Contents Methodology Objectives Notes Sample Sizes Total RespondentsMargin Of Error 694+/- 3.72  Analyze mobile habits, safety, and pet peeves of respondents.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Q uestionnaire A nalysis By Rory Ferron. S ample In order to keep the results as fair as possible I must ensure that my sample is representative of the.
Advertisements

High Frequency Words List A Group 1
Chapter 1: Exploring Data
Confidence Intervals for Population Means
Is It Rational to Vote? Political scientists study all aspects of voting behavior. The most interesting question, of course, is who votes for whom and.
400 Oceangate, Suite #200  Long Beach, California  T:  F:  ID Checking Survey March 2005.
5.1 day 2 Simulations! .
“Can you hear me now?”: The paradoxes of techno-intimacy via the use of mobile communication technology in public. Kathleen M. Cumiskey, Ph.D. The College.
Surveys and Questionnaires. How Many People Should I Ask? Ask a lot of people many short questions: Yes/No Likert Scale Ask a smaller number.
CMU has been said to be the “most wired campus in the US” for two years in a row. What kind of impact does such a infrastructure has on the daily academic.
THE PAST CONTINUOUS.
Safe Online Talk. Today’s Objective To be able to describe positive aspects of online talking and messaging, and to identify situations in which flirting.
Florida Statistics April Road Map: – Research Purpose & Methodology – Summary – Detailed Findings – How Dangerous Is….? – How Distracting Is….?
Prepared by Wirthlin Worldwide A Survey of Handwashing Behavior Prepared for: American Society for Microbiology September 2000 #6649.
Church Dropouts: How Many Leave Church between ages and Why? Spring 2007.
ORC International Proprietary & Confidential Stress Awareness Month Survey Report April 7, 2015 EMBARGOED UNTIL 8:00 AM, April 13, 2015.
CHAPTER 1 Exploring Data 1.1 Analyzing Categorical Data.
LSP 121 Week 2 Intro to Statistics and SPSS/PASW.
Table Of Contents Indiana Media Usage Study2 August 2014 PAGE I.Executive Summary3 II.Specific Findings 1.Newspaper Readership In Indiana8 2.Public Notice.
CHAPTER 1 Exploring Data
SW318 Social Work Statistics Slide 1 Using SPSS for Graphic Presentation  Various Graphics in SPSS  Pie chart  Bar chart  Histogram  Area chart 
Do you know how to keep yourself safe?
Texting While Driving -- Another Kind of Impairment.
Catholic Media Use in the United States Preferences for and Use of Print and Online Content.
Women24 Parenting Survey October aims To investigate trends in parenting To test with data some assumptions frequently made by parents on parenting.
How to Make a Survey.
1 Corporate Leaders and America’s Workforce on Domestic Violence Summary of Findings EMBARGOED UNTIL SEPTEMBER 25TH AT 10AM.
NAME Prosecuting Attorney Distracted Driving. Common Traffic Issues Intoxicated Driving Intoxicated Driving Over The Limit, Under Arrest Over The Limit,
May 2014 © 2014 Ipsos. All rights reserved. Contains Ipsos' Confidential and Proprietary information and may not be disclosed or reproduced without the.
TelePresence Tracking Project Results Psychological Processing of Media Spring 2013.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Estimation and Weighting, Part I.
Questionnaire Construction Guidelines C/IL 102 Dr. Beidler.
Creating Surveys. Getting the right info KISS Your questionnaire should be as short as possible. Make a mental distinction between what is essential to.
©2007, Harris Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. Anheuser-Busch Support For Education vs. Restrictions January 27, 2009 Revised.
Simple Past.
C# Tutorial -1 ASP.NET Web Application with Visual Studio 2005.
Sociological Research Methods Sociology: Chapter 2, Section 1.
What kind of person listens to News Radio? They are usually 35 or older – stable decision makers The audience breakdown is 57% Men, 43% Women The listener.
Campus Crusade For Christ Global Religion Survey Topline Report Prepared by: Infosurv, Inc. November 1, 2013.
Narration tenses Past Simple. “ I heard a scream …” Past Continuous. “ While I was walking past the window I saw a shadow running outside” Past Perfect.
Chapter 1: Exploring Data Sec. 1.1 Analyzing Categorical Data.
Psychological Research Methods Psychology: Chapter 2, Section 2.
It Can Wait Peer Influence Survey September 2015.
BULLYING POLL Prepared for: Equality Hawaii Foundation February 2014 ___________________________.
Exploring The Impact of UGC on Consumer Behavior December 2008.
© 2015 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T and the AT&T logo are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual Property.
1.1 Analyzing Categorical Data Pages 7-24 Objectives SWBAT: 1)Display categorical data with a bar graph. Decide if it would be appropriate to make a pie.
By Jacinta Auchinleck. Hello, it's me I was wondering if after all these years you'd like to meet To go over everything They say that time's supposed.
1 1 Perception of Online Advertising - Germany Comparison of 13 different forms of online advertising Report Study:
The Nationwide Retirement Institute Health Care and Long-term Care Study November 2015 Conducted by Harris Poll NFM-14918AO.
2000 Motion Picture Attendance MPA Worldwide Market Research -1- When looking at the US population by age group, adults age 18+ accounted for 86% of all.
ONLINE SHOPPING SURVEY Ref No :B2015P156KN Date :
2000 US Demographic Study MPA Worldwide Market Research -1- Movies appealed to a broader audience in 2000, with a record number of US residents counting.
1999 Motion Picture Attendance MPA Worldwide Market Research -1- When looking at the US population by age group, adults age 18+ accounted for 83% of all.
Research Findings March 2007 Cox Communications Teen Internet Safety Survey, Wave II – in Partnership with the National Center for Missing & Exploited.
ALL DATA GATHERED OVER MXIT SOCIAL NETWORK
CAPE ROAD SURGERY Patient Questionnaire 2013 / 2014.
Conversation Stopper: What’s Preventing Physicians from Talking With Their Patients About End-of-Life and Advance Care Planning Media Webinar – April 14,
Social Media for Younger Members and New Generations BEN BURGER.
Millennials in IT show aggressive approach to career path in contrast to other generations December 10, 2013 Millennials in IT show aggressive approach.
CREATING A SURVEY. What is a survey questionnaire? Survey questionnaires present a set of questions to a subject who with his/her responses will provide.
SUCCESSFUL ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNING INVENTORY NAME: PRISHEELA MUNIANDY Prof. Dr. MOHAMED AMIN BIN EMBI.
1 1 Perception of Online Advertising - France Comparison of 13 different forms of online advertising Report Study:
1 1 Perception of Online Advertising - USA Comparison of 13 different forms of online advertising Report Study:
Survey: How Old Is Too Young?
Chapter 1: Exploring Data
Study amongst Teens in EMEA Markets – Jan 09
Cell phones and how to use them safely
Survey: How Old Is Too Young?
CHAPTER 1 Exploring Data
Presentation transcript:

