سیستمهای کنترل خطی پاییز 1389 بسم ا... الرحمن الرحيم دکتر حسين بلندي- دکتر سید مجید اسما عیل زاده.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 5 – The Performance of Feedback Control Systems
Advertisements

The Performance of Feedback Control Systems
Chapter 4 Continuous Time Signals Time Response Continuous Time Signals Time Response.
1 سیستمهای کنترل خطی پاییز 1389 بسم ا... الرحمن الرحيم دکتر حسين بلندي - دکتر سید مجید اسما عیل زاده.
Lect.7 Steady State Error Basil Hamed
سیستمهای کنترل خطی پاییز 1389 بسم ا... الرحمن الرحيم دکتر حسين بلندي - دکتر سید مجید اسما عیل زاده.
4. System Response This module is concern with the response of LTI system. L.T. is used to investigate the response of first and second order systems.
Chapter 8 Root Locus <<<4.1>>>
Chapter 5 – The Performance of Feedback Control Systems
Transient and steady state response (cont.)
Transient & Steady State Response Analysis
5.4 Disturbance rejection The input to the plant we manipulated is m(t). Plant also receives disturbance input that we do not control. The plant then can.
Review last lectures.
1 Chapter 9 Differential Equations: Classical Methods A differential equation (DE) may be defined as an equation involving one or more derivatives of an.
Out response, Poles, and Zeros
Feedback Control Systems (FCS) Dr. Imtiaz Hussain URL :
Automatic Control Theory-
1 Chapter 2 We need to write differential equations representing the system or subsystem. Then write the Laplace transform of the system. Then we will.
It is the time response of a system to an input that sets the criteria for our control systems. Many quantitative criteria have been defined to characterise.
NUAA-Control System Engineering
By Irfan Azhar Time Response. Transient Response After the engineer obtains a mathematical representation of a subsystem, the subsystem is analyzed for.
Feedback Control Systems (FCS) Dr. Imtiaz Hussain URL :
Chapter 5 Transient and Steady State Response “I will study and get ready and someday my chance will come” Abraham Lincoln.
سیستمهای کنترل خطی پاییز 1389 بسم ا... الرحمن الرحيم دکتر حسين بلندي - دکتر سید مجید اسما عیل زاده.
سیستمهای کنترل خطی پاییز 1389 بسم ا... الرحمن الرحيم دکتر حسين بلندي - دکتر سید مجید اسما عیل زاده.
Chapter 3 Dynamic Response The Block Diagram Block diagram is a graphical tool to visualize the model of a system and evaluate the mathematical relationships.
سیستمهای کنترل خطی پاییز 1389 بسم ا... الرحمن الرحيم دکتر حسين بلندي- دکتر سید مجید اسما عیل زاده.
Subsea Control and Communications Systems
Lec 6. Second Order Systems
Modern Control System EKT 308 Steady-State and Stability.
Discrete Controller Design
System Time Response Characteristics
Modeling Transient Response So far our analysis has been purely kinematic: The transient response has been ignored The inertia, damping, and elasticity.
1 Time Response. CHAPTER Poles and Zeros and System Response. Figure 3.1: (a) System showing input and output; (b) Pole-zero plot of the system;
Modern Control System EKT 308
1 Teaching Innovation - Entrepreneurial - Global The Centre for Technology enabled Teaching & Learning, M G I, India DTEL DTEL (Department for Technology.
Chapter 7 Steady State Error <<<4.1>>>
Lecture 13: Second-Order Systems Time Response Lecture 12: First-order systems Lecture 13: Second-order systems Lecture 14: Non-canonical systems ME 431,
Automatic Control Theory School of Automation NWPU Teaching Group of Automatic Control Theory.
سیستمهای کنترل خطی پاییز 1389 بسم ا... الرحمن الرحيم دکتر حسين بلندي - دکتر سید مجید اسما عیل زاده.
Intelligent Robot Lab Pusan National University Intelligent Robot Lab Chapter 7. Forced Response Errors Pusan National University Intelligent Robot Laboratory.
Control Systems Lect.3 Steady State Error Basil Hamed.
SKEE 3143 Control Systems Design Chapter 2 – PID Controllers Design
Control engineering ( ) Time response of first order system PREPARED BY: Patel Ravindra.
System Dynamics Dr. Mohammad Kilani
سیستمهای کنترل خطی پاییز 1389 بسم ا... الرحمن الرحيم دکتر حسين بلندي- دکتر سید مجید اسما عیل زاده.
Lecture 7/8 Analysis in the time domain (II) North China Electric Power University Sun Hairong.
Page : PID Controller Chapter 3 Design of Discrete- Time control systems PID C ontroller.
Automatic Control Theory CSE 322
Youngjune, Han Chapter 4 Time Response Youngjune, Han
Control Response Patterns
دکتر حسين بلندي- دکتر سید مجید اسما عیل زاده
Time Response Analysis
DNT Control Principle Steady-State Analysis DNT Control Principle.
Control Systems (CS) Lecture-12-13
Instructor: Jongeun Choi
Time Response System & Control Engineering Lab.
UNIT-II TIME RESPONSE ANALYSIS
Control Response Patterns
UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA PERLIS SCHOOL OF ELECTRICAL SYSTEM ENGINEERING
Response of Higher Order Systems
Chapter 4. Time Response I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be. Pusan National University Intelligent.
Lecture 6: Time Domain Analysis and State Space Representation
B.Tech – II – ECE – II SEMESTER ACE ENGINEERING COLLEGE
UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA PERLIS SCHOOL OF ELECTRICAL SYSTEM ENGINEERING
Chapter 5 – The Performance of Feedback Control Systems
Time Response, Stability, and
Exercise 1 For the unit step response shown in the following figure, find the transfer function of the system. Also find rise time and settling time. Solution.
Chapter 5 The Performance of Feedback Control Systems
By: Nafees Ahamad, AP, EECE, Dept. DIT University, Dehradun
Presentation transcript:

