HD 2007 Rule Diesel Fuel Sulfur Testing and Sampling Methods and Requirements US EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality November 20, 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality is a Lousy Idea-
Advertisements

Interpreting Your Lab Report & Quality Control Results
World Health Organization
Dr Samah Kotb Lecturer of Biochemistry 1 CLS 432 Dr. Samah Kotb Nasr El-deen Biochemistry Clinical practice CLS 432 Dr. Samah Kotb Nasr.
Lecture 8. Quality Assurance/Quality Control The Islamic University of Gaza- Environmental Engineering Department Environmental Measurements (EENV 4244)
Quality Control Procedures put into place to monitor the performance of a laboratory test with regard to accuracy and precision.
Quality Assurance.
Determination of System Equivalency – TaskForce Audi, EA-52, V4.0 WLTP-10-33e.
New Template of Environmental Compliance Approval with Limited Operational Flexibility Environmental Approvals Branch Presented to Air Practitioners’ Group.
Statistics Lecture 22. Last Day…completed 5.1 Today Parts of Section 5.3 and 5.4.
Short Course on Introduction to Meteorological Instrumentation and Observations Techniques QA and QC Procedures Short Course on Introduction to Meteorological.
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Policy
This teaching material has been made freely available by the KEMRI-Wellcome Trust (Kilifi, Kenya). You can freely download,
Detect Limits as Representation for a Standard VAP Rule Discussion Dawn Busalacchi Risk Assessor, DERR, Central Office VAP Rule Discussion Dawn Busalacchi.
QA/QC FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENT Unit 4: Module 13, Lecture 2.
Quality Assurance / Quality Control
QUALITY CONTROL OF PHYSICO-Chemical METHODS Introduction :Validation توثيق المصدوقية.
QA/QC FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENT
Method Comparison A method comparison is done when: A lab is considering performing an assay they have not performed previously or Performing an assay.
Unit #7 - Basic Quality Control for the Clinical Laboratory
Huzairy Hassan School of Bioprocess Engineering UniMAP.
Quality Assurance.
Quality Assessment 2 Quality Control.
Field Analysis Quality Control
Respected Professor Kihyeon Cho
S OFTWARE Q UALITY QA: Quality Assurance By: MSMZ.
Analytical considerations
Quality WHAT IS QUALITY
How to Select a Test Method Marlene Moore Advanced Systems, Inc. June 15, 2010.
QA/QC and QUALIFIERS LOU ANN FISHER CITY OF STILLWATER, OK
Metrology Adapted from Introduction to Metrology from the Madison Area Technical College, Biotechnology Project (Lisa Seidman)
Laboratory QA/QC An Overview.
Control Chart Methodology for Evaluating CEMS Data
Representative Sampling. Samples vs. Populations The population is the total or all of the possible answers we might get by sampling. All of the individuals.
ME551/GEO551 Introduction to Geology of Industrial Minerals Spring 2005 SAMPLING.
5. Quality Assurance and Calibration Quality assurance is We do to get the right answer for our purpose. Have Sufficient accuracy and precision to support.
Chap. 5 Building Valid, Credible, and Appropriately Detailed Simulation Models.
Protocol for inter-laboratory calibration of Male’s monitoring network Nguyen Thi Kim Oanh EEM/SERD, AIT Male’ Declaration 4 th Regional Stakeholders-cum-
Biochemistry Clinical practice CLS 432 Dr. Samah Kotb Lecturer of Biochemistry 2015 Introduction to Quality Control.
RESEARCH & DATA ANALYSIS
Wenclawiak, B.: Fit for Purpose – A Customers View© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003 In: Wenclawiak, Koch, Hadjicostas (eds.) Quality Assurance in.
Control Charts and Trend Analysis for ISO 17025
Quality Control Internal QC External QC. -Monitors a test's method precision and analytical bias. -Preparation of quality control samples and their interpretation.
LECTURE 13 QUALITY ASSURANCE METHOD VALIDATION
Proposed Amendments to Fuel Test Methods Monitoring and Laboratory Division January 25, 2013.
SEMINAR ON PRESENTED BY BRAHMABHATT BANSARI K. M. PHARM PART DEPARTMENT OF PHARMACEUTICS AND PHARMACEUTICAL TECHNOLGY L. M. COLLEGE OF PHARMACY.
Establishing by the laboratory of the functional requirements for uncertainty of measurements of each examination procedure Ioannis Sitaras.
means to “TO CHECK OR PROVE THE VALIDITY OF” According to FDA – “ The goal of validation is to establish a documented evidence which provides a high degree.
Quality is a Lousy Idea-
Unit #6 - Basic Quality Control for the Clinical Laboratory
World Health Organization
EPA Method Equivalency
September 2017 Phillip Godorov Caitlin Farrell
ASTM International Interlaboratory Study Program (ILS)
Practical clinical chemistry
Quality is a Lousy Idea-
This teaching material has been made freely available by the KEMRI-Wellcome Trust (Kilifi, Kenya). You can freely download,
EPA Method Equivalency
What it Means, Why it Works, and How to Comply
METHOD VALIDATION: AN ESSENTIAL COMPONENT OF THE MEASUREMENT PROCESS
Chapter 5 Quality Assurance and Calibration Methods
Why Use Them? By: Marcy Bolek – Alloway
Proposed Ozone Monitoring Revisions Ozone Season and Methods
SDWA Collaborative Efforts Overview
Introduction To Medical Technology
Quality Control Lecture 3
Building Valid, Credible, and Appropriately Detailed Simulation Models
▪Internal quality control:
Quality Assessment The goal of laboratory analysis is to provide the accurate, reliable and timeliness result Quality assurance The overall program that.
Presentation transcript:

HD 2007 Rule Diesel Fuel Sulfur Testing and Sampling Methods and Requirements US EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality November 20, 2002

2 Diesel Fuel Test Methods and Testing Requirements  Designated method is the method that EPA utilizes in its own laboratory to determine compliance with a given standard  Alternative methods are allowed provided they are correlated to the designated method  No requirement for refiners/importers to test every batch of diesel fuel  However, the sulfur standard will be enforced at all points in the distribution system  Test results may be used for affirmative defense in the event of a violation

3 Designated and Alternative Test Methods for Diesel Fuel  For 15 ppm sulfur diesel fuel: –designated test method—ASTM D –alternative test methods— ASTM D ASTM D ASTM D as modified  For 500 ppm sulfur diesel fuel: –designated test method—ASTM D –alternative test methods— ASTM D ASTM D ASTM D (updated to the current version)

4 Diesel Fuel Sampling Methods  Manual Sampling — ASTM D  Automatic Sampling — ASTM D  Automatic Sampling from Pipelines / In-line Blending — ASTM D  Effective June 1, 2001  Same methods are used for low sulfur gasoline

5 Overview of ASTM’s Round Robin Test Results

6 EPA Method Issues  Precision –Standard Deviation of Group of Repeat Measurements on the Same Material  Limit of Quantification (LOQ) –Sensitivity  Accuracy –Interferences  Cost

7 ASTM Statistics  Repeatability –95% CL for Back to Back Repeat Measurements –Surrogate for Precision  Reproducibility –95% CL for Duplicate Measurements Made of the Same Material in Different Laboratories –Surrogate for Accuracy

8 Recent Sulfur Round Robin Diesel Results  Included Several Methods and Instruments  Repeatability Results –One Instrument Value of 0.39 ppm, Several Others near 1 ppm. –Generally Encouraging  Reproducibility Results –Not as Good, No Results below 6 ppm

9 Interpretation of Repeatability  Best Estimate of Precision  Method Precision is Inherent Property –Moderate Influence by Operator Technique –Because Measurements are All Made on the Same Sample, Other Influences Like Interferences Have Little Effect.  Can be Expressed as Precision, SD is Roughly Half of the Repeatability.

10 Interpretation of Reproducibility  Inter-Lab Correlation  Reported Values are a Function of: –Precision –Quality of Written Document –Experience of Operator –Availability of Standards –Availability and Quality of Blanks –Uncorrected Interference

11 Round Robin Observations  No Observed Bias Between Methods –No Problems with Accuracy  Instruments with Good Precision are Available  While There is Room for Improvement, The LOQ Seems Adequate for 15 ppm Diesel Regulation  Instrument Cost is Consistent with Expectations

12 Draft Test Method Plan

13 Potential Test Method Amendment – Performance Criteria Approach  Intend to follow Agency standard guidelines for performance based testing  Conveys “what” needs to be accomplished but not prescriptively ”how” to do it  Under this approach, there would be no designated method but we would notify industry on what method we will use  Allows for greater flexibility in instrument selection and encourages the development and use of better instrumentation

14 Potential Test Method Amendment – Performance Criteria Approach (cont)  Based on specified precision and accuracy criteria from existing approved methods (i.e., from the round robin results)  Possible for measuring properties with gravimetric standards  Could also require QA/QC records documenting initial and continuing demonstration of method performance  Allows everyone to know that they are measuring accurately within the repeatability of the instrument

15 Potential Performance Criteria  Proposed precision and accuracy values which would allow multiple commercially available instruments  Recommend ongoing measurement to ensure that no shift in precision or accuracy has occurred  Data must be retained for audit purposes

16 Precision & Accuracy Demonstration  How method could be qualified for use: –Precision: tests over 1 week Using any commercially available diesel fuel subject to the 15 ppm sulfur standard Current premise is that these precision samples could be run at any point in the day after any routine checks are completed –Accuracy: tests over 1 week Using any commercially acceptable gravimetric sulfur standard Samples could be run in the same sets as the precision samples, if desired  Objective is to make this effort consistent with the normal start up procedure of a test method

17 Terminology  Precision and Accuracy –Precision deals with the consistency of a set of measurements. Can the method get close to the same answer each time in repeat measurements on the same material. –Accuracy is concerned with whether the average of a large number of measurements is very close to the “true value” of what’s being measured.  Repeatability and Reproducibility (both precision measures) –Repeatability, as used by ASTM, is a measure of the consistency with which the same instrument in the same laboratory run by the same operator can get a similar answer on back-to-back tests. –Reproducibility is an interlaboratory precision measure. It looks at the dispersion in a set of tests on the same material using the same method, but in different labs and run by different operators.

18 Terminology (continued)  Gravimetric standard. This is a calibration material that is made by adding a carefully weighed or measured amount of the substance of interest to a known quantity of other materials to give a known concentration.  Matrix effect. This is where a measurement method gets different answers for the concentration of the substance of interest depending on the composition of the “other materials” to which that substance was added. Some methods are able to mostly ignore such matrix differences, while others are said to be “matrix-sensitive”.

19 Terminology (continued)  Statistical Quality Control (SQC). A set of practices designed to monitor and document the quality of ongoing measurement work and alert the analyst to problems before they result in unacceptable quality levels (control charts, etc.)  Round Robin. These are test programs, frequently organized and administered by ASTM, in which the same set of materials (gasolines, diesel fuels, etc.) are sent simultaneously to many different laboratories that are all operating a particular test method. These programs may be conducted for a variety of purposes, but one very important role is to establish the precision of the method in question—both repeatability (intralab), and reproducibility (interlab).