PLANNING, DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION SOUTH DINING RENOVATION PROJECT # CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AT RISK (CMAR) SELECTION PRE-SUBMITTAL MEETING September 9, 2015

AGENDA 2 NAU Mission & Goals: 2015 and beyond… South Dining Renovation: Project’s Mission & Goals Site & Utility Maps Pre-Construction Phase Construction Phase Schedule Project Cost Assumptions Sustainability & Total Cost of Ownership Pre-Construction and Construction Expectations Other Consultants under Owner Qualification submittal format Questions??

NAU MISSION & GOALS: 2015 AND BEYOND… 3 Mission: To provide an outstanding undergraduate residential education strengthened by research, graduate and professional programs, and sophisticated methods of distance delivery. Values: Excellence in Education: Offer a rigorous, high-quality education to all students. Student Success: Place learner needs at the center of our academic and service planning, policies, and programs. Educational Access: Provide all qualified students with access to higher education. Diversity: Achieve multicultural understanding as a priority of educational and civic life. Integrity: Operate with fairness, honesty, and the highest ethical standards to sustain a community of trust. Civility: Support a civil, engaging, and respectful campus climate.

NAU MISSION & GOALS: 2015 AND BEYOND… 4 Strategic Goals: Student success Nationally recognized research excellence Global engagement Diversity, civic engagement, and community building Commitment to Native Americans Sustainability and effectiveness Design a sustainable and effective building that will streamline kitchen and food service efficiency to the benefit of the students and dining staff.

SOUTH DINING RENOVATION PROJECT’S MISSION & GOALS 5 South Dining Renovation Mission: The Mission will be developed with the successful Design and CMAR Team, NAU stakeholders, Commissioning Team and NAU PDC Rep’. The focus of this project from Day 1 will be “Teamwork”.

SOUTH DINING RENOVATION MISSION & GOALS 6 South Dining Renovation Goals: Codes upgrades (FLS, ADA, etc…), Structural repairs, Building upgrades to create an exceptional dining experience, Building efficiency, Flexible/Adaptable Dining Spaces, Students study/learning areas (as allowed in budget), Sustainability & Total Cost of Ownership, Win-Win-Win Team concept for all, Design and Construction teams engaged at the beginning and throughout, Tight delivery schedule (for both design & construction)

SITE MAP 7

8 Site considerations: Create a sense of community on South Campus Proximity of existing student housing facilities (construction working hours, safety, etc..) Food deliveries Relocation of utilities as required NAU ITS Central Hub for fiber distribution (do not disturb) Continuous delivery of food services to students throughout construction Disruption avoidance Site logistic plan

UTILITY MAP 9 Utility wise, the entire South Dining building is fed from same utility points.

PRE-CONSTRUCTION PHASE 10 Review Pre-construction and Construction requirements in the RFQ and in DP/CMAR contracts. Review the DP’s Agreement so you understand their responsibilities as well Review NAU Design Guidelines & NAU Technical Standards Be ready to submit your Pre-Construction proposal shortly after CMAR Team selection!!!

PRE-CONSTRUCTION PHASE 11 Residential Dining is about 28,000 GSF within South DuBois. The area is sufficient in size but is old, structurally not sound, the kitchen is all electric, and overall is not as efficient as it should be… We do not need to add square footage to the facility. CMAR team will be required to investigate a full on renovation vs total demo and re-construction of the residential dining, in collaboration with the DP team. Decisions on construction phasing options. Build a cutting-edge, modern equipment kitchen… Retail dining must remain open during this project. Subcontractor Selection for design-assist as needed. Accurate, real-time estimates throughout pre-con. It should not take weeks for estimate feedback.

