Transition from SKADS to PrepSKA Richard Schilizzi Lisbon, 3 October 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT ROLE OF KEY PERSONNEL Bernd Madauss International Space University Strasbourg February, 2011
Advertisements

Course: e-Governance Project Lifecycle Day 1
5-6 May 2009 AWG Meeting LAX1 Technology Development Project US contributions to global.
Update on the SKA R. T. Schilizzi AA 13 December 2011.
Update on the SKA R. T. Schilizzi East-Asia SKA Workshop 30 November 2011.
Chapter 2.
US Technology Development Project for the SKA Jim Cordes AWG Meeting March 2008, San Francisco SKA Context TDP work plan Constraints and considerations.
Goals of DVA-1 Meeting Overall goal: build an SKA antenna with SKA feeds/receivers, verify performance and fabrication/costs for the next stages of the.
22 May 2008Lynn Baker USSKA Consortia Meeting Washington, DC1 Project Manager, Responsibilities and Tasks –Coordination between groups within the TDP –Promote.
March 2009LOFAR MKSP Update: SKA and PrepSKA Paul Alexander.
SPDO report Richard Schilizzi and Peter Dewdney US SKA Consortium Meeting Madison, 17 November 2008.
Overview of Advanced Design White Paper Farrokh Najmabadi Virtual Laboratory for Technology Meeting June 23, 1998 OFES Headquarters, Germantown.
NGAO Team Meeting Management Peter Wizinowich May 26, 2009.
Dec 2010 AAVP Cambridge workshop AAVP AAVS1/2-low demonstrators Jan Geralt Bij de Vaate.
Dominion Radio Astrophysical Observatory DVA-1 Reflector Development Timeline Gary Hovey NRC-HIA Dominion Radio Astrophysical Observaotry.
The Software Product Life Cycle. Views of the Software Product Life Cycle  Management  Software engineering  Engineering design  Architectural design.
Engineering Systems of.
Unified Software Development Process (UP) Also known as software engineering process SEP describes how requirements are turned into software Defines who,
Chapter 7: The 30 elements of systems engineering
Industrial Engineering Roles In Industry
Mark Bowen Acting Theme Leader – Technologies for Radio Astronomy CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science 14 October 2010 Australia Telescope Users Committee.
DVA Series Work Flow P. Dewdney Apr 15, SPDO DVP Work Flow 2 DVA-1 CPG.
Chapter 3: Project Management Omar Meqdadi SE 2730 Lecture 3 Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering University of Wisconsin-Platteville.
Andrew Faulkner1 Technology Readiness Levels 4 th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon Technology Readiness Levels TRLs Andrew Faulkner.
Rosie Bolton1 SKADS Costing work 4 th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon, 2-3 October 2008 SKADS Costing work: Spreadsheets to scalable designs Rosie Bolton Dominic.
Andrew Faulkner1 SKADS and SKA 4 th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon SKADS and SKA Andrew Faulkner.
ATUC meeting Director’s Report Brian Boyle November 2007.
Casper Signal Processing Workshop 2009 SKA Signal Processing (Preliminary) Wallace Turner Domain Specialist for Signal Processing.
CRISP & SKA WP19 Status. Overview Staffing SKA Preconstruction phase Tiered Data Delivery Infrastructure Prototype deployment.
Rosie Bolton SKADS Workshop April 10th 2008 SKADS Costing work: beyond the benchmark scenario Rosie Bolton Paul Alexander, Andy Faulkner and SKADS Costing.
K. Y. LoEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting September 6-7, 2007 Charge to the Committee K. Y. Lo.
2 nd convergence workshop: introduction R. T. Schilizzi Penticton 22 July 2004.
AAs in PEP Jan Geralt Bij de Vaate. PEP Project Execution Plan for the pre construction phase of the SKA Consortium to be formed AA-low ready for construction.
