Greater Stuttgart Region. Integration area Integration area: 3,012 km 2 Inhabitants: 2.366 million Employees:0.9 million Cities and villages: 141 26 years.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Urban Transport BenchMarking
Advertisements

STIB- David Rispoli STIB - MIVB Brussels Public Transport Company December 2004.
Kräfte bündeln Joining Forces Quality in contracts for public transport Brussels,
Public Transport Organisation & Policy Working Group Findings of Year 2 Urban Transport Benchmarking 29 June 2005 Jérôme Pourbaix.
Cambridgeshire Travel for Work Partnership Tax and Travel Plans Stephen Potter Professor of Transport Strategy
Development of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) in Africa Experience from Lagos, Accra and Kampala.
Estonian Road Administration overview of tasks related to public transport management 6 May 2013.
APTA ANNUAL CONFERENCE OCTOBER 1ST 2003 COMPETITIVE CONTRACTING by Antoine HUREL Chairman & President CONNEX North America Conference on railroad industry.
SCATTER workshop, Milan, 24 October 2003 Testing selected solutions to control urban sprawl The Brussels case city.
Barcelona presentation 1 st Interest Group Workshop Regina Enrich Sard Researcher at Mobility&Energy Group Barcelona Digital Technological Centre 26 th.
SPUTNIC – Strategies for Public Transport in Cities Strategies for Public Transport in Cities Funded by the EU PT Market.
1 Delivering Through Partnerships Stephen Rhodes Passenger Services Director EMTA General Meeting 10 th November 2011.
May 2005 The French Water Services: Main present challenges.
Improving the Urban Public Transport in Developing Countries: The Design of a New Integrated System in Santiago de Chile Antonio Gschwender
EMTA General Meeting, Budapest April Governance issue s in case of the Budapest Transport Association (BKSZ) Dr. DENKE, Zsolt managing director.
Katarzyna Hebel Gdańsk 7 th of May 2008 The integration of the public transport in Tricity.
Financing Public Transport - The Example of Belgrade Doc. Dr Slaven M. TICA, T.E. Honorary Vice President of UITP UITP International Seminar on the Renewal.
ATAL INDORE CITY TRANSPORT SERVICES LIMITED (AICTSL) Performance Management System Madhav Pai Prajna Rao Srinivasan Vasudevan.
University of Belgrade – Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, Vojvode Stepe 305, Belgrade, SERBIA Phone: +381(11) , +381(11) 3091.
Increasing the Quality of Public Transport in Prague Prague Integrated Transport.
UITP Benchmarking Meeting Berlin 13/14 th March 2006 Dublin Bus Presentation John Ryan Manager Regulatory Affairs.
Urban Transport Benchmarking Initiative Paris and the Urban Transport Benchmarking Initiative Isabelle Bachmann- RATP- Paris.
9 th Conference on Competition and Ownership in Land Transport Paratransit Regulation in Brazil: some evidences from Recife’ experience Taciana Ferreira,
Public hearing: Committee of Transport and Tourism Brussels 7 May 2013 Newcomer´s perspective The Fourth Railway Package – public hearing – Brussels.
Mobility plan for Geneva Airport employees. Constraints and needs for the mobility of Geneva airport staff Airport staff: all employees working in the.
Presentation to: Inaugural meeting of North East Rail Forum – July 2014 Jerry Farquharson Director of Business Planning First ScotRail.
Harmonisation of the Public Transportation of Slovenia with the EU: A Need for New Financing and Organisation Solutions ? Stanislav Bozicnik University.
Civitas Workshop –Effective solutions for green urban transport 24 April 2012 Athens Alan Lewis, TTR on behalf of: Lars Elgaard Thomsen, Public Transport.
Todd K. Hayden VIDEO TAPING ON SCHOOL BUSES: WHAT SHOULD YOU BE CONCERNED ABOUT?
HSL Helsinki Region Transport Local Rail Projects in Finland Arttu Kuukankorpi Head of Route Network and Timetable Planning Group.
SURVEY ON HEAVY RAIL CONTRACTS A comparison between the different public services contracts for heavy rail administered by the EMTA Authorities EMTA Budapest.
