Benchmarking Compensation & Benefits: How Do You Compare? Christina L. Greathouse, Ph.D. Strategic Performance Group April 30, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Market Pricing Organizations seek to offer market based pay rates in order to attract and retain competent employees There are two basic methods to recognize.
Advertisements

Compensation 101 Today’s lesson plan: Compensation How To Use Market Data To Support Your Compensation Philosophy.
COMPENSATION STRATEGIES FOR NONPROFITS October 30, 2008 Bay Area Nonprofit HR Network San Francisco, CA.
P.O.C.C. Presentation P.O.C.C. Compensation Overview Maggie Wollaston, SPHR Laurie Grenya DAS HRSD Classification and Compensation Unit.
Market Based Pay System The Market Based Pay System Project.
Faculty & Staff Compensation Programs Board of Regents Meeting
Values and At Our Best tools to guide us Collaboration – We work together Integrity – We build confidence and trust in all interactions.
Human Resources Peer Network Fundamentals of Compensation and Utilizing the CPCA Compensation & Benefits Survey April 3, 2014 Presented by: Brenda Gilchrist,
Fox, Lawson & Associates Compensation Study Summary Findings
A Roundtable Discussion: Market Based Pay Structures for “Reality Based” Pay July 2005.
Pay For Performance: Managing Pay Systems Across Organizations
COMPENSATION - OVERVIEW WHAT IS COMPENSATION? PURPOSES BASES FOR COMPENSATION HOW TO IMPLEMENT? TRENDS.
TRADITIONAL COMPENSATION SYSTEM  PAYMENT BASED ON TASKS  ASSUMES STABILITY OF EMPLOYMENT  REWARDS INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTIONS  PRIMARILY WAGES, SALARIES,
1 Position Evaluation is the foundation of Pay Program Design Exempt Pay Program Design.
Human Resource Management TENTH EDITON © 2003 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook Compensation.
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible Web site, in whole or in part.11–1.
Management Forum Presentation November 3, 2008 Lynne Gervais, Associate Vice-Principal Human Resources 1.
1 Surveying Market Pay Just as skill, effort, responsibility, and working conditions have been used to differentiate rates of pay among major job groupings,
Total Rewards and Compensation
© 2010 McGraw Hill Ryerson 8-1 COMPENSATION Third Canadian Edition Milkovich, Newman, Cole.
STAFF COMPENSATION PROGRAM TOWN HALL MEETINGS FEBRUARY 2004.
Competitive Market Compensation Review July 2009 Project Overview.
FAR Roundtable Luncheon Program Developing Market – Based Pay Practices March 22, 2006 Jim Moss Managing Director.
Prentice Hall, Inc. © A Human Resource Management Approach STRATEGIC COMPENSATION Prepared by David Oakes Chapter 8 Building Market-Competitive.
Market Pay. Company’s Compensation Strategy Example: Base Pay will lag market (25 th percentile) Base Pay will lag market (25 th percentile) Base + Target.
Compensation management “Attracting, retaining and motivating magic people”
Chapter 9 Determining Pay and Benefits.
Erin Packwood 2005 Competitive Compensation Review Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) January 17, 2006.
Staff Compensation Program – Phase 2 Internal Equity Adjustments October 2005.
Cash, Bonuses, Insurance,
Compensation System Development
Non-Academic Staff Compensation Program Employee Presentation 2013.
Promotional Guidelines Key Findings from the WorldatWork Survey of Promotional Guidelines, 2010 © 2011 WorldatWork. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2006 by The Survey Group One Pope Street, Suite 200 Wakefield, MA (781) All Rights Reserved. The Survey.
1 ACC FY07 Classification and Compensation Study.
OPEN – C&HR – INFO 1-2 UM Total Rewards Update Board of Curators January 29 - February 1, 2014.
By: Juan P. Garcia Organizational Research Services Director EMPLOYER OF CHOICE Total Rewards, Trends and Plan Design Take a Chomp Out of Your Comp!
Compensating Employees Definition Objective Bases Types Determining Reward Job Evaluation Compensation Structure.
Compensation Project Faculty & Staff Compensation Programs Board of Regents Finance Committee Meeting Project Overview
Collecting Market Data Presented to NPELRA April 15, 2002 Bruce G. Lawson, CCP Fox Lawson & Associates LLC (602)
© 2009 South-Western Cengage. All rights reserved. Chapter 7 Compensation Strategies and Practices.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-1 Compensating Employees 7.
Compensating Employees Definition Objective Bases Types Determining Reward Job Evaluation Compensation Structure.
Reward Systems By H.V.Kothari. Total Compensation System MonetaryNonmonetary OrganizationMembership Individual or Team Attributes Job or Position Mandatory.
1 Fall Managing TXSTATE For Supervisors Office of Human Resources 601 University Drive Suite340 J. C. Kellam Bldg San Marcos, Texas Classification.
-09/06/13, - Page 1 The Ohio State University - Classification and Compensation Talking Points - CONFIDENTIAL – for internal use only -  Compensation.
Establishing Strategic Pay Plans
Chapter 5 Compensation & Benefits
Compease Staff Salary Administration Program. Compease - General A fully qualified and effective work force is essential to the College’s success Fundamental.
Compensation Management. Compensation Employee compensation – refers to extrinsic and intangible rewards. – refers to all forms of pay or rewards going.
Chapter 9 Managing Compensation
Compensation Study Preliminary Results Overview Presented by: CBIZ Human Capital Services October 26, 2015.
Establishing Strategic Pay Plans
Customised Solutions Sample Reports 2009 Australia.
11-1 McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. fundamentals of Human Resource Management 4 th edition by.
Managing Compensation By Muhammad Zohaib Sufyan SZABIST.
© 2008 by Prentice Hall9-1 Human Resource Management Chapter 9 DIRECT FINANCIAL COMPENSATION.
Compensation Study Preliminary Results Presented by: CBIZ Human Capital Services January 11, 2016.
Creating a Salary Structure 101
Discussion on Compensation. Goal To assist in securing and retaining a staff of necessary quality to achieve the goals and objectives of the organization.
Fair Pay for Northern California Nonprofits: The 2016 Compensation & Benefits Survey HIGHLIGHTS AND TRENDS May 12, 2016 Sponsored by CompassPoint Nonprofit.
City of Galveston Classification & Compensation Study Discussion Preliminary Findings and Recommendations.
Managing Compensation Chapter 10 MGT 3513 “The thermometer of success is merely the jealousy of the malcontents.” Salvador Dali.
Building Market- Competitive Compensation Systems MGT 4543 Compensation Management Chapter 7.
Wage and Salary Management
Compensation Structure and Merit Process
Compensation: Creating an Equitable and Market-driven Pay System
Managing Compensation Chapter 10
Fox, Lawson & Associates Compensation Study Summary Findings
LUHR Compensation Program.
Presentation transcript:

Benchmarking Compensation & Benefits: How Do You Compare? Christina L. Greathouse, Ph.D. Strategic Performance Group April 30, 2008

Copyright SPG 2 Benchmarking Comp & Benefits Determining compensation objectives Choosing sources of data Choosing comparable organizations Matching your positions to benchmark jobs Using multiple data points Deciding which statistics to use Aging the data

Copyright SPG 3 Benchmarking Comp & Benefits Determining your market position Making market adjustments Developing pay ranges Paying for performance Calculating operating ratios Benchmarking your benefits Communicating total compensation information

Copyright SPG 4 Determining Compensation Objectives To achieve internal equity, ensuring that employees are paid fairly in relation to one another. To achieve external equity, ensuring that employees are paid fairly and competitively in relation to the external marketplace. To develop pay management practices that are fair, objective, transparent and legally defensible. To develop a compensation process and system that can be easily maintained and updated.

Copyright SPG 5 Internal Equity Job Evaluation: Determining the relative worth of jobs in order to establish which jobs should be paid more than others within an organization Job Ranking Job Classification Point System Work Valuation

Copyright SPG 6 External Equity: Sources of Data 1.The American Society of Association Executives Compensation and Benefits Study 2.PRM Consulting Management Compensation Report for Not-for-Profit Organizations 3.Cordom Associates Salary Survey of Nonprofit Organizations 4.Human Resources Association – Washington Capital Area (HRA-WCA) Compensation Survey Report 5.U.S. Mercer Benchmark Database 6.SalarySource.com 7.National Journal Biennial Salary Survey 8.National Compensation Study – Association Chief Staff Executives (American Research Company)

