RBES Guiding Principles The Department will comply with the requirements of the nation’s environmental laws and regulations. However, the requirement to.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
By Chris Ford and James Hughes ( ) ( )
Advertisements

The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
Basic Economic Development Course in Pennsylvania Environmental and Commercial Real Estate Legal Issues Surrounding Economic Development Act 2 Issues Scott.
Remediation Programs Update MSECA Quarterly Meeting March 13, 2012.
1 Best Practices for Risk-Informed Remedy Selection, Closure, and Post-closure Control for DOE’s Contaminated Sites October 30, 2013.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Risk-Based Regulation.
What is NPDES? “National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System”
STORMWATER PERMITTING Requirements for the Solid Waste Industry in Colorado 5/04.
1 Indiana Department of Environmental Management Budget Presentation FY
PUBLIC INFORMATION SESSION: Old Fall River Road Landfill Dartmouth, MA Massachusetts Unlined Landfill Closure Policy March 28, 2013 Mark Dakers, Acting.
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Decommissioning Vienna, 2-7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
Module 7: Management Strategies and Potential ARARs.
Colorado School of Mines Research Institute Site DRAFT REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY AND PROPOSED PLAN.
EnviroSense, Inc. An Overview of Environmental Factors in Developing Brownfields Sites in Massachusetts Presented By: Eric S. Wood, P.Hg., PG, LSP President.
Protecting Water Resources: The U.S. Legal Framework Babette J. Neuberger, JD, MPH Associate Dean for Academic Affairs University of Illinois at Chicago.
1 Risk Assessment Develop Objectives And Goals Develop and Screen Cleanup Alternatives Select Final Cleanup Alternative Communicate Decisions to the Public.
SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Protection of the environment from ionising radiation - views of a regulator.
NEI Issues & Current Events George Oliver June 22, th Annual RETS – REMP Workshop South Bend, Indiana.
1 Facilitating Reuse at RCRA Sites: Innovative Technologies for Groundwater Characterization and Cleanup Introduction Walter W. Kovalick Jr., Ph.D. Associate.
Authorization and Inspection of Cyclotron Facilities Authorization for the Decommissioning of the Facility.
U.S. Environmental History 1965 Solid Waste Disposal Act (WSDA) 1976 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) – Identification of wastes (characteristics.
Prioritize Contaminated Sites With a Known Release and a Pathway That Poses the Greatest Threat of Exposure  Pathways to surface water Freshwater wetlands,
Overview of Land Use Compatibility between Sensitive Land Uses and Nuisance Sources Peter Piersol A&WMA/OPPI Land Use Compatibility.
Contaminated Land Management Framework in Malaysia
Overview of Regulatory Changes, Policy and Implementation Colleen Brisnehan Colorado Department of Public Health And Environment Hazardous Materials and.
Proposed Amendments to Chapter 32, Article V, Solid Waste Management, and to Chapter 38, Zoning Orange County Code Presented by the Orange County Environmental.
COMMITMENT & INTEGRITY DRIVE RESULTS Risk Based Corrective Action Using site-specific risk assessment to achieve Regulatory Closure.
Multimedia Assessment for New Fuels: Stakeholders’ Meeting September 13, 2005 Sacramento, CA Dean Simeroth, California Air Resources Board Dave Rice, Lawrence.
2010 Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Conference Institutional Controls Featuring the Pinellas Site Jack Craig U.S. Department of Energy Office of.
Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda April 25, 2013, MassDEP, One Winter Street Boston.
Italy: developments in the new legislation and progress in the remediation of contaminated sites F. Quercia, APAT Tour de Table NATO CCMS Pilot Study Meeting.
History and Cleanup at Chemical Commodities, Inc. Jeff Field US EPA Region 7 1.
1 The Use of Institutional Controls Under the RCRA Corrective Action Program.
Italy: the new legislation on the remediation of contaminated sites F. Quercia, APAT Tour de Table NATO CCMS Pilot Study Meeting 5-7th June 2006, Athens,
