GMR Group Discussion Paper on Terms and Conditions of Tariff November 12, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Decoupling Utility Revenues and Sales: Anti-consumer...anti-poor Presented by: Roger D. Colton Fisher, Sheehan & Colton Public Finance and General Economics.
Advertisements

1 CERC Terms and Conditions of Tariff This presentation will only highlight the relevant financial principles and operation norms. APERC would like to.
Business Performance Analysis (Part 2)
Lignite Project By Ramic, Haris. GLOBAL OUTLOOK FOR ENERGY World energy consumption is projected to increase at about 1.8%/year between 2000 and 2030(driven.
Eng. K A Noel Priyantha Chief Engineer (Renewable Energy) Ceylon Electricity Board 21 October, 2007 Pricing policy for renewable energy - Cost Based Technology.
LDC Infrastructure Replacement and Expansion: Rate Issues Jesse S. Reyes Assistant Attorney General Massachusetts Attorney General’s Office June 17, 2014.
Overview of tariff revision process under Regulatory Commission Prayas - EGI Skill-share workshop for Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan Delegates November 16-18,
1 TARIFF DESIGN for GENERATING STATIONS -- Bhanu Bhushan -- Feb 2011.
Regulatory framework in the Energy Sector Chairman Ph.D. Tserenpurev Tudev Energy Regulatory Commission of Mongolia Energy Mongolia-2012 Ulaanbaatar Mongolia.
STRATEGIC VALUE OF GEOTHERMAL ELECTRICITY AND THE IMPACT OF ITS PRICING Anang Yahmadi PT PLN (Persero) – Directorate of Construction and New/Renewable.
Madhya Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission Terms and Conditions of Tariff MPERC Comments on CERC Discussion Paper.
Return on Invested Capital
Clear Thinking on Nuclear: New Plant Construction Nuclear energy is dependable, affordable, and environmentally sound. Nuclear energy is needed to meet.
Slide 1 Policy Alternatives to Stimulate Private Sector Investment in Domestic Alternative Fuels Wally Tyner with assistance from Dileep Birur, Justin.
LEVELIZED COST OF ENERGY. Summary Levelized costs are calculated as a proxy for the PPA price between a third-party developer and a utility LCOEs amortize.
03 July 2015Course Overview1 Energy Project Evaluation RES Course ESP606 Goal: To build up knowledge to so that participants will be able to assess if.
Chapter 9 Pricing Construction Equipment. Objectives Upon completion of this chapter, you will be able to: –Identify the three main equipment categories.
CHAPTER 8 A framework for interpretation
1 Georgian National Energy and Water Supply Regulatory Commission Tariff Regulation Gocha Shonia Department of Methodology and informational provision.
MSE608C – Engineering and Financial Cost Analysis
City Of Phoenix Water Rates June 30, 2011 Denise Olson Deputy Finance Director Finance Department.
Incentive Regulation Topics Scott A. Struck, CPA Financial Analysis Division Public Utilities Bureau Illinois Commerce Commission.
PROF. HARNESH MAKHIJA Project Cash Flows. Content Elements of cash flow streams Principles of cash flow estimation Cash flow illustrations Cash flow for.
Resource Utilization Analysis Fuel Selection Steam Demands Combined Heat and Power.
1 THE RATE CASE PROCESS A Blend of Science and Superstition Presentation to the Mongolian Energy Regulatory Board By Burl Haar Executive Secretary Minnesota.
© ABB Engineering Services Energy Responding to the Challenge of Climate Change.
Jan H. Jansen Finance Lecture # 1 Jan H. Jansen
RES/CHP Support Scheme in Slovenia Conference: Sustainable Energy Development in SE Europe Irena Praček, Director, Energy Agency of the Republic of Slovenia.
Rate and Revenue Considerations When Starting an Energy Efficiency Program APPA’s National Conference June 13 th, 2009 Salt Lake City, Utah Mark Beauchamp,
Solar Energy Services: Delivering Cost Effective Solar Power March 18, 2004 Claire Broido SunEdison, LLC (443) 226.
Chapter 11: Investment Analysis and Taxation of Income Properties McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
CERC DISCUSSION PAPER ON TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR TARIFF FROM WARM WELCOME TO THE PRESENTATION BY NEYVELI LIGNITE CORPORATION LTD., NEYVELI.
Chapter 5 Presented by Group 6
JSC “OGK-6” 2009 Financial Results (IFRS) April, 2010.
Presentation on CERC Discussion Paper on Tariff Norms By powergrid.
1 27 March 2013 MYPD3 Briefing Session – Portfolio Committee on Energy.
Page 1 of 15 Towards Outcome-Based Incentives for Grid-Connected Windpower Energy Conclave 2006 “Implementing the Integrated Energy Policy” IRADe, New.
INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING. What is Infrastructure? “Infrastructure is define as the physical framework of facilities through which goods and services are.
CASH FLOW ANALYSIS Accrual or Cash basis Accounting? Purchase of goods on credit in year X0100 Selling expenses paid in cash (year X0)50 Sales revenue500.
Michael R. Walker Research Director IGCC Financing Project Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University PH: , FX:
PRESENTATION On National Hydroelectric Power Corporation Ltd. ( A Govt. of India Enterprise) Sector – 33, Faridabad (Haryana), INDIA “Comments on Discussion.
Management and Organisation of Electricity Use Electrical System Optimisation Belgrade November 2003.
Annual Results Presentation 27 August 2009 Jacob Maroga – Chief Executive Empowering the South African dream.
Financial evaluation 9 March Financial Feasibility Assess the ability of the utility or developer to meet the financial obligations associated with.
How can I make a profit and still run out of cash? Review Financial Statements Cash Flow and Working Capital.
Construction of Coal-Fired Generation: Evaluating the Utility Credit Implications Ellen Lapson, Managing Director Fitch Ratings, Utilities, Power & Gas.
Chapter 02 Financial Statements. 2 Value = FCF 1 FCF 2 FCF ∞ (1 + WACC) 1 (1 + WACC) ∞ (1 + WACC) 2 Free cash flow (FCF) Market interest rates Firm’s.
Analysis and Interpretation of Financial Statements
Feasibility Study as a Basis for Investment Financing Arto Nuorkivi ESCOBALT Project Manager, Finland Kaunas, Dec. 14, 2005.
Analyzing Financial Statements
Ihab Elmassry, Egypt 1 RW4 -Tunis, Aug 27-29, 04 SS CDM Cogeneration in Egypt - Additionality Ihab Elmassry, M. Sc. CEM, CDGP Cummins Power Generation,
Submission to NERSA on Revised Eskom MYPD2 Chemical and Allied Industries Association January 2010.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 19 Financial Statement Analysis.
Manufacturing Accounts
World energy production by source in 2004: Oil 40% coal 23.3% natural gas 22.5% hydroelectric 7.0% nuclear 6.5% biomass and other 0.7%.
Illinois Wholesale Market Update December 10, 2003.
Ice Storage for Peak Load Reduction Chris Smith NYSERDA NARUC 2007 Summer Meeting.
Generation Costs. Fuel InputProcess (Generating station) Electrical Energy output Cost of Electrical energy = Cost of fuel + processing cost.
Announcements It’s LSAT week! I take the test on Saturday. If you are sick, stay AWAY from me Most of IA material will be covered this week Summatives.
Electricity pricing Tariffs.
1 RORB Return on Rate Base. Legal Basis  Section 43, (f) of Republic Act No Section 43. Functions of the ERC – x x x (a) x x x (f) x x x “The rates.
Financial Statements and Ratios Look up your stock portfolio at Howthemarketworks.com.
Electricity Basket Price & 2013 Power Policy Hammad Hashmi Advisor Technical (USAID) MWP.
Argentine Power Market Fuel Oil Use & Opportunities for the Future Central Puerto S.A. Fuel Oil / Energy Buyer’s Conference Miami, September 2000.
TARIFF DETERMINATION: GENERATION AND TRANSMISSION
Electricity Generation: Coal v/s N-Gas - Basic Economics
Electricity Generation: coal v/s n-gas - Basic Economics
Channel Management and Logistics
Homework Ch 12 Electricity Regulation
Presentation transcript:

GMR Group Discussion Paper on Terms and Conditions of Tariff November 12, 2003

GMR Group Objective of Tariff Norms Provide incentive for investors for realizing the “power for all” target –Tariff norms that reflect opportunity cost for a given business risk To reduce cost of generation in addition to reducing fixed cost –Reduce taxes –Reduce fuel cost

GMR Group Fixed Cost Recovery Fixed cost recovery should be different for coal and gas plants –Coal plants at [70% ] availability –Gas and liquid plants at [75%] availability

GMR Group Return on Equity The current guideline on Return on Equity of 16% may be continued –The ROE method has been in practice and well understood while ROCE method is complicated to implement –The ROE is linked to risk of business and not interest on debt –There is no return during construction (for 3-5 years) –Project finance debt interest rate is about 11% based on the type of project and risks etc. –Normative Debt: Equity at 70:30 may be continued –FE adjustment for both debt and equity –Interest as a “pass through” may be continued

GMR Group Interest on Working Capital Existing norms may be continued The Coal companies are demanding I (one) month L/C and I (one) month cash advance (equivalent to supply of coal) and the cost of L/C and cash advance should be included for the working capital norm

GMR Group Depreciation The existing norm of depreciation may be continued –Allows repayment of loans, tenors are usually for years for power projects –Provides cash for additional capacity –Advance against depreciation etc. would lead to micro-management by and burden on the Regulatory Commissions

GMR Group Operation and Maintenance (O&M) The current O&M norm of 2.5% of capital cost is low O&M norm should be different for coal (lignite) and gas (liquid) fuel plants O&M should escalate on the basis of WPI O&M should vary with age The suggested base O&M norm as % of capital cost as of COD: Type0-5 of COD> 5 of COD Coal (Lignite)2.5%3% Gas (Liquid Fuels)5%5.5%

GMR Group Other Operating Parameters Heat Rate –Heat Rate for coal Plants of 2500 Kcal/ kWh to be continued –Heat Rate for gas/ liquid fuel plants 2000 Kcal/ kWh (Combined Cycle) and 2900 kcal/ kWh (Open) Cycle may be continued Justified based on existing data Also need to account for load fluctuations, degradation (esp. in case of gas based plants), etc. –The condition “whichever is less” may be removed to incentivise operations to be efficient

GMR Group Other Operating Parameters Specific Fuel Oil Consumption and Auxiliary Energy Consumption –The existing norms may be continued –The condition “whichever is less” may be removed to incentivise operations to be efficient Incentive for higher availability –The existing norm may be continued

GMR Group Additional Points for Reducing Cost of Generation Reduction in taxes –Customs duty on capital goods import: 21.8% –Customs duty on spares: 50.8 –Sales taxes 12-16% –Taxes on fuel –Impact of taxes on capital cost (Base Cost : 100) Imported Content (60) Customs Duty = 60x22%= 13.2 Local Content (40) Sales tax =40X16%=6.4 Total increase in cost 20%

GMR Group Additional Points for Reducing Cost of Generation Reduction fuel cost –Fuel cost forms 40-50% of total cost –Fuel taxes Suggestions –Export parity pricing for liquid fuels –Cost of coal to be in line with international prices