MCP Considerations for Construction of Clean Energy Installations Patricia Donahue, MassDEP, Northeast Regional Office 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ISO EMS OVERVIEW FOR CONTRACTORS
Advertisements

Overseeing the Little Dig- Construction at Contaminated Sites David A. Slowick, Section Chief MassDEP Emergency Response Western Region
Role of Activity & Use Limitations in Clean Energy Development at Disposal Sites Elizabeth Callahan Acting Division Director, Policy and Program Planning,
2014 Vapor Intrusion Guidance Amendments Discussion Points Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting May 22, 2014.
Rhode Island Society of Environmental Professionals in conjunction with the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management Co-hosted by SAME’s Narragansett.
BoRit Superfund Site Timeline
VRP Checklist Presented by: Rob Timmins – Remediation Project Officer William Lindsay – Remediation Project Officer Chris Evans – Remediation Project Officer.
1 WSC Advisory Committee Agenda June 26, :30 Welcome and general updates - Ben Ericson 9:50 Soil Management - next steps for policy and potential.
Responsible CarE® Process Safety Code David Sandidge Director, Responsible Care American Chemistry Council June 2010.
PUBLIC INFORMATION SESSION: Old Fall River Road Landfill Dartmouth, MA Massachusetts Unlined Landfill Closure Policy March 28, 2013 Mark Dakers, Acting.
Status More on gardening pathway & historic fill proposals – situations addressed under the “Permanent Solutions with Conditions (No AULs)” MCP Public.
1 Massachusetts Wetlands Regulations and the MCP Rachel Freed Mass. Department of Environmental Protection Wetlands and Waterways Program Northeast Regional.
PCB - What You Need to Know Presented by:  Darren Lee  Environmental Control Corp., Project Mgr.,  Industrial Hygienist  Previous West Linn- Wilsonville.
ISO EMS CONTRACTOR OVERVIEW May /26/10ISO EMS CONTRACTOR OVERVIEW TRAINING ISO EMS OVERVIEW TRAINING Contents What is ISO
EnviroSense, Inc. An Overview of Environmental Factors in Developing Brownfields Sites in Massachusetts Presented By: Eric S. Wood, P.Hg., PG, LSP President.
Anthropogenic Background Historic Fill WSCAC March 2015
Managing Construction Activities at Disposal Sites June 15, 2011
1 Risk Assessment Develop Objectives And Goals Develop and Screen Cleanup Alternatives Select Final Cleanup Alternative Communicate Decisions to the Public.
Notebook Ref Summary of the Issue ADEC policy states: “If the quality of a water exceeds levels necessary to support propagation of fish, shellfish,
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation NYSDEC Public Meeting September 12, 2013 Brooklyn Navy Yard, Building 92 Former Kent Avenue Site 500 Kent.
Module 4: Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS. 2 Module Objectives  Explain the purpose of the scoping phase of the RI/FS  Identify existing data which.
Other Environmental Issues U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Noise Endangered and Threatened Species Explosive/Flammable Hazards and Underground.
| [Contractor Safety Training] 1 Environmental Policy for Contractors.
Overview of Regulatory Changes, Policy and Implementation Colleen Brisnehan Colorado Department of Public Health And Environment Hazardous Materials and.
COMMITMENT & INTEGRITY DRIVE RESULTS Risk Based Corrective Action Using site-specific risk assessment to achieve Regulatory Closure.
Renewable Energy at Closed Landfills Workshop: Landfill Post Closure Use Permitting Guidelines January 19, 2010 Daniel Hall, Solid Waste Section Chief.
Module 1: Introduction to the Superfund Program. 2 Module Objectives q Explain the legislative history of Superfund q Describe the relationship between.
Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda April 25, 2013, MassDEP, One Winter Street Boston.
History and Cleanup at Chemical Commodities, Inc. Jeff Field US EPA Region 7 1.
Clean-up of former nuclear sites and the role of the Planning regime Jim Cochrane.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” SAFETY ASSESSMENT DURING DECOMMISSIONING SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP ,
MCP Public Hearing Draft Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting March 28,
OVERVIEW OF OIL & GAS EXPLORATION, DEVELOPMENT and STATE REGULATION OVERVIEW OF OIL & GAS EXPLORATION, DEVELOPMENT and STATE REGULATION February 18, 2012.
Module 6: Alternatives. 2  Module 6 contains three sections: – 6.1 Development and Screening of Alternatives – 6.2 Detailed Analysis of Alternatives.
Review of Current Conditions Report and Work Plan for Area 1 Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical Outreach Services for Communities.
10/03/021 Stormwater Video-conference Department of Environmental Protection Stormwater Videoconference October 3, 2002.
Lynne Welsh Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection.
Area I Burn Pit Santa Susana Field Laboratory RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan February 19, 2008 Laura Rainey, P.G. Senior Engineering Geologist California.
Regulatory Framework for Uranium Production Facilities in the U.S.
California Integrated Waste Management Board Tire Flow Study Along the California-Mexico Border Region Special Waste Committee Meeting California Integrated.
Operation, Maintenance and Monitoring of Comprehensive Remedial Actions December 14, 2010 John F. Ziegler & Michael Reed DEP Western Region Office Springfield,
Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.
Corrective Action Program: Working with Your Local Agency to Solve Local Problems James Clay County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health Site.
New Development and Significant Development 12/21/20151 New Development & Significant Redevelopment.
1 Permit Implementation Regulations Defines the phrase “significant change in the design or operation of a solid waste facility that is not authorized.
Greener Cleanups in the Region 10 PCB Program Michelle, Mullin R10 PCB Coordinator Clu-In Webinar November 17, 2015.
Presentation to Association Municipalities of Ontario Implementation of Management of Excess Soil - A Guide for Best Management Practices Ministry of the.
Think safe. Act safe. Be safe. LEHR Site Annual Soil Management Plan Training Sue Fields, Environmental Health & Safety Sept,
Environmental Factors In this module, we will discuss: Environmental legislation Environmental hazards Due diligence Conducting an environmental.
Update: AUL Guidance Revisions Summary of Comments June 23, 2011 Peggy Shaw Workgroup Chair.
Environmental Considerations prior to purchasing Properties Sabine E. Martin, Ph.D., P.G. Center for Hazardous Substance Research Kansas State University.
Environmental Regulation.  Complex set of laws  Constantly changing  Cover: Release, treatment, storage and disposal of Hazardous materials Into air,
LTP and FSS Plan Project Status Overview Presented by Bill Barley September 28, 2015.
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 and 1989 (RCRA) Alex Chenault Period 4.
1 FORMER COS COB POWER PLANT From Characterization to Redevelopment Brownfields2006 November 14, 2006.
Environmental Site Assessments Hazardous Materials/ Regulated Substances Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY REGULATORY AND ECONOMIC RESOURCE DEPT. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT (DERM) “THE PERMITTING PROCESS TO DISPOSE OF STORMWATER.
Westbrook Contractor Safety Training (March 31, 2016) Dana Beaulieu Sappi Westbrook Operations Environmental, Health, Safety and Security Manager Environmental.
Brownfields 101 Environmental Engineering Considerations Presented By: Ileen Gladstone, P.E., LSP, LEED.
GEORGIA PACIFIC WEST PROPOSED INTERIM ACTION Public Meeting & Open House – July 12, 2011.
Slide 1 California Implementation Water Board Policies.
Proposed Plan for No Further Action
Module Planned exposure situations Public exposure (GSR Part 3)
Decontamination Preparedness and Assessment Strategy
Westbrook Contractor Safety Training April 5, 2018
Welcome.
Sacramento County Stormwater Quality Program
Georgia Update Jeff Cown Land Protection Branch
Hold Your Breath—Ohio EPA’s TCE Initiative
Sacramento County Stormwater Quality Program
Presentation transcript:

MCP Considerations for Construction of Clean Energy Installations Patricia Donahue, MassDEP, Northeast Regional Office 1

Presentation Summary Regulatory Overview -Remedial action alternatives at disposal sites Technical Recommendations - applicable to all construction projects

Constructing Clean Energy Installations Within the Disposal Site Footprint Major Regulatory Concerns: Risk to construction workers and nearby residents/receptors Risk to future on-site workers Preclusion of future remedial options

Regulatory Jurisdiction The MCP defines Remedial Action as “containment or removal”…..broadly defined as the cleanup of oil and hazardous materials (OHM) released to the environment. Remediation Waste: includes soil and groundwater containing OHM at concentrations equal to or greater than the applicable reportable concentration

Construction Activities MassDEP has maintained the consistent position that if you’re handling remediation waste, then that activity is a Remedial Action, and as such must be conducted under one of the five remedial response alternatives set forth in the MCP.

The Five MCP Regulatory Vehicles to Undertake Remedial Actions Limited Removal Action (LRA) Immediate Response Action (IRA) Release Abatement Measure (RAM) Utility-Related Abatement Measure (URAM) Comprehensive Response Action (e.g. Phase IV)

Limited Removal Action Prior to notification Soil only “Limited” means “Limited”! – 100 yds oil, 20 yds hazmat Extent of Contamination- known Expectation that the cleanup can be completed within allowable limits

Construction Activities Under an IRA Only in limited cases (e.g. abandoned Underground Storage Tank encountered during excavation) Limit actions to what is necessary to abate IRA condition Perform follow-up construction activities as a RAM

Construction Activities Most Common - RAM May be conducted pre or post RAO Limited in scope and complexity Need an adequate site characterization commensurate with the proposed activities

Installation Construction Considerations For area within and adjacent to the proposed structure/building – Focused site characterization and risk assessment – Focused feasibility study – Source elimination or control – Remedial actions designed to achieve NSR for footprint area

Hints for Successful RAMs Provide sufficient background information, ie history, sources, data summaries, maps Include clear discussion on soil management including the final disposition, re-use on-site, segregation, soil volumes Financial assurance statement for large amounts of soil (>1500 yds) Detailed capping plans, if applicable

