PRECEDE/PROCEED.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 of 13 Organization and Management Information Management in Your Organization IMARK Investing in Information for Development Organization and Management.
Advertisements

A Model for Program Planning in Health Promotion
Health Promotion Theoretical Frameworks
Lesson 1B Moving Toward the MAPP Model
The Underlying Theories of Precede-Proceed Model
Team 6 Lesson 3 Gary J Brumbelow Matt DeMonbrun Elias Lopez Rita Martin.
Planning & Implementing a Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prevention Campaign LCDR Christye Brown.
EVALUATION (PROCEED) by Lawrence Green Muji Sulistyowati
What You Will Learn From These Sessions
Basic Concepts of Strategic Management
Chapter 1: An Overview of Program Evaluation Presenter: Stephanie Peterson.
Program Evaluation. Lecture Overview  Program evaluation and program development  Logic of program evaluation (Program theory)  Four-Step Model  Comprehensive.
Printed by Application of the PRECEDE model to obesity prevention Sally Black, RN, PhD & Cayley Warner, RD Saint Joseph’s University.
CHS 382 Fundamentals of Health Education
Program Planning: Models and Theories Why Theories and Models? Builds clarity in understanding targeted health behavior and environmental context.
Logic Modeling for Success Dr Kathryn Wehrmann Illinois State University.
Program Planning: Models and Theories. Why Theories and Models? Builds clarity in understanding targeted health behavior and environmental context.
1 Minority SA/HIV Initiative MAI Training SPF Step 3 – Planning Presented By: Tracy Johnson, CSAP’s Central CAPT Janer Hernandez, CSAP’s Northeast CAPT.
Presented By: Tracy Johnson, Central CAPT
Program Evaluation In A Nutshell 1 Jonathan Brown, M.A.
Some models relevant for planning health promotion programs Ian McDowell March, 2012.
1 Designing a Monitoring and Evaluation System for a Rural Travel and Transport Project Michael Bamberger Gender and Development Group The World Bank RTTP.
THE REAL ACCESS = REAL IMPACT FRAMEWORK FOR ICT IN DEVELOPMENT Developed by: bridges.org For the Multimedia Training Kit, ICT policy training Copyright.
Eric R. Johnson Hillsborough County, (Tampa) FL
Models for Program Planning in Health Promotion
Impact Evaluation: Initiatives, Activities, & Coalitions Stephen Horan, PhD Community Health Solutions, Inc. September 12, 2004.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Using the Evaluation System to Answer Key Questions About Your Initiative.
A Peer Education Approach to Sexuality Education in Schools Melissa Blake Melissa Reagan Princeton Center for Leadership Training AAHE-AAHPERD National.
Program Fidelity Influencing Training Program Functioning and Effectiveness Cheryl J. Woods, CSW.
KATEWINTEREVALUATION.com Education Research 101 A Beginner’s Guide for S STEM Principal Investigators.
HEALTH PROMOTION PLANNING
1 Using Logic Models to Enhance Evaluation WESTAT Center to Improve Project Performance (CIPP) Office of Special Education Programs Amy A. Germuth, Ph.D.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Health Impact Assessment.
PHSB 612: Interventions Diane M. Dowdy, Ph.D. Spring 2008.
Community Health organizing concepts. community health professionals must possess specific knowledge and skills.  identify problems,  develop plan to.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Refining the Program Intervention Based on Research.
Community-based Participatory Action
Screen 1 of 22 Food Security Policies – Formulation and Implementation Policy Monitoring and Evaluation LEARNING OBJECTIVES Define the purpose of a monitoring.
Workshop on ICT Policy reform and rural communications infrastructure 22August – 2 nd Sept 2004 Tokyo, Japan Rural Communications Development – Uganda.
Save the Environment, save our World!. EMS is a management tool enabling an organization of any size or type to: Identify and control the environmental.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Using the Evaluation System to Answer Key Questions About Your Initiative.
PRECEDE/PROCEED.
Role of Policy in Behavior Change. Contents of the Lecture.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas The Strategic Prevention Framework.
Role of Policy in Behavior Change. Contents of the Lecture.
 2007 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Section B Logic Models: The Pathway Model.
UNEP EIA Training Resource ManualTopic 14Slide 1 What is SEA? F systematic, transparent process F instrument for decision-making F addresses environmental.
Prevention of type two diabetes Among East African Immigrants By Zahra Abdalla MPH 515 -SPRING 2015 Professor. Hartigan.
Developing Logic Models to Prevent Infant Mortality in Kansas Facilitators: Steve Fawcett, Jeffrey Colvin, Vicki Collie-Akers, Marvia Jones, and Kaston.
1 Copyright © 2012 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Copyright © 2008 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 17 Promoting Healthy Communities.
IMPLEMENTING LEAPS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: TRAINERS’ HANDBOOK Monitoring and Evaluating Results.
Organizations of all types and sizes face a range of risks that can affect the achievement of their objectives. Organization's activities Strategic initiatives.
ISSUES & CHALLENGES Adaptation, translation, and global application DiClemente, Crosby, & Kegler, 2009.
PRECEDE – PROCEDE THEORY
Gender-Sensitive Monitoring and Evaluation
Gender-Sensitive Monitoring and Evaluation
Measuring Outcomes of GEO and GEOSS: A Proposed Framework for Performance Measurement and Evaluation Ed Washburn, US EPA.
الگوی پرسید – پروسید در نیازسنجی آموزشی
PRECEDE-PROCEED Green, Kreuter, et al
Program Planning: Models and Theories
PRECEDE – PROCEED THEORY
Using Internet-based Tools to Promote Community Health and Development
THE PRECEDE-PROCEED PLANNING MODEL
THE PRECEDE-PROCEED PLANNING MODEL
The Strategic Prevention Framework
Chapter 23 Community Care.
Transitioning ELPD Standards & Assessments: The ELPD Framework
OGB Partner Advocacy Workshop 18th & 19th March 2010
Program Planning: Models and Theories
Presentation transcript:

PRECEDE/PROCEED

What is PRECEDE/PROCEED? PRECEDE/PROCEED is a community-oriented, participatory model for creating successful community health promotion interventions.

PRECEDE has five phases: Phase 1: Social diagnosis Phase 2: Epidemiological diagnosis Phase 3: Behavioral and environmental diagnosis Phase 4: Educational and organizational diagnosis Phase 5: Administrative and policy diagnosis

PROCEED has four phases: Phase 6: Implementation Phase 7: Process evaluation Phase 8: Impact evaluation Phase 9: Outcome evaluation

Assumptions behind PRECEDE/PROCEED: Since behavior change is by and large voluntary, health promotion (and, by extension, the promotion of other community benefits) is more likely to be effective if it’s participatory. Health and other issues must be looked at in the context of the community. Health and other issues are essentially quality-of-life issues. Health is itself a constellation of factors that add up to a healthy life for individuals and communities.

Why use PRECEDE/PROCEED? A logic model provides a procedural structure for constructing an intervention. A logic model provides a framework for critical analysis. PRECEDE/PROCEED is participatory, thus assuring community involvement. Community involvement leads to community buy-in. PRECEDE/PROCEED incorporates a multi-level evaluation, which means you have the chance to constantly monitor and adjust your evaluation. The model allows leeway to adapt the content and methods of the intervention to your particular needs and circumstances.

How do you use PRECEDE/PROCEED? In Phase 1, social diagnosis, you ask the community what it wants and needs to improve its quality of life. In Phase 2, epidemiological diagnosis, you identify the health or other issues that most clearly influence the outcome the community seeks. In these two phases, you create the objectives for your intervention.

How do you use PRECEDE/PROCEED? (cont.) In Phase 3, behavioral and environmental diagnosis, you identify the behaviors and lifestyles and/or environmental factors that must be changed to affect the health or other issues identified in Phase 2, and determine which of them are most likely to be changeable. In Phase 4, educational and organizational diagnosis, you identify the predisposing, enabling, and reinforcing factors that act as supports for or barriers to changing the behaviors and environmental factors you identified in Phase 3. In these two phases, you plan the intervention.

How do you use PRECEDE/PROCEED? (cont.) In Phase 5, administrative and policy diagnosis, you identify (and adjust where necessary) the internal administrative issues and internal and external policy issues that can affect the successful conduct of the intervention. Those administrative and policy concerns include generating the funding and other resources for the intervention.

How do you use PRECEDE/PROCEED? (cont.) In Phase 6, implementation, you carry out the intervention. In Phase 7, process evaluation, you evaluate the process of the intervention – i.e., you determine whether the intervention is proceeding according to plan, and adjust accordingly. In Phase 8, impact evaluation, you evaluate whether the intervention is having the intended impact on the behavioral and environmental factors it’s aimed at, and adjust accordingly. In Phase 9, outcome evaluation, you evaluate whether the intervention’s effects are in turn producing the outcome(s) the community identified in Phase 1, and adjust accordingly.