© VDV 2015 Public transport by rail in Germany , Rome Oliver Wolff.
Restructuring the public transport network in times of financial crisis: Solutions from Thessaloniki Prof. Panos Papaioannou, Chairman Konstantinidou Christiana,
1 Requirements for Long-distance Bus Terminals in Germany Prof. Dr. Andreas Saxinger Michaela Nachtsheim.
IRU Policies and Taxi Regulation in Finland 28 th March 2013 Moscow Nina Nizovsky The Finnish Taxi Owners´ Federation IRU Taxi Group.
PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN SKOPJE: NEW APROACH FOR BETTER QUALITY OF SERVICE
Negotiation with a call for competition for awarding the S-Bahn Stuttgart Frank Zerban.
Monitoring Key performance indicators Ruud van der Ploeg EMTA GM november 2010 Quality in Amsterdam public transport contracts.
Click to edit Master subtitle style 4/8/11 Select Committee on Appropriations Presentation on proposed amendments to public transport grants (PTISG and.
Prague Integrated Transport (PID).  Prague - area 496 km 2 population 1.2 mil. distance of the city boundary from the centre is 10 km to the north, 18.
Dipl.-Ing. Thomas FISCHER Almada, 26 th March 2009 Parking Policy Graz.
Damjan Kregar LPP d.o.o. (Ljubljana Public Transport Operator) Coimbra, March 2012.
Public transport on Estonia Arne Tilk. Public transport on Estonia 1. Is collective transport (in Estonia) considered as a service of general interest?
Per Gellert /Barcelona Quality for Passengers.
Slide 1 WP D Integrating Mobility Management and Land Use Planning A good example of integration: Sihlcity, Zürich, Switzerland (D2a)
Budapest Transport Closely Held Corporation (BKV) Changes in the public transport in Budapest over the past 15 years Andrea Bagoly, 22 June, 2007 „We make.
TRANSED of September 2012 in New Delhi, India How accessible was the Swedish public transport system in 2010? Helena Svensson, Ph D in public transport.
EMTA General Meeting , Turin Tamas Dombi, ZTM Warsaw1 Actual Problems of the Public Transport in Warsaw Metropolitan Area.
Slide 104/12/2015 Technical comparative assessment of different TramTrain planning and operational structures First Results of comparison of different.
EMTA general meeting November Territorial scope 2.
Public Transportation Excellence Index
Governance issues in case of the Helsinki Region Transport, HSL EMTA General Meeting, Budapest April 2010 Suvi Rihtniemi HSL Helsinki Region Transport.
Discover the Reasons Why... The Future Is Riding On Metro.
Dipl.-Pol. Oliver Mietzsch, Transport Unit, German Association of Cities CEMR-Seminar „The Organization and Financing of Local Public Transport in the.
Warsaw Urban Public Transport short introduction.
EMTA General Meeting Prague May 2012 Round table on PSO Regulation 1370/2007 “Two years after enforcement, where are we? How efficient is the regulation?
Manchester Regional Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 996 – GMATS Manchester Regional Key Centre.
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// TRANSPORT LIBERALISATION TENDENCY MARCH 2016.
Helsingin seudun liikenne -kuntayhtymä Ticket survey – the way to share the costs of public transport for HSL’s member municipalities Matleena Lindeqvist.
Successful Commute Programs Critical components include: 1.An active and informed Employee Transportation Coordinator (you!) 2.Guaranteed ride home 3.Parking.
Metrô Rio & SuperVia March Location BRASIL Rio de Janeiro Rio Rio de Janeiro Metropolitan Region - Population: 11,6 million - Counties: %
TWIST – Transport with a Social Target WInTO GmbH, Hennigsdorf March 26, 2007 Construction, Aims, and Responsibilities Dr. Matthias Stoffregen.
HTM – public transport The Hague area
Developing Transport Service Contracts
Tendering process for the Use of Roads Santiago Metropolitan Public Transport System
Andres Harjo Transport Department City of Tallinn
Nils ZEINO-MAHMALAT Head of e-ticketing
The new regulatory framework for suburban railways
Scale of integration.
Integration of the public transport system
Presentation transcript:

Greater Stuttgart Region

Integration area Integration area: 3,012 km 2 Inhabitants: million Employees:0.9 million Cities and villages: years of experience with integration One integration company for - hosting the sharing of the revenue - informing passengers about timetables and fares

Public transport authorities within the region State of Baden-Württemberg -> heavy rail Greater Stuttgart Region -> suburban rail (S-Bahn) -> regional important trains City of Stuttgart -> light rail and trams -> city buses 4 administrative districts -> regional buses

Operators in the integration network area SSBLength of lines Number of stops Number of vehicles Buses655 km Light Rail190 km Tramway17 km2036 German Rail and WEG Length of lines Number of stations Number of vehicles Suburban Rail (S-Bahn)248 km71255 Heavy Rail (DB)506 km108- WEG (Connex)46 km3721 Regional Buses Length of lines Number of stops Number of vehicles 38 companies3081 km

Ownership of the PT companies Heavy rail and suburban rail (S-Bahn): ->100% shareholder: Federal government Some regional trains -> WEG/Connex Light rail, Tram and city buses -> City of Stuttgart Regional bus companies: -> more or less private

Right of initiative to create PT services Heavy rail and suburban rail: -> S tate of Baden-Württemberg and the Greater Stuttgart Region PT in the City of Stuttgart: -> the City of Stuttgart PT (bus) in the administrative districts: -> if no subsidies needed: the operators -> if subsidies needed: the administrative districts

Integration system Full integration - zone system for determination of the ticket fare - one ticket for all modes - same fare for all modes - several interchanges are possible - fare is not depending on number of interchanges

Share of responsibilities Network Company (for the whole network area): information and promotion, network management Operators (for the whole network area): fares and ticketing Heavy rail and suburban rail: PTA: definition of service; quality management Operators: personnel and employment conditions PT in the City of Stuttgart: PTA: definition of service; quality management Operators: personnel and employment conditions PT (bus) in the administrative districts: PTA (if subsidies needed): definition of service Operators (if no subsidies needed): definition of service Operators (in both cases): personnel and employment conditions

Existing contract: suburban rail (S-Bahn) Contract was directly awarded Covers the whole region with almost 9 million train-km Valid until 2012 Net-contract with around 65% farebox revenues

Existing contract: suburban rail (S-Bahn) Main contents: Minimum volume of supply is defined Regulations in case of increasing or decreasing volume Regulations concerning new lines and more volume on existing lines Subsidies for existing and future train-km are already defined Who is in charge of the definition of service and quality How to proceed at the end of the contract when the new contract is going to be tendered Financial regulations (how much has to be paid when) Distribution Quality management system

The measurement of quality Punctuality at 6 stations, devided in peak and off peak Special trained external personnel checks criteria like cleanliness, information within the trains and if the trains are damaged Passengers are asked how the feel about punctuality, information, cleanliness, security Both objective and subjective results are relevant for bonus and malus (all in all max. around 1 million ): objective 70% und subjective 30% in addition to the bonus/malus system all trains that did not run are not paid by the region (without regarding the reason)

Development of quality since 2002 Ticket machines Management of complaints Information in trains Free of damage Cleanliness in trains

Development of quality since 2002 PuncutalityCleanlinessSecurityDamagesNumber of seats Information (normal case) Information (disturbanc es) Satisfaction of passangers

How to proceed with malus payments? Penalty is used to increase the quality of infrastructrue First project was an automatically announcement of the stations in the trains Current project: realtime information at stations and New signals to increase speed of trains

Subsidies for regional buses Bus operators have a gross-contract with the Greater Stuttgart Region Gross-contract is based on the revenue the operators had before the integration, 11 years ago. For new bus lines the contracts are negotiated between operators, counties or communities and the Greater Stuttgart Region There is no monitoring of the contratcs Contracts do not include incentives

Development of costs Subsidies S-Bahn Subsidies regional busoperators Farebox revenue Cost of living index Subsidies per train-km Subsidies per bus-km

Development of costs Subsidies S-Bahn Subsidies regional busoperators Farebox revenue Cost of living index Subsidies per train-km Subsidies per bus-km

Development of costs Subsidies S-Bahn Subsidies regional busoperators Farebox revenue Cost of living index Subsidies per train-km Subsidies per bus-km

Development of costs Subsidies S-Bahn Subsidies regional busoperators Farebox revenue Cost of living index Subsidies per train-km Subsidies per bus-km

Development of costs Subsidies S-Bahn Subsidies regional busoperators Farebox revenue Cost of living index Subsidies per train-km Subsidies per bus-km

Financing public transport in the future Contract for the S-Bahn is going to be tendered Financing of the bus system in the future is currently to be discussed in working groups. Counties and operators reject tendering contracts. existing contracts with the bus operators are going to be evaluated according to the 4th criteria of the European Court of Justice with a target costs evaluation