STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF1 Two-particle correlations and Heavy Ion Collision Dynamics at RHIC/STAR Mike Lisa, Ohio State University STAR.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Mass, Quark-number, Energy Dependence of v 2 and v 4 in Relativistic Nucleus- Nucleus Collisions Yan Lu University of Science and Technology of China Many.

Advertisements

Detailed HBT measurement with respect to Event plane and collision energy in Au+Au collisions Takafumi Niida for the PHENIX Collaboration University of.

Results from PHENIX on deuteron and anti- deuteron production in Au+Au collisions at RHIC Joakim Nystrand University of Bergen for the PHENIX Collaboration.

In relativistic heavy ion collisions a high energy density matter Quark-Gluon Plasma (QGP) may be formed. Various signals have been proposed which probe.

DNP03, Tucson, Oct 29, Kai Schweda Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory for the STAR collaboration Hadron Yields, Hadrochemistry, and Hadronization.

STAR Patricia Fachini 1 Brookhaven National Laboratory Motivation Data Analysis Results Conclusions Resonance Production in Au+Au and p+p Collisions at.

STAR HBT 6 Sep 2003XXXIII ISMD - Krakow Poland1 Azimuthally-sensitive HBT (asHBT) in Au+Au collisions at  s NN =200 GeV Mike Lisa, Ohio State University.

Statistical Models A. ) Chemical equilibration B

Recent Results from STAR Rene Bellwied, Wayne State, for the STAR Collaboration  Thermalization & Timescales  High pt physics  Fluctuations  130 to.

5-12 April 2008 Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics STAR Particle production at RHIC Aneta Iordanova for the STAR collaboration.

Resonance Dynamics in Heavy Ion Collisions 22nd Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics , La Jolla, California Sascha Vogel, Marcus Bleicher UrQMD.

Statistical Models A.) Chemical equilibration (Braun-Munzinger, Stachel, Redlich, Tounsi) B.) Thermal equilibration (Schnedermann, Heinz) C.) Hydrodynamics.

High p T identified hadron anisotropic flow and Deuteron production in 200 GeV Au+Au Collisions Shengli Huang Vanderbilt University for the PHENIX Collaboration.

Bulk signatures & properties (soft particle production)

WWND, San Diego1 Scaling Characteristics of Azimuthal Anisotropy at RHIC Michael Issah SUNY Stony Brook for the PHENIX Collaboration.

S C O T T PRATPRAT MICHIGANMICHIGAN S T T E UNIVRSITYUNIVRSITY T H BTBT PUZZLE PUZZLE Z A N D E X T E N D I N G HYRODYNAMICS HYRODYNAMICS.

High p T identified charged hadron v 2 and v 4 in 200GeV AuAu collisions by the PHENIX experiment Shengli Huang Vanderbilt University for the PHENIX Collaboration.

ISMD31 / Sept. 4, 2001 Toru Sugitate / Hiroshima Univ. The 31 st International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics on 1-7, Sept in Datong, China.

Particle Spectra at AGS, SPS and RHIC Dieter Röhrich Fysisk institutt, Universitetet i Bergen Similarities and differences Rapidity distributions –net.

Masashi Kaneta, LBNL Masashi Kaneta for the STAR collaboration Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. First results from STAR experiment at RHIC - Soft hadron.

Rashmi Raniwala Hot & Dense Matter in RHIC-LHC Era, February 12-14, 2008, TIFR, Mumbai 1 Rashmi Raniwala Department of Physics University of Rajasthan.

Collective Flow in Heavy-Ion Collisions Kirill Filimonov (LBNL)

STAR HBT 30 Aug 2001Mike Lisa - ACS Nuclear Division - Chicago 1 Characterizing the freezeout at RHIC: HBT, spectra, and elliptic flow U.S. Labs: Argonne,

Spectra Physics at RHIC : Highlights from 200 GeV data Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez ISMD ‘02, Alushta, Ukraine Sep 9, 2002.

STAR HBT 31 Oct 2001Mike Lisa - Kent State Seminar1 Emergence of a Consistent Picture from First Results of STAR at RHIC? Mike Lisa, Ohio State University.

Partonic Collectivity at RHIC ShuSu Shi for the STAR collaboration Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Central China Normal University.

1 2-particle correlation at RHIC Fabrice Retière, LBNL for the STAR collaboration.

