Goal – to understand why we use comparative analysis in political science, to understand the methods of comparison available and the methods we will use.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Constitutions, Law and Judiciary
Advertisements

Comparative Government. Reasons to Study Comparative Government Countries are actors in a continuously unfolding play Comparative Government and Politics.
Introduction to Theories of Public Policy
SUBJECT: GOVERNMENT CLASS: SS1 WEEK : 1 PERIOD:1 & 2 TOPIC: THE MEANING AND SCOPE OF THE SUBJECT MATTER-GOVERNMENT LESSON 1 TOPIC :- DEFINITION OF GOVERNMENT.
INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE. 2 Implemented in 12 countries of Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, through IUCN regional.
Week 2: Major Worldviews January 10, 2007
Curriculum Project Garred Kirk. EARL 1: Civics The student understands and applies knowledge of government, law, politics, and the nation’s fundamental.
Neo-realists – neo-liberals The debate to date. Neo-realism Neo-Liberalist.
COMPARATIVE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION MPA 503 WHAT IS CPA (Lecture 03)
Fundamentals of Political Science
C OUNCIL OF E UROPE F ORUM FOR THE F UTURE OF D EMOCRACY Y EREVAN, A RMENIA, O CTOBER 2010 Theme 2: Institutions and Democratic Governance Democracy.
Dynamics of Comparison Comparing Political Systems.
Introducing Governance.  Much used term especially ‘good governance’ and ‘democratic governance’  From Greek word kubernân = to pilot or steer  Originally.
Political Thinking and Political Science. Political Thinking  Involves the careful gathering and sifting of information in the process of forming a knowledgeable.
COMPARING THE POLITICAL SYSTEM THROUGH SYSTEMS THEORY
Introduction to Comparative Politics
THE VITAL ROLE OF PEOPLE SKILLS TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROFESSION INTERNATIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE PROFESSIONALS DAY NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECRETARIES & ADMINISTRATIVE.
LA Comprehensive Curriculum
Vocabulary- the key to understanding this stuff. Correlation An apparent association between certain factors or variables An apparent association between.
Vocabulary Important Themes and Concepts The Key to Understanding.
Introducing Comparative Politics
Comparing Political Systems
Part Two: Sovereignty, Authority & Power
International Centre for Policy Studies Kyiv, Ukraine Dr. Vira Nanivska International Centre for Policy Studies Tel /38 Web:
Conceptual Approach to Comparative Government & Politics.
Goal – to apply the ST and S-F (and other approaches) to real-world analysis. To understand the factors to be compared and the data used in empirical.
AP Comparative – Day 1 Agenda Comparative Government & Politics Enduring Understanding –Comparative Government & Politics is a branch of political science.
Political Science Al-Bayan Bilingual School
What is Comparative Government?
A.ABDULLAEV, Director of the Public Fund for Support and Development of Print Media and Information Agencies of Uzbekistan.
Government and Public Policy
Political Culture & Political Ideologies
Government and the Public Good and Forms of Government Chapter 1- Section 1 review and Section 2.
Politics and Political Science. Defining Characteristics of Politics making of decisions for groups 1.Involves the making of decisions for groups of people.
Dr. Afxendiou A.P. Comparative Government and Politics Sachem Norht High School CITIZENS, SOCIETY AND THE STATE.
Chapter 2: Comparing Political Systems By: Alyssa Wright Ashley Smith Matthew Jacob.
Comparing Political Systems. Why Compare? “Without comparisons to make, the mind does not know how to proceed.” Tocqueville “Man is by nature a social.
Part Two: Sovereignty, Authority & Power “Sovereignty is not given, it is taken.” -- Kemal Ataturk (Turkish soldier) “I have as much authority as the Pope,
Comparative Government. Reasons to Study Comparative Government Countries are actors in a continuously unfolding play Comparative Government and Politics.
Goal – to understand the S-F method and A&P’s terminology all are useful for analyzing political systems. Questions from homework? Questions about Palmer’s.
Comparing Political Systems
Chapter 1 The Comparative Study of Politics Comparative Politics: Structures and Choices 2e By Lowell Barrington.
Political Concepts An Introduction To Political Theory and Statehood.
Introduction to Comparative Government Chapter 1.
Goal – to understand ST and Structural-functional approaches. To analyze how the textbook relates to our method of comparison. 1.Questions from homework?
Chapter 1: Seeking New Lands, Seeing with New Eyes.
1-1 Principles of Government. State: Synonym: country. “Political community that occupies a definite territory and has an organized government with the.
Chapter 2 “Comparing Political Systems” Comparison is the scientific study of politics Theories are developed on political processes.
DEVELOPING THE WORK PLAN
Goal – to apply the ST and S-F (and other approaches) to real-world analysis. To understand the factors to be compared and the data used in empirical.
- The concept of political culture provides a new name for one of the oldest subject of concern in political science. - Political culture as a concept.
Part Six: Public Policy “Justice is itself the great standing policy of civil society; and any eminent departure from it, under any circumstances, lies.
Goal – to understand that the S-F method and A&P’s terminology are useful for analyzing political systems. Starter – jot down a list of questions from.
Goal – to understand why we use comparative analysis in political science and to understand the methods of comparison available and the method we will.
Comparative Government and Politics Introduction and Method.
Defining Political Culture. Political Culture – the collection of political beliefs, values, practices, and institutions that the government is based.
Why do we Compare We compare to Learn –The only way to understand our political system is to compare it with others. Go to Roskin, read the box on Page.
Introduction to Comparative Politics
AP Comparative Government
Comparative Political Theory
Comparing Political Systems Structures and Functions
AP COGO UNIT 1 Trivia Review
Dec 18 – Comp Gov – Introduction
AP COGO UNIT 1 Trivia Review
Comparing Political Systems
Global Challenges of Comparative Politics
AP Comp Day 4 – How and WHAT will we compare?
Comparing Political Systems
AP Comp Day 4 – How and WHAT will we compare?
AP Comp Day 3 – 3 groups Goal – to understand the methods of comparison available and the method we will use in this course. To analyze how the textbook.
Presentation transcript:

Goal – to understand why we use comparative analysis in political science, to understand the methods of comparison available and the methods we will use in this course. Questions from homework? What is “Politics”? What will we need to analyze to understand politics in general and in any particular case?Politics Why compareWhy compare? – What are the benefits to comparison according to Kesselman (textbook), McCormick ( AR #11 p ) and A and P ( AR #9 p ) Review 5 Substantive Topics from pdf P5-13–our method5 Substantive Topics Presentation – groups and country selection Key Terms - differentiate between state, government, nation and regimeKey Terms How will we compare in this course? Read AR #8 p Systems Theory, Structural-Functional, Historical, Typological Evaluate pros and cons of each method Finish or reread AR #11 p – how to compare? Why STs? AP Comp Day 2 – 3 groups

Politics is the processes, actions and relationships between individuals and groups to make collective decisions. Usually these are focused on answering the questions: 1) Who gets what (of scarce resources), when, where and how? (another way of asking this is: what should gov’t do and how should it do it?) 2) How does “who” get decided? Therefore, if the above is an acceptable answer to what is politics, then what conclusions can we draw about what needs to be studied in order to understand politics and comparative politics? But politics are also the effects of the answers to these questions – Conflict arises over the answers to the above two questions and politics are also the management of these different, and resultant conflicts

Need to study among other things: 1.processes of making policies and putting them into effect. 2.actors involved in making and implementing policy 3.Sources and methods of information used to make policy 4.Environment (political, cultural, geographical, demographic, economic) in which policies are made 5.Methods and biases in policy-maker selection 6.Conflict and cooperation – methods, prevalence, role, actors 7.Systems and structures influencing and influenced by policy- making Therefore – we will use the College Board’s Substantive Topic framework

Substantive Topics and AP Terminology Sovereignty, Authority, Power, Political Institutions Citizens, Society & State Political and economic Change Public Policy Identify the key questions that each of the above ST’s asks you to understand about each of the nation-state case studies. Use the STs to analyze what you know of the US political system.

Kesselman – to better understand how globalization-caused interdependence affects us To help prognosticate the direction countries and the world are going and then how best to address this future Gain the analytical skills and tools to better understand ourselves and our domestic situation. To develop understanding about politics in general Why compare? McCormick – make sense of the world understand ourselves develop many more options to address similar problems broaden our horizons about other people, cultures, values and methods to break down prejudice and misunderstandings to lessen potential for conflict (or promote cooperation) develop rules about politics Almond & Powell – to better understand specific factors that have led to different aspects of political systems. Helps us develop solutions to public policy problems Helps us to understand and address changes

Groups for Presentation 1 / Presentation 2 1.United Kingdom/ Mexico 2.Russian Federation/ Iran 3.People’s Republic of China/ Nigeria Debates will be between these two grouped countries You will be a team of business development consultants tasked with determining in which of the two countries a business should develop a foreign subsidiary.

State – collection of all individuals, groups and institutions involved in making, implementing and adjudicating public policies. Government – members of the “temporary” administration – generally the executive branch Nation - group of people with common language, culture, identity and affinity to land, Regime – the system of rules under which the political system operates

Political System – collection of institutions involved in the creation and implementation of public policy System-environment approach- focus on general process and interaction between inputs, decision-making, outputs, feedback and the environment Structural-functional approach – focus on the process within each step in the system - the who and how each of inputs, decisions and outputs AND the evaluation of the effectiveness of the entire system in maintaining the regime and providing for the satisfaction of its people Typology approach – focus on comparing the various types of gov’t from authoritarian to democratic. Here system theory is augmented by categorization to better evaluate the success of various types and their strengths and weaknesses relative to each other Historical Approach – looking at the past to better understand where the political system will go in the future. Probably includes study of the political culture as it interacts with the political system

inputs Decision- making outputs Feedback

inputs Decision- making outputs Feedback History and culture

articulation aggregation Policy making implementation Policy functions System Functions Foreign state

Legitimacy A significant segment of the citizenry must believe that the state acts with some moral authority. People believe that the state has the right to issue rules binding for people within their borders - Kesselman People believe that rules should be followed voluntarily because they are in the best interests of all citizens. – Palmer People have the feeling that the regime’s rule is rightful and should be obeyed.- Roskin Some key legitimizing factors – Transparency, free elections, compatibility of system with culture, open and free press, economic success, improved living standards, rule of law, access to quality public services, civil rights, responsiveness to inputs, civil society, accountability, political efficacy,