NCLB Monitoring Overview and Details 2013-2017 5/15 Version.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Follow-up Reporting Expectations MSCHE Annual Conference 2009 Mary Ellen Petrisko.
Advertisements

Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results.
NCLB Consolidated Monitoring Integrated Approach to Title III Monitoring.
NCLB Monitoring NCLB/ESEA Cycle Legal Requirement: EDGAR Part 80.40(a)—monitor subgrant activities to assure compliance with applicable.
FY12 Title I Program Review Preparation Title I Technical Assistance Session School Improvement Grant Programs October 6, 2011.
ESEA Program Review Russ Sweet Preparing for ESEA Program Reviews of Titles I-A, II-A, VI-B (REAP), and X Summer 2014.
Do Now: Matching Game  Match the numbers from Column A to the clues in Column B to learn fun facts about Title IIA Massachusetts Department of Elementary.
Verification Kentucky Department of Education September 2012.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
SAISD Federal Programs Department. Stage 1 of the Organization and Development Process Form the Planning Team 1 2.
Preparing for Title IIA Monitoring Review (FY14) February 24, 2015 Office of Educator Effectiveness Aviva Baff Isadora Choute Cynthia Mompoint Deborah.
Financial and Programmatic Monitoring ESEA/Act 807 ACSIP Arkansas Department of Education Division of Academic Accountability.
NH Department of Education NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan April 15, 2011 Referencing requirements for Schools in Need.
SAISD Federal Programs Department. Stage 1 of the Organization and Development Process Form the Planning Team 1 2.
SSAI Sponsor Transition Webinar t We will start in 5 minutes. t Please dial in by following the instructions (to see those instructions again click the.
MCKINNEY-VENTO HOMELESS EDUCATION GRANT AWARDEE TRAINING Division of Performance and Accountability January 14, :00 AM(MST)
Federal Programs Consolidated Review Monitoring Kelly Iorfida Education Administrative Associate Division of Federal Programs Department of Education.
LEA Federal Program Monitoring/Review Presented by: Kelly Iorfida and Norma Hull Division of Federal Programs Department of Education.
Tutorial Introduction Fidelity NTSConnect is an innovative Web-based software solution designed for use by customers of Fidelity National Title Insurance.
Verification Visit by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) September 27-29, 2010.
Title I Technical Assistance Training Federal and State Programs.
Subrecipient Monitoring FY15 of Education Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Federal Programs Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III,
Welcome Document Imaging System Training Dial in number: (559) Participant Access Code: #
Title III Desk Monitoring Oregon Department of Education Office of Education Equity – Title III.
1 Fall 2010 Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education October 5, 2010.
Medicaid Allowable Expenditure Report- MAER Amy Kanter, SBS Auditor Michigan Department of Health and Human Services 2015 MDHHS SBS Conference – Traverse.
NCLB Monitoring Overview Part 1 - Questions. Objectives  To provide clearer understanding of the monitoring process  To provide further guidance regarding.
Successful Program Implementation: Meeting Compliance Statutes Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title.
TITLE I COMPARABILITY Determinations & Reporting Title I Technical Assistance Session School Improvement Grant Programs October 6, 2011.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education Self Review (SESR) Activity Three: Corrective.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction CAIS Overview for FPM Reviews and Title III Improvement Plans.
NH Department of Education Division of Program Support Bureau of Nutrition Programs and Services Verification Module for National School Lunch Program.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Bureau of Federal Educational Programs Updates _________________________________.
Submitting Course Outlines for C-ID Designation Training for Articulation Officers Summer 2012.
1 NCLB Title Program Monitoring NCLB Title Program Monitoring Regional Training SPRING 2006.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Miami-Dade County Public Schools Title I Administration School-level Parental Involvement Plan (PIP)
Coordinated Review Effort (CRE) School Year Karen Franklin, SNS Distance Learning October 1, 2015.
NCLB Monitoring September 19, 2012 Webinar.
Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results Reviewed & Revised with COP April 2011.
Title III Desk Monitoring Oregon Department of Education September 24,
Preparing for the Fall 2005 MEAP and MI-Access Student Pre-ID Process Wednesday, April 13, 2005.
What to Expect When You Are Expecting Consolidated Monitoring: Every Step of the Way Office of Federal Programs Oklahoma State Department of Education.
1 Monitoring/Evaluation Program Overview December 3, 2008 Title III Director’s Meeting.
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Office of Federal Programs December 10, 2013.
MCKINNEY-VENTO HOMELESS EDUCATION GRANT AWARDEE TRAINING Division of Performance and Accountability September 30, :00AM(MDT)
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 1 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
Welcome to today’s Webinar: Tier III Schools in Improvement We will begin at 9:00 AM.
Federal Program Monitoring Overview and Organization.
On Site Review Process. 2 Overview of On Site Review Materials and Process.
NH Restructuring Planning Year (SINI 4 ) Schools: Submitting the Restructuring Plan Presenter: Karen Laba, NH DOE Consultant for School Improvement.
New York State DOH Health Home Care Management Reporting Tool (HH-CMART) Support Calls – Session #3 March 6,
Title I, Part A Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring Lynn Sodat Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability.
Subrecipient Monitoring FY14 Oklahoma State Department of Education Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III, VI and X.
NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan Required by NH RSA 193-H and Federal Public Law for Schools in Need of Improvement.
1 PACTS-Self Evaluation November 1, 2006 Video Conference Elaine Zabor Consultant Office of Federal Programs.
GMAP Grant Management, Application, and Planning Consolidate Application Training.
Component D: Activity D.3: Surveys Department EU Twinning Project.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
January 21, 2014 Welcome! The January COP call will begin in a few moments. –Event password: 5COPcall –Event number: 666– To hear the presentation.
Preparing for Title IIA Monitoring Review (FY15) November 9, 2015 Deborah Walker Meagan Steiner David LeBlanc.
Submission Deadline: Friday, November 17, 2017
Welcome! The B-13 CAP Webinar will begin in a few moments.
Resource Allocation Strategy & Planning August 2017
FY19 Federal Grant Monitoring: Titles I, II, IV
FY19 Grant Monitoring Process: Titles I, II, and IV
Preparing for Title IIA Monitoring Review (FY15)
Educational Stability Program Review 2019/2020
Data Quality 2 (DQ2) & Staff Reporting Webinar
Presentation transcript:

NCLB Monitoring Overview and Details /15 Version

LEGAL MONITORING REQUIREMENT EDGAR Part 80.40(a)—monitor subgrant activities to assure compliance with applicable Federal requirements and that performance goals are being achieved. Maine has established a 5-year NCLB/ESEA cycle for a Desk Review for all SAUs as well as On- site Reviews for some SAUs.

MONITORING PURPOSE Fully and effectively implement the requirements of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended by the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 Regularly monitor programmatic and fiscal elements Provide quality technical assistance based on identified needs

OBJECTIVES FOR THIS WEBINAR Ensure that SAUs understand their responsibilities Ensure that due dates are clear Ensure that information required from the SAU is clear Ensure expectations for the on-site visit are clear Ensure that SAU staff are well prepared for the visit

NCLB MONITORING WEBSITE RESOURCES List of FY___ Sites Original Sample Notice Letter Desk Monitoring Tool * On-Site Monitoring Tool Agenda Template Review Checklist Upload Documents – FTP Instructions * Monitoring Powerpoints * * Documents the SAU must use and review for initial Desk Monitoring.

MONITORING TIMELINE June current year – General sent to SAUs for upcoming visits. August current year – Individual SAU notification of review sent. October 30 current year – SAU Responses and Documents submitted to the Maine Department of Education representing prior school year information. November-December current year –State NCLB teams review the SAU submissions. Phone calls may occur for questions or clarification. January new year – Follow-up letters sent to SAUs to inform the SAU of its review status. March-May new year – On-site visits performed regarding current school year information. June new year – On-site visit follow-up letters sent to SAUs.

NOTIFICATION OF REVIEW PLEASE TAKE NOTE of important information included in the notification that was ed to Supt. and NCLB Coordinator: NCLB Monitoring Tool was attached; Due date for submission of responses and documents is October 30; Consequence if submission not completed and on time; Date of On-site Visit, if one is necessary. If there is a district function or other critical event occurring on the on-site visit date, please contact Jackie Godbout immediately by calling

DESK MONITORING TOOL Two components: Responses to Key Questions Documents to be Submitted The responses and documents should represent the previous school year based on the October 30 submission date.

Desk Monitoring Tool: Responses and File Setup The NCLB Coordinator should ensure that the appropriate program coordinator responds to their program questions i.e. McKinney-Vento Homeless Liaison or Professional Development Coordinator. Recommend creating a folder to store documents that are collected and that will be uploaded as evidence. The SAU may create one response file to the questions and include any response or dissemination description needed for a document. Name the file SAU_NAME_Response File. All supporting documents should be established as individual files according to further instructions.