SKA System Design Kobus Cloete 9 December 2010 AAVP Workshop "Exploring the Universe with the world's largest radio telescope"
CASS, Marsfield Phil Diamond 4 October 2011 SKA Pre-Construction Phase: Where we are, and what we’re trying to achieve ?
The System and Software Development Process Instructor: Dr. Hany H. Ammar Dept. of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, WVU.
Peter Wilkinson1 Conclusions 4 th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon, 2-3 October 2008 SKADS aims to –Demonstrate SKA Scientific Viability and Readiness –Demonstrate.
Request for Proposal (RFP)
Peter Wilkinson SKADS Workshop: Paris 10 October nd SKADS Workshop: Introduction “What is it about?” Peter Wilkinson University of Manchester.
1 - RAP-11/17/08 SSEC Agenda Suggestions Preparations for SSEC2 at Cape Town Bob Preston.
Chapter 6: THE EIGHT STEP PROCESS FOCUS: This chapter provides a description of the application of customer-driven project management.
Australian SKA Pathfinder (ASKAP) David R DeBoer ATNF Assistant Director ASKAP Theme Leader 06 November 2007.
Summary of the Paris SKA Meeting 4-8 September 2006 R. T. Schilizzi.
Andrew Faulkner1 DS4 Deliverables 4 th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon DS4 Deliverables Andrew Faulkner.
Software Project Management (SEWPZG622) BITS-WIPRO Collaborative Programme: MS in Software Engineering SECOND SEMESTER /1/ "The content of this.
RupenEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting May 8-9, Software Requirements Michael P. Rupen EVLA Project Scientist for Software rev. 3may06.
The North America Array Technology Development and the Realization of the SKA-High Steven T. Myers & Jim Ulvestad NRAO 15 Oct 2009 USSKA Consortium Meeting.
Paul Alexander 2 nd SKADS Workshop October 2007 SKA and SKADS Costing The Future Paul Alexander Andrew Faulkner, Rosie Bolton.
Project Management Plan. Project Organisation DVA-1 Board n One member for each stakeholder n Oversees execution of DVA-1 on time and within budget n.
Rosie Bolton 2 nd SKADS Workshop October 2007 SKADS System Design and Costing: Update and next steps Rosie Bolton University of Cambridge.
Power Upgrade Project SNS September 21-22, TBM Cost Estimate Cost Estimate Schedule Approach Tom Mann October 27, 2005.
1 CP586 © Peter Lo 2003 Multimedia Communication Multimedia Development Team.
Square Kilometre Array eInfrastructure: Requirements, Planning, Future Directions Duncan Hall SPDO Software and Computing EGEE 2009.
Paul Alexander1 DS3 Deliverable Status 4 th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon, 2-3 October 2008 DS3 Deliverables Review.
Request for Proposal (RFP) In response to the RFP – the first step is to prepare a proposal 1. Review Customer Requirements and come up with candidate.
Towards a dependable and sustainable National IT Infrastructure MANAGING IT INFRASTRUCTURE ASSETS: IMPLEMENTATION NEEDS.
The North America Array Technology Development and the Realization of the SKA-High Steven T. Myers NRAO 14 May 2009 USSKA Consortium Meeting Washington,
Camera PDR/CD1 Planning 19 September 2008
Request for Proposal (RFP)
Jim Cordes Cornell University
Software Requirements
VLA to EVLA Transition Plan
Click to add title Planning for LSST Verification George Angeli LSST All Hands Meeting Tucson August 15, 2016.
Software Requirements
Software Requirements
DVA1 as Part of the Dish Verification Program (DVP) Washington, DC P
SKA PEP - Dish Array WP5 Phase 1 Dishes with Single Pixel Feed Systems
DOD’S PHASED SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
A Draft Funding Model for the SKA
Preliminary Project Execution Plan
Presentation transcript:

Transition from SKADS to PrepSKA Richard Schilizzi Lisbon, 3 October 2008

PrepSKA deliverables Produce a deployment plan for the full SKA and a detailed costed system design for Phase 1 Integrate all of the activities, reports, and outputs of the various working groups to form an SKA implementation plan including a build plan proposal for construction funding in 2012

PrepSKA Work Program WP1 PrepSKA management WP2 Costed telescope design WP3 Further site characterization in Australia and Southern Africa WP4 Governance WP5 Procurement and involvement of industry WP6 Options for funding WP7 Impact on broad government priorities

PrepSKA

06 |08 |10 |12 |14 |16 |18 |20 |22 |24 | System Design SKA mid + low construction and commissioning SKA-high Construction Sites short-listed EC-FP7: PrepSKA System design Funding Governance Site Selection Preliminary SKA specs External Engineering Review of design Reference Design selected Design Studies /Pathfinder Suite Construction Early Science SKA mid+low SKA-mid+lowComplete SKA Pathfinders Complete System design SKA-hi Pathfinder science Phase 1 complete Concept Design Site Select Concept design for SKA-high Detailed Design/Phase 1 construction and commissioning SKA timeline Full science operations SKA mid+low

WP2 deliverables (Peter Dewdney “Guiding Principles, Activities and Targets for WP2”) Technology selection System Design –including operational – construction tradeoffs Science Performance vs Reference Science Mission Total cost estimate for Baseline Design (incl. contingency) Risk assessment Design and deployment plan Top-level build schedule Upgrade paths

Science Requirements Engineering Design & Cost The Job of WP2 Readiness Assessments Eng. Simulations Prototypes Pathfinders Technical R&D Four Years Case Studies SKACost National PrepSKA SKADS TDP LOFAR ASKAP KAT7 ATA EVLA MWA eMERLIN eEVN Path2SKA

Approach Focus WP2 Description of Work in a different way –Move from 40 technology development tasks, including an ill-defined ‘IVS’ to assembly and verification of large SKA sub-systems –identify and fill gaps Note: Need an integrated systems approach at sub-unit level, eg Feed dish design; LNA feed design Dish Verification Program PAF Verification Program AA Verification Program Signal transport Verification Program …..

Original WP2 technology matrix

Dish Verification Program

WP2 approach Required parameter space can be covered with a small no. of models Contributing institutions contribute designs to several models Verification Programs will need to include a build and test phase, on the way to deriving the cost by 2012Q1 (end of PrepSKA) –VPs are self-evaluating SKA Design Studies and Pathfinders provide the R&D basis for the VPs –Need to target those aspects that map into the SKA –Documentation essential Effectively evaluate the feasibility of implementations outlined in Memo 100

Representative implementations: Phase 1

Representative implementations: Phase 2

SPDO in the PrepSKA era

SPDO Engineering Team Project Engineer Peter Dewdney System EngineerKobus Cloete Domain Specialist Receptors Neil Roddis Domain Specialist Signal TransportRoshene McCool Domain Specialist Computing &Duncan Hall Software Domain Specialist Signal Processingadvertised Site EngineerRob Millenaar Project Management Officerinterviews next week

Liaison Engineers Senior engineering managers Roles Lead design teams for which the Lead Institution has assumed responsibility Serve as communication person for relations between SPDO and Lead Institution

WP2 Schedule SPDO staffing, familiarisation and training (ongoing) Appoint liaison engineers (ongoing) WP2 Kickoff meeting, Nov (Deliverable #1) MoAs with organisations/lead institutions (ongoing) Review Reference Science Mission, Dec08 State of SKA technology –call for documentation (Jan 09) Review by International Engineering Advisory Committee, Mar 09 (Deliverable #2)

WP2 deliverables SKA operations concept WP296RPP12 Composite volume, SKA life cycle study, operations plan and support model – Y3 report WP21089RPP36 Composite volume, SKA cost and performance optimization, manufacturing studies and technical documentation – Y3 report WP29133RPP36 SKA system design – interim report WP2947RPP36 Sub-system hardware specifications WP2912RPU15 Report on sub-system integration and evaluation WP2924RPP27 Y3 Report on IVS specification WP2933RPP36 Y3 prototype IVS hardware WP2948PPP36 Y3 Report on IVS integration and test WP2942RPP36 Y3 report detailing performance and cost data for high dynamic range ASKAP antenna WP21510RCO36 Y3 report detailing performance and cost data for composite MeerKat antenna WP2710RCO36 Y3 report detailing performance and cost data for carbon fibre antenna WP2810RCO36 Y3 report detailing performance and cost data for TDP antenna WP21210RCO36