Copyright SPG 7 Choosing Comparable Organizations Industry Size of budget Number of employees Location Individual versus institutional members Tax status

Copyright SPG 8 Matching Your Jobs to Benchmark Jobs Scope Experience required Education required Supervisory responsibility Multi-function jobs

Copyright SPG 9 Deciding Which Data to Use Mean: Average Median: Midpoint/50 th Percentile - figure above and below which half of the reported compensation figures fall 25 th Percentile: figure above which 75% of the reported compensation figures fall 75 th Percentile: figure above which 25% of the reported compensation figures fall

Copyright SPG 10 Arriving at a Market Price Take the median or average of the data based on two or more “cuts”: Location Size (budget and/or # of employees) Industry Type of organization

Copyright SPG 11 Arriving at a Market Price 50 th %75 th % WDC$283,600$432,800 Trade Assn.$361,800$619,000 $30M-$60M$306,000$369, Emp.$307,000$393,800 MEDIAN:$306,000$413,300 AVERAGE:$314,350$453,750

Copyright SPG 12 Aging the Data Increases for executive staff ranged from 4.6% to 5.3% in Increases for managers/supervisors averaged 4% in Increases for other staff averaged 3.9% in

Copyright SPG 13 Determining Your Market Position ASAEPRMHRAAVG.YOUR ORG. DIFF. $56.2$62.1$71.4$63.2$72.214% $85.8$97.1$73.9$85.6$80.1-6% $127.1$156.7$141.3$141.7$ %

Copyright SPG 14 Adjustments to Market Price QUALIFICATIONS PERFORMANCE Entry-Level, Little or No Experience Lacks Some Position Quals Meets Position Quals Above Average Quals Extremely Well Qualified Needs Improvement -20%-15%-10%-5%__ Partially Meets Expectations -15%-10%-5%__+5% Meets Expectations -10%-5%__+5%+10% Exceeds Expectations -5%__+5%+10%+15% Significantly Exceeds Expectations __+5%+10%+15%+20%

Copyright SPG 15 Developing Pay Ranges MinMidMax Grade 1$32,000$40,000$48,000 Grade 2$36,800$46,000$55,200 Grade 3$42,320$52,900$63,480 Grade 4$48,668$60,835$73,002 Grade 5$55,968$69,960$83,952

Copyright SPG 16 Merit Increases MARKET POSITION PERFORMANCE Below 50% Percentile 50 th to 75 th Percentile Above 50 th Percentile Unsatisfactory 0% Needs Improvement 0%- 2.8%0%-2%0% Meets Expectations 3.5% - 4.5%3.0% - 3.5%2.5% - 3.0% Exceeds Expectations 5.0%- 6.0%4.0%- 5.0%3.0%- 4.0% Significantly Exceeds Expectations 6.5%- 8.0%5.0%- 6.5%4.0%- 5.0%

Copyright SPG 17 Operating Ratios Total staff compensation (exempt & non-exempt FTEs): Total revenue Staff size (FTEs): Total revenue Employee benefits costs: Total revenue Employee benefits costs: Total staff compensation

Copyright SPG 18 Benchmarking Benefits Sources of Data: 1.The American Society of Association Executives Compensation and Benefits Study 2.PRM Consulting Management Compensation Report for Not-for-Profit Organizations 3.Cordom Associates Biennial Benefit Survey of Nonprofit Organizations

Copyright SPG 19 Benchmarking Benefits Benefit Description Orgs with Emps Your Org Your Org vs Market Avg. % healthcare premium paid by employer 80%100%+ Avg. unmatched employer contribution to 401(k) 7%0%_ Long-term care 9%Yes+ Health Club Membership 15%No= Flexible Work Arrangements 50%Yes=

Copyright SPG 20 Total Compensation Statements BenefitEmployer CostEmployee Cost Medical/Dental$4,565$910 Disability/Life$1,245___ 401(k) Match$8,194___ Salary/Bonus$65,654 TOTAL COMP$79,658

Copyright SPG 21 Contact Information Chris Greathouse Strategic Performance Group 8000 Towers Crescent Drive, Suite 300 Vienna, VA – Main phone number – Direct phone number