Updates to LDP for IPv6 draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-02 Vishwas Manral Rajiv Papneja Carlos Pignataro Rajiv Asati IETF 80 - Prague, Czech.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MPLS Multiple Topology Support draft-zhao-mpls-ldp-multiple-topology-01 draft-zhao-mpls-rsvp-te-multiple-topology-01 IETF 80 – Prague.
Advertisements

LDP IP and PW Capability draft-raza-mpls-ldp-ip-pw-capability-00.txt Kamran Raza Sami Boutros draft-raza-mpls-ldp-ip-pw-capability-00.txt.
Multicast LDP extension for hub & spoke multipoint LSP
IPv6 Routing IPv6 Workshop Manchester September 2013
BGP Extensions for BIER draft-xu-idr-bier-extensions-01 Xiaohu Xu (Huawei) Mach Chen (Huawei) Keyur Patel (Cisco) IJsbrand Wijnands (Cisco)
CS Summer 2003 Lecture 14. CS Summer 2003 MPLS VPN Architecture MPLS VPN is a collection of sites interconnected over MPLS core network. MPLS.
MPLS H/W update Brief description of the lab What it is? Why do we need it? Mechanisms and Protocols.
A Study of MPLS Department of Computing Science & Engineering DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY, LEICESTER, U.K. By PARMINDER SINGH KANG
Running MPLS on an IPv6-only Network Wes George (operator asking for it) Vishwas Manral Rajiv Asati Rajiv Papneja Carlos Pignataro.
Extension to LDP-VPLS for Ethernet Broadcast and Multicast draft-delord-l2vpn-ldp-vpls-broadcast-exten-03 Presenter: Zhihua Liu, China Telecom IETF79,
1 Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) presented by: chitralekha tamrakar (B.S.E.) divya krit tamrakar (B.S.E.) Rashmi shrivastava(B.S.E.) prakriti.
IETF80, Prague1 LDP Extensions for Optimized MAC Address Withdrawal in VPLS model 3 supporting Qualified learning draft-chen-l2vpn-vpls-mac-opt-qualified-01.
Draft-akiya-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode-simple Nobo Akiya George Swallow Carlos Pignataro Loa Andersson Mach Chen Shaleen Saxena IETF 88, Vancouver, Canada.
Host Identity Protocol
IETF 84, July 2012Slide 1 Multiple LDP Instances in single Label Space Mustapha Aïssaoui, Pranjal K. Dutta Alcatel-Lucent.
IPv6 WORKING GROUP March 2002 Minneapolis IETF Bob Hinden / Nokia Steve Deering / Cisco Systems Co-Chairs.
Softwire Mesh Framework: Multicast Mingwei Xu Yong Cui CERNET, China Chris Metz, Cisco 68 th IETF Meeting, Prague March 2007.
Device Reset Characterization draft-ietf-bmwg-reset-02 Rajiv Asati Carlos Pignataro Fernando Calabria Cesar Olvera Presented by Andrew.
Managing the Use of Privacy Extensions for SLAAC in IPv6 (draft-gont-6man-managing-privacy- extensions-01.txt) Fernando Gont (UTN/FRH) Ron Broersma (DREN)
Advanced Roaming & Mobility Scenarios in IPv6 Rafal Lukawiecki Strategic Consultant & Director Project Botticelli Ltd in.
Draft-ietf-fecframe-config-signaling-02 1 FEC framework Configuration Signaling draft-ietf-fecframe-config-signaling-02.txt IETF 76 Rajiv Asati.
Draft-asati-bgp-mpls-blackhole-avoidance-00.txt1 BGP/MPLS Traffic Blackhole Avoidance Proposal draft-asati-bgp-mpls-blackhole-avoidance-00 Rajiv Asati.
Mobile IPv6 with IKEv2 and revised IPsec architecture IETF 61
1 Multicast Routing Blackhole Avoidance draft-asati-pim-multicast-routing-blackhole-avoid-00 Rajiv Asati Mike McBride IETF 72, Dublin.
Gap Analysis for Operating IPv6- only MPLS Networks draft-george-mpls-ipv6-only-gap-01 Wes George (operator asking for it) Carlos Pignataro, Rajiv Asati.
IDR WG 6PE-Alt draft-manral-idr-mpls-explicit-null-00.txt Vishwas Manral, IPInfusion Manoj Dutta, IPInfusion IETF 71, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
IETF 69, July 2007Slide 1 Preferential Forwarding Status bit Definition draft-muley-dutta-pwe3-redundancy-bit-01.txt Praveen Muley, Pranjal K. Dutta, Mustapha.
Label Distribution Protocols LDP: hop-by-hop routing RSVP-TE: explicit routing CR-LDP: another explicit routing protocol, no longer under development.
Signaling Color Label Switched Paths Using LDP draft-alvarez-mpls-ldp-color-lsp-00 Kamran Raza Sami Boutros Santiago.
Extended procedures and Considerations for Loop Free Alternatives draft-chunduri-rtgwg-lfa-extended-procedures-01 Uma Chunduri Ericsson Inc. Jeff Tantsura.
Routing Protocols Internal and External Routing 6DEPLOY. IPv6 Deployment and Support.
1 IETF-70 draft-akhter-bmwg-mpls-meth MPLS Benchmarking Methodology draft-akhter-bmwg-mpls-meth-03 IETF 70 Aamer Akhter / Rajiv Asati /
Draft-ietf-mpls--ldp-dod-01IETF 83: 28 March LDP DoD draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-dod-01 Thomas Beckhaus (Deutsche Telekom AG) Bruno Decraene (France Telecom)
82 nd Taipei Protection Mechanisms for LDP P2MP/MP2MP LSP draft-zhao-mpls-mldp-protections-00.txt Quintin Zhao, Emily Chen, Huawei.
83rd IETF – Paris, France IJ. Wijnands E. Rosen K. Raza J. Tantsura A. Atlas draft-wijnands-mpls-mldp-node-protection-00
Deploying Dual-Stack Lite in IPv6 Network draft-boucadair-dslite-interco-v4v6-04 Mohamed Boucadair
IPv6 over ’s IPv6 Convergence Sublayer IPv6 over ’s IPv6 Convergence Sublayer draft-madanapalli-ipv6-over ipv6cs-00 Syam Madanapalli.
Fast Reroute for Node Protection in LDP-based LSPs draft-esale-mpls-ldp-node-frr-02 Raveendra Torvi Luay Jalil
Requirements for LER Forwarding of IPv4 Option Packets
Softwire Mesh Framework: Multicast
IETF 67, MPLS WG, San Diego 11/08/2006
Syam Madanapalli Basavaraj Patil Erik Nordmark JinHyeock Choi
Multi-Instances ISIS Extension draft-ietf-isis-mi-08.txt
PCEP Extensions For Transporting Traffic Engineering (TE) Data
IETF 95 – Buenos Aires April 2016
Yimin Shen (Juniper) Rahul Aggarwal (Arktan Inc)
78th IETF Meeting - Maastricht 27th, July 2010
IPv6 Router Alert Option for MPLS OAM
LDP and RSVP Extension for MPLS Muti-Topology Support
PLR Designation in RSVP-TE FRR
MPLS Basics 2 2.
LDP Extensions for RMR draft-esale-mpls-ldp-rmr- extensions
N. Kumar, C. Pignataro, F. Iqbal, Z. Ali (Presenter) - Cisco Systems
A Unified Approach to IP Segment Routing
YANG Data Models MPLS Base and Static LSPs draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-04 draft-ietf-mpls-static-yang-04 Tarek.
(draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang-04)
draft-pim-with-ipv4-prefix-over-ipv6-nh
GeneRic Autonomic Signaling Protocol draft-ietf-anima-grasp-08
Technical Issues with draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed
Fast Reroute for Node Protection in LDP- based LSPs
Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping for IPv6 Pseudowire FECs
ECE 544 Project3 Dheeraj Medikonda Ravi Chandra Godavarthi 1.
draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-00
draft-pim-with-ipv4-prefix-over-ipv6-nh
draft-liu-pim-mofrr-tilfa-00
YANG Data Models for TE and RSVP draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-19 draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-10 draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-te-05 draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-mpls-01.
draft-ietf-pim-ipv4-prefix-over-ipv6-nh
Supporting Flexible Algorithm Prefix SIDs in LSP Ping/Traceroute
Time-to-Live TLV for LSP-Ping draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-ttl-tlv-01 Sami Boutros Siva Sivabalan George Swallow Vishwas.
Presentation transcript:

Updates to LDP for IPv6 draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-02 Vishwas Manral Rajiv Papneja Carlos Pignataro Rajiv Asati IETF 80 - Prague, Czech Republic

Agenda  Motivation  Open Questions  Changelog  Next step draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6

Motivation Address few deficiencies in LDP for IPv6 (& dual-stack) usage 1.LSP mapping 2.LDP identifier 3.LDP discovery 4.LDP session establishment 5.LDP label exchange 6.Gen. TTL Security Mechanism More details in the ‘additional slides’… Update RFC5036 draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6

Open Questions draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6 1.Should LDP prefer IPv4 or IPv6 Transport for session peering, if dual-stacked? Draft’s preference is IPv6 2.Should the ‘label space’ be shared between IPv4 and IPv6 bindings? Draft’s preference is YES. 3.Should GTSM be default for LDPv6? Draft’s preference is YES.

Changelog between -00 and -02 draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6 Added: Section 1.1 to clarify topological Scenarios Section 6.2 on maintaining separate hello adj. Section 7 ‘LDP Label exchange’ New co-author ‘Carlos Pignataro’ GTSM as a default for LDPv6 Updated: Section 4 (transport address in hello is now per AFI) Section 5.1 (Hop Limit=255 instead of 1) Section 9 (Security Consideration better with GTSM)

Current State Very stable, thanks to extensive review & feedback Both 1:1 and mailing list Thanks to Kamran Raza, Eric Rosen, Lizhong Jin, Bin Mo, Mach Chen, and Kishore Tiruveedhula. draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6

More review & feedback Authors believe that -02 is close to WGLC Next Steps draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6

Thank You !

Additional Slides

1. LSP Mapping LSP mapping now works for not only IPv4, but also IPv6 Next-hop address –IPv4 (e.g. /32) –IPv6 (e.g. /128) draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6

2. LDP Identifier Use LSR Id = 32-bit, even for an IPv6 node Section of RFC5036 is updated –From –To draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6 For a given address family over which a Hello is sent, and a given label space, an LSR MUST advertise the same transport address. An LSR MUST advertise the same transport address in all Hellos that advertise the same label space.

3. Peer Discovery Link-local scope multicast (FF02:0:0:0:0:0:0:2) in LDP Hello –Only for Basic Discovery Separate LDP Hello Adjacencies for IPv4 and IPv6 –Separate LDP Link Hellos for v4 and v6 using the same LDP Id (= LSR Id + Label Space) draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6

4. LDP Session Establishment and Maintenance Changes to ‘Transport connection’ –Send ONLY one optional Transport Address object per Hello –Allow ONLY one transport connection, in case of dual-stack –Prefer IPv6 transport, in case of dual-stack draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6

5. Label Distribution IPv6 label bindings exchanged only if IPv6 Hello Adjacency existed (per peer) –Vice versa is true as well draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6