Analysis of Nutrient Loading and Coliform Contamination of the Sauk River (St. Cloud, MN) Jacob Galzki & Mitch Bender Fig. 1.1 and 1.2 E.coli and total.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Certain types of bacteria indicate animal and human waste pollution.
Advertisements

Water Contaminants. Nitrate Acceptable ranges: Source of contaminant: Indication of contaminant: Health Problems: Solution: 0-10 mg/L Human and animal.
Water Quality Indicators.
Water Testing!.
Water Quality Tests.
2009 Water Quality Monitoring Report – Fish Creek Vaughn Hauser, B.Sc. Naomi Parker, B.Sc., BIT, CEPIT.
Cameron Faxon GIS in Water Resources 11/16/2010. Hurricane Katrina (category 3) Date of Landfall: August 29 th Point of Landfall: Buras, LA Approximately.
Water Monitoring Lab. Why Test Water Quality? Water testing allows scientists and citizens to have a full understanding of what is affecting their stream.
Health of water determined by the balance between physical, chemical and biological variables. Physical variables=temperature, turbidity, and water movement.
Water Chemistry Testing. We have been investigating the “health” of the Ramsey Brook in the following ways: Mapping Imperviousness Surveying Macroinvertebrates.
RESULTS With increasing amounts of Novobiocin there was an obvious decrease in survival of colony forming units of bacteria (Fig. 8). Triclosan was more.
The Impact of Hurricane Sandy on the Abundance of Coliforms in Tyler Run Michelle Greaver Department of Biological Sciences, York College of Pennsylvania.
Assessing Aquatic Ecosystems & Measurement. Aquatic Ecosystem Assessment The health of an aquatic ecosystem can be determined by examining a variety of.
Laboratory Analysis: Samples were analyzed for: Dissolved Organic Nitrogen (DON) Dissolved Inorganic Nitrogen (NH 4 and NO 3 ) Total Dissolved Nitrogen.
E 5. Dissolved oxygen Outline biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) as a measure of oxygen- demanding wastes in water. Distinguish between aerobic and anaerobic.
Somebody call the doctor! An introduction to water health
Water Quality in CUHK Data Analysis Skill Virtual laboratory: investigating water qualities of local lake in CU campus Environmental Science Module of.
Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.
Water Use. What is the hydrologic cycle? The water cycle Precipitation Evaporation transpiration.
Water Quality. Indicators of Water Quality 1) Nitrates a) Eutrophication b) Algae Blooms 2) pH 3) Turbidity 4) Temperature 5) Dissolved Oxygen 6) Bioindicators.
WARM-UP Update your Table of Contents Write your homework! Get a list of Vocab Set 4 off the front table DateSession # ActivityPage # 10/2321Water Quality.
 pH is a measure of the acidity or alkalinity of a solution  Pure water is said to be neutral or consisting of a pH of 7  When testing pH you are not.
Water Quality Module 5:1. Importance of Clean Water  Health  Environment  Recreation  Natural beauty Module 5:2.
1 WATER as A Resource. Drinking Water 2 Water Contamination  How do we know what is “clean water?” In other words, how do we know if water is “safe”
Water Chemistry Project In order to evaluate water changes, we need access to reliable information on current and past conditions. If changes are already.
Fecal Coliform Aquatic Ecology.
SOMEBODY CALL THE DOCTOR! AN INTRODUCTION TO WATER HEALTH.
Redwood River TMDL Critique David De Paz, Alana Bartolai, Lydia Karlheim.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Bacteria Source Tracking on Little River in Westfield, MA Michael Fant, Jean-Baptiste Bangoret, and Tim Grady Abstract The quality of public waterways.
METHODS. Physical Methods Steam Profile Discharge Air Temperature Water Temperature Relative Humidity.
Results and Discussion The above graph depicts FC colony plate averages for each sample site. Samples are ordered from upstream to downstream as indicated.
Lesson 1.5 Pg
Water Chapter 5 Part II.
Water Pollution By: Cathy Lin and Kelly Jung Per.2 June 7, 2006.
Kakanui Rachel Ozanne, Water Quality Scientist. Long-term (SOE) monitoring Water quality ~78 sites Monthly sampling.
Water Quality Natural & Controlled Environments. Monitoring natural environments Photo courtesy of Melissa Gutierrez.
Chemical Testing Collecting Water Chemistry Data to determine levels of pollution How healthy is the water?
