15-6-2013Sample Fetching Rover All rights reserved, 2013, Thales Alenia Space Template reference : 100181708K-EN SAMPLE FETCHING ROVER (SFR) FOR MSR Andrea.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
POLICY Space Export Controls Update Since Delivering the 1248 Report to Congress - April 2012 −Congress added language into the FY13 National Defense Authorization.
Advertisements

ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use ExoMars ESWT#7 9 Dec ESWT # Rover science preparations (RSM, LS) Status, problems, and how we will solve.
6 th International Planetary Probe Workshop, Atlanta, Georgia Short Course on Extreme Environments Technologies 06/ Preliminary - For Discussion.
DOC-TAS-EN-002 ExoMars-2018 DM Entry Decent Landing LSSWS# December 2014 Turin.
ODS3F –Observation and Detection Systems For Forest Fire Monitoring
All rights reserved, 2007, Thales Alenia Space EXOMARS Industry Day Carrier Module Presentation Thales Alenia Space- Italia (Turin)
07/07/2005 Coupling with PF2012: No existing PF “as is” able to accommodate Karin On going study in France to develop a new generation of PF product line.
PLATO Phase A/B1 Status TOU Meeting Catania 28 Feb 2011 PLAnetary Transits and Oscillation of stars.
Polar Highly Elliptical / Molniya Orbit Science (PHEMOS) Mission Phase 0/A Studies Mid-Term Review Meetings January 12-14th, 2011.
SATELLITES What They Do and How They Work Michael J. Mackowski Aerospace Engineer October 2013 With Updates from Shawn Shepherd.
The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) is the first mission in NASA's Vision for Space Exploration, a plan to return to the moon and then to travel to.
The Lander is at a 25 km Lunar altitude and an orbital period of approximately 110 minutes. After separation occurs the Lander is completely self sufficient.
Long Term Science working group status LSWT Venice, 30/03-01/04/2009.
MAXIM Power Subsystem Diane Yun Vickie Moran NASA/GSFC Code (IMDC) 8/19/99.
Autonomous Landing Hazard Avoidance Technology (ALHAT) Page 1 March 2008 Go for Lunar Landing Real-Time Imaging Technology for the Return to the Moon Dr.
Navigation Systems for Lunar Landing Ian J. Gravseth Ball Aerospace and Technologies Corp. March 5 th, 2007 Ian J. Gravseth Ball Aerospace and Technologies.
Flying, Hopping and Perching Microbots for Extreme Environment Exploration Deployed Using CubeSats Jekan Thanga 1, Jim Bell 1 Space and Terrestrial Robotic.
Presented at the Colorado Undergraduate Space Research Symposium April 20, 2013 Aurora, CO Team Charlie: Aaron Bartelt Stacie Noetzelmann Philip Jurney.
Status GRACE Mission Operations 1 GSTM – Potsdam - 15 October 2007 Status GRACE Mission Operations Joseph G. Beerer, JPL Operations Mission Manager Franz-Heinrich.
Author Name Page 1 CNES’07 Peer Review 4/17/02 CNES’07 Mars Premier Peer Review Rendezvous and Sample Capture OS Beacon Electronics And Power System Mark.
LHC Beam Screen Heaters: System overview, consolidation needs and project planning 4 February TE-CRG/JCC (Beam Screen Heater Review) 1.
“ PHOBOS - SOIL ” Phobos Sample Return Mission 1. goals, methods of study A.Zakharov, Russian academy of sciences Russian aviation.
The Rover Concept for the ESA ExoMars Mission
A Simple Entry, Descent, and Floating System for Planetary Ballooning Daisuke Akita Tokyo Institute of Technology.
1 wp4 – Technical Issues for payload integration within the Nacelle for High Altitude flight Budapest 24/11/04 Marco Bobbio Pallavicini Carlo Gavazzi Space.
Alternatives Concepts White Paper IPT 02E. Project Management The University of Alabama Huntsville Team LeaderEddie Kiessling StructuresNathan Coffee.
1 Formation Flying Shunsuke Hirayama Tsutomu Hasegawa Aziatun Burhan Masao Shimada Tomo Sugano Rachel Winters Matt Whitten Kyle Tholen Matt Mueller Shelby.
ReVeal Passive Illumination by Radar (PAIR). Overview Payload / Mission Communication Launch Orbit Power Thermal Attitude Propulsion Finance.
Tielong Zhang On behalf of the CGS Team in the Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Science Spacecraft System and Payload China Geomagnetism.
20a - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Attitude Control System (ACS) Eric Holmes, Code 591 Joe Garrick, Code 595 Jim Simpson, Code 596 NASA/GSFC August.
