CES Status J.Osborne 6 November 2009 Status Report from Civil Engineering and Services Working Group J.Osborne GS/SEM for CES Working Group
CES Status Civil engineering and services Develop a layout for the interaction region. This includes civil engineering and technical infrastructure. Work with ILC wherever synergies exist. Planning and cost estimates for the construction of the experimental area, including surface buildings. This includes civil engineering, cooling an ventilation, electrical installations, survey, access control, transport and handling, etc. Collaborate closely with the Detector Working Group. Follow up the evolution of the detector and MDI layout, starting from existing preliminary layouts.
CES Status CES Working Group Representatives : Civil Engineering and ChairmanJ.Osborne(GS) Technical SecretaryM.Gastal(EN) EN Co-ordinatorC.Hauviller(EN) CLIC Link persons (from other WG’s)P.Lebrun / G.Riddone…(DG&BE) Cooling and Ventilation CVJ.Inigo-Golfin / M.Nonis / C.Martel(EN) Electricity ELC.Jach(EN/DG) Survey SUH.Mainaud Durand(BE) Controls, Safety ASET.Pettersson(GS) Horizontal Handling HEK.Kershaw(EN) Vertical HandlingHEI.Ruehl(EN) CE Layouts, 3d modelsA.Kosmicki (GS) SC Link PersonR.Trant / F.Corsanego(DG) Experimental Area DesignM.Gastal(EN) ILC membersV.Kuchler (FNAL), A.Enomoto (KEK) Civil Engineering and Services (CES) WG
CES Status J.Osborne 5 November Design
CES Status J.Osborne 5 November Design
CES Status 4.5m tunnel used as baseline for 2007 costing exercise
CES Status 7 4.5m tunnel for CDR
CES Status 8
9 CDR Long profile as per ILC
CES Status 10 20mrad To be modified !
CES Status 11 To be modified !
CES Status ILC RDR Baseline Layouts for Interaction Region
CES Status 400t 400 ton gantry crane is the cost driver large steel columns down to floor level would be needed Lot of lost space ILC RDR Baseline for IR cavern
CES Status Possible layout for ILC Interaction Region for Deep Tunnel Solution using CMS concept A.Herve (CMS) study 2007
CES Status Proposed new cross section for ILC Interaction Region
CES Status ILC Dubna design for shallow site
CES Status ILC 3d models developed at CERN using CATIA
CES Status 14.Oct CLIC_09 Workshop H.Gerwig/ A. Gaddi/ N.Siegrist Tunnel part Thin endcaps Is this ‘tunnel part’ more stable than cavern ? “Tunnel is at least ~ 10 times more stable than detector” (A. Seryi, CLIC08)
CES Status 2004
CES Status 2005 Stability of CMS platforms could be checked ?
CES Status Summary Design for ILC RDR experimental hall exists but will be developed further for TDP For CLIC CDR design should be developed further, better adapted to CERN environment Costing for CDR required for all technical infrastructure CES will collaborate closely with the Detector Working Group. Follow up the evolution of the detector and MDI layout, starting from existing preliminary layouts.