Identification of Eighteen Flutter Derivatives Arindam Gan Chowdhury a and Partha P. Sarkar b a Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Aerospace Engineering,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Development of a Sine-Dwell Ground Vibration Test (GVT) System Presented at CSIR Research and Innovation Conference: February 2006 DPSS Mr Louw.
Advertisements

Introduction An important research activity in the area of global optimization is to determine an effective strategy for solving least squares problems.
Kjell Simonsson 1 Vibrations in linear 1-degree of freedom systems; I. undamped systems (last updated )
Manipulator Dynamics Amirkabir University of Technology Computer Engineering & Information Technology Department.
Automotive Research Center Robotics and Mechatronics A Nonlinear Tracking Controller for a Haptic Interface Steer-by-Wire Systems A Nonlinear Tracking.
Simulating an Insect-Scale Flapping Wing Air Vehicle
Finite Element Method in Geotechnical Engineering
Manipulator Dynamics Amirkabir University of Technology Computer Engineering & Information Technology Department.
Unit 6: Structural vibration An Introduction to Mechanical Engineering: Part Two Structural vibration Learning summary By the end of this chapter you should.
Data Fitting A Development of Dynamic Wind Tunnel Testing Technique with Magnetic Suspension and Balance System Workshop on Next Generation Transport Aircraft.
On the Accuracy of Modal Parameters Identified from Exponentially Windowed, Noise Contaminated Impulse Responses for a System with a Large Range of Decay.
Experimental Aerodynamics & Concepts Group Micro Renewable Energy Systems Laboratory Georgia Institute of Technology Validation of.
Some effects of large blade deflections on aeroelastic stability Bjarne S. Kallesøe Morten H. Hansen.
Feedback Control of Flexible Robotic Arms Mohsin Waqar Intelligent Machine Dynamics Lab Georgia Institute of Technology January 26, 2007.
MAE 3241: AERODYNAMICS AND FLIGHT MECHANICS
CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE SEISMIC ANALYSIS USING ARTIFICIAL ACCELEROGRAMS
Formulation of a complete structural uncertainty model for robust flutter prediction Brian Danowsky Staff Engineer, Research Systems Technology, Inc.,
Proceedings of the 18 th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering ICONE18 May , 2010, Xi’an, China Hannam University Fluid-elastic Instability.
Part 5 Parameter Identification (Model Calibration/Updating)
1 SIMULATION OF VIBROACOUSTIC PROBLEM USING COUPLED FE / FE FORMULATION AND MODAL ANALYSIS Ahlem ALIA presented by Nicolas AQUELET Laboratoire de Mécanique.
Fig.6 Next Generation Airplane ( ■ Design of Next Generation Airplanes - Lightweight airframe - High aspect ratio.
1 20-Oct-15 Last course Lecture plan and policies What is FEM? Brief history of the FEM Example of applications Discretization Example of FEM softwares.
Classification: Internal Status: Draft Predicting characteristic loads for jackets and jack-ups Shallow water location – quasi-static approach Problem.
Prognosis of gear health using stochastic dynamical models with online parameter estimation 10th International PhD Workshop on Systems and Control a Young.
A PPLIED M ECHANICS Lecture 06 Slovak University of Technology Faculty of Material Science and Technology in Trnava.
Aerospace Engineering Laboratory II Vibration of Beam
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Progress in identification of damping: Energy-based method with incomplete and noisy data Marco Prandina University of Liverpool.
Aeroelastic effects Wind loading and structural response Lecture 14 Dr. J.D. Holmes.
HEAT TRANSFER FINITE ELEMENT FORMULATION
By Chanat Ratanasumawong (CRW) Identification of System’s Dynamic Parameters Engineering Mechanical Laboratory, CRW, Engineering.
ASCE Wind Loads SESSION 1-2 Wind Engineering Theory: Bluff Body Aerodynamics.
Yeong-Jong Moon 1), Jong-Heon Lee 2) and In-Won Lee 3) 1) Graduate Student, Department of Civil Engineering, KAIST 2) Professor, Department of Civil Engineering,
DEWEK 2004 Lecture by Aero Dynamik Consult GmbH, Dipl. Ing. Stefan Kleinhansl ADCoS – A Nonlinear Aeroelastic Code for the Complete Dynamic Simulation.
Engineering Mechanical Laboratory Identification of System’s Dynamic Parameters by NAV and CRW Engineering Mechanical Laboratory, NAV.
