Nicolo de Groot, Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryDESY PRC, 7/8 May 2003p. 1 CCD-based Vertex Detector - LCFI status report Nicolo de Groot RAL/Bristol Conceptual.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Konstantin Stefanov, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory4 th ECFA-DESY Workshop, 1-4 April 2003p. 1 CCD-based Vertex Detector - LCFI status report Konstantin.
Advertisements

1 Konstantin Stefanov, CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory LCFI Status Report: Sensors for the ILC Konstantin Stefanov CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
The Status of the LCFI Project Snowmass 2005 Joel Goldstein CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory For the LCFI Collaboration.
A CCD-based vertex detector Status report from the LCFI collaboration
Latest Developments from the CCD Front End LCWS 2005 Stanford Joel Goldstein, RAL for the LCFI Collaboration.
Konstantin Stefanov, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory UTA LC Workshop, 8 Jan Report from the LCFI collaboration Konstantin Stefanov RAL Introduction:
1 Konstantin Stefanov, CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory 1 26 September 2006 LCFI Status Report: Vertex Detector R&D Konstantin Stefanov CCLRC Rutherford.
LCFI Collaboration Status Report LCWS 2004 Paris Joel Goldstein for the LCFI Collaboration Bristol, Lancaster, Liverpool, Oxford, RAL.
Development of an Active Pixel Sensor Vertex Detector H. Matis, F. Bieser, G. Rai, F. Retiere, S. Wurzel, H. Wieman, E. Yamamato, LBNL S. Kleinfelder,
LCWS 31/5/2007Erik Johnson STFC,RAL1 ILC Vertex Detector Mechanical Studies Erik Johnson On behalf of the LCFI collaboration STFC, Rutherford Appleton.
Recent developments with LCFI ■ Introduction – towards the ILC ■ Some international VXD developments ■ Progress with LCFI sensor development and testing.
Andrei Nomerotski 1 CCD-based Pixel Detectors by LCFI Andrei Nomerotski (U.Oxford) on behalf of LCFI collaboration Hiroshima2006, Carmel CA Outline  LCFI.
1 Konstantin Stefanov, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory 1 LCFI Status Report Konstantin Stefanov on behalf of LCFI CALICE UK Meeting, 27 March 2007  Introduction.
28 June 2002Santa Cruz LC Retreat M. Breidenbach1 SD – Silicon Detector EM Calorimetry.
Andrei Nomerotski 1 External Electronics : WP4 Andrei Nomerotski, LCFI Collaboration Meeting 28 March 2006 Outline  Test Boards for Sensors : MotherBoards.
Vertex 2002, Kona, Hawaii S.Xella – Rutherford Appleton Laboratory A vertex detector for the next linear collider Stefania Xella on behalf of the LCFI.
Linear Collider Flavour Identification Collaboration: Case for Support ■ Introduction to the ILC and LCFI: ♦Physics at the ILC ♦LCFI physics studies ♦Sensor.
Andrei Nomerotski 1 CPC2 and Electron Microscopy A.Nomerotski 7//9/2007  Worldwide efforts to develop sensors for keV electrons for Transmission.
1 Instrumentation DepartmentMicroelectronics Design GroupR. Turchetta 3 April 2003 International ECFA/DESY Workshop Amsterdam, 1-4 April 2003 CMOS Monolithic.
Konstantin Stefanov, CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory PPRP open session: LCFI, IoP, 8 th September Linear Collider Flavour Identification (LCFI)
A new idea of the vertex detector for ILC Y. Sugimoto Nov
SVX4 chip 4 SVX4 chips hybrid 4 chips hybridSilicon sensors Front side Back side Hybrid data with calibration charge injection for some channels IEEE Nuclear.
Development of Readout ASIC for FPCCD Vertex Detector 01 October 2009 Kennosuke.Itagaki Tohoku University.
D. Lissauer, BNL. 1 ATLAS ID Upgrade Scope R&D Plans for ATLAS Tracker First thoughts on Schedule and Cost.
Si Pixel Tracking Detectors Introduction Sensor Readout Chip Mechanical Issues Performance -Diamond.
Why silicon detectors? Main characteristics of silicon detectors: Small band gap (E g = 1.12 V)  good resolution in the deposited energy  3.6 eV of deposited.
Study of FPCCD Vertex Detector 12 Jul. th ACFA WS Y. Sugimoto KEK.
Fine Pixel CCD Option for the ILC Vertex Detector
July US LC Workshop Cornell U – Chris Damerell 1 A CCD-based vertex detector Chris Damerell on behalf of the LCFI Collaboration Project overview.
07 October 2004 Hayet KEBBATI -1- Data Flow Reduction and Signal Sparsification in MAPS Hayet KEBBATI (GSI/IReS)
LCFI Collaboration Status Report LCUK Meeting Oxford, 29/1/2004 Joel Goldstein for the LCFI Collaboration Bristol, Lancaster, Liverpool, Oxford, QMUL,
1 Digital Active Pixel Array (DAPA) for Vertex and Tracking Silicon Systems PROJECT G.Bashindzhagyan 1, N.Korotkova 1, R.Roeder 2, Chr.Schmidt 3, N.Sinev.