Desk Monitoring Tool: Responses to Questions For the response file, we are looking for a description of the processes used to accomplish the task in most instances. Please note: Use the Q1, Q2, Q3 numbering sequence in your response file. If providing support evidence, save as a separate file and name it SAU_NAME_Q1, SAU_NAME_Q6b, etc. Make sure when a pronoun is used, it clearly links back to a person or object. When a person’s name is used, include the person’s title or position. When a group is mentioned, include the makeup of the group using titles or positions.

Desk Monitoring Tool: Responses to Questions When meetings are held, include the frequency of meetings. Do not reference “periodically” or “regularly.” Use specificity such as once every two months, at the first staff meeting of each month, etc. Include whether or not minutes of meetings are available. Results of mee tings, discussions, or data review may be helpful to the response, but ensure that it is brief and pertinent to the overall process.

Desk Monitoring Tool: Documents To Be Submitted Documents should be saved as individual files and identified by SAU_NAME_D1, SAU_NAME_D2, SAU_NAME_D3, etc. Documents should be dated. If a document was disseminated, provide a description of the dissemination process in the SAU’s response file or as part of the document itself. Acceptable format of documents i.e. doc, pdf, docx; not Apple Pages format. If a document is not available in an electronic format, send 2 copies to Title I, MDOE, 23 State House Station, 111 Sewell Street, Augusta, ME Note: US Postal date stamp must be by October 30.

DESK MONITORING: UPLOAD PROCESS A File Transfer Protocol (FTP) site is established; Upload instructions were ed to SAUs with their notification letter and are posted to NCLB monitoring website; A site link, SAU login, and a password are included in the instructions. Do not attempt to login more than twice in a 30- minute period. The system will lock up. Contact Jackie Godbout at if this occurs.

DESK MONITORING: UPLOAD PROCESS If using a MAC to upload,… Downloading the wizard is not necessary Only one file at a time can be uploaded (rather than multiple files) Contact Meghan Southworth at for assistance with MAC issues.

NCLB INTERNAL TEAM REVIEW NCLB Team Reviews are scheduled for November and December. A Review Checklist will be completed for each SAU. There are three choices for each response or document—Meets Intent, Needs Recommendation, or Finding. A telephone call may occur for clarifying questions or to notify the SAU that an on-site visit will be necessary. Factors used to determine if an on-site visit is necessary: late submission or failure to submit desk review documentation, severity of findings/recommendations, repeat findings from previous NCLB review, complexity of program elements, and/or total allocation amount.

FOLLOW-UP REVIEW LETTER Follow-up Review Letters will be sent by January 30. If no on-site visit is necessary, the letter will include: Recommendations, Findings, and Corrective Action steps. If an on-site visit is necessary, the letter will include the above elements plus the following elements: Date of on-site visit; Reason for on-site visit; Findings so that solutions could be discussed or developed locally before the on-site visit; and Plans for the on-site visit.

ON-SITE MONITORING TIMELINE 30 days before the on-site visit, the SAU must submit via to the State NCLB Team Coordinator: – the on-site visit agenda and – a completed On-Site Monitoring Tool Day of visit, the On-Site Monitoring Tool document and all evidence representing the current school year should be complete and available for State NCLB Team review. [Is a single copy sufficient?]

PREPARE ON-SITE VISIT AGENDA Review the Visit Assignment Sheet and create an agenda using the on-line agenda template Start time should be 8:30 am unless earlier is needed agenda 30 days prior to the on-site visit

DAY OF ON-SITE VISIT Open with welcome and overview of agenda Review status of the Desk Monitoring indicators On-Site Monitoring Tool should be completed and evidence from the current school year readily available – either as paper copies or stored on a memory stick Staff should be prepared to discuss the indicators, questions, and evidence

DAY OF ON-SITE VISIT A current year-to-date expenditure detail run for each Title (IA, IIA, III and VI) should be available Lunch: Maine DOE staff can either purchase school lunch or order from a nearby eatery/sandwich shop. Having a menu on hand is helpful. Oral Report Out by MDOE staff at end of day Follow-up Letter and Report, to include both desk and on-site monitoring, by June 30.

OCTOBER 30 DUE DATE If Desk Monitoring documentation is not received by October 30, the SAU automatically receives an on-site visit and will receive a notification of its responsibilities. − The SAU will be required to follow all previously outlined Desk Monitoring Tool requirements 30 days prior to the on-site visit, and − In addition to the Desk Monitoring requirements, the SAU will be required to provide all of the additional On-site Visit information.

PROCESS STARTS AGAIN Initial notification to SAUs will go out in June for the next cycle year. QUESTIONS? Contact Jackie Godbout

RESOURCES STATE MONITORING INFORMATION: FEDERAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS: home.html home.html