III. Ground-Water Management Problem Used for the Exercises.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Modeling of Data. Basic Bayes theorem Bayes theorem relates the conditional probabilities of two events A, and B: A might be a hypothesis and B might.
Advertisements

Test of (µ 1 – µ 2 ),  1 =  2, Populations Normal Test Statistic and df = n 1 + n 2 – 2 2– )1– 2 ( 2 1 )1– 1 ( 2 where ] 2 – 1 [–
IX. Transient Model Sensitivity Analysis. Sensitivity Analysis for the Initial Model One-percent sensitivities: Can be explained using principle of superposition.
11-1 Empirical Models Many problems in engineering and science involve exploring the relationships between two or more variables. Regression analysis.
Welcome to PHYS 225a Lab Introduction, class rules, error analysis Julia Velkovska.
VII. Observation-Parameter Statistics
CmpE 104 SOFTWARE STATISTICAL TOOLS & METHODS MEASURING & ESTIMATING SOFTWARE SIZE AND RESOURCE & SCHEDULE ESTIMATING.
Model calibration using. Pag. 5/3/20152 PEST program.
Regression Analysis Module 3. Regression Regression is the attempt to explain the variation in a dependent variable using the variation in independent.
Simple Linear Regression. Start by exploring the data Construct a scatterplot  Does a linear relationship between variables exist?  Is the relationship.
Regression Analysis Once a linear relationship is defined, the independent variable can be used to forecast the dependent variable. Y ^ = bo + bX bo is.
Regression Analysis Using Excel. Econometrics Econometrics is simply the statistical analysis of economic phenomena Here, we just summarize some of the.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved Least Squares Regression Models.
Statistics: Data Analysis and Presentation Fr Clinic II.
Transient Simulations require: Initial Conditions Storage Coefficient Time step.
The Simple Regression Model
The Calibration Process
Watershed Hydrology, a Hawaiian Prospective; Groundwater Ali Fares, PhD Evaluation of Natural Resource Management, NREM 600 UHM-CTAHR-NREM.
Water Supply Study Present and Planned Water Supply Operational (2001) spring water bottling plant, with groundwater extraction rates approximating 125.
Groundwater Modeling – 2: Computer Implementation
Quantify prediction uncertainty (Book, p ) Prediction standard deviations (Book, p. 180): A measure of prediction uncertainty Calculated by translating.
Introduction to Linear Regression and Correlation Analysis
Calibration Guidelines 1. Start simple, add complexity carefully 2. Use a broad range of information 3. Be well-posed & be comprehensive 4. Include diverse.
MODFLOW – Introduction Organization & Main Packages
Stats for Engineers Lecture 9. Summary From Last Time Confidence Intervals for the mean t-tables Q Student t-distribution.
IV. Sensitivity Analysis for Initial Model 1. Sensitivities and how are they calculated 2. Fit-independent sensitivity-analysis statistics 3. Scaled sensitivities.
Inferences in Regression and Correlation Analysis Ayona Chatterjee Spring 2008 Math 4803/5803.
Chapter 7 Estimates and Sample Sizes
Identify Parameters Important to Predictions using PPR & Identify Existing Observation Locations Important to Predictions using OPR.
Statistical Decision Making. Almost all problems in statistics can be formulated as a problem of making a decision. That is given some data observed from.
Using Ground-Water Model Predictions and the ppr and opr Statistics to Guide Data Collection.
CHAPTER 14 MULTIPLE REGRESSION
(Zheng and Bennett) Steps in Transport Modeling Calibration step (calibrate flow model & transport model) Adjust parameter values Traditional approach.
VI. Evaluate Model Fit Basic questions that modelers must address are: How well does the model fit the data? Do changes to a model, such as reparameterization,
Grid design/boundary conditions and parameter selection USGS publication (on course website): Guidelines for Evaluating Ground-Water Flow Models Scientific.
Modflow, GWVistas MODular three-dimensional finite- difference ground-water FLOW model
V. Nonlinear Regression Objective-Function Surfaces Thus far, we have: Parameterized the forward model Obtained head and flow observations and their weights.
VIII: Methods for Evaluating Model Predictions 1. Define predictive quantity and calculate sensitivities and standard deviations (Ex8.1a) 2. Assess data.
Groundwater Modeling – 3 Transient Models Groundwater Hydraulics Daene C. McKinney.
Studying the effects of an irrigation/drainage network on groundwater table fluctuations using 3D groundwater flow modeling Mohammad Zare Manferd Koch.
Calibration Guidelines 1. Start simple, add complexity carefully 2. Use a broad range of information 3. Be well-posed & be comprehensive 4. Include diverse.
RIV61 RIVER PACKAGE The purpose of the River Package is to simulate the effects of flow between surface-water features and groundwater systems. For each.
CHEMISTRY ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY Fall Lecture 6.
LECTURE 3: ANALYSIS OF EXPERIMENTAL DATA
IX. Transient Model Nonlinear Regression and Statistical Analysis.
Simple Linear Regression. Data available : (X,Y) Goal : To predict the response Y. (i.e. to obtain the fitted response function f(X)) Least Squares Fitting.
Edward’s Aquifer Ground-water Flow Model Texas Ground Water 2004 November 19, 2004 George B. Ozuna.
Regularised Inversion and Model Predictive Uncertainty Analysis.
Calibration & Sensitivity Analysis. Head measured in an observation well is known as a target. Baseflow measurements or other fluxes (e.g., ET) are also.
Steady-State and Transient Models of Groundwater Flow and Advective Transport, Eastern Snake River Plain Aquifer, INL and Vicinity, Idaho Jason C. Fisher,
Machine Learning 5. Parametric Methods.
Regression Analysis Deterministic model No chance of an error in calculating y for a given x Probabilistic model chance of an error First order linear.
IX. Transient Forward Modeling. Ground-Water Management Issues Recall the ground-water management issues for the simple flow system considered in the.
CHAPTER 1 EVERYTHING YOU EVER WANTED TO KNOW ABOUT STATISTCS.
Using the Model to Evaluate Observation Locations and Parameter Information in the Context of Predictions.
Statistics 350 Lecture 2. Today Last Day: Section Today: Section 1.6 Homework #1: Chapter 1 Problems (page 33-38): 2, 5, 6, 7, 22, 26, 33, 34,
Statistical Decision Making. Almost all problems in statistics can be formulated as a problem of making a decision. That is given some data observed from.
©2013, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved Chapter 3 Investigating the Relationship of Scores.
AUTOMATED PARAMETER ESTIMATION Model Parameterization, Inverse Modeling, PEST.
Groundwater Modeling Assignment #2. Parts A and B.
Development and Application of a Groundwater-Flow Model of the Atlantic Coastal Plain aquifers, Aiken County, South Carolina to Support Water Resource.
Introduction, class rules, error analysis Julia Velkovska
The Calibration Process
Chapter 6 Calibration and Application Process
POSC 202A: Lecture Lecture: Substantive Significance, Relationship between Variables 1.
Calibration.
GLOBAL PROCESS DATA Name File: Contains the names of most input and output files and controls the parts of the model program that are active. Discretization.
Chapter 5 Sources and Sinks
Statistical Inference for the Mean: t-test
Presentation transcript:

III. Ground-Water Management Problem Used for the Exercises

Ground-Water Flow System The flow system is comprised of two confined aquifers separated by a confining unit. Inflow occurs primarily as areal recharge; there is also a very small amount of inflow across the boundary with the hillside. At steady-state, outflow occurs only as discharge to the river.

Management Issues Ground-water management issues related to this flow system: Pumping wells for water supply are being completed in aquifers 1 and 2. The effect of pumping on the river is of concern, because there is a minimum required discharge from the ground-water system to the river. A landfill is proposed in one corner of the study area. The landfill developers claim (a) the landfill is outside the capture zone of the wells and (b) any leaking effluent will reach the river sufficiently diluted. We are developing a flow model to help evaluate these claims.

Will effluent go to well or river? ? ? Predicted transport from landfill

Ground-Water Flow Model First, steady-state model without pumping will be developed and calibrated using available measurements of hydraulic-heads and discharge to the river, and will be used for preliminary evaluation of the issues. Then, pumping wells will be installed, a long-term aquifer test will be conducted using the wells, and a transient model of the system will be recalibrated using the steady-state measurements as well as the additional drawdown and river discharge data collected during the test. See flow model setup in Figure 2-1b (page 32) of Hill and Tiedeman. See model parameter definition and starting values in Table 3-1 (page 38). See true simulated conditions in Figures 2-1c and 2-1d (page 22-23).

MODFLOW Packages Used Basic (BAS) and the Discretization input file Define model grid, including rows, columns, and layers Define types of model layer (confined; convertible) Layer Property Flow (LPF) Define hydraulic properties – K, S s, S y, Anisotropy Recharge (RCH) Define distribution of areal recharge River (RIV) General-Head Boundary (GHB) Well (WEL) Define pumpage Used here for prediction runs only

Spatial Discretization -- Ground-Water Flow Model Grid Figure 2-1b of Hill and Tiedeman (page 22)

Layer-Property Flow Package Figure 2-1a of Hill and Tiedeman (page 34) Define hydraulic properties – K, Ss, Sy, Anisotropy Model layer 1 is homogeneous Model layer 2 has K that increases linearly from beneath the river to the hillside

Recharge Package Can apply recharge to model layer 1 or top active cell at each row, column location Input a flow rate (L/T). The program multiplies by area to get volume per time. Layer data. Parameters are used to define the recharge rate. For this problem, use 2 zones; no multiplication arrays.

