Proposed National Unified Goal For Traffic Incident Management Working Together for Improved Safety, Clearance and Communications.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ohio QuickClear Ohio Fire Chiefs' Association Annual Conference
Advertisements

Michigan Highway Strategic Safety Plan and SHRP 2 TIM Training Angie Kremer, P.E. Michigan Department of Transportation Traffic Incident Management Engineer.
Brought to you by GOVERNANCE AND LOCAL GROUPS ORGANISATION IN THE US.
 Definition  Goals  Elements  Roles and Responsibilities  Accomplishments.
Mobility and Safety Product Team (Work Zones). Integrated Product Teams “Integrated Product Teams (IPT’s) are chartered by agency leadership to address.
Ohio QuickClear TIM Training subtitle. QuickClear Committee AAA Ohio Buckeye State Sheriff’s Association Ohio Association of Chiefs of Police Ohio Department.
Use of Traffic Incident Management in Intelligent Traffic Systems Mark Meints Emergency Program Specialist Nebraska Department of Roads.
Integrated Corridor Management Overview and Status Mike Freitas ICM Initiative Coordinator U.S. DOT ITS Joint Program Office.
Traffic Incident Management (TIM) Mark Meints NDOR Emergency Program Specialist.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Performance Management.
BIO Az DPS Assignments Masters from Northern Arizona University
SHRP2/Mi-TIME TIM Training
11 th International Symposium Loss Prevention and Process Safety Promotion in the Process Industries 1 OECD Workshop on Sharing Experience in the Training.
Highway Incident Management Training Guide 4 th Technical Review Panel Meeting Illinois Department of Transportation June 21, 2010 TRP Meeting 6/21/101.
A Guide to Emergency Response Planning at State Transportation Agencies NCHRP Project 20-59(23) Published as NCHRP Report 525, Vol. 16.
ICM San Antonio – IH-10 Corridor Brian Fariello, TxDOT.
Proposed National Unified Goal For Traffic Incident Management Working Together for Improved Safety, Clearance and Communications.
MAINTENANCE & TRAFFIC OPERATION INCIDENT MANAGEMENT.
What is ITS ? Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) means electronics, communications, or information processing used singly or in combination: to enhance.
Proposed National Unified Goal For Traffic Incident Management Working Together for Improved Safety, Clearance and Communications.
MODULE 2 ROLES AND PROCEDURES
ITS America 2007 Annual Meeting Session 41 Traffic Incident Management A Top-Down Vision Charles E. Wallace, Ph.D., P.E.
FHWA10/1/ MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES REWRITE AND OUTREACH EFFORT TARGET DATE: 2001.
Md Sakoat Hossan, Research Assistant Xia Jin, PhD, Assistant Professor A Comprehensive Framework for Traffic Incident Management Program Planning and Assessment.
A Few Quick Items from AASHTO June 2006 Jim McDonnell, PE Associate Program Director, Engineering.
Prepared by the TIME Task Force Operations Committee 1 T.I.M. TEAMS T.I.M. TEAMS TIM Traffic Incident Management Team.
SHRP 2 National TIM Responder Training Changing Traffic Incident Management by Training a Nation of Responders…
I-95 Corridor Coalition Quick Clearance Program ITS Georgia Annual & Tennessee TSITE Quarterly Meeting September 25, 2006 Chattanooga, Tennessee.
New Perspectives, Innovative Strategies and Integrated Approaches NTOC Talking Operations Web Conference June–July 2008 MANAGING TRAVEL DEMAND TO MITIGATE.
Getting Results from Regional Traffic Incident Management Teams Southwest Florida T I M Teams Collier - Lee - Charlotte and Sarasota - Manatee.
Metro Atlanta Traffic Incident Management “Strategic Vision Update” Presented by Marvin Woodward TIME Quarterly Meeting January 23, 2007.
October 17, 2012 Connie S. Sorrell Chief of Systems Operations.
Implementation Overview SHRP 2 Oversight Committee June 18, 2012.
US DOT Planning for Operations Initiative – An Update AASHTO SCOH Annual Meeting June 14-17, 2009 Manchester, NH Rick Backlund – FHWA Office of Operations.
Working Together to Save Lives An Introduction to the FHWA Safety Program for FHWA’s Safety Partners.
Module Funding Sources, Requirements, and Opportunities Identify, access, and share funding to support road safety initiatives.
Towards Zero Deaths: A National Strategy on Highway Safety Tony Kane Director, Engineering and Technical Services AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan.