1 Teaching Innovation - Entrepreneurial - Global The Centre for Technology enabled Teaching & Learning M G I, India DTEL DTEL (Department for Technology.
RELIABLE DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS Mehdi Modares, Robert L. Mullen and Dario A. Gasparini Department of Civil Engineering Case Western.
A Parallel Hierarchical Solver for the Poisson Equation Seung Lee Deparment of Mechanical Engineering
M. Khalili1, M. Larsson2, B. Müller1
Structural Health Monitoring in WSNs by the Embedded Goertzel Algorithm Maurizio Bocca, M.Sc. Department of Automation and Systems Technology Aalto University.
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 16
Virtual Gravity Control for Swing-Up pendulum K.Furuta *, S.Suzuki ** and K.Azuma * * Department of Computers and Systems Engineering, TDU, Saitama Japan.
Texas A&M University, Department of Aerospace Engineering AUTOMATIC GENERATION AND INTEGRATION OF EQUATIONS OF MOTION BY OPERATOR OVER- LOADING TECHNIQUES.
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 23 Representing motion with complex numbers and arithmetic 1 Purdue Aeroelasticity.
AAE556 Lectures 34,35 The p-k method, a modern alternative to V-g Purdue Aeroelasticity 1.
MESB 374 System Modeling and Analysis Translational Mechanical System
By Dr. A. Ranjbaran, Associate Professor
Finite Element Method in Geotechnical Engineering
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 21
Short introduction to aeroelasticity
INVESTIGATION OF IDLING INSTABILITIES IN WIND TURBINE SIMULATIONS
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lectures 22, 23
OSE801 Engineering System Identification Spring 2010
Dynamic analysis of wind turbines subjected to Ice loads
Structural damping - an energy dissipation mechanism
Aerospace Engineering Experimentation and Laboratory II Vibration of Beam by NAV.
Multi-physics Simulation of a Wind Piezoelectric Energy Harvester Validated by Experimental Results Giuseppe Acciani, Filomena Di Modugno, Ernesto Mininno,
Purdue Aeroelasticity
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 6 – Multi-DOF systems
Dr-Ing Asrat Worku, AAIT
University of Bridgeport
LOCATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF DAMPING PARAMETERS
1C9 Design for seismic and climate changes
Purdue Aeroelasticity
Purdue Aeroelasticity
Vibration based structural damage detection for structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure system.
MULTI DEGREE OF FREEDOM (M-DOF)
Presentation of Final Project – Gergely Gyebrószki Supervisors:
Dual Induction theory for Wind Turbines
Flutter-a scary instability
Presentation transcript:

Identification of Eighteen Flutter Derivatives Arindam Gan Chowdhury a and Partha P. Sarkar b a Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Aerospace Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA b Associate Professor/Wilson Chair, Departments of Aerospace Engineering and Civil, Construction and Environmental Engrg., Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA INTRODUCTION  AEROELASTICITY: Interaction between aerodynamic forces and structural motion. Interaction between aerodynamic forces and structural motion.  FLUTTER INSTABILITY: Self-excited oscillation of a structural system (e.g., flutter-induced failure of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge in 1940). Self-excited oscillation of a structural system (e.g., flutter-induced failure of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge in 1940).  FLUTTER ANALYSIS: Flutter speed is calculated using frequency-dependant Flutter Derivatives that are experimentally obtainedfrom wind Flutter speed is calculated using frequency-dependant Flutter Derivatives that are experimentally obtained from wind tunnel testing of section models. tunnel testing of section models. FLUTTER DERIVATIVE FORMULATION  SECTION MODEL FOR WIND TUNNEL TESTING: , M U h, L p, D  AEROELASTIC FORCE VECTOR: where,  is air density; U is the mean wind velocity; B is the width of section model; K = B  /U is the reduced frequency Non-dimensional aerodynamic coefficients Hi , Ai  and Pi , i = 1-6, are called the Flutter Derivatives. Flutter Derivatives evolve as functions of reduced velocity, U / n B = 2  /K (n is frequency;  is circular frequency).  