سیستمهای کنترل خطی پاییز 1389 بسم ا... الرحمن الرحيم دکتر حسين بلندي- دکتر سید مجید اسما عیل زاده

Recap. Signal Flow Graph : –Algebra, –Mason Rule, Introduction to Time Domain Analysis 2

Time Domain Performance Specification 3

Outline Introduction Test Input Signals Performance of a first-order system Performance of a second-order system Effects of a Third Pole and a Zero on the Second- Order System Response Estimation of the Damping Ratio The s-plane Root Location and the Transient Response 4

Introduction/1 Objectives The ability to adjust the transient and steady-state response of a feedback control system is a beneficial outcome of the design of control systems. 5

Introduction/2 One of the first steps in the design process is to specify the measures of performance. We introduce the common time-domain specifications such as percent overshoot, settling time, time to peak, time to rise, and steady-state tracking error. 6

Introduction/3 We will use selected input signals such as the step and ramp to test the response of the control system. The correlation between the system performance and the location of the system transfer function poles and zeros in the s-plane is discussed. 7

Introduction/4 We will develop valuable relationships between the performance specifications and the natural frequency and damping ratio for second-order systems. Relying on the notion of dominant poles, we can extrapolate the ideas associated with second-order systems to those of higher order. 8

Test Input Signal Since the actual input signal of the system is usually unknown, a standard test input signal is normally chosen. Commonly used test signals include step input, ramp input, and the parabolic input. 9

For example in a radar tracking system for antiaircraft missiles, the position and speed of the target to be tracked may vary in an unpredictable manner. Mobile robot with collision avoidance, … From the step function to the parabolic function, they become progressively faster with respect to time. 10

For the purposes of analysis and design, it is necessary to assume some basic types of test inputs so that the performance of a system can be evaluated (CLASSFICATION OF INPUTS). The responses due to these inputs allow the prediction of the system’s performance to other more complex inputs. 11

General form of the standard test signals r(t) = t n R(s) = n!/s n+1 12

Test signals r(t) = A t n n = 0 n = 1 n = 2 r(t) = Ar(t) = Atr(t) = At 2 R(s) = 2A/s 3 R(s) = A/s R(s) = A/s 2 13

The ramp signal is the integral of the step input, and the parabola is the integral of the ramp input. The unit impulse function is also useful for test signal purposes. The responses due to these inputs allow the prediction of the system’s performance to other more complex inputs. 14

