Working with nisai education Richard Dunnill and Jim Pugh Institute for Education Policy Research Staffordshire University

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Assessment
Advertisements

Creating the Map To Set the Direction. Educational Positioning System (EPS – a play on GPS)
Supporting further and higher education Learning design for a flexible learning environment Sarah Knight and Ros Smith Pedagogy Strand of the JISC e-Learning.
BA (Hons) Primary Education Year Three School Based Training Briefing
Weber State University Master of Education in Curriculum and Instruction Candidate Assessment Plan.
IVETTE:Implementation of virtual environments in training and in education Targeted Socio-Economic Research Programme Mario Barajas University of Barcelona.
Shelley Zion, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver
The student experience of e-learning Dr Greg Benfield Oxford Centre for Staff & Learning Development.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Fred Gross Education Development Center, Inc.
Redesigning the IOE Post-Compulsory PGCE Programme Jay Derrick.
Aspects of professional learning; a new framework for student reflection Rachel Lofthouse & Roger Knill, School of Education, Communication & Language.
The Teaching Role of Librarians Dr. Rolando A. Taha Education Supervisor DepEd, Puerto Princesa City.
Graduate Attributes Jackie Campbell, Laura Dean, Mark de Groot, David Killick, Jill Taylor.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Rediscovering Research: A Path to Standards Based Learning Authentic Learning that Motivates, Constructs Meaning, and Boosts Success.
SOLSTICE Conference th & 5 th June 2015 Designing and facilitating cross-country collaborative learning in a professional education context Sarah.
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
PG Cert HE Post Graduate Certificate in Higher Education Teaching.
Asynchronous Discussions and Assessment in Online Learning Vonderwell, S., Liang, X., & Alderman, K. (2007). Asynchronous Discussions and Assessment in.
Conceptual Framework for the College of Education Created by: Dr. Joe P. Brasher.
Brooke Bennett. *National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Teachers* 1. Facilitate & inspire student learning and creativity.
Developing an Online Course: A Road Map for the Process English Language Arts 3-5: Vocabulary.
Illinois MSP Program Goals  To increase the content expertise of mathematics and science teachers; 4 To increase teaching skills through access to the.
History PGCE Subject Development Panel Jan Feedback from Chief External Examiner 2013/14 KEY STRENGTHS: 1.Highly efficient and effective communication.
TEACHERS’ KNOWLEDGE AND PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE
Assessment Practices That Lead to Student Learning Core Academy, Summer 2012.
Company LOGO Embedding Mathematics into Advanced Careers 1 New Jersey Entrepreneurship Summer Teacher Training Institute July 31, 2013 Facilitator: Kenna.
New Opportunities The new Secondary Curriculum: A curriculum for the future.
PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING LEARNING. What is It? Problem Based Learning (PBL), is a student-centered instructional strategy pioneered by McMaster University,
Professionally Speaking : Qualitative Research and the Professions. Using action research to gauge the quality of feedback given to student teachers while.
Our Curriculum Journey Duloch Primary and Nursery Our Curriculum Journey Duloch Primary and Nursery.
Exploring Evidence.
Roles and Responsibilites of the Mentor Teacher Thank you for participating in our Mentor/Mentee Program! Parkway School District Summer 2010.
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
DPASII Criterion Rubrics for Teachers. Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1a: Selecting Instructional Goals ELEMENT Value, sequence and alignment.
Towards a framework ….. Vision Development Where do we want to go? Why? How?
Blueprint for GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS. The Minister’s reform agenda is based on the following belief: “All students are entitled to an excellent education.
Centre for Educational Development ORHEP Project 1 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported.
Personalised Learning NOCN Level 2. Induction Welcome and introductions Completion of enrolment forms Qualification Initial assessment Personalised learning.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Supporting further and higher education Situating e-portfolios: what do learners need? Helen Beetham Consultant in Pedagogy JISC e-learning programme.
Faculty Development Models
How to Apply it in the Classroom Elicit ideas Elaboration & Reconstruc- tion Frequent problem based activities Variety of info. & resources Collaboration.
Secondary Curriculum Review Implications for teacher trainers.
1 CECV Intervention Framework Module 5A Learning & Teaching EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION.
Inquiry and IBL pedagogies What do inquiry tasks look like in science? Tool IH-1: Exploring teachers’ ideas.
Module 6 Primary ITT Providers and NQT Coordinators: Learning Outside the Classroom – an Introduction.
LESSON DESIGN WORKSHOP. Objective 1: Design coherent instruction and learning activities collaboratively that are highly relevant to students and pedagogical.
Developing a Work Based Portfolio
POLICY VISION for ICT TPD. Vision The vision statement looks to the future and is written in broad terms. This will form the basis of the ICT-TPD Policy.
Re-Thinking Pre-College Math: From “Professional Development” to “Professional Learning” August 2011 Institute.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Defining & Aligning Local Curriculum. What is Curriculum? Individually consider your personal definition of the term curriculum What words do you think.
National Professional Standards for Teachers. Focus Role of the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership Background on the National Professional.
Creative Curriculum and GOLD Assessment: Early Childhood Competency Based Evaluation System By Carol Bottom.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
Strategies for blended learning in an undergraduate curriculum Benjamin Kehrwald, Massey University College of Education.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
Copyright © May 2014, Montessori Centre International.
The Exeter Model of ITE Induction for Initial Teacher Education Coordinators, Mentors, Principal School Tutors, University Visiting Tutors and External.
Using the STEM learning impact evaluation process Also known as The Impact Toolkit (ITK)
Using Research-Teaching Linkages to Enhance Graduate Attributes George Gordon, Cherie Woolmer University of Strathclyde 5 March 2009.
EDUC 410 Fall, “Teachers are designers. An essential act of our profession is the crafting of curriculum and learning experiences to meet specified.
School – Based Assessment – Framework
“Five E” Learning Cycle: Engage
Consistency of Teacher Judgement
Planning a cross- curricular topic
Presentation transcript:

working with nisai education Richard Dunnill and Jim Pugh Institute for Education Policy Research Staffordshire University 14 – 19 Diplomas: Teacher Learning and Development Presentation 10 b)

working with nisai education The core issue 1.Helping teachers to rethink their pedagogy in the context of new learning technologies –…not just our technical approaches to planning, learning, resourcing, teaching and assessment –…review, refresh and renew our understandings of learning in our specialist areas –…use this to inform our pedagogy, technically and organically

working with nisai education Key components of our approach 1.Introduction to and Induction into use of Nisai learning platform 2.Challenge/Review/Reflect on learning in the specialist area 3.Critical evaluation of student learning resulting from pedagogical practice using Nisai learning platform and reviewed notions of specialist learning 4.Changed and continually changing pedagogical practice, reviewed on the basis of evidence of student learning

working with nisai education Seven Areas for Review and Development 1.IDENTIFYING THE LEARNERS AND THEIR EDUCATIONAL NEEDS an understanding of Diploma learners’, their range of learning requirements and some ways that e-learning might support their learning. 2.DESIGNING ONLINE COURSES FOR DIPLOMA LEARNERS the differences between designing traditional face-to-face learning and learning which utilises online environments and media, and some key implications of the latter for managing learning, teaching and assessment with Diploma learners. 3.DESIGNING LEARNING FOR DIPLOMA LEARNERS ways of providing online courses and support for learners, including learning platforms and virtual learning environments. 4.SUPPORTING ONLINE DPILOMA LEARNERS the additional support needed to assist learners.

working with nisai education 5.ASSESSING AND PLANNING FOR THE LEARNING NEEDS OF DIPLOMA LEARNERS share experiences of assessing the learning needs of learners, of how and when such assessment should take place, the skills needed to operate such procedures and how to engage the learners in the processes 6.DEVELOPING EFFECTIVE E- LEARNING COMMUNITIES WHICH PROMOTE RESPONSIBLE CONTRIBUTIONS. the potential of e-learning communities, can e-communities really contribute to growing Diploma learner confidence, motivation and academic progress, strategies for allowing learners to communicate, investigate and collaborate 7.DEVELOPING INDEPENDENT AND COLLABORATIVE E- DIPLOMA LEARNERS. methods of developing independent and collaborative e-learners and the advantages of personalising learning to achieve this by exploring the components of personalised learning and investigating how these can be applied in e learning environments.

working with nisai education The Learning Questions 1.Learning – where and when? 2.Learning – how?... with others…incl teachers? 3.Learning – how?... alone? 4.Learning – making progress? 5.Learning – possible futures? 6.Learning – resources and tracking ? LEARNING… WHAT???

working with nisai education Learning Study Lessons that are directed by intended learning outcomes are more likely to raise student attainment Seidel et al., 2005 Bereiter and Scardamalia 1989, Black and Wiliam 1998

working with nisai education Learning study combines two elements. It takes the collaborative ‘plan-teach-review’ teacher development model of Japanese ‘Lesson Study’ and focuses the process using variation theory. In lesson study groups of teachers work intensively together to plan a lesson. One of the group then teaches the lesson whilst the others observe. These observations then provide the basis for a searching reflection on how the teaching helped learners during the lesson. In ‘Learning Study’ variation theory is used to focus teachers’ attention on variation in outcomes of learning.