Our Case Study. Rationale for study The TMDL model assumes that there is no decrease in seepage during low flow conditions, basing its calculations on.
The Blue Planet The Blue Planet Indicators of Water Quality.
North Creek Water Quality Prepared by Jon Rogers and Carie McCoy.
Warm Up Complete the text dependent questions for the Water Scarcity text. Do your own work. Homework: Read 16C-21C answer ?’s 1-3, 5 p22C Read 24C-31C.
Missed Creek adventure????
 Salinity: Salinity is the concentration of dissolved salts in the water and is an important element of a  habitat. Aquatic animals are adapted to living.
Surface Water Quality Indicators Around the Farm Water Quality Area of Expertise Team.
 The health of a water system is determined by the balance between physical, chemical, and biological variables.
Indicators of Water Quality
Unit 7 Hydrosphere Day 11 Focus: Water Quality Indicators Turn in late flash cards 9-19 and projects NOW! Warm-up – ½ sheet – Analyze the table.
EUTROPHICATION By: Annette Miles.
Water Quality Rice Creek Watershed.
Mulberry River Watershed
Adapted From Ms. Hasan Mr. Aguilar Uteach Step 2 Lesson 3, 2012
8.E.1 Understand the hydrosphere and the impact of humans on local systems and the effects of the hydrosphere on humans. 8.E.1.3 Predict the safety and.
Unit 5 Lesson 3 Human Impact on Water
Unit 4 Lesson 1 Human Impact on Water
Determining The Health of a Stream/River
Water Quality.
Water health & pollution
Plant Nutrients Diego and lorenzo.
Wetlands.
Water Pollution.
Effects of Human Activity on Water
_________: the measure of how _________ water is due to _______________ ____________________. Turbidity cloudy suspended particles Definition:
Indicators of Water Quality
Welcome to Jeopardy!.
The Effect of Fertilizers on Microbial Survivorship
Indicators of Water Quality
Water Quality What is water quality?
Determining The Health of a Stream/River
Presentation transcript:

Analysis of Nutrient Loading and Coliform Contamination of the Sauk River (St. Cloud, MN) Jacob Galzki & Mitch Bender Fig. 1.1 and 1.2 E.coli and total colifom contamination measured in colony forming unit (CFU) counts per 100 mL sample (error bars represent standard deviation). Fig. 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3 Nutrient concentration measured in milligrams per liter: phosphate, ammonia, and nitrate respectively (error bars represent standard deviation). Table 1. Temperature, pH, conductivity, suspended solids, and total solids for each sample date averaged from three grab samples. The degradation of water quality due to anthropogenic activity adversely affects both recreational and natural values of waterways worldwide. Agriculture and urban sprawl are two large contributors to water quality degradation. Fertilizers are often used in excess and animal wastes are often not managed properly. Both fertilizers and animal wastes contain nutrients which can be carried to nearby waterways during periods of rainfall. This can lead to eutrophication, which may cause a loss of biodiversity, fish kills, and ultimately a loss of the natural beauty of the affected body of water. Animal wastes may also contain harmful bacteria, such as E.coli, which is a direct threat to human health. From September 2005 through October 2006, a study was conducted to examine the levels of nutrients and coliform bacteria in the Sauk River near St. Cloud, MN. When weather permitted, grab samples were taken from the Sauk River biweekly and after significant rain events (>1.25 cm). The samples were analyzed in the laboratory for nitrate, phosphate, and ammonia (three nutrients commonly found in agricultural fertilizers and animal wastes). The samples were also analyzed for coliform contamination. Nutrient loading was calculated at 58 Mg per year for PO 4 -P; 1,433 Mg per year for NO 3 -N; and 112 Mg per year for NH 3 -N. E.coli levels were measured over the EPA recreational standard of 126 CFU/100 mL during 8 of the 18 sampling dates. The highest level was measured at 690 CFU/100 mL and the average was 146 CFU/100 mL. Abstract Anthropogenic sources of nutrients can influence runoff and contribute to nutrient loading of nearby waterways. Increases of these nutrients have been associated with water quality issues, such as eutrophication. When an excess amount of nutrients enter a body of water, growth of aquatic vegetation is accelerated. This vegetation cannot sustain itself and eventually dies. This process results in lower dissolved oxygen levels in the body of water and can threaten fish populations and other aquatic life. When left unchecked, eutrophication can also lead