Policy and Legal Framework on Soil Contamination Management in Thailand Workshop on Strengthening Contaminated Soil Monitoring in Vietnam, November.
Clean-up of former nuclear sites and the role of the Planning regime Jim Cochrane.
The Contaminated Sites Cleanup Process (18 AAC 75)
Draft Policy for Assessing & Managing Contaminants in soil: a progress report WMINZ Conference, 15 October 2009 James Court and Howard Ellis Ministry for.
Monitored Natural Attenuation and Risk-Based Corrective Action at Underground Storage Tanks Sites Mike Trombetta Department of Environmental Quality Environmental.
State and Tribal Government Working Group November 12, 2008 FERNALD NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGES SETTLEMENT.
Lynne Welsh Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection.
1 A Consultancy on management of large amounts of radioactive waste after an emergency situation ~ Experience on aftermath of Fukushima Daiichi NPS accident.
Area I Burn Pit Santa Susana Field Laboratory RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan February 19, 2008 Laura Rainey, P.G. Senior Engineering Geologist California.
Regulatory Framework for Uranium Production Facilities in the U.S.
Corrective Action Program: Working with Your Local Agency to Solve Local Problems James Clay County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health Site.
Greener Cleanups in the Region 10 PCB Program Michelle, Mullin R10 PCB Coordinator Clu-In Webinar November 17, 2015.
DOE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP BIOTA PROTECTION Stephen L. Domotor (202)
By Mitch Cooper & Haley Herbert January 1987 Vertac site manufactured herbicides 1978 National Dioxin Survey 1983 Site placed on the National.
Intervention – 2004 Nanisivik Reclamation and Closure Plan Arctic Bay June 3-4, 2004 Nunavut Water Board Public Hearing.
Presentation to Association Municipalities of Ontario Implementation of Management of Excess Soil - A Guide for Best Management Practices Ministry of the.
Think safe. Act safe. Be safe. LEHR Site Annual Soil Management Plan Training Sue Fields, Environmental Health & Safety Sept,
Brian Hitchens and Sam Williams PCBs in the Urban Environment: Implications for Long-Term Sustainability Of Low-Threshold Remediation.
Evaluation Measures for Municipal Storm Water Management Programs Daniel Rourke Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District October 15, 2003 Counting Raindrops.
Ukraine Petro Nakhaba All-Ukrainian Public Organization “ Chysta Khvylya ” Deputy Head Kyiv, Ukraine Contaminated Sites Management Joint UMOE-DEPA Project.
Some Comments on Risk-Based End States & Contaminated Site Cleanup Session 17 Waste Management 2004 Tucson, Arizona March 2, 2004 Charles W. Powers, PI.
1 Indiana Department of Environmental Management Budget Presentation FY
1. 2 Presentation Highlights BGOU overview Scope of the Remedial Investigation Investigation results Schedule 2.
RCRA 2020 Vision… A View from a Facility Owner Lloyd E. Dunlap Atlantic Richfield Company, BP.
Long-Term Management of Contaminated Soil and Groundwater – Iwilei District, Honolulu April 16, 2015.
What is Stormwater? Direct result of rainfall Recharges groundwater by infiltration Produces “runoff” (excess rainfall after infiltration) May be concentrated.
Omaha Riverfront Redevelopment Project Brownfields 2004 C. Dale Jacobson, P.E., DEE.
Proposed Plan for No Further Action
Presentation on Livermore Lab Site 300 Superfund Cleanup Peter Strauss, Environmental Scientist, PM Strauss & Assoc. Community-Wide Meeting on
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sacramento County Stormwater Quality Program
“Malaysia’s Presentation on Experiences Using the POPs Toolkit” by Goh Choo Ta Final Regional Workshop Da Nang, Vietnam 2009 Draft Project Implementation.
AFPC Policy Protect its personnel, contractors,3rd parties and the environment against the hazards of exposure to ionizing radiation due to AFPC activities.
IMS-approach to the The Kempen (Flemish-Dutch border)
Horst Monken-Fernandes Waste Technology Section NEFW
Sacramento County Stormwater Quality Program
Presentation transcript:

RBES Guiding Principles The Department will comply with the requirements of the nation’s environmental laws and regulations. However, the requirement to develop and achieve risk-based end states will drive the Department’s compliance strategy. End states, including the selected remedies, must be based on an integrated site-wide perspective (including the current and future use of surrounding land), rather than on isolated operable units or release sites. End states must be focused on protecting the relevant receptors based on the intended land use. Sites must document the final anticipated risk-based condition that drive a cleanup decision or activity. Sites must consider the interim risks to the public, workers, and the environment in the selection of actions required to achieve risk-based, end states. Ecosystem health should not be endangered nor should workers be put at risk by requiring them to take actions that result in little or no reduction in risk to the public or the environment. Where contaminants are expected to persist but can be isolated, risk concepts should include effective and transparent institutional controls to maintain isolation. Long term monitoring and surveillance methods must be designed to assure that the contaminants remain sequestered and human health and the environment are protected. Stakeholders and regulators must be consulted in the actions needed to develop and achieve risk- based, end-states End states must address how we are to manage the impacts of future risks and vulnerabilities, including the creation of contingency plans in the event that site conditions change after clean up is completed.

RBES Implementation Phase I: Establish Framework – DOE Policy, DOE P Use of Risk-based End States (2003) – Guidance for Developing Site-specific Risk-based End State Vision (2003) – DOE Memorandum: Risk Based End State Guidance Clarification (2003) – Public and Intergovernmental Outreach – Site Specific End State Vision Document Phase II: Identify Changes – Variance Analysis and Report – Legislative Recommendations – Public and Intergovernmental Outreach Phase III: Implement Changes – Renegotiate Agreements – Modify Site Baselines – Legislative Package and Actions – Regulatory Actions – Public Intergovernmental Outreach

Site Characterization by Hazard Areas Groundwater Operable Unit (GWOU) Surface Water Operable Unit (SWOU) Burial Grounds Operable Unit (BGOU) (Group1) Surface Soils Operable Unit (SSOU) Permitted Landfills Burial Grounds Operable Unit (BGOU) (Group 2) Legacy Waste and DMAs Cylinder Yards and DUF6 Conversion Facility GDP Facilities

Hazard Area Descriptions

Hazard Area 1 - GWOU C-720 Maintenance and Storage Building C-400 Cleaning Facility SWMU 1: C-747-C Oil Land Farm SWMU 2: C-749 Uranium Burial Ground SWMU 4: C-747 Contaminated Burial Ground SMWU 201: Northwest Groundwater Plume SWMU 202: Northeast Groundwater Plume SWMU 210: Southwest Groundwater Plume Little Bayou Creek Groundwater Plume Seeps

Hazard Area 2 – Surface Water Operable Unit SWMUs 60, 61, 62, 63, 66, 67, 68, 69, 168, and 526: Internal plant ditches and outfalls SWMUs 58 and 59: NSDD SWMU 64: Little Bayou Creek SWMU 63: Bayou Creek SWMU 179: Storm sewer systems SWMUs 13, 14, 15, 16, and 520: Scrapyards

Hazard Area 3 – Burial Ground Operable Unit (Group 1) SWMU 3: C-404 Low-level Radioactive Waste Burial Ground SWMU 6: C-747-B Burial Ground SWMU 145: Residential/Inert Landfill Borrow Area (and old NSDD Channel)

Hazard Area 5 – Permitted Landfills SWMU 9: C-746-S Residential Landfill SWMU 10: C-746-T Inert Landfill SWMU 208: C-746-U Landfill

Hazard Area 6 – C-746-K Landfill SWMU 5: C-746-F Burial Ground SWMU 7: C-747-A Burial Ground SWMU 8: C-746-K Landfill SWMU 30: C-747-A Burn Area

Hazard Area 7 – Legacy Waste DMSAs C-746-AC-746-VC-310C-337 C-746-BC-746-MC-331C-752-A C-746-H3C-752-CC-333C753-A C-746-QC-733C-335 Outside-Locations 1-18C-333-Locations 1-43C-409-Locations 1-2 C-310-Locations 1-5C-333-Locations 1-45C-720-Locations 1-4 C-331-Locations 1-24C-400-Locations 1-8

Hazard Area 9 – GDP Facilities C-331, C-333, C-335, and C-337 process buildings and associated switchyards and cooling towers C-710 Technical Service Building C-720 Building C-724/725 Paint Shop Sewage Treatment Plant Water Treatment Plants C-400 Cleaning Building