Step-for representation a stationary target Ramp- for track a constant angular position (first derivatives are constant) Parabolas- can be used to represent accelerating targets (second derivatives are constant) 15

Test Signal Inputs Test Signal r(t) R(s) Step position r(t) = A, t > 0 = 0, t < 0 R(s) = A/s Ramp velocity r(t) = At, t > 0 = 0, t < 0 R(s) = A/s 2 Parabolic acceleration r(t) = At 2, t > 0 = 0, t < 0 R(s) = 2A/s 3 16

Test inputs vary with target type parabola ramp step 17

Steady-state error Is a difference between input and the output for a prescribed test input as 18

Application to stable systems Unstable systems represent loss of control in the steady state and are not acceptable for use at all. 19

Steady-state error: a) step input, b) ramp input 20

Time response of systems c(t) = c t (t) + c ss (t) The time response of a control system is divided into two parts: c t (t) - transient response c ss (t) - steady state response 21

Transient response All real control systems exhibit transient phenomena to some extend before steady state is reached. lim ct(t) = 0 for t  22

Steady-state response The response that exists for a long time following any input signal initiation. 23

Poles and zeros of a first order system Css(t)Ct(t) 24

Poles and zeros A pole of the input function generates the form of the forced response ( that is the pole at the origin generated a step function at the output). The zeros and poles generate the amplitudes for both the transit and steady state responses 25

A pole on the real axis generate an exponential response of the form Exp[-  t] where -  is the pole location on real axis. The farther to the left a pole is on the negative real axis, the faster the exponential transit response will decay to zero. Effect of a real-axis pole upon transient response 26

Evaluating response using poles Css(t ) Ct(t) 27

First order system 28

First-order system response to a unit step Transient response specification: 1. Time-constant, 1/a 2. Rise time, Tr 3. Settling time, Ts 29

Transient response specification for a first-order system 1.Time-constant, 1/a Can be described as the time for (1 - Exp[- a t]) to rise to 63 % of final value. 1.Rise time, T r = 2.2/a The time for the waveform to go from 0.1 to 0.9 of its final value. 3.Settling time, T s = 4/a The time for response to reach, and stay within, 2% of its final value 30

Transfer function via laboratory testing 31

Identify K and a from testing The time for amplitude to reach 63% of its final value: 63 x 0.72 = 0.45, or about 0.13 sec, a = 1/0.13 = 7.7 From equation, we see that the forced response reaches a steady-state value of K/a =0.72. K= 0.72 x 7.7= 5.54 G(s) = 5.54/(s+7.7). 32

Exercise A system has a transfer function G(s)= 50/(s+50). Find the transit response specifications such as Tc, Tr, Ts. 33

34

Steady-state response If the steady-state response of the output does not agree with the steady-state of the input exactly, the system is said to have a steady-state error. It is a measure of system accuracy when a specific type of input is applied to a control system. 35

Y(s) = R(s) G(s) 36

Steady-state error T(s) = 9/(s + 10) Y(s) = 9/s(s+10) y(t) = 0.9(1- e -10t ) y(∞) = 0.9 E(s) = R(s) - Y(s) ess = lim s E(s) =

38

Performance of a second-order system 39

Numerical example of the second- order system 40

A second order system exhibits a wide range of response. The general case: which has two finite poles and no zeros. The term in the numerator is simple scale. Changing a and b we can show all possible transient responses. 41

Changes in the parameters of a second- order system can change the form of the response. Can display characteristic much like a first-order system or display damped or pure oscillation for its transient response. 42

The unit step response then can be found using C(s)= R(s) G(s), where R(s) = 1/s, followed by a partial- fraction expansion and inverse Laplace transform 43

Overdamped 44

Underdamped 45

Undamped 46

Critically damped 47

fig_04_11 48

Step response for second order system damping cases 49

Summary Overdamped Poles: Two real at -  1, -  2 Underdamped Poles: Two complex at -  d + j  d, -  d - j  d Undamped Poles: Two imaginary at + j  1, - j  1 Critically damped Poles: Two real at -  1, 50