working with nisai education Learning Study – the process 1.Choosing the object of learning; 2.Ascertaining students’ initial understanding; 3.Collaborative planning and teaching of a lesson by a small group of participants with a tutor 4.Evaluation of the lesson focusing on how variations between students’ understanding are related to observations of the teaching; 5.Documentation of the process and outcomes of the research. 6.Repeating the process in the light of the outcomes of the above

working with nisai education 1.1 day – introduction, induction, organisation, f2f 2.(online induction and organisation continues) 3.Half day – learning study #1 planning f2f 4.(online collaborative taught Diploma sessions take place) 5.Half day – learning study #1 review f2f 6.(online activity ongoing) 7.Half day – learning study #2 planning f2f 8.(online collaborative taught Diploma sessions take place) 9.Half day – learning study #2 review f2f 10.(online activity ongoing) 11.1 day – overall review and future planning f2f Learning study – in practice

working with nisai education The Core Issue Revisited 1.Helping teachers to rethink their pedagogy in the context of new learning technologies –…not just our technical approaches to planning, learning, resourcing, teaching and assessment –…review, refresh and renew our understandings of learning in our specialist areas –…use this to inform our pedagogy, technically and organically

working with nisai education References BEREITER, C. AND SCARDAMALIA (1989) Intentional Learning as a Goal of Instruction in L. Resnick (Ed.) Knowing Learning and Instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp ). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Lawrence Erlbaum Associates BLACK, P. AND WILIAM, D. (1998) Assessment and classroom Learning, Assessment in Education, pp BORKO, H. (2004) Professional Development and Teacher learning: Mapping the Terrain, Educational Researcher, 33, 8, pp DAVIES, P. AND DUNNILL, R.(2008) ‘Learning Study’ as a model of collaborative practice in initial teacher education in Journal of Education for Teaching 34:1 pp3-16 DAVIES, P. AND DUNNILL R. (2006) Improving learning by focusing on variation in Teaching Business and Economics 9:2 DAVIES, P. AND DUNNILL R.(2006) Disciplines, outcomes and purpose in social science education in Journal of Social Science Education 7:1 FERNANDEZ, C. CANNON, J. AND CHOKSHI, S. (2003) A US-Japan lesson study collaboration reveals critical lenses for examining practice, Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, pp GLAZER, E. M. AND HANNAFIN, M. J. (2006) The collaborative apprenticeship model: Situated professional development within school settings, Teaching and Teacher Education, 22,2 pp HIEBERT, J., GALLIMORE, R. AND STIGLER, J.W. (2002) A knowledge base for the Teaching profession: What Would it Look Like and How Can We Get One? Educational Researcher, 31, 5, pp KAGAN, D.M. (1992) Implications of Research on Teacher Belief, Educational Psychologist, 27, 1, pp KINCHIN, I.M. AND ALIAS, M. (2005) Exploiting Variations in Concept Map Morphology as a Lesson-planning tool for Trainee Teachers in Higher Education, Journal of In-Service Education, 31.3, pp LEWIS, C., PARRY, R. AND MURATA, A. (2006) How Should Research Contribute to Instructional Improvement: The Case of lesson Study, Educational Researcher, 35, 3, pp LITTLE, J.W. (2002) Locating learning in teachers’ communities of practice: Opening up problems of analysis in records of everyday practice, Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, pp PANG, M. AND MARTON, F. (2003) Beyond “Lesson Study”: Comparing two ways of facilitating the grasp of some economic concepts, Instructional Science, 31, PANG, M. AND MARTON, F, (2005) Learning Theory as Teaching Resource: Enhancing Students’ Understanding of Economic Concepts, Instructional Science, 33: SEIDEL, T., RIMMELE, R. AND PRENZEL, M. (2005) Clarity and coherence of lesson goals as a scaffold for student learning, Learning and Instruction 15, STONES, E. (1992) Quality Teaching: A sample of cases (London: Routledge). VALLI, L. (1992) Reflective Teacher Education: cases and critiques (Albany: State University of New York Press). WOOD, K. (2000) The experience of learning to teach: changing student teachers' ways of understanding teaching, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32, 1, pp The experience of learning to teach: changing student teachers' ways of understanding teaching