Leo Greiner TC_Int1 Sensor and Readout Status of the PIXEL Detector.
Development of an ASIC for reading out CCDS at the vertex detector of the International Linear Collider Presenter: Peter Murray ASIC Design Group Science.
Vertex Detector for GLD 3 Mar Y. Sugimoto KEK.
Summary STS working group Design optimization STS (Strip) layout R&D (MAPS) Working packages.
1 Engineering issues for FPCCD VTX Detector Y. Sugimoto KEK July 24, 2007.
1 Konstantin Stefanov, CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory 1 ECFA 2006, Valencia LCFI Status Report: Vertex Detector R&D Konstantin Stefanov CCLRC Rutherford.
Fine Pixel CCD for ILC Vertex Detector ‘08 7/31 Y. Takubo (Tohoku U.) for ILC-FPCCD vertex group ILC vertex detector Fine Pixel CCD (FPCCD) Test-sample.
Thin Silicon R&D for LC applications D. Bortoletto Purdue University Status report Hybrid Pixel Detectors for LC.
FPCCD option Yasuhiro Sugimoto 2012/5/24 ILD 1.
Joel Goldstein, RAL 4th ECFA/DESY LC Workshop, 1/4/ Vertex Readout Joel Goldstein PPd, RAL 4 th ECFA/DESY LC Workshop DAQ Session 1 st April 2003.
FPCCD Vertex detector 22 Dec Y. Sugimoto KEK.
1 Konstantin Stefanov, CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory LCFI Detector R&D Status Report WP2 – Sensor Development WP3 – Readout and Drive Electronics.
Andrei Nomerotski 1 Andrei Nomerotski, University of Oxford for LCFI collaboration ILC VD Workshop, Menaggio, 23 April 2008 LCFI Report.
BTeV Hybrid Pixels David Christian Fermilab July 10, 2006.
Konstantin Stefanov, CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory PPRP open session: LCFI, IoP, 8 th September Linear Collider Flavour Identification (LCFI)
M. Deveaux, CBM-Collaboration-Meeting, 25 – 28. Feb 2008, GSI-Darmstadt Considerations on the material budget of the CBM Micro Vertex Detector. Outline:
1 FPCCD VTX Work Plan Y. Sugimoto 2010/1/22. 2 FPCCD: Features and R&D issues (1/2) Small pixel size (~5  m) –Sensor development Small size chip; ~6mm.
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Particle Physics Department G. Villani CALICE MAPS Siena October th Topical Seminar on Innovative Particle and.
Report to LCFI Oversight Committee, January 2007 ■ Introduction – towards the ILC ■ Some international VXD developments ■ Progress with LCFI sensor development.
1 Konstantin Stefanov, STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory 1 TILC08, Sendai, Japan A CCD Based Vertex Detector Konstantin Stefanov STFC Rutherford Appleton.
LCFI POsC, July 13, LCFI Project Oversight Committee Outline CCD Clock Drive (WP3/4) External Electronics (WP4) CCD Sensors (WP2) CCD Testing (WP5)
Leo Greiner IPHC1 STAR Vertex Detector Environment with Implications for Design and Testing.
1 Performance of a CCD tracker at room temperature T. Tsukamoto (Saga Univ.) T. Kuniya, H. Watanabe (Saga Univ.); A. Miyamoto, Y. Sugimoto (KEK); S. Takahashi,
1 Konstantin Stefanov, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory 1 LCWS2007 Progress with the CPCCD and the ISIS Konstantin Stefanov Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
1 Konstantin Stefanov, STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory 1 Vertex 2007, Lake Placid A CCD Based Vertex Detector Konstantin Stefanov STFC Rutherford Appleton.
Vertex detector R&D Work Plan in /3/11 Y. Sugimoto for KEK-Tohoku-TohokuGakuin-Niigata- ToyamaCMT Collaboration.
Rene BellwiedSTAR Tracking Upgrade Meeting, Boston, 07/10/06 1 ALICE Silicon Pixel Detector (SPD) Rene Bellwied, Wayne State University Layout, Mechanics.
Sonja Hillert, University of Oxford2 nd ECFA LC workshop, Durham, 1 st September 2004 p. 0 Recent results from R&D towards a vertex detector at the international.
Highlights from the VTX session Marc Winter & Massimo Caccia R&D reports: – DEPFET (M. Trimpl) – CCD (S. Hillert) – UK-CMOS (J.Velthuis) – Continental-CMOS.
Low Mass, Radiation Hard Vertex Detectors R. Lipton, Fermilab Future experiments will require pixelated vertex detectors with radiation hardness superior.
Multiple Scattering and Sensor Thickness Preserving track extrapolation accuracy to bulk of particles at low momentum requires ultra-thin sensors and mechanical.
Andrei Nomerotski 1 Andrei Nomerotski, University of Oxford for LCFI collaboration LCWS2008, 17 November 2008 Column Parallel CCD and Raw Charge Storage.
Requirements and Specifications for Si Pixels Sensors
First Testbeam results
Silicon Pixel Detector for the PHENIX experiment at the BNL RHIC
LCFI Status Report: Sensors for the ILC
Vertex Detector Overview Prototypes R&D Plans Summary.
SiD Tracker Concepts M. Breidenbach
Presentation transcript:

Nicolo de Groot, Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryDESY PRC, 7/8 May 2003p. 1 CCD-based Vertex Detector - LCFI status report Nicolo de Groot RAL/Bristol Conceptual design and goals Detector R&D program at LCFI  Development of Column Parallel CCDs and readout electronics  Thin ladder program for mechanical support of the sensors  Physics design studies Summary CCD-based Vertex Detector

Nicolo de Groot, Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryDESY PRC, 7/8 May 2003p. 2 Partners: Bristol,Lancaster, Liverpool, Oxford, QMUL, RAL Assuming 5 development cycles of ~20 months, not unlike LHC experiments Funded for 3 year by PPARC (2.26M£) from April 2002, with the possibility for further funding Manpower is ramping up (3 new recruits since February) LCFI Project Overview

Nicolo de Groot, Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryDESY PRC, 7/8 May 2003p. 3 5 layers at radii 15, 26, 37, 48 and 60 mm; Low power, gas cooled; High precision, low mass support mechanics; Encased in light foam cryostat; Minimum number of external connections. Conceptual Design and Goals Thin detector (< 0.1% X 0 ) for low error from multiple scattering; Close to the interaction point for reduced extrapolation error; Readout time:  8 ms for NLC/JLC (read between trains) 50 μs for TESLA inner layer (read  20 times during the train); Pixel size  20 μm  20 μm, stand-alone tracking, radiation hard, etc.

Nicolo de Groot, Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryDESY PRC, 7/8 May 2003p. 4 Large area, high speed CCDs Inner layer CCDs: 100  13 mm 2, 2500(V)  650(H) pixels per CCD end; Outer layers: 2 CCDs with size 125  22 mm 2, 6250(V)  1100(H) pixels; 120 CCDs, 799  10 6 pixels (20 μm square) in total; For NLC/JLC: readout time  8 ms in principle sufficient, but not easy to achieve with standard CCDs, Column Parallel CCD is desirable; For TESLA:  50 μs readout time for inner layer CCDs : 50 Mpix/s from each CCD column  Outer layers: 250 μs readout, 25 MHz from each column  Column Parallel CCD is essential Satisfy TESLA requirements, but thinking about NLC/JLC as well CPCCD for JLC/NLC could be very advantageous CCD Development

Nicolo de Groot, Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryDESY PRC, 7/8 May 2003p. 5 Electronics only at the ends of the ladders; Bump-bonded assembly between thinned CPCCD and readout chip; Readout chip does all the data processing:  Amplifier and ADC with Correlated Double Sampling for each CCD column  Gain equalisation between columns  Hit cluster finding  Data sparsification  Memory and I/O interface CPCCD is driven with high frequency, low voltage clocks; Low inductance layout for clock delivery. CCD Ladder End

Nicolo de Groot, Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryDESY PRC, 7/8 May 2003p. 6 CPCCDs for TESLA: Quality of 50 MHz clocks over the entire device (area = 13 cm 2 ): Power dissipation:  Large capacitive load (normally  2-3 nF/cm 2 ), needs low clock amplitudes;  Low average power (  10 W) for the whole detector, but large peak power (TESLA duty cycle = 0.5%). Feedthrough effects:  2-phase drive with sine clocks – natural choice because of symmetry and low harmonics  Ground currents and capacitive feedthrough largely cancel CPCCDs for NLC/JLC: Low readout frequency (780 kHz) – in principle few electrons noise could be achieved; CCD Development

