The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UF Hybrid Rocket Teams Mile High Club Brought to you by Chris Leonard, Ty Morton, Sam Darr, and Josh Childs.
Advertisements

University of Florida PDR Presentation. Vehicle Design Diameter: 5.86 Length: 135 Static Stability Margin: 1.4 Total Weight: 23.6 lbs.
Preliminary Design Review. Rocket & Payload Schematic.
Northwestern University Space Technology and Rocketry Society (NUSTARS) NASA Student Launch Flight Readiness Review March 16, 2015.
The effect of gravitational stress on the diffusion of liquids. New team.
U NIVERSITY OF F LORIDA T HE M OST I NTERESTING R OCKET IN THE W ORLD.
P RELIMINARY D ESIGN R EVIEW University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Rockety Team.
“ The Other Woman ” National Association of Rocktry Level Three Certification Project By Steve Laird NAR #86948.
Critical Design Review NASA University Student Launch Initiative University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Student Launch Project Preliminary Design Review January 10, 2014.
Launch Lug – helps to guide the rocket upward until it reaches enough velocity for the fins to engage. Parachute – assists in the safe recovery of the.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI CDR Presentation.
U NIVERSITY OF F LORIDA PDR P RESENTATION. O UTLINE Project Organization Vehicle Design Payload Design Recovery System Simulations Future Work.
Our Mission Statement  Launch a high-power rocket to an altitude of one mile carrying the Operation: Epic Beep payload package. At lift off, the rocket’s.
RezRiders. Mission statement Through the USLI program the Northwest Indian College Space Center’s RezRiders Team enhances its involvement in science,
Flight Readiness Review March Vehicle Criteria Testing and vehicle design Bulkheads: 9-Ply ½” birch plywood made by Public Missiles, Ltd or ¼ inch.
NASA CDR Presentation Spring Grove Area High School.
Alabama A&M University Rocket Program CDR Presentation 2011.
UAA Rocketry Critical Design Review Presentation.
NASA SLI 2010 Mulberry Grove High School Flight Readiness Review Measurement of UVB Radiation Absorption by Cloth Material at Different Altitudes and Measurement.
Windward Community College University of Hawaii
Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014.
Flight Readiness Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 47 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude 5203’- RockSim.
Critical Design Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 45 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude RockSim.
November 7,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6.00 inches  Mass: oz. / 17.34lbs.  Span: inches  Center of Gravity: inches.
The effect of gravitational stress on the diffusion of liquids. New team SLI 2012.
Flight Readiness Review Atomic Aggies. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Critical Design Review of “Mach Shock Reduction” Phase II January 2008 Statesville, NC.
Launch Vehicle  Launch Vehicle Summary  The length of the rocked is inches, and the mass is ounces.  We have a dual Deployment Recovery.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI FRR Presentation.
CDR Clear Lake's Team Rocket 2929 Bay Area Blvd. Houston, TX
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Intercollegiate Rocket Engineering Competition Spring 2015 EML Ethics and Design Project Organization.
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Student Launch Project Flight Readiness Review April 21, 2014.
 Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications  Static stability margin  Plan for vehicle safety verification and testing  Baseline motor selection.
Windward Community College University of Hawaii
Flight Readiness Review Team Hawaii. Vehicle Properties Diameter (in)6 inches Length (in)127 inches Gross Liftoff Weight (lb)50.25 lb Launch Lug/button.
3/19/09. Animal Motor Works (AMW) K475WW High Power Rocket Motor. 54 mm casing, 40.3 cm long, 2.9 seconds burn time, 1394 N-sec total impulse, and
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom.
FRR Presentation IF AT FIRST YOU DON’T SUCCEED, TRY AGAIN… AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN.
Flight Readiness Review Student Launch Initiative SCS Rocket Team Statesville Christian School April 2, 2008.
Bacteria Hunters Bacterial Concentrations Above and Below the Planetary Boundary Layer.
The Effect of Acceleration on the Crystallization of Sodium Acetate.
The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.
The Efficiency of Flexible Solar Panels and Changes in the Earth’s Magnetic Field at Altitude.
University of Florida Rocket Team Critical Design Review Presentation.
Critical Design Review Presentation Jan. 20, 2011.
Atomic Aggies CDR. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Project Ares University of Central Florida NASA Student Launch 1/28/2015.
Bacteria Hunters Bacterial Concentrations Above and Below the Planetary Boundary Layer.
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom Body Tube Length-
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB PDR PRESENTATION 1.
HARDING UNIVERSITY FLYING BISONS A Study of Atmospheric Properties as a Function of Altitude Flight Readiness Review.
University Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Team Rocket.
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Critical Design Review 15 Janurary2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
January 14,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6 inches  Mass: oz. / lbs.  Span: 22 inches  Center of Gravity: inches 
FAMU PDR Presentation. Table of Contents Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications Static stability margin Plan for vehicle safety verification.
Critical Design Review Presentation Project Nova.
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB CDR PRESENTATION 1.
Flight Readiness Review UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA CONNER DENTON, JOHN FAULK, NGHIA HUYNH, KENT LINO, PHILLIP RUSCHMYER, & ANDREW TINDELL MENTOR : RICHARD.
UCF_USLI Preliminary Design Review David Cousin Freya Ford Md Arif Drew Dieckmann Stephen Hirst Mitra Mossaddad University of Central Florida.
College of Engineering
Critical Design Review Presentation
November 7, 2014.
November 7, 2014.
Final Readiness Review
Plantation High SL team 1
2019 First Nation Launch – Oral Presentation
Presentation transcript:

The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket

March 21Second test flight of full-scale vehicle April 12Rocket ready for launch April 16Rocket Fair/Hardware & Safety check April 19SLI Launch Day

1.First stage burn 2.Stage separation. 3.Booster coasts to its apogee and deploys main parachute. 4.Booster lands safely 5.Second stage motor burn 6.Sustainer reaches apogee, deploys drogue parachute 7.Sustainer descends under drogue parachute to 700ft 8.Main parachute deploys, slowing rocket to safe landing speed of fps. 9.Sustainer lands safely.

Stable launch of the vehicle Target altitude of one mile reached Smooth stage separation. Proper deployment of all parachutes Safe recovery of the booster and the sustainer

Length 156.5” Diameter6” Liftoff weight37.4 lb. Motor K1275 Redline (54mm) CP118.8” (from nosetip) CG ” (from nosetip) Static Margin 4.23 calibers

Length 94” Diameter4” Liftoff weight12.7 lb. Motor J380 Smokey Sam (54mm) CP83.8” (from nosetip) CG63.6” (from nosetip) Static Margin 5.04 calibers

LetterPartLetterPart ANoseconeHPayload Bay B Main Parachute I Payload Electronics C Sustainer E-Bay J Drogue Parachute DFinsKMotor Mount E Transition L Main Parachute F Booster E-Bay M Payload Electronics GFinsNMotor Mount

Fins: 1/32” G10 fiberglass + 1/8” balsa sandwich Body: fiberglass tubing, fiberglass couplers Bulkheads: 1/2” plywood Motor Mount: 54mm phenolic tubing, 1/2” plywood centering rings Nosecone: commercially made plastic nosecone Rail Buttons: large size nylon buttons Motor Retention system: Aeropack screw-on motor retainer Anchors: 1/4” stainless steel U-Bolts Epoxy: West System with appropriate fillers

BoosterSustainer Flight Stability Static Margin Thrust to Weight Ratio Velocity at Launch Guide Departure: 54 mph (launch rail length 144”)

Wp - ejection charge weight in pounds. dP - ejection charge pressure, 15psi V - free volume in cubic inches. R - combustion gas constant, ft- lbf/lbm R for FFFF black powder. T - combustion gas temperature, 3307 degrees R

Ejection charges have been verified using static testing. SectionEjection Charge Booster2.15 g (of FFFF black powder) Sustainer (Drogue)2.0 g Sustainer (Main)3.15 g Stage Separation Charge1.0 g

ComponentWeightParachute Diameter Descent Rate Booster (predicted) 399 oz92 in. (main) 17.6fps Sustainer (measured) 211 oz24 in. (drogue) 54.7 fps Sustainer (measured) 211 oz60 in. (main) 17.5 fps

Tested Components C1: Body (including construction techniques) C2: Altimeter C3: Data Acquisition System (custom computer board and sensors) C4: Parachutes C5: Fins C6: Payload C7: Ejection charges C8: Launch system C9: Motor mount C10: Beacons C11: Shock cords and anchors C12: Rocket stability C13: Second stage separation and ignition electronics/charges

Verification Tests V1 Integrity Test: applying force to verify durability. V2 Parachute Drop Test: testing parachute functionality. V3 Tension Test: applying force to the parachute shock cords to test durability V4 Prototype Flight: testing the feasibility of the vehicle with a scale model. V5 Functionality Test: test of basic functionality of a device on the ground V6 Altimeter Ground Test: place the altimeter in a closed container and decrease air pressure to simulate altitude changes. Verify that both the apogee and preset altitude events fire. (Estes igniters or low resistance bulbs can be used for verification). V7 Electronic Deployment Test: test to determine if the electronics can ignite the deployment charges. V8 Ejection Test: test that the deployment charges have the right amount of force to cause parachute deployment and/or planned component separation. V9 Computer Simulation: use RockSim to predict the behavior of the launch vehicle. V10 Integration Test: ensure that the payload fits smoothly and snuggly into the vehicle, and is robust enough to withstand flight stresses.