AEROELASTICALLY MODIFIED EQUATIONS OF MOTION:  STATE-SPACE FORMULATION : C eff and K eff are the aeroelastically modified effective damping and stiffness matrices. Flutter Derivatives are extracted by identifying elements of effective damping & stiffness matrices at zero & various non-zero wind speeds. NEW SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION (SID) TECHNIQUE  SAMPLE DISPLACEMENT TIME HISTORY WITH NOISE/SIGNAL RATIO OF 20% OBTAINED NUMERICALLY TO TEST THE NEW SID RATIO OF 20% OBTAINED NUMERICALLY TO TEST THE NEW SID TECHNIQUE: TECHNIQUE:  ITERATIVE LEAST SQUARE METHOD (ILS METHOD) : A new SID technique was developed for the extraction of flutter derivatives from free vibration displacement time histories obtained from a section model testing.  MOTIVATION : Extraction of all eighteen flutter derivatives required development of a robust SID technique that will efficiently work with noisy signal outputs from a three-degree-of-freedom dynamic system.  ALGORITHM FOR ILS METHOD : EXPERIMENTAL SETUP (WiST Laboratory, ISU) Vertical & Horizontal Force Transducers Three-DOF Elastic Suspension System Torsional DOF Assembly & Torque Sensor RESULTS Average Percentage Errors for Numerical Simulations DOF Combinations and Corresponding Flutter Derivatives Obtained Case Noise-to-Signal Ratio Diagonal Stiffness Terms Non-Diagonal Stiffness Terms Diagonal Damping Terms Non-Diagonal Damping Terms 1-DOF (ILS) 20% DOF (MITD) 5% % DOF (ILS) 10% % DOF (ILS) 5% % Case DOF Combination Flutter-Derivatives Extracted 1 1-DOF Vertical (V) H1*, H4* 2 1-DOF Torsional (T) A2*, A3* 3 1-DOF Lateral (L) P1*, P4* 4 2-DOF Vertical+Torsional (V&T) H1*, H2*, H3*, H4*, A1*, A2*, A3*, A4* 5 2-DOF Vertical+Lateral (V&L) H1*, H4*, H5*, H6*, P1*, P4*, P5*, P6* 6 2-DOF Lateral+Torsional (L&T) P1*, P4*, P2*, P3*, A2*, A3*, A5*, A6* 73-DOF All the 18 flutter derivatives  EIGHTEEN FLUTTER DERIVATIVES OF NACA 0020 AIRFOIL: OBTAIN NOISY DISPLACEMENT TIME HISTORIES [SIZE n x (2N+2) ] BUILD LOW PASS ‘BUTTERWORTH’ FILTER PERFORM ZERO-PHASE DIGITAL FILTERING OF DISPLACEMENTS OBTAIN VELOCITY AND ACCELERATION TIME HISTORIES BY FINITE DIFFERENCE FORMULATION (EACH HAVING SIZE n x 2N ) PERFORM ‘WINDOWING’ TO OBTAIN NEW SETS OF DISPLACEMENT, VELOCITY, ACCELERATION TIME HISTORIES (EACH HAVING SIZE n x N ) CONSTRUCT (EACH HAVING SIZE 2n x N ) GENERATE A MATRIX BY LEAST SQUARES (SIZE 2n x 2n ) USING INITIAL CONDITIONS SIMULATE, UPDATE A MATRIX BY LEAST SQUARES (SIZE 2n x 2n ): ITERATE TILL THE CONVERGENCE OF A MATRIX CALCULATE FLUTTER DERIVATIVES FROM ELEMENTS OF A MATRIX EXTRACTED AT ZERO AND VARIOUS NON-ZERO WIND SPEEDS (Note: Modified Ibrahim Time Domain (MITD) method was developed by Sarkar, Jones, and Scanlan in1994) REFERENCES:  Sarkar, P.P., Jones, N.P., Scanlan, R.H. (1994). “Identification of Aeroelastic Parameters of Flexible Bridges”. J. of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE 1994, 120 (8), pp  Gan Chowdhury, A., Sarkar, P.P. (2003). “A New Technique for Identification of Eighteen Flutter Derivatives using Three- Degrees-of-Freedom Section Model”. Accepted 21 July 2003, Engineering Structures.  Sarkar, P.P., Gan Chowdhury, A., Gardner, T. B. (2003). “A Novel Elastic Suspension System for Wind Tunnel Section Model Studies”. Accepted 12 September 2003, J. of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics.  Gan Chowdhury, A., Sarkar, P.P. (2003). “Identification of Eighteen Flutter Derivatives”. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Wind Engineering, Lubbock, Texas, USA, pp  DISPLACEMENT TIME HISTORY AS ABOVE WITHOUT NOISE MATCHES WELL WITH THE FILTERED ONE (SEE ALGORITHM): MATCHES WELL WITH THE FILTERED ONE (SEE ALGORITHM):