TSAG Briefing To ITS America Safety Forum Dia Gainor, TSAG Chair.
1 Operations Academy Senior Management Program Next Offering September 16-26, 2008.
Guidance and Support of ITS Programs Michael Freitas May 2000 US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration.
N ATIONAL T RAFFIC I NCIDENT M ANAGEMENT (TIM) R ESPONDER T RAINING LAW ENFORCEMENT | FIRE | EMS | TRANSPORTATION TOWING & RECOVERY | COMMUNICATIONS.
Traffic Incident Management Program AASHTO SSOM Meeting April 9, 2013 AASHTO SSOM Meeting April 9, 2013.
Omaha – Council Bluffs 2010 Traffic Forum. What is Traffic Incident Management? Traffic Incident Management Refers to the coordinated, preplanned, procedures.
National Transportation Operations Coalition (NTOC) Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration NAWG Meeting.
INFRASTRUCTURE, OPERATIONS & SAFETY A. George Ostensen FHWA Office of Safety 8 January 2005 White House Conference on Aging Listening Session USDOT- FHWA.
Fig 1. Sample SHSPs and signing of the SAFETEA-LU Legislation supporting EMS’s SHSP role, August 10, 2005 Strategic Highway Safety Plans: Where is EMS?
1 Using Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Technologies and Strategies to Better Manage Congestion Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator of.
Regional Concept of Transportation Operations: The Hampton Roads Experience Presented by: Camelia Ravanbakht, PhD Talking Technology & Transportation (T3)
1 Federal Highway Administration, USDOT The Final Rule on Work Zone Safety and Mobility Updates to 23 CFR Section 630, Subpart J Presented by Tracy Scriba,
Economic Impact of an Incident In Highway Scene Management.
5/8/02FHWA Office of Safety1 FHWA Safety Core Business Unit Office-Level Structure Develops and manages programs for the safe operation of roadways, bicycle.
Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration US Department of Transportation Congestion Initiative Update I-95.
Florida’s Traffic Incident Management Program A Plan For Success Florida’s TIM Strategic Plan Paul Clark – Florida DOT Traffic Incident Management and.
Regional Concept for Transportation Operations: An action plan to address transportation operations in Southeast Michigan Talking Technology & Transportation.
IntegratedCorridorManagement 1 Integrated Corridor Management Overview and Activities Jeff Lindley Director, Office of Transportation Management FHWA February.
December 16, :00 – 2:45. MPM Team Agenda 1.Review of MPM Program and Team 2.Consensus items document 3. Upcoming activities 4. Discussion.
Introduction Highway Scene Management Training. Training Objectives 1. Define "Roadway Clearance" and explain its importance to those traveling on NC.
A National Unified Goal for Traffic Incident Management (TIM): What is it, and why is it needed? ITS PCB T3 Webinar September 11, 2008.
Integrated Corridor Management Initiative Dale Thompson Transportation Specialist Office of Operations R&D May 4, 2005.
AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan Development & Implementation Status 2004 Traffic Records Forum David M. Smith Senior Transportation Specialist, Office.
SAFETEA-LU Section 1201 Real-Time System Management Information 23 CFR Part 511 AASHTO SSOM Task Force on Systems Operations Performance Measures 9 April.
State of ITS Industry in a Time of Change Session Annual Meeting of TRB Christine M. Johnson.
Authority Removal or “Remove It” Laws These laws provide authority (and immunity from liability in general) for designated public agencies to remove abandoned.
1 USDOT Congestion Initiative Baltimore – Washington Regional Traffic Signal Forum Maritime Institute Linthicum, MD March 14, 2007 Regina McElroy Director,
FHWA Update SHRP2 Implementation and Other Agency TSMO R&D Efforts Tracy Scriba, FHWA 12/8/15 1.
NATIONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Department of Homeland Security Executive Office of Public Safety.
Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) February 5, 2003.
National Emergency Communications Plan Update National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners Winter Committee Meeting February 16, 2015 Ron Hewitt.
Missouri Traffic Safety and Blueprint Conference October 19, 2016
FHWA TSMO / SHRP2 Research
Presentation transcript:

Proposed National Unified Goal For Traffic Incident Management Working Together for Improved Safety, Clearance and Communications

Overview What is the National TIM Coalition? Where did the concept of the National Unified Goal for TIM come from? What is the Goal & how will it be attained? How will the Goal support state & local TIM programs?

 1960’s& 70’s Freeway Traffic Management Systems Pilot Freeway Service Patrols  1980’s More Freeway Service Patrols USDOT TIM Handbooks of Best Practices  1990’s TIM Research & National Committees Nationwide Metro TIM Conferences  2000’s National TIM Conference (2002) Formation of the NTIMC (2004) Origins of the NTIMC

NTIMC Member Organizations Transportation (AASHTO, ATA/ATRI, ATSSA, FHWA, ITE, ITSA, I-95 CC, TRB, AMPO) Fire & Rescue (Emergency Responder Safety Institute, IAFC, IAFF, IFSTA, NFPA, NVFC, USFA) Emergency Medical Services (NASEMSO) Public Safety Communications (APCO, NENA) Towing & Recovery (TRAA, AAA) Law Enforcement (IACP)

NTIMC Early Actions High Visibility Vest Standard for Public Safety Responders Input to Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Devices NCHRP Research Guidance & Recommendations European Scanning Tour

European TIM Scan Tour: Locations Visited  Countries & cities England  Birmingham Germany  Ahrweiler, Cologne, Bergisch- Gladbach The Netherlands  Delft, Arnhem Sweden  Stockholm Two weeks in April 2005

Concept of a “National Unified Goal”  Consensus document vs Federal policy mandate  Field-up vs Top-down  Fundamental “20-80” vs Comprehensive vision  Actionable vs Idealistically constitutional  Flexible & incremental vs Rigid “all or nothing”

NUG Development Process 1.Listening Sessions – Summer, Topical TIM Expert White Papers – Fall, “Strawman” Draft NUG – Fall, NUG Development Conference – November, NUG Finalization – January-February, NTIMC Release of Proposed NUG - March, NUG Ratification by Coalition Organizations - Underway 8.Release of Final NUG at Joint Press Event- Fall,2007

What is the National Unified Goal Traffic Incident Management? The Traffic Incident Management National Unified GOAL is: Responder Safety; Safe, Quick Clearance; and Prompt, Reliable, Interoperable Communications.

6Foundational Cross-cutting Strategies NUG Framework 3 Objectives 12 Core Strategies

NUG Objective 1 Responder Safety  Responder deaths and injuries are an increasing concern. >300 law enforcement officers die in vehicle incidents each year. >20% annual firefighter deaths occur on roadways. 5 towing industry struck-by deaths in first 3 months of 2006.

NUG Objective 1 Responder Safety NUG Strategies for promoting Responder Safety are: Recommended Practices for Responder Safety; Move Over / Slow Down Laws; and Driver Training and Awareness.

NUG Objective 2 Safe, Quick Clearance Non-recurring traffic incidents account for one- fourth of congestion and delay. 1 minute of Interstate lane blockage = 4 minutes of delay. TIM promotes quicker clearance, but not at the expense of responder safety, or of achievement of the missions of all responders.

NUG Objective 2 Safe, Quick Clearance NUG Strategies for promoting Safe, Quick Clearance are: Multidisciplinary TIM Procedures; Response and Clearance Time Goals; and 24 / 7 Availability.

NUG Objective 3 Prompt, Reliable, Interoperable Communications Improving incident communications is essential to achieving other goals. Because incident communications is both important and complex, it is highlighted as the third NUG objective.

NUG Strategies for promoting Prompt, Reliable, Interoperable Communications are:  Multidisciplinary Communications Practices & Protocols  Prompt, Reliable Responder Notification  Interoperable Voice and Data Networks  Broadband Emergency Communications Systems  Prompt, Reliable Traveler Information Systems  Partnerships with News Media and Information Providers NUG Objective 3 Prompt, Reliable, Interoperable Communications

6 NUG Cross-Cutting “Foundation” Strategies 6 NUG Strategies are cross-cutting. These strategies are the foundation for achieving all 3 major objectives of the NUG.  Multidisciplinary NIMS-based TIM Training  Awareness & Education Partnerships  TIM Technology  Goals for Performance and Progress  Effective TIM Policies  State & Regional TIM Partnerships and Programs

How Will We Achieve the National Unified Goal ? NTIMC will achieve the three major objectives of the National Unified Goal by implementing 18 strategies through the following Immediate Actions:  “Officially” approve NUG for media rollout event  Define & document recommended practices  Define themes for public awareness  Support a pilot multidisciplinary training program

NUG Value to TIM Programs Less costly program development, avoid reinventing the wheel More efficient & consistent training Framework for comparing efforts & practices Common tools for TIM program promotion Leveraged national opportunities for driver awareness

TIM Opportunities & Threats Opportunities Resonance with NIMS Emergency Preparedness Program Linkages – Safety, Freight, Work Zones Threats Lack of Respect Lack of Trust Arrogance

FOR MORE INFORMATION NTIMC Web Site  Proposed NUG  Proposed NUG Detail  NUG Technical Papers