to surface scum, pest infestations, and foul odors which severely impairs the recreational value of a body of water. Coliform bacteria that are associated with agricultural practices, like E.coli, also enter surface runoff and eventually nearby waterways. These coliform bacteria are found in the intestinal tracts of warm blooded creatures and are spread through feces. If ingested they can cause symptoms in humans ranging from abdominal cramping and diarrhea to kidney failure, paralysis, and, in rare cases, death. Most strains of E.coli are harmless, but their presence in waterways should act as a red flag to health officials (Davidson, 2005). Introduction Determine the current nutrient and coliform bacteria levels in the Sauk River near St. Cloud, MN. Monitor changes in the water quality over time and in relationship with rain events (> 1.25 cm). Determine the need for future investigation concerning agricultural and urban development effects on the nutrient and coliform bacteria levels in the Sauk River. Research Project Objectives Grab samples were taken in replicate from the Sauk River biweekly and after significant rainfall events (>1.25 cm). The location of sample collection was near the Sauk River’s confluence with the Mississippi River near St. Cloud, MN. Ortho-phosphate concentration was determined using an ascorbic acid reduction spectrophotometric procedure (Clesceri et al., 1989). Nitrate concentration was determined using a second derivative UV/visable spectrophotometric procedure (Crumpton et al., 1992). Ammonia concentration was also determined using a salicylate spectrophotometric method (Clesceri et al., 1989). Total coliform and E.coli levels were determined using an EPA approved m- ColiBlue24 membrane filtration method (EPA, 2003). Using standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, the samples were analyzed for pH, conductivity, suspended solids, and total solids (Clesceri et al., 1989). Methods and Analysis The high levels of coliform bacteria found in the Sauk River have the potential to cause health risks to individuals using the river for recreational purposes. Spikes in coliform bacteria levels appear to correlate with rain events, leading to the conclusion that surface runoff is contributing these bacteria to the river. These findings have triggered future research that will investigate E. coli hot spots along the entire river in effort to determine the locations of possible problem areas. Conclusion Dr. Mitch Bender, Research Advisor Dr. Charles Rose, Nitrate Analysis Assistance References Clesceri, L.S., Greenberg, A.E., & Trussell, R.R, (editors) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 17th ed. DHA-AWWA-WDCK. Washington D.C. Crumpton, W.G., Isenhart, T.M., & Mitchell, P.D Nitrate and organic N analyses with second derivative spectroscopy. Limnology and Oceanography. 37: Davidson, O.G Hung Out to Dry: post Katrina floodwaters are dirty, but so are other U.S. waterways. Grist Magazine. 11 Oct EPA (2003). Total Coliforms and E. Coli Membrane Filtration Method. Retrieved 18 January 2006 from: _mlmanual_appendix-o.pdf. MN DNR Data Deli. Map Data. Retrieved 2 October 2006 from: MPCA (2005). Specific Standards of Quality and Purity for Class 2 Waters of the State; Aquatic Life and Recreation. Retrieved 19 January 2006 from: /arule/7050/0222.html. Acknowledgements & References Photo Credit: Mitch Bender Photo Credit: Jacob Galzki Photo Credit: Vanessa Bradseth Photo Credit: Matt Lenz a)b) c)d) Photo a) obtaining water samples; Photo b) incubating bacterial plates; Photo c) colony development after 24 hour incubation; Photo d) colony analysis St. Cloud State University 1.2) Total coliform CFU/100mL Sample Date 1.1) E. coli EPA Recreational Water Standard 126 CFU/100mL CFU/100mL Sample Date 2.3) Nitrate Sample Date mg N/L 2.2) Ammonia Sample Date mg N/L Phosphate 2.1) Sample Date mg P/L St. Cloud Sampling Site Cartography by Jacob Galzki Data Source: MN DNR Data Deli 3) Fig. 3 Map displaying the confluence of the Sauk and Mississippi Rivers, as well as the watershed the Sauk River drains. Rain event Nutrient loading was calculated at 58 Mg per year for PO 4 -P; 1,433 Mg per year for NO 3 -N; and 112 Mg per year for NH 3 -N. E.coli levels were measured over the EPA recreational standard of 126 CFU/100 mL during 8 of the 18 sampling dates. The highest level was measured at 690 CFU/100 mL and the average was 146 CFU/100 mL. 7 of the 9 rain events triggered E.coli levels above EPA recreational standards. The highest total coliform level was measured at 15,570 CFU/100 mL and the average was 5374 CFU/100 mL. Discussion