V 1 V 2 V 3 V 4 V 5 V 6 V 7 V 8 V 9 V 10 C 1 C 2 C 3 C 4 C 5 C 6 PP C 7 C 8 C 9 C 10 C 11 C 12 C 13

Full Scale Vehicle Launch

Liftoff Weight: 34 lbs Motor:BoosterK1100 T SustainerI599N Length: 157 inches Diameter:6in Stability Margin:Booster4.53 Sustainer5.88 Vehicle Parameters

Test dual deployment avionics Test full deployment scheme Test validity of simulation results Test rocket stability Test staging scheme Flight Objectives

Apogee: 2519 ft – RockSim Prediction:2479 ft Time to apogee: 12 seconds Apogee events: drogue Sustainer main parachute: 700 ft Sustainer Flight Results

Apogee Events Sustainer Main Parachute Deployment Sustainer True Apogee Sustainer Flight Data Temporary Altimeter #2 Power Failure Booster Apogee

DescriptionInitial Point time, altitude End Point time, altitude Descent Rate Sustainer Descent with Drogue 13.5s, 2466ft54.5s, 700ft 43.0 fps Sustainer Descent with Main 58.0s, 588 ft97.5s, 0ft 14.9 fps Booster Descent with Main (unopened) 10.6, 845ft18.7, 0ft 104 fps Measured Decent Rates

Recorded data Simulation results (updated CD) Apogee = 2519ft Apogee = 2479ft Flight Simulations vs. Data

We will use an array of pressure sensors to observe the airflow characteristics around several obstacles during a two stage flight. After flight, we will test the rocket in a wind tunnel and compare the results.

Artificial protrusions (obstacles) will be placed on the sustainer body to create disturbances in airflow. Airflow Pressure sensors will measure the local pressure before and after the protrusions

The sequence of our payload as it goes from flight to the final report.

Determine the effect of obstacles on the surface of rocket on airflow around the rocket Determine the accuracy of wind tunnel testing

Obstacles remain attached to the rocket during flight. Sensors will successfully collect and store measureable data during flight. Data collected is reliable and accurate.

The payload will measure the airflow around the rocket using an array of pressure sensors. The location of the pressure sensors are shown in red and obstacles are shown in blue.

Sampling rate: 100 times per second Sampling resolution:16 bits (2 LSB noise expected) 100kPa full scale range (15kPa ~ 115kPa) Sampling locations: 12 on sustainer and 12 on booster

Each data acquisition board (DAB) reads and stores data from 6 pressure sensors Analog signals from the sensors are carried to the digitizer (ADC) using a shielded cable All DABs in the same stage are activated by the same G-switch shielded cable Common G-switch sensor Dataacquisition

Electronics Data Acquisition Board: controls signal digitization, receives and stores digitized data from pressure sensors Sensor Board: hosts a single pressure sensor and signal conditioning (noise suppression) circuitry Electrical schematics for DAB: shows the components and connections between them

1.Fin 2.Parachute 3.Data Processing and Storage 4.Motor        Sensor package

Diagram of the sustainer showing the payload integration. DPS Unit Timer Alt Sensor package Parachute Compartment

Diagram of the Booster showing the payload integration. Fin Tab Fin Motor Alt Parachute DPS&S Parachute Compartment

Independent Variables – Type and location of obstacles………….…. L – Air density outside of rocket……..……..…. D – Speed of air flow…………………………………. S – Air pressure………………………………………… P – Acceleration profile…………………………….. X,Y,Z Dependent Variables – Pressure at each sensor………….………….. Y i

Identical rocket in wind tunnel and actual flight Identical obstacles on rocket in wind tunnel and actual flight Similar wind speeds in wind tunnel and actual flight of first stage Identical sensors and method of data storage

Primary correlations – Yx = f(L) (local pressure vs. location) – Yx = f(S) (local pressure vs. airspeed) – Data from wind tunnel test and actual flight will be compared Further correlations from actual flight – pressure vs. selected independent variables

TestMeasurement PressurePressure will be collected at least 100 times per second by the sensor array

Components 1.Pressure Sensors 2.Battery Pack 3.Altimeter 4.3D Accelerometer 5.Obstacles Verification Tests 1.Drop Test 2.Connection and Basic Functionality Test 3.Pressure Sensor Test 4.Scale Model Flight 5.Durability Test 6.Acceleration Test 7.Battery Capacity Test

P=PLANNED F=FINISHED T E S T S COMPONENTSCOMPONENTS 1FFP 2FFF 3FFFFF 4FFFP 5FFF

Simulated pressure profile at 100mph Predicted pressure changes: -400Pa Pa

Simulated pressure profile at 250mph Predicted pressure changes: -2,000Pa.. +1,500Pa

Resolution: true 14 bit (16 bit digitization with 2 LSB noise) 14 bits = 16,384 signal levels Sensor range: 100,000Pa (15,000 – 115,000Pa) 100,000Pa / 16,384 levels = 6.10Pa / level Expected pressure 100mph: -400Pa ~ +300Pa  mph: -2,000Pa ~ +1,500Pa  573 levels

Questions?