Van Allen Probes Spacecraft Operations July 29, 2015 Kristin Fretz
LUNAR ROVER Concept proposal meeting Dr. Ashish Dutta Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur Kanpur, INDIA ( *** for private circulation only)
Colorado Space Grant1 DINO Safety Review DINO Communications Team: Hosam Ghaith Mike Li Zach Allen.
Bits and Pieces. Spacecraft Systems Propulsion –Already discussed Communications Science instruments Power.
Mars Exploration Rover MER Surface Lifetime Presented at Landing Site Selection Workshop #3 March 26-28, 2002 J. Matijevic 3/28/02.
Back to TITAN 24/06/2008 All rights reserved, 2007, Thales Alenia Space Template reference : K-EN TITAN probes following CASSINI - HUYGENS Denis.
FIRST/Planck 12 December 2000PT The FIRST Mission Implementation Status and Schedule T. Passvogel The Promise of FIRST.
Mars Exploration Rovers (MER) Entry, Descent, Landing, and Deployment.
Lunar Drilling and Driving Carnegie Mellon December 2007 Red Whittaker.
By: Christiano Daniel Abadi. Deliverables/Achievements in Spring 2000: 8 Systems Engineering Documents Overall and power budgets Gantt Chart for Preliminary.
DINO PDR 23 October 2015 DINO Systems Team Jeff Parker Anthony Lowrey.
Minimalist Mars Mission Establishing a Human Toehold on the Red Planet Executive Summary DevelopSpace MinMars Team.
PSB dump: proposal of a new design EN – STI technical meeting on Booster dumps Friday 11 May 2012 BE Auditorium Prevessin Alba SARRIÓ MARTÍNEZ.
Universal Chassis for Modular Ground Vehicles University of Michigan Mars Rover Team Presented by Eric Nytko August 6, 2005 The 2 nd Mars Expedition Planning.
Human Exploration of Mars Design Reference Architecture 5
USAFA Department of Astronautics I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Astro 331 Thermal Control Subsystem (TCS)—Intro Lesson 37 Spring.
Mars Exploration Rover Science Goals Determine whether Life ever arose on Mars Characterize the Climate of Mars Characterize the Geology of Mars Prepare.
Goals for this Meeting: Day 1 Day 2 Update the community on progress in the exploration of Mars, including NASA and the European Space Agency (missions.
Basic Satellite Communication (3) Components of Communications Satellite Dr. Joseph N. Pelton.
Astrium ‘Robotics and Autonomy’ Test facilities - hardware and software verification - for 28 Feb 2012 Harwell meeting. Tony Jorden Elie Allouis.
Mars Sample Return Discussions As presented on February 23, 2010
Rover and Instrument Capabilities Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop Michael Wagner, James Teza, Stuart Heys Robotics Institute, Carnegie.
Robotics and Autonomy Test Facility - Hardware Verification needs Elie Allouis HRAF Workshop – 28/02/2012.
Wes Ousley June 28, 2001 SuperNova/ Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Thermal.
MEPAG: Action Items, Forward Planning Jack Mustard, MEPAG Chair MRO HiRISE / U. Arizona / JPL / NASA NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER: This document was prepared.
Colorado State University Paul Scholz, Tyler Faucett, Abby Wilbourn, Michael Somers June
Solar Orbiter EUS: Thermal Design Progress Bryan Shaughnessy, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory 1 Solar Orbiter EUV Spectrometer Thermal Design Progress Bryan.
Nine Years of Atmospheric Remote Sensing with SCIAMACHY – Instrument Performance Gottwald, Krieg, Lichtenberg, Slijkhuis – DLR-IMF Noël, Bramstedt, Bovensmann,
Micro Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Mechanical George Roach Dave Peters 17 May 2002 “Technological progress is like an axe in the.
Pre-decisional – for Planning and Discussion Purposes Only 1 Technology Planning for Future Mars Missions Samad Hayati Manager, Mars Technology Program.
Study of the HTS Insert Quench Protection M. Sorbi and A. Stenvall 1 HFM-EuCARD, ESAC meeting, WP 7.4.1CEA Saclay 28 feb. 2013,
Power Philip Luers NASA/GSFC Code 561 August 16-17, 2005.
Rosetta Science Working Team Meeting #26 Working Group #1
Planetary Lander PDR Team Name
Design of the thermosiphon Test Facilities 2nd Thermosiphon Workshop
CINEMA System Engineering
ECSS-E-ST-50-15C Adoption Notice
REQUIREMENTS FOR MISSIONS towards europa
5. Conclusions and future work
CHEOPS - CHaracterizing ExOPlanet Satellite
Presentation transcript:

Sample Fetching Rover All rights reserved, 2013, Thales Alenia Space Template reference : K-EN SAMPLE FETCHING ROVER (SFR) FOR MSR Andrea MERLO

Page Sample Fetching Rover All rights reserved, 2013, Thales Alenia Space CONTENTS Agenda 1 - Team Presentation 2 - Systems Design  Why SFR?  What  When  Where  Design Drivers  Key Features  SFR System Overview  Mission Timeline  Mission Feasibility  Critical Technologies to be developed (MREP/MREP2)

Page Sample Fetching Rover All rights reserved, 2013, Thales Alenia Space TEAM PRESENTATION 58.4% 25%8.3%5%3.3%

Page Sample Fetching Rover All rights reserved, 2013, Thales Alenia Space WHY SFR? The proposed Mars Sample Return (MSR) mission would be a campaign of three missions: 1. a sample caching mission (2018), which would cache rock cores for later pickup 2. a MSR Orbiter Mission (2022), which would return the OS to the Earth’s surface MSR Campaign 3a. a MSR Lander Mission (2024), which would retrieve the sample (through the SFR) and place it in Mars orbit in the form of a container called the OS 3b. the activity also considers an alternative nominal mission scenario where the SFR is landed separately from the MAV platform and by a Mars Precision Lander (MPL) OR

Page Sample Fetching Rover All rights reserved, 2013, Thales Alenia Space  Departure from the landing point (Mars Lander or proximities in case of MPL)  Cache maximum distance = MSR Lander or MPL landing accuracy ( 7,5km semi-major axis )  Operations: The rover will navigate and transverse from its landing site to the location of a sample cache deposited on the Martian surface by a previous rover mission (e.g. Max-C 2018 MSR mission element) The rover will retrieve and carry the sample cache by using a Cache Acquisition System (CAS) Return to the MAV and possible manipulation of the collected samples WHAT (Nominal) SFR Nominal Mission MAV CACHE 7.5Km

Page Sample Fetching Rover All rights reserved, 2013, Thales Alenia Space  Departure from the landing point (Mars Lander or proximities in case of MPL)  Operations: Identification of the target location by using the PanCam Travel to the target location Target verification and confirmation by using the PanCam Sample Acquisition by using the Sample Acquisition System (SAS) Return to the MAV and possible manipulation of the collected samples. WHAT (Backup) SFR Backup Mission

Page Sample Fetching Rover All rights reserved, 2013, Thales Alenia Space WHEN MI-GEN-20 The SFR surface mission shall start in 09/2025 (Ls 133) FP-GEN-30 The rover nominal mission shall be at least 180 sols SFR operations Ls133 Landing 4/3/2026 1/9/2025 Ls237 End of Mission Optical Depth: first five months of the mission OD=1 (i.e. from 1 Sep 2025 (Ls 133) to 2 Feb 2026 (Ls 218)) and OD=1.5 for the remaining 3 months (i.e. from 2 Feb 2026 (Ls 218) to 4 Mar 2026 (Ls 237)) Solar Conjunction: from 23rd Dec Ls 193- to 26th January Ls 213-, leading to almost 30sols of no communication with Earth OD=1 COMMS NO COMMS OD=1.5

Page Sample Fetching Rover All rights reserved, 2013, Thales Alenia Space WHERE MI-GEN-10 The SFR shall operate at a range of latitude between 5° South and 25° North 5 South 25 North MARS

Page Sample Fetching Rover All rights reserved, 2013, Thales Alenia Space SFR DESIGN DRIVERS MASS & ENVELOPE MOBILITY RELIABILITY - Target Mass for Rover + Payload (SAS or CAS) + margins is 60Kg (FP-GEN-10) - The maximum volume for the rover shall be less than 1 x 1 x 0.7 m3 (FP-GEN-20) - Travel a straight line distance of 15 Km (FP-MOB- 10) in about 110 sols (180 sols for the entire mission FB-GEN-30) - Absolute localisation required to approach the MAV (and the cache for the Nominal Reference Mission) Rover design shall provide single-fault failure tolerance (PS-GEN-10)  loss of SFR means loss of Mars Sample and return Mission primary objective S MALL F AST R ELIABLE

Page Sample Fetching Rover All rights reserved, 2013, Thales Alenia Space KEY FEATURES - SMALL Dimensions STOWEDDEPLOYED MASS Kg ( incl. System Margin )

Page Sample Fetching Rover All rights reserved, 2013, Thales Alenia Space KEY FEATURES - FAST SFR Navigation capabilities: - Discontinuities Threshold0.18 m - Slopes Threshold20 deg - Continuous Navigation - Closed Loop Navigation Speed55 m/h - Ground Track Distance21 Km - Avg. Distance x Sol ~210 m/Sol Travel Distance & Speed

