CSE 511a: Artificial Intelligence Spring 2013

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Classification Classification Examples
Advertisements

Particle Filtering Sometimes |X| is too big to use exact inference
CPSC 502, Lecture 15Slide 1 Introduction to Artificial Intelligence (AI) Computer Science cpsc502, Lecture 15 Nov, 1, 2011 Slide credit: C. Conati, S.
Bayes Rule The product rule gives us two ways to factor a joint probability: Therefore, Why is this useful? –Can get diagnostic probability P(Cavity |
Belief Propagation on Markov Random Fields Aggeliki Tsoli.
Probabilistic inference
Bayes Rule How is this rule derived? Using Bayes rule for probabilistic inference: –P(Cause | Evidence): diagnostic probability –P(Evidence | Cause): causal.
CS 188: Artificial Intelligence Spring 2007 Lecture 19: Perceptrons 4/2/2007 Srini Narayanan – ICSI and UC Berkeley.
Announcements  Project proposal is due on 03/11  Three seminars this Friday (EB 3105) Dealing with Indefinite Representations in Pattern Recognition.
CS 188: Artificial Intelligence Fall 2009
Introduction to Machine Learning course fall 2007 Lecturer: Amnon Shashua Teaching Assistant: Yevgeny Seldin School of Computer Science and Engineering.
Generative Models Rong Jin. Statistical Inference Training ExamplesLearning a Statistical Model  Prediction p(x;  ) Female: Gaussian distribution N(
CS 188: Artificial Intelligence Fall 2009 Lecture 23: Perceptrons 11/17/2009 Dan Klein – UC Berkeley TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual.
Today Logistic Regression Decision Trees Redux Graphical Models
CPSC 422, Lecture 18Slide 1 Intelligent Systems (AI-2) Computer Science cpsc422, Lecture 18 Feb, 25, 2015 Slide Sources Raymond J. Mooney University of.
CS 188: Artificial Intelligence Fall 2009 Lecture 19: Hidden Markov Models 11/3/2009 Dan Klein – UC Berkeley.
Review Rong Jin. Comparison of Different Classification Models  The goal of all classifiers Predicating class label y for an input x Estimate p(y|x)
Jeff Howbert Introduction to Machine Learning Winter Classification Bayesian Classifiers.
Review: Probability Random variables, events Axioms of probability
Crash Course on Machine Learning
Advanced Multimedia Text Classification Tamara Berg.
Methods in Medical Image Analysis Statistics of Pattern Recognition: Classification and Clustering Some content provided by Milos Hauskrecht, University.
Made by: Maor Levy, Temple University  Up until now: how to reason in a give model  Machine learning: how to acquire a model on the basis of.
CS 188: Artificial Intelligence Spring 2007 Lecture 18: Classification: Part I Naïve Bayes 03/22/2007 Srini Narayanan – ICSI and UC Berkeley.
QUIZ!!  T/F: The forward algorithm is really variable elimination, over time. TRUE  T/F: Particle Filtering is really sampling, over time. TRUE  T/F:
Bayesian networks Classification, segmentation, time series prediction and more. Website: Twitter:
Classification: Feature Vectors
CSC321: 2011 Introduction to Neural Networks and Machine Learning Lecture 11: Bayesian learning continued Geoffrey Hinton.
CS 188: Artificial Intelligence Spring 2006 Lecture 9: Naïve Bayes 2/14/2006 Dan Klein – UC Berkeley Many slides from either Stuart Russell or Andrew Moore.
Empirical Research Methods in Computer Science Lecture 7 November 30, 2005 Noah Smith.
Empirical Research Methods in Computer Science Lecture 6 November 16, 2005 Noah Smith.
Classification Techniques: Bayesian Classification
CS 188: Artificial Intelligence Fall 2007 Lecture 22: Viterbi 11/13/2007 Dan Klein – UC Berkeley.
CSE 446: Naïve Bayes Winter 2012 Dan Weld Some slides from Carlos Guestrin, Luke Zettlemoyer & Dan Klein.
CSE 473: Artificial Intelligence Spring 2012 Bayesian Networks - Learning Dan Weld Slides adapted from Jack Breese, Dan Klein, Daphne Koller, Stuart Russell,
Review: Probability Random variables, events Axioms of probability Atomic events Joint and marginal probability distributions Conditional probability distributions.
Machine Learning  Up until now: how to reason in a model and how to make optimal decisions  Machine learning: how to acquire a model on the basis of.
CHAPTER 6 Naive Bayes Models for Classification. QUESTION????
CSE 473: Artificial Intelligence Autumn 2010 Machine Learning: Naive Bayes and Perceptron Luke Zettlemoyer Many slides over the course adapted from Dan.
Announcements  Project 5  Due Friday 4/10 at 5pm  Homework 9  Released soon, due Monday 4/13 at 11:59pm.
Recap: General Naïve Bayes  A general naïve Bayes model:  Y: label to be predicted  F 1, …, F n : features of each instance Y F1F1 FnFn F2F2 This slide.
QUIZ!!  In HMMs...  T/F:... the emissions are hidden. FALSE  T/F:... observations are independent given no evidence. FALSE  T/F:... each variable X.
Lecture 2: Statistical learning primer for biologists
Naïve Bayes Classification Material borrowed from Jonathan Huang and I. H. Witten’s and E. Frank’s “Data Mining” and Jeremy Wyatt and others.
Naïve Bayes Classifier April 25 th, Classification Methods (1) Manual classification Used by Yahoo!, Looksmart, about.com, ODP Very accurate when.
SUPERVISED AND UNSUPERVISED LEARNING Presentation by Ege Saygıner CENG 784.
CS 541: Artificial Intelligence Lecture IX: Supervised Machine Learning Slides Credit: Peter Norvig and Sebastian Thrun.
CS 541: Artificial Intelligence Lecture IX: Supervised Machine Learning Slides Credit: Peter Norvig and Sebastian Thrun.
CS 541: Artificial Intelligence Lecture IX: Supervised Machine Learning Slides Credit: Peter Norvig and Sebastian Thrun.
CS 2750: Machine Learning Bayesian Networks Prof. Adriana Kovashka University of Pittsburgh March 14, 2016.
Naïve Bayes Classification Recitation, 1/25/07 Jonathan Huang.
LEARNING FROM EXAMPLES AIMA CHAPTER 18 (4-5) CSE 537 Spring 2014 Instructor: Sael Lee Slides are mostly made from AIMA resources, Andrew W. Moore’s tutorials:
CAP 5636 – Advanced Artificial Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence
Naïve Bayes Classifiers
Qian Liu CSE spring University of Pennsylvania
CS 188: Artificial Intelligence Fall 2006
Artificial Intelligence
Perceptrons Lirong Xia.
CS 188: Artificial Intelligence Fall 2008
CS 188: Artificial Intelligence Fall 2008
CS 4/527: Artificial Intelligence
Naïve Bayes Classifiers
CS 188: Artificial Intelligence Spring 2006
Speech recognition, machine learning
CS 188: Artificial Intelligence
CS 188: Artificial Intelligence Fall 2007
Naïve Bayes Classifiers
Perceptrons Lirong Xia.
Speech recognition, machine learning
Presentation transcript:

CSE 511a: Artificial Intelligence Spring 2013 Lecture 23: Machine Learning and Vision 04/22/2012 Robert Pless via Kilian Q. Weinberger Several slides adapted from Dan Klein – UC Berkeley

Announcements CONTEST is up! Project 4 due today! Grade update (including Project 4 contributions) out Wednesday.

Pointer to other classes! Up until now: how to reason in a model and how to make optimal decisions Machine learning: how to acquire a model on the basis of data / experience Learning parameters (e.g. probabilities) Learning structure (e.g. BN graphs) Learning hidden concepts (e.g. clustering) Vision: Applying Bayes Nets to Image Data

Example: Spam Filter Input: email Output: spam/ham Setup: Dear Sir. First, I must solicit your confidence in this transaction, this is by virture of its nature as being utterly confidencial and top secret. … Input: email Output: spam/ham Setup: Get a large collection of example emails, each labeled “spam” or “ham” Note: someone has to hand label all this data! Want to learn to predict labels of new, future emails Features: The attributes used to make the ham / spam decision Words: FREE! Text Patterns: $dd, CAPS Non-text: SenderInContacts … TO BE REMOVED FROM FUTURE MAILINGS, SIMPLY REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE AND PUT "REMOVE" IN THE SUBJECT. 99 MILLION EMAIL ADDRESSES FOR ONLY $99 Ok, Iknow this is blatantly OT but I'm beginning to go insane. Had an old Dell Dimension XPS sitting in the corner and decided to put it to use, I know it was working pre being stuck in the corner, but when I plugged it in, hit the power nothing happened.

