Phil 148 Chapter 2B. Speech Act Rules 1. Must the speaker use any special words or formulae to perform the speech act? 2. Must the (a) speaker or (b)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cooperation and implicature.
Advertisements

Neo Griceans. RECAP Pragmatics So far in class we’ve been concerned with literal meaning. But people mean more things when they use words than just what.
Pragmatics is the study of how people do things with words.
Yule, Cooperation and implicature Pertemuan 4 Matakuliah: G1042/Pragmatics Tahun: 2006.
Conversational Implicature (Based on Paltridge, chapter 3)
Conversations  Conversation are cooperative events:  Without cooperation, interaction would be chaotic. Would be no reason to communicate  Grice's.
Topic 10: conversational implicature Introduction to Semantics.
The Cooperative Principle
1 MODULE 2 Meaning and discourse in English COOPERATION, POLITENESS AND FACE Lecture 14.
On Status and Form of the Relevance Principle Anton Benz, ZAS Berlin Centre for General Linguistics, Typology and Universals Research.
People & Speech Interfaces CS 260 Wednesday, October 4, 2006.
Semantics & Pragmatics (2)
Jennifer Saul  St Athanasius, meeting his persecutors, who ask if Athanasius is nearby: “He is not far from here”; rather than.
Pragmatics.
Chapter Seven Pragmatics
Semantics 3rd class Chapter 5.
Game Theory and Grice’ Theory of Implicatures Anton Benz.
Theories of Discourse and Dialogue. Discourse Any set of connected sentences This set of sentences gives context to the discourse Some language phenomena.
Functions of Speech 1. Expressive 2. Directive 3. Informative (Referential) 4. Metalinguistic 5. Poetic 6. Phatic 7. Heuristic 8. Commissive 9. Performative.
Language used in conversation Two ways 1. For manipulating relationships 2. Achieving particular goals Rules for conducting and interpreting conversations.
Chapter 8 Pragmatics Contents 8.1 Some basic notions 8.2 Speech act theory 8.3 Principle of conversation.
Department of English Introduction To Linguistics Level Four Dr. Mohamed Younis.
Research Methods in T&I Studies I Cooperative Principle and Culture-Specific Maxims.
C OOPERATIVE P RINCIPLES Drs. Liliek Soepriatmadji, M.Pd.
Pragmatics.
Phil 148 Chapter 3A. Violating Conversational Rules Often, violating a conversational rule draws attention to a specific use of language for a specific.
Pragmatics. Pragmatics n Pragmatics studies how human communication functions.
Pragmatics 1 Ling400. What is pragmatics? Pragmatics is the study of language use.Pragmatics is the study of language use. Intuitive understanding of.
Dr. Katie Welch LING  Heretofore, we have talked about the form of language  But, this is only half the story.  We must also consider the.
MLS 570 Critical Thinking Reading Notes Fogelin: Ch. 1 Fall Term 2006 North Central College Dr. Sally Fowler.
Presentation about pragmatic concepts Implicatures Presuppositions
Wildean Maxims, Gricean Maxims: do the Characters in Earnest Cooperate? N. Saudo-Welby, Université de Picardie (CORPUS)
Welcome Back, Folks! We’re travelling to a littele bit far-end of Language in Use Studies EAA remains your faithful companion.
UNIT 2 - IMPLICATURE.
Pragmatics LO: to understand and be able to apply Grice’s conversational maxims and the concept of schema to texts. Starter: Discussion point Without realising.
ADRESS FORMS AND POLITENESS Second person- used when the subject of the verb in a sentence is the same as the individual to.
Optimal answers and their implicatures A game-theoretic approach Anton Benz April 18 th, 2006.
Chapter 7 Pragmatics English Linguistics: An Introduction.
Intention & Cooperation Discourse and Dialogue CS 359 October 18, 2001.
Cooperation and Implicature (Conversational Implicature) When people talk with each other, they try to converse smoothly and successfully. Cooperation.
Chapter 6 Guidelines for Modelling. 1. The Modelling Process 1. Modelling as a Transformation Process 2. Basic Modelling Activities 3. Types of Modelling.
Discourse Analysis The Negotiation of Meaning Systemic and Schematic Knowledge. People make sense of written or spoken text according to the world they.
Introduction to Linguistics
Lesson 20: Public Speaking Teen Leadership. Effective Communication for Leaders Why is it important to learn to communicate more effectively? Your future.
Language: Comprehension, Production, & Bilingualism Dr. Claudia J. Stanny EXP 4507 Memory & Cognition Spring 2009.
Implicature. I. Definition The term “Implicature” accounts for what a speaker can imply, suggest or mean, as distinct from what the speaker literally.
Aristotel‘s concept to language studies was to study true or false sentences - propositions; Thomas Reid described utterances of promising, warning, forgiving.
SEMANTICS ??? aardvark SEMANTICS ??? aardvark. SEMANTICS: word and sentence meaning. PRAGMATICS: speaker meaning. The semiotic triangle:
Utilization of Sentences Lec. 3
Figurative Language Understanding: A Special Process?
COOPERATION and IMPLICATURE
GRICE’S CONVERSATIONAL MAXIMS
Grice’s Maxims LO: to understand the co-operative principle and how we can use it within our own analysis.
Discourse and Pragmatics
Intro today-HCC class 12, Ist 331, 3 oct 16-FER
Introduction to Linguistics
Truth in advertising Entailment/Implicature “One-third less salt…”
Conversational Maxims
Why conversation works.
The Cooperative Principle
COOPERATIVE PRINCIPLE.
Nofsinger. R., Everyday Conversation, Sage, 1991
Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based & R-based implicature Laurence R. Horn (1984)
The study of meaning in context
The Cooperative Principle
Pragmatics Predmetni nastavnik: doc. dr Valentna Boskovic Markovic
Gricean Cooperative Principle (Maxim) and Implicature
Nofsinger. R., Everyday Conversation, Sage, 1991
Intro today class 11, Ist 331, 1 oct 13
Presentation transcript:

Phil 148 Chapter 2B

Speech Act Rules 1. Must the speaker use any special words or formulae to perform the speech act? 2. Must the (a) speaker or (b) audience hold any special position for the speaker to perform the speech act? 3. Are there any other special circumstances required for the speech act? 4. Is any response or uptake needed to complete the speech act? 5. What feelings/desires/beliefs is the speaker expected to have? 6. What general purpose or purposes are served by this kind of speech act?

Conversational Acts When one uses a speech act to affect another, a conversational act has occurred. One can perform the speech act while failing to perform the intended conversational act. Conversational acts are largely governed by a set of assumptions we will refer to as “conversational rules” (though strictly speaking they are conventions)

(Herbert) Paul Grice Educated at Oxford, taught there for several years, spent the last two decades of his life at the University of California at Berkeley Many of his most influential writings are reprinted in the book Studies in the Way of Words

The Cooperative Principle Language is a cooperative enterprise. It doesn’t work if one side doesn’t cooperate. Grice’s Cooperative Principle contains 4 rules: – Quantity – Quality – Relevance – Manner

Quantity 1. Make your contribution as informative as is required for the current purposes of the exchange 2. Do not make your contribution more informative than is required. ScY ScY

Quality 1. Do not say that which you believe to be false. 2. Do not say that for which you lack adequate evidence.

Relevance Make your information germane to the purposes of the exchange. (anyone see a quantity problem with that?) Unfortunately, there is no set guideline for relevance. Either one can recognize it or one cannot. Make your information germane to the purposes of the exchange. (anyone see a quantity problem with that?)

Manner 1. Avoid obscurity of expression 2. Avoid ambiguity – Giant Police Exercise to Guard Bush – exceptions: when telling a joke for example. 3. Be brief 4. Be orderly --- in short, don’t be goofy.

Conversational Implication When we assume others are following conversational rules, and assume that they assume that we are also, we can convey a great deal of information without saying it. In a conversational exchange we expect more than to be taken literally. The purpose of language is not precision, but versatility. Consider the case of names for persons. There is a reason that they’re so brief even though this can sometimes lead to ambiguity. Apply that same reasoning to names for everything else and you begin to get the picture.

Violating Conversational Rules Damning with faint praise Irony (sarcasm to us Americans) Figurative language Intentional Ambiguity