HBT Dan Magestro, The Ohio State University Overview of HBT interferometry Overview of HBT interferometry The SPS & RHIC HBT program The SPS & RHIC HBT.

STAR 1 APS Spring Meeting - April malisa Recent results from STAR M.A. Lisa, for the STAR Collaboration.

STAR 1 Warsaw STAR/ALICE HBT Workshop - May malisa Dynamics at low and high p T from the Solenoidal Tracker At RHIC (STAR) Mike Lisa, Ohio State.

STAR S.A. Voloshin Elliptic Flow at RHIC STAR Collaboration U.S. Labs: Argonne, Berkeley, Brookhaven National Labs U.S. Universities: Arkansas, UC Berkeley,

Dan Magestro The Ohio State University for the STAR Collaboration HBT relative to the reaction plane at RHIC Where we stand after Year-1 Motivation for.

09/15/10Waye State University1 Elliptic Flow of Inclusive Photon Ahmed M. Hamed Midwest Critical Mass University of Toledo, Ohio October, 2005 Wayne.

Sergey Panitkin Femtoscopy at RHIC Sergey Panitkin Brookhaven National Lab.

System size dependence of freeze-out properties at RHIC Quark Matter 2006 Shanghai-China Nov System size dependence of freeze-out properties.

Hadron Collider Physics 2012, 12/Nov/2012, KyotoShinIchi Esumi, Univ. of Tsukuba1 Heavy Ion results from RHIC-BNL ShinIchi Esumi Univ. of Tsukuba Contents.

Sergey Panitkin Current Status of the RHIC HBT Puzzle Sergey Panitkin Brookhaven National Lab La Thuile, March 18, 2005.

Masashi Kaneta, First joint Meeting of the Nuclear Physics Divisions of APS and JPS 1 / Masashi Kaneta LBNL

Peter Kolb, November 18, 2003Momentum Anisotropies1 Momentum Anisotropies -- Probing the detailed Dynamics Department of Physics and Astronomy State University.

Azimuthal HBT measurement of charged pions With respect to 3 rd event plane In Au+Au 200GeV collisions at RHIC-PHENIX Takafumi Niida for the PHENIX Collaboration.

STAR HBT 13 February 2003Winter Workshop - Breckenridge CO1  HBT in STAR Mike Lisa*, Ohio State University “Traditional” HBT results: 200 GeV vs 130 GeV.

STAR HBT 16 Oct 20032nd Warsaw Meeting on Correlations and Resonances 1 Azimuthally-sensitive HBT (asHBT) in Au+Au collisions at  s NN =200 GeV Mike Lisa,

Heavy-Ion Physics - Hydrodynamic Approach Introduction Hydrodynamic aspect Observables explained Recombination model Summary 전남대 이강석 HIM

School of Collective Dynamics in High-Energy CollisionsLevente Molnar, Purdue University 1 Effect of resonance decays on the extracted kinetic freeze-out.

Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook, ISMD, Kromĕříž, Roy A. Lacey What do we learn from Correlation measurements at RHIC.

Budapest, 4-9 August 2005Quark Matter 2005 HBT search for new states of matter in A+A collisions Yu. Sinyukov, BITP, Kiev Based on the paper S.V. Akkelin,

24 Nov 2006 Kentaro MIKI University of Tsukuba “electron / photon flow” Elliptic flow measurement of direct photon in √s NN =200GeV Au+Au collisions at.

Characterization of the pion source at the AGS Mike Lisa The Ohio State University Motivation and Measurement Systematics of HBT in E895 Existing problems.

Charged and Neutral Kaon correlations in Au-Au Collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 200 GeV using the solenoidal tracker at RHIC (STAR) Selemon Bekele The Ohio State.

BNL/ Tatsuya CHUJO JPS RHIC symposium, Chuo Univ., Tokyo Hadron Production at RHIC-PHENIX Tatsuya Chujo (BNL) for the PHENIX Collaboration.

Andras. Ster, RMKI, Hungary ZIMANYI-SCHOOL’09, Budapest, 01/12/ Azimuthally Sensitive Buda-Lund Hydrodynamic Model and Fits to Spectra, Elliptic.

RHIC FLOW & HBT 29 oct 2003malisa - DNP03 - Tucson, AZ1 Flow & Correlations in the soft RHIC (Selected highlights) Mike Lisa Ohio State University.

