 2008 FACET Review 1 Lab Overview and Future Onsite Facilities Persis S. Drell DirectorSLAC.
This is the last message in this gathering of North American PI’s with an interest in the INFN hosted SuperB project. I will try to deal with issues on.
Interdisciplinary and Interagency Cooperation in High Energy Physics Barry Barish BPA 5-Nov-02.
View from the NSF: Later Years J. Whitmore (EPP-PNA) M. Pripstein (LHC) M. Goldberg, J. Reidy (EPP) LEPP – CLEO CESR Symposium at Cornell, May 31, 2008.
Overview of the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Major Research Instrumentation (MRI) Program Office of Integrative Activities National Science.
The Future of US Accelerator Science – Comments from NSF Tony F. Chan Assistant Director MPS/NSF AAAS Chicago February 13, 2009.
HEPAP and P5 Report DIET Federation Roundtable JSPS, Washington, DC; April 29, 2015 Andrew J. Lankford HEPAP Chair University of California, Irvine.
LSC – Hanford, WA 11th November 2003 The View from NSF Funding: FY 03 (actual) & FY 04 (prospects) Funding Opportunities for GP Research Some Developments.
Partnerships and Broadening Participation Dr. Nathaniel G. Pitts Director, Office of Integrative Activities May 18, 2004 Center.
The FY 2009 Budget Thomas N. Cooley, NSF Council of Colleges of Arts and Sciences March 13, 2008.
NSF Particle Physics & Particle and Nuclear Astrophysics Programs Fermilab Users’ Meeting 31 May – 01 June, 2006 R. Boyd, M. Goldberg, J. Kotcher, M. Pripstein,
Partnerships for Innovation Key Underlying Tenets ¬ Innovation happens locally - partnerships with state, regional and local governments and industry are.
Biomedical Science and Engineering Funding Opportunities at NSF Semahat Demir Program Director Biomedical Engineering Program National Science Foundation.
National Science Foundation 1 Evaluating the EHR Portfolio Judith A. Ramaley Assistant Director Education and Human Resources.
Department of Energy Office of Science High Energy Physics Briefing to the Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee Dr. Robin Staffin Associate Director,
Recommendations for Science at SNOLAB Andrew Hime On behalf of the Experiment Advisory Committee Aug. 17, 2005 SNOLAB Surface Building.
Physics Priorities S. Dawson July 11, 2007 Fermilab Steering Committee Meeting.
1 Investing in America’s Future The National Science Foundation Strategic Plan for FY Advisory Committee for Cyberinfrastructure 10/31/06 Craig.
Promoting Diversity at the Graduate Level in Mathematics: A National Forum MSRI October 16, 2008 Deborah Lockhart Executive Officer, Division of Mathematical.
1 DUSEL and Gravitational Waves Vuk Mandic University of Minnesota 03/17/08.
LSC – Hanford 16 th - 19 th August 2004 The View from NSF Changes in NSF leadership Funding Interagency Working Group response to Q2C Outreach - New $5M.
SLUO LHC Workshop: Closing RemarksPage 1 SLUO LHC Workshop: Closing Remarks David MacFarlane Associate Laboratory Directory for PPA.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy RHIC Users Meeting BNL; June 8, 2006 Gulshan Rai RHIC/AGS Users Meeting Gulshan Rai Program Manager for Heavy.
U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science High Energy Physics Advisory Panel Meeting FY 2009 Budget Request.
P5 and the HEP Program A. Seiden Fermilab June 2, 2003.
Report from NSF/MPS Tony Chan Assistant Director Directorate for Math & Physical Sciences Fermi Lab Users Meeting June 7, 2007.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Raymond L. Orbach Director Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Presentation to BESAC December 6, 2004.
CARRUTHERS LSC 3/20/06 1 LIGO-G M The View from NSF Tom Carruthers LIGO Program Officer National Science Foundation (703)
24-Aug-11 ILCSC -Mumbai Global Design Effort 1 ILC: Future after 2012 preserving GDE assets post-TDR pre-construction program.
PPAN Programmatic Review Presentation to PP town meeting Jordan Nash.
11 DOE Office of Science High Energy Physics Program AAAC Meeting October 15, 2009 National Science Foundation Dennis Kovar Associate Director of the Office.
Summary Comments and Discussion Pier Oddone 40 th Anniversary Users’ Meeting June 8, 2007.
1 Investing in America’s Future The National Science Foundation Strategic Plan for FY OPP Advisory Committee 10/26/06.
Department of Energy Office of Science  FY 2007 Request for Office of Science is 14% above FY 2006 Appropriation  FY 2007 Request for HEP is 8% above.
BIO AC November 18, 2004 Broadening the Participation of Underrepresented Groups in Science.
John Womersley 1/13 Fermilab’s Future John Womersley Fermilab May 2004.
P5 Report: The Particle Physics Roadmap 1 A. Seiden Fermilab May 14, 2007.
DESY. Status and Perspectives in Particle Physics Albrecht Wagner Chair of the DESY Directorate.
Philip Burrows HEP Forum, Coseners House, 6/05/06 Elementary Particle Physics in the 21 st Century Philip Burrows John Adams Institute Oxford University.
Detector R&D through the NSF PHY division. Jim Shank/Jim Whitmore, NSF CPAD Meeting Arlington, TX 5-7 October, 2015.
Report from the NSF Elementary Particle Physics Marv Goldberg, Saul Gonzalez, Randy Ruchti Particle Astrophysics Jean Cottam Allen, Jon Kotcher, Jim Whitmore.
DETECTOR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Fred Borcherding 1.
Nigel Lockyer Fermilab Operations Review 16 th -18 th May 2016 Fermilab in the Context of the DOE Mission.
Revealing the Hidden Nature of Space and Time Charting the Course for Elementary Particle Physics (in the U.S.) Committee on Elementary Particle Physics.
SiD Workshop The EPP (Elementary Particle Physics) Team M. Goldberg, M. Pripstein, J. Reidy J. Whitmore, J. Kotcher, S. Meador, F. Cooper Boulder, Sept.
CPAD Instrumentation Frontier Meeting October 5-7, 2015 Glen Crawford, Helmut Marsiske Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy DOE Office of High.
CPM 2012, Fermilab D. MacFarlane & N. Holtkamp The Snowmass process and SLAC plans for HEP.
Particle Physics Sector Young-Kee Kim / Greg Bock Leadership Team Strategic Planning Winter Workshop January 29, 2013.
Strategic Planning Process
Strategic Planning Process
Yet Another Report from DOE Office of High Energy Physics
NSF Particle Physics & Particle and Nuclear Astrophysics Programs
STFC Update – Programmes Directorate PPAP Community Meeting
Presentation transcript:

NSF Portfolio for FY07 Vancouver ILC Workshop July, 2006 M. Goldberg, J. Kotcher, M. Pripstein, R. Ruchti, J. Stone

J. Kotcher Vancouver ILC Workshop, July Outline Maintaining diversity EPP & PNA goals, portfolio Recent-year funding breakdown ILC specifics, FY07 outlook Closing remarks EPP = Experimental Particle Physics program PNA = Particle & Nuclear Astrophysics program

J. Kotcher Vancouver ILC Workshop, July EPP 2010 on Diversity “Particle physics, like all of other elements of the scientific enterprise, explores the unknown, and this inevitably requires shouldering some uncertainty. Thus, it is important to maintain a diverse and comprehensive portfolio of research activities – from theory to accelerator R&D to the construction of new experimental facilities to efforts to probe entirely new areas.” From Findings and Recommendations: “In particular, it is important to recall the strategic necessity of mounting, regardless of budgetary constraints, a comprehensive program that reflects a diversity of scientific opportunities and approaches to the scientific challenges facing particle physics. Under no circumstances, therefore, should the committee’s top two or three priorities be permitted to exhaust the entire available budget. Indeed, in the most pessimistic budget scenario…the level of resources invested in the priorities outlined below would need to be modified, but the need for pursuing a diversified research portfolio would be unchanged.” We listen…

J. Kotcher Vancouver ILC Workshop, July Discovery potential never greater – new chapter LHC will dominate accelerator-based HEP in the near future, other US HEP accelerators phasing out Next generation frontier accelerator requires multibillion-$ investment, international cooperation Vision for field’s transition is taking shape, but not yet fully formed (EPP 2010, HEPAP, subpanels) Intellectual breadth of NSF program reaches beyond energy frontier, and accelerators in general NSF supports ~10% of US program, ~40% of university activities DOE is primary steward of national accelerator complex and will lead the ILC campaign NSF will increase investment to broaden field, e.g. DUSEL, while supporting university groups across frontiers The Emerging Landscape

J. Kotcher Vancouver ILC Workshop, July NSF FY07 Priorities From Feb 06 talk by M. Turner on FY07 Rollout: –Advancing the Frontier (grant support) –Facility Stewardship, Instrumentation and CyberInfrastructure –Broadening Participation –Education and Workforce Development $15M increase for EPP in FY07 budget request

J. Kotcher Vancouver ILC Workshop, July Advancing the Frontier Elementary Particle Physics (EPP), fundamental research across –the energy frontier – the attempt to discover new fundamental particles and laws of physics by studying collisions at the highest energies achievable with current and future accelerators; –the neutrino frontier – exploration of the properties of the neutrino, a particle now known to carry mass and believed to be fundamental to understanding the developing universe; and –the cosmic frontier – the study of dark matter and dark energy. Physics of the universe (POU), a set of activities carried out in partnership with DOE and NASA for exploring –the mysteries of dark matter and dark energy; –the earliest phases in development of the universe; –the fundamental nature of time, matter and space; and –the role of gravitation.