SITE MAP 12

PRE-CONSTRUCTION PHASE 13 Bldg. 64 Not in scope Basement

PRE-CONSTRUCTION PHASE 14 Bldg. 64 Not in scope 1 st Floor

PRE-CONSTRUCTION PHASE 15 Bldg. 64 Not in scope 2 nd Floor

PRE-CONSTRUCTION PHASE 16 Bldg. 63 In scope Basement 130’-6” 114’-11”

PRE-CONSTRUCTION PHASE 17 Bldg. 63 In scope 1 st Floor 113’-9” 114’-11”

CONSTRUCTION PHASE 18 Review the current CMAR NAU contract prior to submittal as terms & conditions of the contract won’t be negotiable. Review Pre-construction and Construction requirements in the RFQ and in DP/CMAR contracts. Need to maintain Food Service function in the building (Bldg. 63 and/or 64) or in immediate proximity of this facility. Potentially work construction in phases. Students traffic around the project. Safety. Working hours.

SCHEDULE 19 DP selected by 9/29/15 CMAR selected by 10/08/15 Assessment/Feasibility/Programming done by 11/13/15 100% Schematic Design done by 12/24/15 100% DD done by 2/26/16 100% CD done by 4/22/16 ABOR Approval at the 6/8/16 Business & Finance meeting JCCR Approval TBD Start construction either right after ABOR approval (6/9/16) if we can start without JCCR’s approval, or after 7/16/16 (after the Explorer 2016 Conference). Substantial Completion Date is 7/14/17. Open Food Services to Students around mid-August 2017.

SCHEDULE 20

PROJECT COST ASSUMPTIONS 21 Construction Cost:$10,500,000 to $14,000,000 Soft Cost (40%):$4,500,000 to $6,000,000 o This includes FF&E, DP Fee, Other Owner Costs Total Project Cost:$15,000,000 to $20,000,000 o $15M is for dining, up to $5M additional for student learning space Estimated Total Gross Square Footage Range: o Bldg. 63 (South Dining) =~ 28,000 GSF o Potential Students tutoring space = TBD

SUSTAINABILITY & TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP 22 This facility is expected to be LEED Gold Certified. CMAR Team (including proposed Sub-Contractors such as MEP Trades) shall have strong knowledge and experience with sustainability initiatives relative to this type of building and with renovation and construction. Pre-construction team must have a strong understanding/experience with energy-efficient HVAC systems. Total Cost of Ownership shall be calculated to demonstrate that building materials and building systems will be selected based on most sustainable criteria.

PRECONSTRUCTION & CONSTRUCTION EXPECTATIONS & TEAM APPROACH 23 Collaboration between DP and CMAR for: o dynamic estimating of construction costs throughout the design process to prepare cost estimates that accurately forecast a detailed GMP, o detailed scheduling around design and construction efforts. Analyze of phasing options, o budget and scope management, o constructability reviews, system reviews and value engineering. Active/Engaged participation with constructability from Assessment/Programming through Commissioning. Experience with achieving low Cost of Ownership (energy efficient building with adaptability).

OTHER CONSULTANTS UNDER OWNER 24 Geo-Tech investigation: as needed Survey: as needed 3 rd party Estimating Firm: to provide independent estimating and validation of DP’s and CMAR’s estimates at Schematic and GMP phases. Commissioning: Commissioning Agent will be hired by NAU by end of September and will actively participate in design review during the pre-construction phase. Both DP and CMAR will be required to be fully engaged during commissioning activities at the end of construction.

QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL FORMAT 25 Proposal due date: September 21, 2015 by 3:00 pm 1 Original and 8 Copies + 1 Electronic Version Page Count: o Items A – G cannot exceed 20 pages o Tabs do not count as pages unless there is content on them o Resumes cannot exceed 2 pages each Proposed team-member’s projects, not firm’s projects o Submittal Certification is 1 page

DISQUALIFICATION ITEMS 26 Refer to RFQ for specifics o Turning in submittal late – if mailing, be mindful of slow delivery times o Contacting any NAU employee regarding this project other than as outlined in the RFQ (Stephanie Bauer) o Not providing the correct number of submittals or exceeding the page limit o Submitting in the wrong location o Company profiles in Resumes. Resumes should be about the individual, not the firm

SOUTH DINING RENOVATION PROJECT # QUESTIONS???