Nicolo de Groot, Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryDESY PRC, 7/8 May 2003p. 7 Our First CPCCD (E2V) Delivered, testing imminent 1-stage source followers and direct connections on 20 μm pitch Direct connections and 2-stage source followers Two phase, pixel size 20 μm  20 μm; Wire/bump bond connections to readout chip and external electronics; Two charge transport regions; Serious testing in the following months!

Nicolo de Groot, Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryDESY PRC, 7/8 May 2003p. 8 First bump-bondable readout chip (CPR-1) Designed by the Microelectronics Group at RAL; Voltage amplifiers for the 1-stage SF outputs, charge amplifiers for the direct connections; Everything on 20 μm pitch; 0.25 μm CMOS process; scalable and designed to work at 50 MHz; Smaller chip with ADC arrays and amplifiers already tested; Work on next generation chip with 2  2 cluster finding and sparsification has started. Principle demonstrated on 20  m pitch. FIFO bit flash ADCs Charge Amplifiers Voltage Amplifiers Wire/bump bond pads Readout Chip Design

Nicolo de Groot, Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryDESY PRC, 7/8 May 2003p. 9 A program to design CCD support structures with the following properties: Very low mass (< 0.4% X 0 – SLD VXD3) Shape repeatability to few microns when temperature cycled down to  –100  C; Compatible with bump bonding; Overall assembly sufficiently robust for safe handling with appropriate jigs; Thin Ladder R&D Three options: Unsupported CCDs – thinned to  50 μm and held under tension Semi-supported CCDs – thinned to  20 μm and attached to thin (and not rigid) support, held under tension; Fully-supported CCDs – thinned to  20 μm and bonded to 3D rigid substrate (e.g. Be)

Nicolo de Groot, Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryDESY PRC, 7/8 May 2003p. 10 FEA simulations continuing: Distortions of only few μm, optimise adhesive pitch and size; Silicone adhesive: NuSil, excellent at low temperature Layer thickness  0.12% X 0 XY stage for 2-dimensional profiling being assembled: Laser displacement meter Resolution 1 μm Models made from steel + unprocessed Si will be measured CCD brought down Assembly after shim removal and curing Beryllium substrate (250 μm) Beryllium substrate with adhesive balls Thinned CCD (  20 μm) Adhesive Shims 1 mm 0.2mm Semi-supported Option

Nicolo de Groot, Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryDESY PRC, 7/8 May 2003p. 11 FEA Simulation

Nicolo de Groot, Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryDESY PRC, 7/8 May 2003p. 12 Physics Design Studies The design of the VXD should be driven by the physics requirements: 2 configurations, 5 layer single thickness and 4 layer double thickness Make single muon and pion tracks for all p’s and  ’s in Brahms. Fit the distributions Include the parametrizations in Simdet Biggest effect from removal of the inner layer Provide to physics groups

Nicolo de Groot, Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryDESY PRC, 7/8 May 2003p. 13 Tagging Performance Clear performance difference between configurations Charm suffers most, B tagging is “easy” Good agreement between Brahms and Simdet (T. Kuhl) 5layers 4 layers, double

Nicolo de Groot, Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryDESY PRC, 7/8 May 2003p. 14 Vertex Charge New procedure to attach track to vertices Charged B, up to 89% correct tag, 6-8% worse for 4 layer double thickness configuration Charged D, excellent purity, less of a difference between the confugurations

Nicolo de Groot, Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryDESY PRC, 7/8 May 2003p. 15 Physics Plans Neutral B: dipole Maintain, develop and improve tools Provide them to the physics community so we can get feed-back on detector parameters from various physics channels Make a transition to new C++/Java environment

Nicolo de Groot, Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryDESY PRC, 7/8 May 2003p. 16 Detector R&D work at the LCFI collaboration:  Development of fast column parallel CCD and its readout chip;  Precision mechanical support of thinned CCDs.  Physics Design Studies Most aspects of the R&D are applicable to all proposed LC machines; High speed CPCCDs are mainly for TESLA, however NLC/JLC likely to benefit from slow CPCCDs; Significant work is required, challenging combination of chip size and speed; More results to follow in a couple of months. More information is available from the LCFI’s web page: Summary