J. Kotcher Vancouver ILC Workshop, July Deep Underground Science and Engineering Laboratory Broad, rich, multi-disciplinary scientific program –Biology, Engineering, Geosciences, Physics Excellent match to NSF goals, mission Intrinsically strong program for education/outreach Multi-purpose national laboratory that will serve variety of scientific communities over many decades Provides long-term, facility-based focus for diverse physics research program: Dark matter, double-beta decay, solar neutrinos, low background counting, nuclear astrophysics, geoneutrinos, supernovae neutrinos, long baseline neutrino oscillations/proton decay (“megaton detector”) Collaborative approach being sought with DOE from outset DUSEL is first priority for next new project start in Physics Division

J. Kotcher Vancouver ILC Workshop, July Overall EPP/PNA Goals Empowering university-based investigators Adding value: –Partnerships Building interdisciplinary collaboration Increasingly relevant as scope of EPP/PNA broaden –Broadening Participation Single investigators Non-traditional, under-represented participants Research in Undergraduate Institutions (RUIs) –Education and Outreach Activities –Above are among criteria for proposal review

J. Kotcher Vancouver ILC Workshop, July EPP/PNA Portfolio (in no particular order) University Program –Accelerator- and non-accelerator based physics (includes ILC) –Computational physics LHC Construction and Operations CESR/Cornell (includes ILC) DUSEL Accelerator and Detector R&D (APPI) –ILC-related, and other, support Coordination with related disciplines, groups Partnerships PNA plays central role in funding a number of projects: –HiRes, Veritas, Auger, CDMS, Xenon, WARP, PICASSO, DRIFT, Milagro, QUIET, STACEE,…

J. Kotcher Vancouver ILC Workshop, July Base and Allied Funding: EPP, PNA, Theory Includes univ.

J. Kotcher Vancouver ILC Workshop, July Funding History

J. Kotcher Vancouver ILC Workshop, July Larger Award Types MREFC: Major Research Equipment and Facilities Construction –Awards for projects which exceed a minimum of $100M over the project life. Involves the National Science Board (NSB) directly. Timing depends upon Division, Directorate & NSF priority, project readiness, etc. –DUSEL, LIGO, LHC Construction, CLEO, IceCube MRI: Major Research Infrastructure –Awards for developing university scientific infrastructure. Proposal deadline is late January of a given year. –Two award maxima, by type ($800k, $2M) –Portions of the DØ Upgrade, MICE electronics development Both represent means by which funding of larger-scale initiatives is complemented (MRI) or realized (MREFC)

J. Kotcher Vancouver ILC Workshop, July NSF ILC Support NSF support of ILC in FY05 ~ $0.75M in FY05 –University research in detector & accelerator development ($0.25M) Split ~ 50/50 detector/accelerator –Support of GDE personnel & activities ($0.5M) Support was doubled in FY06, total ~ $1.5M –University support: $300k detector, $235k accelerator –GDE ~ $1M All university support is partnership with DOE Support of ILC work at Cornell –Current activities: linac cavity development, damping ring design, tpc detector readout & design, GDE/LCSGA participation & leadership –Future activities under discussion: damping ring test facility, scrf development & processing, r&d and engineering on sc wigglers Cornell will be the coalescence point for NSF ILC participation as the project moves forward

J. Kotcher Vancouver ILC Workshop, July Support of ILC Construction at NSF This month, MPS presented ILC to MREFC Panel requesting it be included in list of “horizon projects” –Form, scope of this MREFC to be determined Placeholder – not required it be spelled out in detail at this time –Panel includes Directorate, Assistant Directors, Financial, others that oversees MREFC development, queuing, etc. –Under their consideration This will be the primary mechanism whereby ILC construction will be supported at NSF, should the project reach that phase MPS = Directorate of Mathematical and Physical Sciences (includes Physics Division)

J. Kotcher Vancouver ILC Workshop, July Two Large-Scale Commitments for FY07 Highest Priority of EPP 2010 Report: “Fully exploit opportunities afforded by…LHC.” –NSF National Science Board in May 2006 approved the proposals for $87M over 5 years, beginning in FY07, for ATLAS/CMS detector operations NSF Physics Division announced in March 2006 its intention to allocate $6-7M for DUSEL-related R&D and technical design in FY07. –Increasing recognition that early support of projects is essential Both LHC operations and DUSEL R&D will be supported through the Research & Related Activities (R&RA) budget, in accordance with current NSF guidelines

J. Kotcher Vancouver ILC Workshop, July FY07 ILC Funding Despite anticipated budget increases (remains promising, but not final), the aforementioned commitments will make simply maintaining the current funding levels of other programs in FY07 a considerable challenge. Increases in FY07 to these programs have been, by necessity, all but ruled out. We hope (expect…?) the budgets in following years to provide some relief. We believe it our responsibility to present the situation realistically, without over-promising: FY07 will be one in which we will be attempting to hold the line on the major portion of the EPP program.

J. Kotcher Vancouver ILC Workshop, July Closing Remarks Scientific opportunities as promising as ever Diverse array of exciting, fundamental questions to be answered NSF will continue to support the ILC, and looks forward to further collaboration with DOE as the campaign gains momentum We are committed to maintaining a balanced portfolio as we rise to meet the challenges ahead “We respond to proposals.”