Contents

Methodology Objectives Notes Sample Sizes Total RespondentsMargin Of Error 694+/  Analyze mobile habits, safety, and pet peeves of respondents  Look at the above info by gender and age to see if there are any differences  Analyze mobile habits, safety, and pet peeves of respondents  Look at the above info by gender and age to see if there are any differences  Survey link: / /  There is a roughly 70% male / 30% female split within the data. Weighting to the mobile population gender mix was not performed on this data set because pet peeves, have you ever questions, and other questions do not show any major differences in how males vs. females responded, therefore weighting would not change the results.  When reviewing the various data splits throughout this report (i.e., gender or age), keep in mind that each of the groups add up to 100% on their own. Thus if you are looking at males vs. females for a particular measure, all answering options within that question will add up to 100% for males and also 100% for females.  Survey link: / /  There is a roughly 70% male / 30% female split within the data. Weighting to the mobile population gender mix was not performed on this data set because pet peeves, have you ever questions, and other questions do not show any major differences in how males vs. females responded, therefore weighting would not change the results.  When reviewing the various data splits throughout this report (i.e., gender or age), keep in mind that each of the groups add up to 100% on their own. Thus if you are looking at males vs. females for a particular measure, all answering options within that question will add up to 100% for males and also 100% for females. Background  Questionnaire design was developed by Microsoft and comScore and the survey was fielded by Smooth Fusion. All analysis in this report was performed by comScore. With a pure probability sample of 694 one could say with a ninety-five percent probability that the overall results would have a sampling error of +/ percentage points. However, besides sampling error, all sample surveys and polls may be subject to several additional sources of error that cannot be calculated, including, but not limited to coverage error, error associated with non-response, error associated with question wording and response options, and post-survey weighting and adjustments.

Executive Summary The top pet peeves are related to interruptions/distractions, with constant phone checking selected most often. Over one-half of respondents have shared their location and half have pocket- dialed someone. Almost 40% of respondents think men and women are equal when it comes to who has safer mobile habits. The main anecdotes shared were about using a phone while in transit, being disruptive in a quiet, public place, dropping the phone in liquid, and having pretend phone conversations as an avoidance tactic.

