EUROPEAN INITIATIVES IN THE FIELD OF MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS AND MUTUAL RECOGNITION NEW LEGAL MECHANISM FOR CREATING AN AREA OF FREEDOM,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
European Judicial Network The EJN website:
Advertisements

on Transfer of Sentenced Persons
11 COUNTER-TERRORISM COMMITTEE CTED PRESENTATION ON MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE TO MEMBER STATES presentation by CTED GENERAL LEGAL ISSUES GROUP, INCLUDING.
European payment order Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment.
European Investigation Order Background and Context Steve Peers April 7, 2014.
Article 54 CISA and the ECJ/CGEU case law
Introduction to basic principles of Regulation (EC) 45/2001 Sophie Louveaux María Verónica Pérez Asinari.
Service of documents within European Union Council regulation No 1348/2000 on the service in the Member states of judicial and extrajudicial documents.
International Cooperation in Law enforcement: Mutual Legal Assistance TAIEX Training Workshop Ankara, May, 2012 Jaganathan SARAVANASAMY Assistant.
Slide 1/31 © copyright Standard training programme in judicial cooperation in criminal matters within the European Union Version: 3.0 Last updated:
Purpose MLA and extradition (and other forms of international judicial cooperation) with 3rd countries is part of the external policy of the Union Purpose.
NEW EXISTING TOOLS FOR ENHANCING INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL COOPERATION WITHIN THE EUROPEAN UNION Towards a new generation of mutual legal assistance mechanisms.
Double jeopardy and Mutual Legal Assistance
Slide 1/32 © copyright Standard training programme in judicial cooperation in criminal matters within the European Union Version: 3.0 Last updated:
Taking of evidence within the European Union Council regulation no 1206/2001 on cooperation between the courts of Member States in the taking of evidence.
The Area of Liberty, Security and Justice. Objectives Free movement for EU citizens Security and safety in a Europe without borders Figth against international.
Bali Process Technical Expert Workshop on Mutual Legal Assistance and Law Enforcement Bangkok, Thailand, June 2011 Celia Maunder International Crime Cooperation.
The European Public Prosecutor: Coming soon to a country near you? An EPP working with UK authorities Practical issues Mike Kennedy President of Eurojust.
Irish Centre for European Law Conference The Law of the Lisbon Treaty.
INTRODUCTION INTO PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Marko Jovanovic, LL.M. MASTER IN EUROPEAN INTEGRATION Private International Law in the.
Slide 1/15 © copyright Standard training programme in judicial cooperation in criminal matters within the European Union Version: 3.0 Last updated:
European Arrest Warrant
Eneken Tikk // EST. Importance of Legal Framework  Law takes the principle of territoriality as point of departure;  Cyber security tools and targets.
1 Substantive criminal law and mutual recognition Hans G. NILSSON, Jur Dr h.c. Head of Division Criminal justice Council of the European Union.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States
Privacy and security: Is Europe going banana? Jean-Marc Van Gyseghem Head of Unit « Liberties in the information society » CRID – University.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States. Formerly concluded international agreements of Member States with third countries Article 351 TFEU The rights.
EU Criminal Law Introduction, Lisbon Treaty. EU criminal legislation EU cannot adopt a general EU criminal code EU cannot adopt a general EU criminal.
6 December 2010 Judicial cooperation in the EU From mutual legal assistance to mutual recognition Adrienne Boerwinkel Senior Legal Adviser Dutch Ministry.
Course: European Criminal Law SS 2009 Hubert Hinterhofer.
International Cooperation in Criminal Matters Extradition and Mutual Legal Assistance in Transnational Investigations.
Migration Law Schengen Information System by Konrad Wilk.
European arrest warrant and equality of treatment of EU citizens: Croatian example Elizabeta Ivičević Karas University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law.
M O D U L O IV M O D U L E IV. THE PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION.
Combatting Transnational Organized Crime through EXTRADITION
Digitalization of courts in the context of mutual assistance in criminal matters Dr Arkadiusz Lach Department of Criminal Procedure University of Nicolaus.
Doc. dr. sc. Aleksandra Maganić, Pravni fakultet Zagreb.
Welcome to Maastricht University. Faculty of Law Oral v. written evidence in the European Union Prof. André Klip Maastricht University, Ravenna 14 May.
Service of documents within European Union Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on the service.
Taking of evidence within the European Union Council regulation no 1206/2001 on cooperation between the courts of Member States in the taking of evidence.
AGIS 2004 EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June The European Arrest Warrant Project A short overview of Project JAI/2004/AGIS/043.
MODULE II: THE INSTRUMENTS OF JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE.- TOPIC 4 THE 1959 CONVENTION ON MUTUAL.
Chapter IV. International Cooperation. 2 2 International Cooperation Mandatory Offences Optional Offences Narrow Dual Criminality Requirements In MLAs.
Fight against terrorism. EU institutional/legal framework A bit of history 1957: European Communities are born.
MODULE II: THE INSTRUMENTS OF JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE.- TUTOR: JOSÉ MIGUEL GARCÍA MORENO Red Europea.
Living in an area of freedom, security and justice European CommissionDirectorate-General Justice and Home affairs.
European Arrest Warrant – Actual Challenges
OTHER COUNCIL OF EUROPE CONVENTIONS INTRODUCTION.
Experience of Slovenia in implementation of European Arrest Warrant
PRINCIPLE NE BIS IN IDEM IN EUROPEAN UNION CRIMINAL LAW Zoran Burić, PhD University of Zagreb – Faculty of Law Department for Criminal Procedural Law
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 2– Freedom Movement for Workers Bilateral.
1 European Evidence Warrant Mutual recognition and judicial co- operation in criminal matters in the EU Jarlath Spellman Irish National Member Eurojust.
Lost in Translations – An Examination of the Legal & Practical Problems Associated with the Implementation (or Non-Implementation) of Directive 2010/64/EU.
TAIEX SEMINAR JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS: TWENTY YEARS OF SHARING EU EXPERTISE 3 June, 2016 Dr. Anna Fiodorova Working group II EaP session.
International cooperation in criminal matters in the XXIth century: towards a new approach?
Workshop on strengthening international legal cooperation among OSCE Member States to combat transnational organized crime (Vienna, 7-9 April 2008) Extradition.
TAIEX INTERNAL MARKET WEEK IN BUDAPEST November 2004 Co-operation of Customs Administrations Presentation by: Sandro Le Noci – Italian Customs.
CROSS BORDER GATHERING EVIDENCE
JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS IN THE EU
EXPERIENCES CONCERNING JIT
International cooperation in criminal matters legal framework and examples from practice - Macedonian experiences Ohrid
Dr. Željko Karas Police College, Zagreb (Croatia)
Directive 2016/800 on procedural safeguards for children suspected or accused in criminal proceedings Steven Cras Political Administrator, General Secretariat.
Daniel BERNARD Federal Prosecutor of Belgium CICERO FOUNDATION SEMINAR
Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters within the European Union
European arrest warrant – in theory
Eurojust’s involvement in JITs
Gozotuk and Brugge case
European Arrest Warrant
Eurojust: The EU Judicial Cooperation Unit
Presentation transcript:

EUROPEAN INITIATIVES IN THE FIELD OF MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS AND MUTUAL RECOGNITION NEW LEGAL MECHANISM FOR CREATING AN AREA OF FREEDOM, SECURITY AND JUSTICE

LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS AND MUTUAL RECOGNITION TRADITIONAL MECHANISMS: Council of Europe and Bilateral arrangements. –MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE: EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON MUTUAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS, FIRST ADDITIONAL PROTOCOL. Bilateral agreements. –EXTRADITION: EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON EXTRADITION, FIRST AND SECOND ADDITIONAL PROTOCOLS. Bilateral agreements. –ENFORCEMENT OF CRIMINAL JUDGEMENTS: EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON THE TRANSFER OF SENTENCED PERSONS, EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON THE VALIDITY OF CRIMINAL JUDGEMENTS, 1990.

LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS AND MUTUAL RECOGNITION MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE –FRAMEWORK FOR TRADITIONAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE SYSTEM –SYSTEM OF CENTRAL AUTHORITIES: NO DIRECT TRASNMISSION, EXCEPT IN CASE OF URGENCY (cc CENTRAL AUTHORITY) –GROUNDS FOR REFUSAL BASED ON PUBLIC ORDER AND ESSENTIAL NATIONAL INTEREST –EXECUTION RULED BY THE LAW OF THE REQUESTING COUNTRY (locus regit actum) –FORMS OF ASSISTANCE: NOTIFICATIONS, TAKING OF EVIDENCE, HANDING OF OBJECTS, REQUEST FOR SEARCH AND SEIZURE (SUBJECT TO DOUBLE CRIMINALITY)...

LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS AND MUTUAL RECOGNITION Traditional mutual assistance is based on the recognition of judicial borders and the principle of territoriality. The intervention of Central Authorities implies political control over the granting of the assistance: public order as ground for refusal. Application of the Law of the Requested Party can lead to the non validity of the material in the proceedings in the Requesting Party. New forms of assistance based on new investigating measures: videoconference, joint investigation teams, undercover agents...

LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS AND MUTUAL RECOGNITION SOLUTIONS AT EUROPEAN LEVEL SOLUTIONS AT EUROPEAN LEVEL –EUROPEAN UNION SCHENGEN AGREEMENT: COMPLEMENTING THE EC ON MLA, ON A VOLUNTARY BASIS. –DIRECT NOTIFICATION –DIRECT TRANSMISSION OF REQUESTS BETWEEN JUDICIAL AUTHORITIES –ADMINISTRATIVE AUTHORITIES.

LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS AND MUTUAL RECOGNITION CONVENTION ON MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS BETWEEN THE MEMBER STATES, 29 th May Entry into force: 8 ratifications of the old MS. –Extends the application of MLA to proceedings before administrative authorities and proceedings involving legal persons. –Provides for the application of the law of the Requesting State (if it is not contrary to the principles of the Requested State). –To the extent possible, deadlines must be met, and reasons to non compliance must be given.

LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS AND MUTUAL RECOGNITION SERVICE OF DOCUMENTS: –GENERAL RULE: BY POST –ONLY IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES IT IS POSSIBLE TO SERVE THE DOCUMENT THROUGH THE COMPETENT AUTHORITIES OF THE REQUESTED STATE. –TRANSLATION: ONLY IF THE ADDRESEE DOES NOT UNDERSTAND THE LANGUAGE OF THE REQUESTING STATE, AND ONLY THE IMPORTANT PASSAGES THEREOF. –ACCOMPANIED BY A REPORT STATING HIS/HER RIGHTS (ALSO TRANSLATED TO A LANGUAGE OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE).

LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS AND MUTUAL RECOGNITION REQUEST FOR MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE AND SPONTANEOUS EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION: –GENERAL RULE: DIRECT TRANSMISSION BETWEEN JUDICIAL AUTHORITIES. –TRASNMISSION THROUGH CENTRAL AUTHORITIES IS ALSO POSSIBLE. –INFORMATION LAID WITH A VIEW TO PROCEEDINGS IN THE REQUESTED STATE: they may be transmitted directly. –TRANSMISSION THROUGH CENTRAL AUTHORITIES> TEMPORARY TRANSFER OR TRANSIT OF PERSONS IN CUSTODY EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION ON CRIMINAL RECORDS.

LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS AND MUTUAL RECOGNITION NEW FORMS OF ASSISTANCE: –HEARING BY VIDEO AND TELE CONFERENCE –CONTROLLED DELIVERIES (for extraditable offences) –JOINT INVESTIGATION TEAMS (information obtained may be used for the purpose for which the JIT was created, and for other purposes in certain cases). –COUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISION OF 13 JUNE 2002 –COVERT INVESTIGATIONS –INTERCEPTIONS OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS

LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS AND MUTUAL RECOGNITION COUNCIL OF EUROPE: –SECOND ADDITIONAL PROTOCOL TO THE 1959 CONVENTION. Entry into force: 3 ratifications (done). SIMILAR FRAMEWORK AS PROVIDED FOR BY THE 2000 CONVENTION. ADMINISTRATIVE AUTHORITIES SERVICE BY POST DIRECT TRANSMISSION LAW APPLICABLE TO THE EXECUTION NEW FORMS OF ASSISTANCE

LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS AND MUTUAL RECOGNITION EXTRADITION –PROCEDURE: 2 PHASES, ADMINISTRATIVE + JUDICIAL. –POLITICAL DECISSION: TO CONTINUE WITH THE JUDICIAL PHASE OF THE EXTRADITION PROCEDURE + TO SURRENDER THE PERSON. –DISCRETIONARY GROUNDS FOR REFUSAL. –NO DEADLINES FOR GRANTING EXTRADITION OR EFFECTING SURRENDER. –PRINCIPLE OF DUAL CRIMINALITY

LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS AND MUTUAL RECOGNITION EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT –COUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISSION OF JUNE 13, 2002 ON THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT AND SURRENDER PROCEDURES BETWEEN MEMBER STATES. FIRST CONCRET MEASURE TO IMPLEMENT MUTUAL RECOGNITION WITHIN THE EU IN THE FIELD OF CRIMINAL LAW ENTRY INTO FORCE: 1st January 2004 (old Member States), 1st May 2004 (for the new MS). –However, some MS did not comply with this deadline (Germany, Czeck Republic, Italy). Since the entry into force of the implementing legislation in Italy, on 14 May 2005, all 25 MS apply now the EAW.

LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS AND MUTUAL RECOGNITION The objective set for the Union to become an area of freedom, security and justice leads to abolishing extradition between Member States and replacing it by a system of surrender between judicial authorities. Further, the introduction of a new simplified system of surrender of sentenced or suspected persons for the purposes of execution or prosecution of criminal sentences makes it possible to remove the complexity and potential for delay inherent in the present extradition procedures. Traditional cooperation relations which have prevailed up till now between Member States should be replaced by a system of free movement of judicial decisions in criminal matters, covering both pre-sentence and final decisions, within an area of freedom, security and justice. The European arrest warrant provided for in this Framework Decision is the first concrete measure in the field of criminal law implementing the principle of mutual recognition which the European Council referred to as the cornerstone of judicial cooperation.

LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS AND MUTUAL RECOGNITION Definitition of the EAW: it IS a JUDICIAL DECISION. –It is issued by a MS with a view to view to the arrest and surrender by another Member State of a requested person, for the purposes of conducting a criminal prosecution or executing a custodial sentence or detention order. –Member States SHALL execute any European arrest warrant on the basis of the principle of mutual recognition.

LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS AND MUTUAL RECOGNITION SCOPE OF THE EAW: –Acts punishable by the law of the issuing Member State by a custodial sentence or a detention order for a maximum period of at least 12 months or, –where a sentence has been passed or a detention order has been made, for sentences of at least four months. –DUAL CRIMINALITY is excluded in respect of a list of 36 offences punishable in the issuing MS by a custodial sentence of at least three years, including terrorism, drug trafficking, money laundering, homicide, etc…

LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS AND MUTUAL RECOGNITION GROUNDS FOR NON-EXECUTION: –MANDATORY: AMNESTY IN THE EXECUTING MS NE BIS IN IDEM NON LIABILITY OF THE PERSON ON ACCOUNT OF HIS/HER AGE. –OPTIONAL: PROCEEDINGS PENDING IN THE EXECUTING MS THE PERSON IS STATUTE-BARRED IN EXECUTING MS FOR EXECUTION OF A SENTENCE, IF THE PERSON IS A NATIONAL OF THE EXECUTING MS AND IT UNDERTAKE TO EXECUTE THE SENTENCE ITSELF TERRITORIALITY

LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS AND MUTUAL RECOGNITION GUARANTEES TO BE GIVEN IN PARTICULAR CASES: –DECISION RENDERED IN ABSENTIA –LIFE SENTENCE PENALTY –EAW FOR PROSECUTION, IF THE PERSON IS A NATIONAL OF THE EXECUTING MS, THAT HE/SHE WILL BE SENT BACK TO SERVE THE SENTENCE.

LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS AND MUTUAL RECOGNITION FORM, CONTENT AND PROCEDURE: –MULTILINGUAL STANDARD FORM –INFORMATION: name of the person, issuing judicial authority, nature of the offence, penalty, description of the facts. –TRANSMISSION: directly to the executing judicial authority, or by an alert in the Schengen Information System. By any secure means of transmission.

LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS AND MUTUAL RECOGNITION SURRENDER DECISION: –The person shall be kept in custody –If the person consents: 10 DAYS. –Otherwise: MAX. 60 DAYS AFTER DETENTION (possibility to extend another 30 days). –TIME LIMITS FOR THE SURRENDER: AS SOON AS POSIBLE, AND NO LATER THAN 10 DAYS AFTER THE DECISION IS MADE.

LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS AND MUTUAL RECOGNITION OTHER CONCRETIONS OF THE MUTUAL RECOGNITION PRINCIPLE: –COUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISION OF JULY 22, 2003 ON THE EXECUTION OF SEARCH ORDERS. –COUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISION OF FEBRUARY 24, 2005 ON THE APPLICATION OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION OF ECONOMIC SANCTIONS. –IN NEGOTIATION: THE EUROPEAN EVIDENCE WARRANT AND FM FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF CUSTODIAL SENTENCES IN THE EU.