Example: Digit Recognition Input: images / pixel grids Output: a digit 0-9 Setup: Get a large collection of example images, each labeled with a digit Note: someone has to hand label all this data! Want to learn to predict labels of new, future digit images Features: The attributes used to make the digit decision Pixels: (6,8)=ON Shape Patterns: NumComponents, AspectRatio, NumLoops … 1 2 1 ??

Other Classification Tasks In classification, we predict labels y (classes) for inputs x Examples: Spam detection (input: document, classes: spam / ham) OCR (input: images, classes: characters) Medical diagnosis (input: symptoms, classes: diseases) Automatic essay grader (input: document, classes: grades) Fraud detection (input: account activity, classes: fraud / no fraud) Customer service email routing Web-search (input: query+page, classes: relevant, irrelevant) … many more Classification is an important commercial technology! Automatic essay grading?!!!

Important Concepts Data: labeled instances, e.g. emails marked spam/ham Training set Held out set Test set Features: attribute-value pairs which characterize each x Experimentation cycle Learn parameters (e.g. model probabilities) on training set (Tune hyperparameters on held-out set) Compute accuracy of test set Very important: never “peek” at the test set! If data is from a time series, split at time point!!! Evaluation Accuracy: fraction of instances predicted correctly Overfitting and generalization Want a classifier which does well on test data Overfitting: fitting the training data very closely, but not generalizing well Bayes Variance trade-off : Most important concept in ML. Training Data Held-Out Data Test Data

Bayes Nets for Classification One method of classification: Use a probabilistic model! Features are observed random variables Fi Y is the query variable Use probabilistic inference to compute most likely Y You already know how to do this inference

Simple Classification Simple example: two binary features S F direct estimate Bayes estimate (no assumptions) Reminder. How to do classification with a Bayes Net? Conditional independence +

General Naïve Bayes A general naive Bayes model: We only specify how each feature depends on the class Total number of parameters is linear in n |Y| x |F|n parameters Y F1 F2 Fn |Y| parameters n x |F| x |Y| parameters

Inference for Naïve Bayes Goal: compute posterior over causes Step 1: get joint probability of causes and evidence Step 2: get probability of evidence Step 3: renormalize +

General Naïve Bayes What do we need in order to use naïve Bayes? Inference (you know this part) Start with a bunch of conditionals, P(Y) and the P(Fi|Y) tables Use standard inference to compute P(Y|F1…Fn) Nothing new here Estimates of local conditional probability tables P(Y), the prior over labels P(Fi|Y) for each feature (evidence variable) These probabilities are collectively called the parameters of the model and denoted by  Up until now, we assumed these appeared by magic, but… …they typically come from training data: we’ll look at this now

A Digit Recognizer Input: pixel grids Output: a digit 0-9

Naïve Bayes for Digits Simple version: Naïve Bayes model: One feature Fij for each grid position <i,j> Possible feature values are on / off, based on whether intensity is more or less than 0.5 in underlying image Each input maps to a feature vector, e.g. Here: lots of features, each is binary valued Naïve Bayes model: What do we need to learn?

Examples: CPTs 1 0.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0.01 2 0.05 3 4 0.30 5 0.80 6 0.90 7 8 0.60 9 0.50 1 0.05 2 0.01 3 0.90 4 0.80 5 6 7 0.25 8 0.85 9 0.60

Parameter Estimation Estimating distribution of random variables like X or X | Y Empirically: use training data For each outcome x, look at the empirical rate of that value: This is the estimate that maximizes the likelihood of the data Elicitation: ask a human! Usually need domain experts, and sophisticated ways of eliciting probabilities (e.g. betting games) Trouble calibrating r g g

A Spam Filter Naïve Bayes spam filter Data: Classifiers Dear Sir. First, I must solicit your confidence in this transaction, this is by virture of its nature as being utterly confidencial and top secret. … Naïve Bayes spam filter Data: Collection of emails, labeled spam or ham Note: someone has to hand label all this data! Split into training, held-out, test sets Classifiers Learn on the training set (Tune it on a held-out set) Test it on new emails TO BE REMOVED FROM FUTURE MAILINGS, SIMPLY REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE AND PUT "REMOVE" IN THE SUBJECT. 99 MILLION EMAIL ADDRESSES FOR ONLY $99 Ok, Iknow this is blatantly OT but I'm beginning to go insane. Had an old Dell Dimension XPS sitting in the corner and decided to put it to use, I know it was working pre being stuck in the corner, but when I plugged it in, hit the power nothing happened.