Hints for Successful RAMs, cont. Always discuss approach to dewatering to handle groundwater as well as stormwater accumulation Provide plan to manage new discoveries (e.g. new contaminants, buried USTs or drums) Provide health and safety plan Discuss environmental monitoring

RAM - Significant Modifications Submit modified RAM Plan if: new contaminants(s) or unexpected conditions are discovered “significant” change in soil volume (20% of est.) change in soil management option major modification of remedial system or treatment technology

Utility-Related Abatement Measures Requires notification with written confirmation due within 7 days Utility work only- no foundations! – Sewer, water, gas, electric, telecommunications Develop health and safety plan Make sure follow-up paperwork including URAM completion statement is submitted Discuss known releases in vicinity – off property

So, now that the RAO has been filed………

Construction at Disposal Sites with a Response Action Outcome Statement 310 CMR

Potential New Release Condition 310 CMR (17) notification exemption unless information would negate or change site closure documentation Handle conservatively- notify Retraction option within 60 days if LSP can opine that contamination is consistent with RAO filed.

Sites with Valid A-1, A-2 or B-1 RAOs Remediation Waste Management and “Anti- Degradation” provisions of 310 CMR still apply Permit, TC or extension not required No documentation to DEP - can voluntarily submit Public involvement not required

Anti-Degradation Provisions 310 CMR For soils less than reportable concentrations May be reused on-property or off-property at locations with the same or similar levels of contamination, provided the receiving location – Would not exceed an RC – OHM levels are not significantly lower

Sites with Valid A-3 or B-2 RAOs Activity and Use Limitations Depending on planned work…..

“Limited” Soil Excavation Soil limits are analogous to Limited Removal Action provisions (100 yds oil, 20 yds hazmat) Excavation must be allowed by the AUL No RAM Plan required Follow Remediation Waste regulations

Beyond “Limited” Shall be conducted as a RAM: all provisions at 310 CMR apply Public involvement required No permit, tier classification or extension required If remedial actions are being conducted to allow change in site use or activities, requirements of 310 CMR must be met

Beyond Scope of RAM Conduct as Phase IV Comprehensive Response Action Valid Permit, Tier Classification or Extension Necessary Public Involvement Required If remedial actions are being conducted to allow change in site use or activities, requirements of 310 CMR must be met

Revise RAO? Yes, if AUL terms and conditions have changes as a result of the remedial action Yes, if information and assumptions change ie site boundaries, levels of OHM, Class of RAO Revised RAO can be limited to the disposal site area where the response actions were conducted.

Sites with Class A-4 or B-3 RAOs Treated the same as A-3 or B-2 RAOs as described on previous slides unless an engineered barrier is present.

Engineered Barrier Present Remedial activities that are in or will affect the area where the Engineered Barrier is present: Must be conducted as a Phase IV CRA Public involvement required Valid Tier Classification required

Sites with Valid Class C RAOs Actions conducted in accordance with a Remedial Action Plan May conduct a RAM No de minimis volumes C-2 requires valid Tier Classification

Exemptions Not Subject to MCP Release/Disposal Site Exemptions pursuant to MGL c. 21e Reporting Exemptions at 310 CMR

Handle Cautiously 310 CMR Response actions shall be undertaken for releases of oil and/or hazardous material that do not require notification under 310 CMR if the releases or threats of release pose a significant risk to health, safety, public welfare, or the environment, as described in 310 CMR

Managing Exempt Releases No submittal requirements or fees to DEP Develop and implement HASP Manage contaminated soil and groundwater in accordance with applicable requirements Use same standard of care to conform to applicable laws, regs, etc.

Part II - Technical Guidance No one set of guidance for addressing construction activities Available resources on MassDEP website -Construction Policy: WSC Rail Trail Redevelopment BMP Real Time Air Monitoring paper (dust) Construction PP presentations – Training info

Large Project Encourage your client to utilize an environmental manager to: – Confirm permitting/approvals – Verify Training and HASP implementation – Monitor all excavation activities – Monitor all removed soil – Ensure soil re-use and or transportation off-site in appropriate manner

Work Considerations Keep “It” On the Site Perimeter air and dust monitoring Dust control Odor control Noise control/abatement Anti-track truck pads/truck decontamination Stormwater control Monitor for and cleanup incidental spills

Soil Management Plan ahead - appropriate containment Separate storage areas - “clean”/re- use/dispose Secure storage - snow fencing, haybales Locate stockpiles away from property line and residences (if possible) Consider direct load for soil to be recycled or disposed of off-site

Dewatering - Potentially Contaminated groundwater Options detailed in 310 CMR On-site discharge Off-site disposal – Treat and discharge to WWTP- local approval – Discharge to surface water- federal approval necessary

Summary Several ways to complete construction projects under the MCP Understand the site and how soil will be managed to meet project goals Plan ahead Go! 36

Contact Information / /