Bulk properties at RHIC Olga Barannikova (Purdue University) Motivation Freeze-out properties at RHIC STAR perspective STAR  PHENIX, PHOBOS Time-span.

1 Space-time analysis of reactions at RHIC Fabrice Retière Lawrence Berkeley Lab STAR collaboration.

24 June 2007 Strangeness in Quark Matter 2007 STAR 2S0Q0M72S0Q0M7 Strangeness and bulk freeze- out properties at RHIC Aneta Iordanova.

Japanese Physics Society meeting, Hokkaido Univ. 23/Sep/2007, JPS meeting, Sapporo, JapanShinIchi Esumi, Inst. of Physics, Univ. of Tsukuba1 Collective.

Global and Collective Dynamics at PHENIX Takafumi Niida for the PHENIX Collaboration University of Tsukuba “Heavy Ion collisions in the LHC era” in Quy.

Elliptic Flow of Inclusive Photon Elliptic Flow of Inclusive Photon Ahmed M. Hamed Midwest Critical Mass University of Toledo, Ohio Oct. 22,

Hadron Spectra and Yields Experimental Overview Julia Velkovska INT/RHIC Winter Workshop, Dec 13-15, 2002.

Piotr Szarwas Adam Kisiel, Fabrice Retière Non-identical particle correlations at STAR.

R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook 1 Arkadij Taranenko XVIII Baldin ISHEPP September 25-30, JINR Dubna Nuclear Chemistry Group SUNY Stony Brook, USA Scaling Properties.

Soft physics in PbPb at the LHC Hadron Collider Physics 2011 P. Kuijer ALICECMSATLAS Necessarily incomplete.

RHIC/INT Workshop on HBT - jan021 The low-energy end of the HBT excitation function Mike Lisa, for Roy Lacey, for the E895 Collaboration N.N. Ajitanand,

Anisotropic flow of charged and strange particles in PbAu collisions at 158 AGeV measured in CERES experiment J. Milošević 1),2) 1)University of Belgrade.

STAR HBT oct 2002Mike Lisa - XXXII ISMD - Alushta, Ukraine 1 Azimuthally-sensitive HBT in STAR Mike Lisa Ohio State University Motivation Noncentral collision.

Adam Kisiel – CERN Hirschegg 2010 – 19 Jan Femtoscopy in relativistic heavy-ion collisions as a probe of system collectivity Adam Kisiel CERN.

Example analysis of toy model

Collective Dynamics at RHIC

Scaling Properties of Identified Hadron Transverse Momentum Spectra

Dipartimento Interateneo di Fisica, Bari (Italy)

Presentation transcript:

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF1 Two-particle correlations and Heavy Ion Collision Dynamics at RHIC/STAR Mike Lisa, Ohio State University STAR Collaboration Motivation / STAR Central collision dynamics – spectra & HBT(p T ) Non-central collision dynamics – elliptic flow & HBT(  ) Further info from correlations of non-identical particles Consistent picture of RHIC dynamics Conclusions

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF2 Why heavy ion collisions? Study bulk properties of nuclear matter The “little bang” Extreme conditions (high density/temperature) expect a transition to new phase of matter… Quark-Gluon Plasma (QGP) partons are relevant degrees of freedom over large length scales (deconfined state) believed to define universe until ~  s Heavy ion collisions ( “little bang”) the only way to experimentally probe deconfined state Study of QGP crucial to understanding QCD low-q (nonperturbative) behaviour confinement (defining property of QCD) nature of phase transition

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF3 RHIC BRAHMS PHOBOS PHENIX STAR AGS TANDEMS Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) 2:00 o’clock 4:00 o’clock 6:00 o’clock 8:00 o’clock 10:00 o’clock STAR PHENIX RHIC AGS LINAC BOOSTER TANDEMS 9 GeV/u Q = MeV/u Q = +32 HEP/NP  g-2 U-line BAF (NASA) PHOBOS 12:00 o’clock BRAHMS 2 concentric rings of 1740 superconducting magnets 3.8 km circumference counter-rotating beams of ions from p to Au max center-of-mass energy: AuAu 200 GeV, pp 500 GeV RHIC Runs Run I:Au+Au at  s = 130 GeV Run II: Au+Au and pp at  s = 200 GeV

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF4 The STAR Collaboration 451 Collaborators (294 authors) 45 Institutions 9 Countries: Brazil, China, England, France, Germany, India, Poland, Russia, US

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF5 Geometry of STAR ZCal Barrel EM Calorimeter Endcap Calorimeter Magnet Coils TPC Endcap & MWPC ZCal FTPCs Vertex Position Detectors Central Trigger Barrel or TOF Time Projection Chamber Silicon Vertex Tracker RICH

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF6 Au on Au Event at CM Energy ~ 130 AGeV Event Taken June 25, 2000.