Summary: Gender Differences Demographics: The majority of respondents, especially from the younger age groups, were male. Pet Peeves: Pet peeves were very similar between both genders. Men are slightly more annoyed by loud talkers, while women are bothered a bit more by people not silencing their phones when appropriate. Have you ever…: Women are more likely to share their location, while men who share are more frequent sharers than women. Checking someone in without permission, losing a mobile phone, and pocket-dialing someone were actions that men and women had only slight differences in. Who is safer: Men believe they have safer mobile habits than women.

Summary: Age Differences Demographics: 80% of respondents were between the ages of Pet peeves: Among the top 5 pet peeves, respondents ages 40 and over are more annoyed by interrupting behaviors like loud talkers and traffic delayers compared to other age groups. Have you ever…: Frequency of sharing location, checking in someone without their permission, and losing a mobile phone were all similar across age groups. Sharing location is skewed younger, and pocket-dialing increases as age increases. Who is safer: Younger respondents believe men are safer mobile users.

Survey demographics n=192n= n=185, n=197, n=175, n=115, 60+ n=22

Top 5 Pet Peeves Constant phone checkingLoud talkersUsing or not silencing phones when appropriate Using the phone during face-to-face conversation Mobile phone users delaying traffic 44% 39% 41% 40% 35% Constant phone checking is a top 5 pet peeve for nearly one-half of respondents. A phone check typically lasts less than 30 seconds and checks are often within 10 minutes of each other according to recent studies (see footnotes). Habit-formation in smartphones use is mainly reward based. (notifications from social networking, communications, and news)

Interruptions Items like call screening, check-ins, and BlueTooth usage are less of a nuisance.

Only slight differences exist in pet peeves between genders. Older age groups seem to find interrupting behaviors to be the most irritating. Top 5 Pet Peeves Split by Gender Top 5 Pet Peeves Split by Age

Over half of respondents have shared their location, but most do not share frequently. 58% Yes 35% No 7% Unsure Have you ever shared your location? How often do you share your location?

Have you ever shared your location? Note: Numbers displayed represent the percentage who said “Yes” to the ‘Have You Ever’ action described by this slide 54% 59%

Very frequent sharers are more often men than women. How often do you share your location?

Unwelcomed check ins happen infrequently, most likely because people aren't as bothered by being checked in; it was the 2nd least selected pet peeve. Have you ever checked in someone without their permission? 29% Yes 61% No 10% Unsure

Checking in others is an activity skewed towards the younger age groups – the target audience of social apps. Have you ever checked in someone without their permission? Note: Numbers displayed represent the percentage who said “Yes” to the ‘Have You Ever’ action described by this slide 30% 28%

Amazingly, almost half of respondents have lost a phone! Have you ever lost your mobile phone? 47% Yes 52% No 1% Unsure

There are minimal differences between gender and age categories around phone loss. Have you ever lost your mobile phone? Note: Numbers displayed represent the percentage who said “Yes” to the ‘Have You Ever’ action described by this slide 46% 48%

Half of respondents have pocket-dialed. Have you ever pocket-dialed someone? 50% Yes 40% No 10% Unsure

Have you ever pocket-dialed someone? Note: Numbers displayed represent the percentage who said “Yes” to the ‘Have You Ever’ action described by this slide 50% 51%

Unsure 14% Women 14% Men 32% They’re Equal 39% 4-in-10 believe men and women are equally safe in using their mobile phones. Who do you think has safer mobile habits?

Men believe they have safer habits; women don’t discriminate. The respondents in the age group are over ¾ male and believe men are safer. =

“ …no they didn’t”

Texting/calling someone while in transit Having your phone go off/using your phone while you are in a quiet public setting (movie theater or at school) Getting your phone wet and most likely ruining it Pretending to be talking to someone on your phone and actually getting a call in the middle of the pretend conversation Themes from respondent’s anecdotes

“Thinking I'd silenced my phone in the movie theater only to have an alarm continue to go off at regular intervals. Funny thing was, I was getting aggravated because I thought it was someone else's phone going off!” “I know someone who pulled up at a red light next to someone he knew, so he called him on his mobile, only to watch the guy he was calling look at his caller ID and set the phone back down. Basically, he watched himself get screened.” “people acting like they're talking with someone over the phone for a very long time in public transit/places then suddenly the phone itself rings due to a real call” “My wife was non-stop texting me one day while driving in the car. I was ignoring them since I was driving but the Bluetooth in my car stereo kept interrupting my music when she texted with a beep beep sound. I got frustrated so grabbed the phone to text her to wait til I got home - I sideswiped the guard rail and ruined the entire side of my car. It cost me thousands! Now my new Windows Phone will read the text to me instead so I can safely recite a reply.” “I once dropped my phone in the soup and it worked just fine afterwards.”