The River (RIV) and General-Head Boundary (GHB) Packages are used Both define head- dependent boundaries: q=C(H-h) GHB DRN RIV

Well Package List data – layer, row, column, pumpage rate Input volume of discharge per time. Outflow is NEGATIVE. For this problem, no pumpage parameters need to be defined, but you can use the parameter capability to define them if you like. [Why might you want to do that?]

Parameters and Starting Values Table 3-1 of Hill and Tiedeman (page 38)

True Simulated Conditions Figure 2-1 c and 2d of Hill and Tiedeman (page 22-23)

Observations 10 head observations, 5 in each model layer. Observed values shown in Table 3-2 (page 38) of Hill and Tiedeman. 1 steady-state flow observation: ground-water discharge to the river of –4.4 m 3 /sec.

Head Observations Well identifierObservation name LayerRowCol Observed head (m) Variance of well elevation measurement error (m 2 ) Variance of water-level measurement error (m 2 ) Variance of the observation (m 2 ) 11.ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss Table 3-2 of Hill and Tiedeman (page 38)

Weighting is accomplished using UCODE_2005 Here we break for a lecture introducing UCODE_2005

Weights on Observations Weighted residuals are squared and summed in the objective function: PriorHeadsFlows Need to weight the observations for two primary reasons: So that residuals for observations with different units (e.g. heads and flows) can be summed in the objective function. To account for different observations having different degrees of measurement error. Weighting is used to reduce the influence of observations that are less accurate, and to increase the influence of observations that are more accurate.

Weights on Observations Defining the weights as being proportional to the inverse of the variance of measurement error meets both these needs: The variance of measurement error is an estimate of the uncertainty of the observation. How do we quantify this? Need to quantify the uncertainty using:  A range that is symmetric about the measurement used for the observation.  A probability with which the true value is expected to occur within the range.

Weights on Observations: Example 1 A head observation is thought to be “good to within 3 meters”. Quantify this as “there is a 95-percent chance the true value falls within 3 meters of the measurement.” Use a normal probability table to determine that a 95-percent confidence interval is a value plus and minus 1.96 times the standard deviation, . Thus, 1.96 x  = 3 m, so  = 1.53 m, and the variance  2 = 2.34 m 2.

Weights on Observations: Example 2 A measurement of stream loss to a ground-water system is derived by subtracting two streamflow measurements, an upstream value of 3.0 m 3 /s and a downstream value of 2.5 m 3 /s. Quantify uncertainty: The first measurement is considered to be slightly worse than the second. For the upstream measurement, the hydrologist believes that there is a 90% chance that the true value falls within ± 5% of the measured value; for the downstream measurement, there is a 95% chance that the true value falls within ± 5% of the measured value. Using values from a normal probability table, a 90% confidence interval is a value ±1.65 times the standard deviation, . Upstream measurement: 1.65 x  = 0.05 x 3.0 m 3 / , so  = m 3 /s. Downstream measurement: 1.96 x  = 0.05 x 2.5 m 3 / , so  = m 3 /s. The loss of streamflow in the reach between these two measurements is 0.5 m 3 /s. How accurately is this loss known? Add variances!! The variance of the loss is = (m 3 /  ) 2.

Weights for the Steady-State Problem Head Observations: Elevation of each observation well has a variance of measurement error of 1.00 m 2. Each water-level measurement has a variance of measurement error of m 2. Thus, total variance measurement error = m 2 Flow Observation: Coefficient of variation of 10%; thus  = 0.1 x 4.4 m 3 /s = 0.44 m 3 /s DO EXERCISE 3.2d: Calculate weights on hydraulic-head and flow observations.

Model Fit Using Starting Parameter Values DATA AT HEAD AND FLOW LOCATIONS OBSERVATION MEASURED SIMULATED WEIGHTED NAME VALUE VALUE RESIDUAL WEIGHT**.5 RESIDUAL hd01.ss hd02.ss hd03.ss hd04.ss hd05.ss hd06.ss hd07.ss hd08.ss hd09.ss hd10.ss flow01.ss STATISTICS FOR THESE RESIDUALS: MAXIMUM WEIGHTED RESIDUAL: 0.158E+01 Observation: hd01.ss MINIMUM WEIGHTED RESIDUAL: E+02 Observation: hd03.ss AVERAGE WEIGHTED RESIDUAL: E+02 # RESIDUALS >= 0. : 2 # RESIDUALS < 0. : 9 NUMBER OF RUNS: 3 IN 11 OBSERVATIONS SUM OF SQUARED WEIGHTED RESIDUALS : SUM OF SQUARED WEIGHTED RESIDUALS WITH PRIOR: SUM OF SQUARED, WEIGHTED RESIDUALS: DEPENDENT VARIABLES: From UCODE-2005 output file. DO EXERCISE 3.3: Evaluate model fit using the starting parameter values. Least squares objective function

Example Least-Squares Objective Function HEADS FLOWS PRIOR 2 1 ))('()(bhhbS ii nh i i    

Basic Steps for Model Calibration Italicized steps are affected by using regression