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF7 Particle ID in STAR pions kaons protons deuterons electrons STAR dE/dx dE/dx PID range:  (dE/dx) =.08] p  ~ 0.7 GeV/c for K /   ~ 1.0 GeV/c for  p/p RICH PID range: GeV/c for K /  GeV/c for  p/p RICH “kinks”: K     + VoVo Decay vertices K s   + +  -   p +  -   p +  +  -   +  -   +  +  +    + K - Topology Combinatorics K s   + +  -   K + + K -   p +  -   p +  +    + +  -   p +  -   from K + K - pairs K + K - pairs m inv same event dist. mixed event dist. background subtracted dn/dm

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF8 Kaon Spectra at Mid-rapidity vs Centrality Exponential fits to m T spectra: K+K+ K-K- (K + +K - )/2 KsKs STAR preliminary 0-6% 11-18% 26-34% 45-58% 58-85% Centrality cuts 0-6% 11-18% 26-34% 45-58% 58-85% Centrality cuts 0-6% 11-18% 26-34% 45-58% 58-85% Centrality cuts Good agreement between different PID methods

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF9 Hadrochemistry: particle yields vs statistical models

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF10 lattice QCD applies

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF11 Already producing QGP at lower energy? Thermal model fits to particle yields (including strangeness, J/  )  approach QGP at CERN? is the system really thermal? warning: e + e - falls on similar line!! dynamical signatures? (no) what was pressure generated? what is Equation of State of strongly-interacting matter? Must go beyond chemistry:  study dynamics of system well into deconfined phase (RHIC) lattice QCD applies

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF12 Collision dynamics - several timescales initial state pre-equilibrium QGP and hydrodynamic expansion hadronic phase and freeze-out Chemical freeze out Kinetic freeze out “end result” looks very similar whether a QGP was formed or not!!! low-p T hadronic observables hadronization 1 fm/c ?5 fm/c ?10 fm/c ?50 fm/c ?time dN/dt “temperature”

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF13 First RHIC spectra - an explosive source data: STAR, PHENIX, QM01 model: P. Kolb, U. Heinz various experiments agree well different spectral shapes for particles of differing mass  strong collective radial flow mTmT 1/m T dN/dm T light heavy T purely thermal source explosive source T,  mTmT 1/m T dN/dm T light heavy very good agreement with hydrodynamic prediction

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF14 Hydrodynamics: modeling high-density scenarios Assumes local thermal equilibrium (zero mean-free-path limit) and solves equations of motion for fluid elements (not particles) Equations given by continuity, conservation laws, and Equation of State (EOS) EOS relates quantities like pressure, temperature, chemical potential, volume –direct access to underlying physics Works qualitatively at lower energy but always overpredicts collective effects - infinite scattering limit not valid there –RHIC is first time hydro works! lattice QCD input

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF15 “Blast wave” Thermal motion superimposed on radial flow (+ geometry) Hydro-inspired “blast-wave” thermal freeze-out fits to , K, p,   R  s E.Schnedermann et al, PRC48 (1993) 2462 T th = 107 MeV  = 0.55 preliminary M. Kaneta

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF16 Momentum-space characteristics of freeze-out appear well understood Coordinate-space ? Probe with two-particle intensity interferometry (“HBT”) The other half of the story…

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF17 “HBT 101” - probing source geometry Measurable! F.T. of pion source 5 fm 1 m  source  (x) r1r1 r2r2 x1x1 x2x2 p1p1 p2p2 1-particle probability  (x,p) = U * U 2-particle probability

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF18 “HBT 101” - probing the timescale of emission KK R out R side Decompose q into components: q Long : in beam direction q Out : in direction of transverse momentum q Side :  q Long & q Out (beam is into board) beware this “helpful” mnemonic!