State Characterization Map Narrative Summary – Sources – Exposure pathways – Projected risk levels Conceptual Site Model – A description of the hazard area of concern – Primary and secondary sources of contamination – Current and potential future release, transport, and exposure mechanisms – Current and potential future receptors believed to be at risk – Current and planned barriers or mechanisms (e.g. removal) that will prevent or limit potential exposure to at-risk receptors Treatment Train

Current RBES

Risk Assessment Summary

Example Conceptual Site Model

Treatment Train

Current Planned Actions Continued access and institutional controls (e.g., capping, controls on groundwater use) Response actions to reduce the concentration of TCE and other solvents in subsurface areas that act as sources of groundwater contamination Response actions to reduce TCE concentrations in the dissolved phase plumes Monitored natural attenuation of sources of groundwater contamination (TCE source areas) and the dissolved phase plumes following completion of response action to reduce TCE concentrations Active measures to reduce TCE concentrations in groundwater discharged to surface water Construction of sediment control basins Excavation and off-site disposal of surface and subsurface soil and sediment to attain a target risk of 1E-06 for hypothetical residents and an average PCB concentration of 1ppm within exposure units in industrial and recreational areas Excavation and off-site disposal of wastes from burial grounds On-and off-site disposal of debris from D&D of facilities and infrastructure

Proposed RBES Actions Continued access and institutional controls (e.g., capping, controls on groundwater use) Monitored natural attenuation of sources of groundwater contamination (TCE source areas) and the dissolved phase plumes with continued access and institutional controls Excavation and on and off site disposal of contaminated surface soil and sediment to attain a target risk of 1E-04 to receptors consistent with current and future land use and an average PCB concentrations within exposure units of 25 ppm in industrial areas and 1 ppm in recreational areas Characterization and off site disposal of legacy waste On-and off-site disposal of debris from D&D of facilities and infrastructure

1) Enhanced institutional controls to limit groundwaterVSContamination of PGDP Water Policy to limit groundwater use— affects Hazard areas 1,6, and 9 2) Monitored natural attenuation for groundwater source areas, with either enhanced institutional controls or continuation of the PGDP Water Policy VSActive treatment of groundwater source areas using heating technologies, with continuation of the PGDP Water Policy—affects Hazard Areas 1 and 9 3) Monitored natural attenuation for groundwater source areas, with either enhanced institutional controls or continuation of the PGDP Water Policy VSExcavation of groundwater source areas (burial grounds), with continuation of the PGDP Water Policy—affects Hazard Area 1 4) Monitored natural attenuation for the dissolved phase groundwater plumes, with either enhanced institutional controls or continuation of the PGDP Water Policy VSActive treatment for the dissolved phase plume using oxidation technologies, with continuation of the PGDP Water Policy—affects Hazard Area 1 5) Continued monitoring of discharges of groundwater to surface water VSActions to reduce contaminant levels in groundwater discharged to surface water—affects Hazard Area 1 6) Cleanup levels for soil and sediment in industrial areas set at targets of 1E-04 (under an industrial scenario) and PCBs of 25 ppm and cleanup levels for soil and sediment in recreational areas set at targets of 1E-04 (under a recreational scenario) and PCBs of 1 ppm VSCleanup levels for soil and sediment in industrial and recreational areas set at targets of 1E-06 (under a residential scenario) and PCBs of 1 ppm—affects Hazard Areas 2,4,8, and 9 7) Continued monitoring of contaminant levels in surface water at outfalls VSConstruction of sediment control basins to reduce contaminant migration in surface water—affects Hazard Area 2 8) Capping of certain burial groundsVSExcavation of certain burial grounds—affects Hazard Area 3 9) Construction of potential CERCLA CellVSNo construction—affects Hazard Area 5 10) Cleanup levels for soil and/or decontamination of surfaces in industrial areas set at targets of 1E-04 (industrial) and PCBs of 25 ppm VSTargets of 1E-06 (residential) and PCBs of 1 ppm—affects Hazard Area 7 RBES Actions Current Planned Actions Variance Analysis

Transition Assessment (for each hazard area)