The data-driven conclusion: High-stakes testing has failed.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education Board Kentucky Challenge to Lead Goals for Education Kentucky is On the Move Progress Report 2008 Challenge.
Advertisements

No Child Left Behind Act January 2002 Revision of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Education is a state and local responsibility Insure.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
NCLB Margaret Werts, Ph.D. Appalachian State University.
NCLB Basics From “What Parents of Students with Disabilities Need to Know & Do” National Center on Educational Outcomes University of Minnesota
Education in the United States & No Child Left Behind Marc McGuigan Physics Education Forum Monday, April 23, 2007.
Achievement of Hmong Students in Saint Paul Public Schools Hmong Youth Educational Services Banquet – June 2006 Tom Watkins Director of Research, Evaluation.
Dr. Elena Izquierdo UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO
Alaska’s English Language Arts and Mathematics Standards Need for Change 1.
What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.
NYC ACHIEVEMENT GAINS COMPARED TO OTHER LARGE CITIES SINCE 2003 Changes in NAEP scores Leonie Haimson & Elli Marcus Class Size Matters January.
Beyond the Classroom: The Use of Essential Skills for Remediation and Extension Christine Koch November 2008.
TODOS General Meeting Steve Klass Salt Lake City, Utah, April 2008.
AYP: Are You Perfect? By: Jalynn Speck, Linda Oller, and Jill Polsley.
The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics National Assessment of Educational Progress 1.
Grade 3-8 English. 2 The Bottom Line This is the first year in which students took State tests in Grades 3,4,5,6,7, and 8. With the new individual.
NYC ACHIEVEMENT GAINS COMPARED TO OTHER LARGE CITIES SINCE 2003 Changes in NAEP scores Class Size Matters August
High Stakes Testing EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos.
Delaware Student Testing Program (DSTP) Informational Meeting and Public Forum Organized by Advocates for Children’s Education (ACE) February 12, 2003.
Michigan’s Accountability Scorecards A Brief Introduction.
Instruction, Assessment & Student Achievement Presented: September 23, 2013 Bessie Weller Elementary School.
STAR Tests How they affect student and school. What are the STAR Tests?  STAR stands for Standardized Testing and Reporting.  These tests are mandated.
© 2010 THE EDUCATION TRUST Raising Achievement and Closing Gaps Between Groups: Roles for Federal Policy.
Understanding Your Student Score Report. Let’s start with side one.
Welcome to the TAYLOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Introduction to MCAS.
Agenda (5:00-6:30 PM): Introduction to Staff Title I Presentation PTA Information Classroom visits (two 30 minute rotations)
Validity in the Context of High-Stakes Accountability? Rebecca Holcombe June 24, 2015 Johanna Bandler.
Welcome to the TAYLOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Introduction to MCAS.
Annual Student Performance Report October Overview NCLB requirements related to AYP 2012 ISAT performance and AYP status Next steps.
The Nation’s Report Card Science National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
District Improvement….. Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating.  What does this mean.
Annual Student Performance Report September
The Nation’s Report Card: Geography National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
Grade 3-8 English Language Arts and Math Results.
MCAS 2007 October 24, 2007 A Report to the Sharon School Committee and Dr. Barbara J. Dunham Superintendent of Schools Dr. George S. Anthony Director of.
WHY ARE WE TAKING SO MANY TESTS? Education Reform and the Modern Accountability Movement Wayne Zhang.
This year’s PSSA results show that Pennsylvania is on track to move all students to proficiency by 2014 as required by the federal No Child Left Behind.
Parents as Partners: How Parents and Schools Work Together to Close the Achievement Gap.
Parkway District Improvement…. 10/16/ Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating. 
What are these tests? 2001 No Child Left Behind (U.S. federal law)
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP), – Is part of the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) – makes schools.
We have studied the progress in schools in the 20 th century. Accomplishments between 1900 and 1980? 1. EXPANSION OF SYSTEM OF SCHOOLING (K-12) 2. MOVE.
On the horizon: State Accountability Systems U.S. Department of Education Office of Elementary and Secondary Education October 2002 Archived Information.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
2015 State PARCC Results Presented to the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education Robert Lee MCAS Chief Analyst and Acting PARCC Coordinator October.
¿Who Graduates?. First the good news:
University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Challenges for States and Schools in the No.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
Neo-Conservative Ideas Berliner and Biddle ( ) Neo-conservative “centrist” thought won out in school reform. Main approaches to school reform: Get.
NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND Adequate Yearly Progress Report August 2009.
NAEP 2007: Reading and Mathematics, Grades 4 and 8 New Jersey State Board of Education Work Session Assistant Commissioner Jay Doolan Assessment Director.
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. UNDERSTANDING.
1 School Report Cards 2002–2003 An Overview. 2 School Report Card: Overall Trends Elementary school achievement is up in English and math over Middle.
STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY: PROMOTION AND GRADUATION TESTS BY ISABELLA BROWN Emory University Summer 2006.
MCAS Progress and Performance Index Report 2013 Cohasset Public Schools.
1 Leading the Next Generation of Education Reform in New York State New York State Education Department James A. Kadamus September 22, 2005.
Web Pedagogies Week 8: Systems Approach The No Child Left Behind Policy.
A Brief History Data-Based School & District Improvement
Gloria Ladson-Billings University of Wisconsin
Salt Lake City, Utah, April 2008
Demystifying and Implementing the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
TESTING: How We Measure Academic Achievement
Assessing Student Learning Heather Holshouser CUR 528 September 19, 2015 University of Phoenix Siddeeqah Johnson.
This data series from the NAEP long-term assessment shows there is.
NCLB “No Child Left Behind”.
AYP and Report Card.
The data-driven conclusion: High-stakes testing has failed.
History of No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Presentation transcript:

The data-driven conclusion: High-stakes testing has failed.

Has high-stakes testing improved overall academic achievement in Massachusetts? Has it improved the achievement of low-scoring student groups? The answer is, No.

The data: The National Assessment of Educational Progress NAEP tests samples of students in every state. There are no individual school scores and no punishments for low scores, so nobody preps for this test. That makes it far more accurate as a measure of skills than state tests that teachers spend weeks and even months getting their students ready for. Like other standardized tests, NAEP tests only a narrow range of the abilities and qualities that parents want schools to foster, but it does test that narrow range accurately.

The era of high-stakes testing Massachusetts students had to pass the MCAS to get their diplomas starting in (Three earlier classes took the test but did not have to pass it to get a diploma.) Beginning in 2002, No Child Left Behind mandated escalating penalties for an ever-growing percentage of schools. The Achievement Gap Act of 2010 and the federal NCLB waiver agreement let high-scoring schools off the hook while adding more sanctions for schools near the bottom. What do Massachusetts NAEP results show for the period after 2002 compared with the years before high-stakes testing?

All students 4 th grade reading

(Scores for Hispanic students are hard to interpret because the percentage of recent immigrants who speak little English has changed over the years, and these tests are only given in English.)

4 th grade reading (These data don’t go back as far as data for all students or for racial and ethnic subgroups.)

4 th grade reading

4 th grade math National reading scores have been mostly level since NAEP began in the 1970s. Math scores have been rising gradually over the years. The rate of improvement looks about the same before and after high-stakes testing started.

4 th grade math

8 th grade reading

8 th grade math

12 th grade reading NAEP only has scores for Massachusetts 12 th graders for 2009 and 2013.

12 th grade reading

12 th grade math