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF19 Large lifetime - a favorite signal of “new” physics at RHIC hadronization time (burning log) will increase emission timescale (“lifetime”) magnitude of predicted effect depends strongly on nature of transition measurements at lower energies (SPS, AGS) observe  <~3 fm/c “”“” with transition cc Rischke & Gyulassy NPA 608, 479 (1996) 3D 1-fluid Hydrodynamics  ~ …but lifetime determination is complicated by other factors…

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF20 First HBT data at RHIC STAR Collab., PRL (2001) Data well-fit by Gaussian parametrization Coulomb-corrected (5 fm full Coulomb-wave) “raw” correlation function projection 1D projections of 3D correlation function integrated over 35 MeV/cin unplotted components

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF21 HBT excitation function STAR Collab., PRL (2001) decreasing parameter partially due to resonances saturation in radii geometric or dynamic (thermal/flow) saturation the “action” is ~ 10 GeV (!) no jump in effective lifetime NO predicted Ro/Rs increase (theorists: data must be wrong) Lower energy running needed!? midrapidity, low p T  - from central AuAu/PbPb

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF22 Central collision RHIC Hydrodynamics reproduces p-space aspects of particle emission up to p T ~2GeV/c (99% of particles)  hopes of exploring the early, dense stage Heinz & Kolb, hep-th/

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF23 Central collision RHIC Hydrodynamics reproduces p-space aspects of particle emission up to p T ~2GeV/c (99% of particles)  hopes of exploring the early, dense stage x-space is poorly reproduced model source is too small and lives too long and disintegrates too slowly? Correct dynamics signatures with wrong space-time dynamics? The RHIC HBT Puzzle Heinz & Kolb, hep-th/ Is there any consistent way to understand the data? Try to understand in simplest way possible

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF24 Blastwave parameterization: Implications for HBT: radii vs p T Assuming , T obtained from spectra fits  strong x-p correlations, affecting R O, R S differently p T =0.2 p T =0.4 K K RSRS RORO “whole source” not viewed

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF25 Blastwave: radii vs p T STAR data blastwave: R=13.5 fm,  freezeout =1.5 fm/c Using flow and temperature from spectra, can account for observed drop in HBT radii via x-p correlations, and R o <R s …but emission duration must be small Four parameters affect HBT radii p T =0.4 p T =0.2 K K

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF26 From R long :  t kinetic  = 8-10 fm/c (fast!) Simple Sinyukov formula –R L 2 =  t kinetic  2 T/m T  t kinetic  = 10 fm/c (T=110 MeV) B. Tomasik (~3D blast wave) –  t kinetic  = 8-9 fm/c

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF27 hydro evolution Dynamical models: x-anisotropy in entrance channel  p-space anisotropy at freezeout magnitude depends on system response to pressure Noncentral collision dynamics or

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF28 hydro evolution Dynamical models: x-anisotropy in entrance channel  p-space anisotropy at freezeout magnitude depends on system response to pressure Noncentral collision dynamics hydro reproduces v 2 (p T,m) RHIC for p T < ~1.5 GeV/c system response  EoS early thermalization indicated Heinz & Kolb, hep-ph/

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF29 hydro evolution later hadronic stage? hydro reproduces v 2 (p T,m) RHIC for p T < ~1.0 GeV/c system response  EoS early thermalization indicated Effect of dilute stage dilute hadronic stage (RQMD): little effect on v RHIC Teaney, Lauret, & Shuryak, nucl-th/ SPS RHIC

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF30 hydro evolution later hadronic stage? hydro reproduces v 2 (p T,m) RHIC for p T < ~1.5 GeV/c system response  EoS early thermalization indicated Effect of dilute stage dilute hadronic stage (RQMD): little effect on v RHIC significant (bad) effect on HBT radii calculation: Soff, Bass, Dumitru, PRL 2001 STAR PHENIX hydro only hydro+hadronic rescatt

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF31 hydro evolution later hadronic stage? hydro reproduces v 2 (p T,m) RHIC for p T < ~1.5 GeV/c system response  EoS early thermalization indicated Effect of dilute stage dilute hadronic stage (RQMD): little effect on v RHIC significant (bad) effect on HBT radii related to timescale? - need more info Teaney, Lauret, & Shuryak, nucl-th/

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF32 hydro evolution later hadronic stage? hydro reproduces v 2 (p T,m) RHIC for p T < ~1.5 GeV/c system response  EoS early thermalization indicated Effect of dilute stage dilute hadronic stage (RQMD): little effect on v RHIC significant (bad) effect on HBT radii related to timescale? - need more info qualitative change of freezeout shape!! important piece of the puzzle! in-plane- extended out-of-plane-extended Teaney, Lauret, & Shuryak, nucl-th/