Naïve Bayes for Text Bag-of-Words Naïve Bayes: Generative model Predict unknown class label (spam vs. ham) Assume evidence features (e.g. the words) are independent Warning: subtly different assumptions than before! Generative model Tied distributions and bag-of-words Usually, each variable gets its own conditional probability distribution P(F|Y) In a bag-of-words model Each position is identically distributed All positions share the same conditional probs P(W|C) Why make this assumption? Word at position i, not ith word in the dictionary!

Example: Spam Filtering Model: What are the parameters? Where do these tables come from? ham : 0.66 spam: 0.33 the : 0.0156 to : 0.0153 and : 0.0115 of : 0.0095 you : 0.0093 a : 0.0086 with: 0.0080 from: 0.0075 ... the : 0.0210 to : 0.0133 of : 0.0119 2002: 0.0110 with: 0.0108 from: 0.0107 and : 0.0105 a : 0.0100 ...

Spam Example P(spam | w) = 98.9 Word P(w|spam) P(w|ham) Tot Spam Tot Ham (prior) 0.33333 0.66666 -1.1 -0.4 Gary 0.00002 0.00021 -11.8 -8.9 would 0.00069 0.00084 -19.1 -16.0 you 0.00881 0.00304 -23.8 -21.8 like 0.00086 0.00083 -30.9 -28.9 to 0.01517 0.01339 -35.1 -33.2 lose 0.00008 -44.5 -44.0 weight 0.00016 -53.3 -55.0 while 0.00027 -61.5 -63.2 -66.2 -69.0 sleep 0.00006 0.00001 -76.0 -80.5 P(spam | w) = 98.9

Example: Overfitting 2 wins!!

Example: Overfitting Posteriors determined by relative probabilities (odds ratios): south-west : inf nation : inf morally : inf nicely : inf extent : inf seriously : inf ... screens : inf minute : inf guaranteed : inf $205.00 : inf delivery : inf signature : inf ... What went wrong here?

Generalization and Overfitting Relative frequency parameters will overfit the training data! Just because we never saw a 3 with pixel (15,15) on during training doesn’t mean we won’t see it at test time Unlikely that every occurrence of “minute” is 100% spam Unlikely that every occurrence of “seriously” is 100% ham What about all the words that don’t occur in the training set at all? In general, we can’t go around giving unseen events zero probability As an extreme case, imagine using the entire email as the only feature Would get the training data perfect (if deterministic labeling) Wouldn’t generalize at all Just making the bag-of-words assumption gives us some generalization, but isn’t enough To find out how to deal with this, take the Machine Learning Course!!

Graphical Models types Directed causal relationships e.g. Bayesian networks Undirected no constraints imposed on causality of events (“weak dependencies”) Markov Random Fields (MRFs) MLRG

Example MRF Application: Image Denoising Original image (Binary) Noisy image e.g. 10% of noise Question: How can we retrieve the original image given the noisy one? MLRG

MRF formulation Nodes For each pixel i, y1 y2 x1 x2 yi xi yn xn xi : latent variable (value in original image) yi : observed variable (value in noisy image) xi, yi  {0,1} y1 y2 x1 x2 yi xi yn xn MLRG

MRF formulation Edges x1 x2 xi xn y1 y2 yi yn xi,yi of each pixel i correlated local evidence function (xi,yi) E.g. (xi,yi) = 0.9 (if xi = yi) and (xi,yi) = 0.1 otherwise (10% noise) Neighboring pixels, similar value compatibility function (xi, xj) x1 x2 xi xn y1 y2 yi yn We could put directions on these edges. Then we would have some conditional independences. MLRG

P(x1, x2, …, xn) = (1/Z) (ij) (xi, xj) i (xi, yi) MRF formulation x1 x2 xi xn y1 y2 yi yn P(x1, x2, …, xn) = (1/Z) (ij) (xi, xj) i (xi, yi) Question: What are the marginal distributions for xi, i = 1, …,n? Approach called belief propagation. MLRG