Presented By: Braulio Escobar, Jim Beidleman, Dave Taucher, Joseph Kaminski

 Project Background  Project Objectives  Information  Design Process  Our Design  Conclusion

 Large Steel Company with Extensive client base  Facing large problem with disorganized and mislabeled scrap coming in  Causing off heats and affecting quality of their product  Creates dissatisfied clients  Currently correcting the heats one batch at a time  Do so by adding in pure alloys  Chromium cost $32 for every 100g  Manganese cost $6.50 for every 100g  Aluminum cost $15.72 for every 100g  Expensive  Time consuming  Would like a system created to mitigate these issues

 Would like for the material to be organized before entering their facilities  The problem requires us to look at the big picture  Cooperation between large entities (i.e. auto manufacturers, scrappers, etc.) 

 The recycled steel is creating issues  Unfeasible to exclude scrap metal from the solution  Too costly to make steel solely from scratch  Will be impossible eventually  Expanding countries of China and India  Limited resources  Inflation & exorbitant prices  Effectively use scrap to sustain steel making into the future  “Cradle-to-Cradle”

 Identify Problem  Find The Needs  Identify Effective Solution  Analyze Effectiveness Of Solution

 Several Problems:  Issue of Organization  Issue of Effective Storage  Issue of Multiple Entities Cooperating

 Efficient  Cost  Time  Space  Within ArcelorMittal’s tolerances  Appropriate Incentives  Sustainable  Organized

 Efficient Process  Sustainable  Incentives that propagate the process and can be maintained into the foreseeable future of all entities involved  Process that can be maintained without exorbitant operational costs  Space Efficient  ArcelorMittal does not separate the steel on site

Means/Functions123 Organization Method By SizeBy CompositionBy Density Metal Recognition Coding Chemical Process Magnetic Process Transportation Train TrucksBarges Primary Organizational Entity ScrapyardOutside Contractor ArcelorMittal

A: By size/ chemical process/ Barges/ ArcelorMittal B: By composition/ coding/ train/ scrapyard C: By density/ Magnetic process/ trucking/ scrapyard Constraints/ Objectives Weight %ABC C: Cost Effective X C: Time Effective C: Organized C: No ArcelorMittal Involvement O: Efficiency 50.8/50 40%.4/50 20% O: Sustainable 50.7/50 35%.6/50 30% Totals 75%50%

 Would Purchase manuals from Manufactures  More Specific in scrap process 

 Builds on ArcelorMittal’s already established specs  Provides incentives for scrappers to meet their specs fully  Utilizes the cradle-to-cradle concept better  Less cost for raw materials  Possibly reduced mining  Help reach a shrinking state of new steel production

 Our Solution  Effectively implement appropriate incentives  Can be sustained into the foreseeable future  Utilizes almost all of existing infrastructure therefore efficient process

 ArcelorMittal  Schnitzer Scrapping  Chemicool  Steel.org  Ted Frick PhD Chemistry (U.S. Steel)