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF33 Possible to “see” via HBT relative to reaction plane?  p =0°  p =90° R side (large) R side (small) for out-of-plane-extended source, expect large R side at 0  small R side at 90  2 nd -order oscillation R s 2 [no flow expectation] pp

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF34 “Traditional HBT” - cylindrical sources (reminder) KK R out R side Decompose q into components: q Long : in beam direction q Out : in direction of transverse momentum q Side :  q Long & q Out (beam is into board)

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF35 Anisotropic sources  Six HBT radii vs  Source in b-fixed system: (x,y,z) Space/time entangled in pair system (x O,x S,x L ) out pp b KK side x y ! explicit and implicit (x  x (  )) dependence on  Wiedemann, PRC (1998).

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF36 Symmetries of the emission function I. Mirror reflection symmetry w.r.t. reactionplane (for spherical nuclei):  with II. Point reflection symmetry w.r.t. collision center (equal nuclei):  with Heinz, Hummel, MAL, Wiedemann, nucl-th/

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF37 Fourier expansion of HBT Y=0 Insert symmetry constraints of spatial correlation tensor into Wiedemann relations and combine with explicit  -dependence: Note: These most general forms of the Fourier expansions for the HBT radii are preserved when averaging the correlation function over a finite, symmetric window around Y=0. Relations between the Fourier coefficients reveal interplay between flow and geometry, and can help disentangle space and time Heinz, Hummel, MAL, Wiedemann, nucl-th/

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF38 x out x side K Anisotropic HBT AGS (  s~2 AGeV)  p (°) R 2 (fm 2 ) outsidelong ol os sl Au+Au 2 AGeV; E895, PLB (2000) strong oscillations observed lines: predictions for static (tilted) out-of-plane extended source  consistent with initial overlap geometry  p = 0°

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF39 x out x side K Meaning of R o 2 (  ) and R s 2 (  ) are clear What about R os 2 (  ) ?  p (°) R 2 (fm 2 ) outsidelong ol os sl Au+Au 2 AGeV; E895, PLB (2000) R os 2 (  ) quantifies correlation between x out and x side No correlation (tilt) b/t between x out and x side at  p =0° (or 90°) K x out x side K x out x side K x out x side K x out x side K x out x side K x out x side  p = 0°  p ~45° Strong (positive) correlation when  p =45° Phase of R os 2 (  ) oscillation reveals orientation of extended source No access to 1 st -order oscillations in STAR Y1

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF40 Indirect indications of x-space RHIC v 2 (p T,m) globally well-fit by hydro-inspired “blast-wave” (Houvinen et al) STAR, PRL (2001) soliddashed 0.04   0.02  a (c) 0.04  S2S   0.02  0 (c) 100   20 T (MeV) temperature, radial flow consistent with fits to spectra anisotropy of flow boost spatial anisotropy (out-of-plane extended) 

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF41 STAR data Au+Au 130 GeV minbias preliminary significant oscillations observed blastwave with ~ same parameters as used to describe spectra & v 2 (p T,m) additional parameters: R = 11 fm  = 2 fm/c !! full blastwave consistent with R(p T ), K- 

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF42 preliminary full blastwave STAR data Au+Au 130 GeV minbias significant oscillations observed blastwave with ~ same parameters as used to describe spectra & v 2 (p T,m) additional parameters: R = 11 fm  = 2 fm/c !! consistent with R(p T ), K-  no spatial anisotropy no flow anisotropy both flow anisotropy and source shape contribute to oscillations, but… geometry dominates dynamics freezeout source out-of-plane extended  fast freeze-out timescale ! (7-9 fm/c)

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF43 Azimuthal HBT: hydro predictions RHIC (T 0 =340  0 =0.6 fm) Out-of-plane-extended source (but flips with hadronic afterburner) flow & geometry work together to produce HBT oscillations oscillations stable with K T Heinz & Kolb, hep-th/ (note: R O /R S puzzle persists)

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF44 Azimuthal HBT: hydro predictions “LHC” (T 0 =2.0  0 =0.1 fm) In-plane-extended source (!) HBT oscillations reflect competition between geometry, flow low K T : geometry high K T : flow sign flip RHIC (T 0 =340  0 =0.6 fm) Out-of-plane-extended source (but flips with hadronic afterburner) flow & geometry work together to produce HBT oscillations oscillations stable with K T Heinz & Kolb, hep-th/

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF45 HBT( φ ) Results – 200 GeV Oscillations similar to those 130GeV 20x more statistics  explore systematics in centrality, k T much more to come… STAR PRELIMINARY

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF46 Kaon – pion correlations: dominated by Coulomb interaction Smaller source  stronger (anti)correlation K-p correlation well-described by: Blast wave with same parameters as spectra, HBT But with non-identical particles, we can access more information… STAR preliminary Adam Kiesel, Fabrice Retiere

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF47 Initial idea: probing emission-time ordering Catching up: cos  0 long interaction time strong correlation Ratio of both scenarios allow quantitative study of the emission asymmetry Moving away: cos  0 short interaction time weak correlation Crucial point: kaon begins farther in “out” direction (in this case due to time-ordering) purple K emitted first green  is faster purple K emitted first green  is slower

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF48 measured K-  correlations - natural consequence of space-momentum correlations clear space-time asymmetry observed C+/C- ratio described by: –“standard” blastwave w/ no time shift Direct proof of radial flow-induced space-momentum correlations Kaon = 0.42 GeV/c Pion = 0.12 GeV/c STAR preliminary

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF49 Summary RHIC 130 GeV Au+Au Disclaimer: all numbers (especially time) are rough estimates Tomasik (3D blastwave): 8-9 fm/c (fit to PHENIX even smaller) Sinyukov formula: R long 2 =  2 T/m T = 10 fm/c for T=110 MeV K-  K*

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF50 Summary RHI – the only way to create/study deconfined colored matter Hadrochemistry suggests creation of RHIC (and SPS) Quantitative understanding of bulk dynamics crucial to extracting real physics at RHIC p-space - measurements well-reproduced by models anisotropy [v 2 (p T,m)]  system response to compression (EoS) x-space - generally not well-reproduced anisotropy [HBT(  )]  evolution, timescale information, geometry/flow interplay Azimuthally-sensitive HBT: correlating quantum correlation with bulk correlation reconstruction of full 3D source geometry relevant here: OOP freeze-out Data do suggest consistent (though surprising) scenario strong collective effects rapid evolution, then emission in a “flash” (key input to models) where is the hadronic phase? K- , HBT(p T ), HBT(  ), K*… By combining several (novel) measurements, STAR severely challenges our understanding of dynamics in the soft sector of RHIC

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF51 Backup slides follow Freezeout geometry out-of-plane extended early (and fast) particle emission ! consistent with blast-wave parameterization of v 2 (p T,m), spectra, R(p T ), K-  With more detailed information, “RHIC HBT puzzle” deepens what about hadronic rescattering stage? - “must” occur, or…? does hydro reproduce  t  or not?? ~right source shape via oscillations, but misses R L (m T ) Models of bulk dynamics severely (over?)constrained

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF52 Summary Freeze-out scenario f(x,t,p) crucial to understanding RHIC physics p-space - measurements well-reproduced by models anisotropy  system response to compression probe via v 2 (p T,m) x-space - generally not well-reproduced anisotropy  evolution, timescale information Azimuthally-sensitive HBT: a unique new tool to probe crucial information from a new angle  elliptic flow data suggest x-space anisotropy  HBT R(  ) confirm out-of-plane extended source for RHIC conditions, geometry dominates dynamical effects oscillations consistent with freeze-out directly from hydro stage (???) consistent description of v 2 (p T,m) and R(  ) in blastwave parameterization challenge/feedback for “real” physical models of collision dynamics

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF53 RHIC  AGS Current experimental access only to second-order event-plane odd-order oscillations in  p are invisible cannot (unambiguously) extract tilt (which is likely tiny anyhow) cross-terms R sl 2 and R ol 2 y=0  concentrate on “purely transverse” radii R o 2, R s 2, R os 2 Strong pion flow  cannot ignore space-momentum correlations (unknown) implicit  -dependences in homogeneity lengths  geometrical inferences will be more model-dependent the source you view depends on the viewing angle

STAR HBT 4 oct 2002malisa - seminar IUCF54 Summary of anisotropic AGS RQMD reproduces data better in “cascade” mode Exactly the opposite trend as seen in flow (p-space anisotropy) Combined measurement much more stringent test of flow dynamics!!