Page Sample Fetching Rover All rights reserved, 2013, Thales Alenia Space KEY FEATURES - RELIABLE In case of an anomaly not recoverable automatically or a missed communication (i.e. no communication with the Orbiter in a Communication Timed Window) the rover switches to Safe Mode. This mode has to be supported during the entire mission for 14 sols in every condition (even Local Dust Storm with OD = 2). The rover is ready for a communication with the Orbiter (communication RX chain always ON night and day), waiting instructions from ground. The rover SW implements Mission Execution Autonomy Level of E3, as defined by ECSS All critical equipments redundant by design and On-board Fault Management Level of F2 as defined by ECSS Reliability

Page Sample Fetching Rover All rights reserved, 2013, Thales Alenia Space KEY FEATURES - PP Planetary Protection SFR is part of a Category V Restricted Return mission (MSR) Restrictions on return of Martian contaminated HW to Earth SFR will not return, but issues must be kept in mind For forward contamination of Mars, SFR must conform to Category IVb requirements Low bioburden and bioburden density Very highly controlled sample handling equipment The SFR subsystems which are involved in the acquisition and delivery of samples (or cache of samples) to be used for life detection must be must carry a bioburden of < 30 spores at a density of < 0.03 spores / m2, or meet levels of biological burden driven by the nature and sensitivity of the particular life ‐ detection experiments The elements of the SFR not involved in sample / cache acquisition and handling shall carry a biological burden of < 5x104 bacterial spores on exposed external and internal surfaces AIT of SAS / CAS in a very highly controlled environment e.g. ISO 3 cabinet Precision cleaning of contact surfaces Permanent Biobarrier to be removed on Mars C.f. Phoenix Biobarrier. Control of individual elements and AIT carried out in a bioburden controlled environment (c.f. Exomars) Each component must be assessed for appropriate bioburden reduction Dry Heat Microbial Reduction preferred as the only qualified process Other options possible as only surface bioburden needs be controlled (e.g. H2O2, IPA wiping) Isolation of volumes by HEPA filters to render them “unaccountable” for bioburden. 11

Page Sample Fetching Rover All rights reserved, 2013, Thales Alenia Space SFR OVERVIEW Executive Summary SubsystemSelected configuration Structure Main body 660 (length) x 600 (width) x 300 (height) mm made by parallelepiped-shaped CRFP sandwich Mechanisms Telescopic Mast + PTU and Spring-actuated Solar Array Hinges Autonomy Autonomy level E3 GNC Continuous navigation, perception based on Stereo Vision, standard equipment without Sun Sensor nor LocCam (i.e. NavCam exploiting Navigation and Localisation, IMU). Redundancy is foreseen for NavCam and IMU (only accelerometers). Absolute localisation performed by Ground using Bundle Adjustment technique. Locomotion Locomotion formula 6 x 6 x 4 and Exomars 3 bogies suspension system. 6 x Flexible wheels (188mm Diameter, 66mm Width, 6mmx12places Grousers). Linear Deployment Mechanism Power Battery: space qualified ABSL 18650NL Solar Array: Area 1.83m 2, organised in 3 panels (fixed 0.71m deployable 0.56m 2 each) with AZUR 3G30 cells (BoL 29.5% EoL 25.5%) PCDU: based on Maximum Power Point “ Tracking (MMPT) with temp measurement SA Regulator and unregulated bus Telecommunication UHF link implemented with monopole antenna and Redundant UHF Transceiver (heritage from MREP DUX development) – hot during day, cold during night Data Handling Two PM in cold redundancy. Each PM (LEON3 based) includes FPGAs for GNC image processing algorithms Thermal Thermal regulation based on an insulated space inside the body, by means of a gas gap, where the internal units (heaters, evaporators, passive LHP) are installed. 3 radiators are placed on the external part of the body - RHU-free Payload PanCam + Cache Acquisition System (CAS) or Sample Acquisition System (SAS) for back-up mission scenario

Page Sample Fetching Rover All rights reserved, 2013, Thales Alenia Space SFR OVERVIEW Configuration - External 6 x Flexible Wheels

Page Sample Fetching Rover All rights reserved, 2013, Thales Alenia Space SFR OVERVIEW Configuration - Internal

Page Sample Fetching Rover All rights reserved, 2013, Thales Alenia Space MISSION FEASIBILITY SFR feasibility objectives The objective is to satisfy 3 main requirements to assess Baseline Mission feasibility: 1.Perform the Baseline Reference Mission within 180 sols, travelling 15Km straight line distance (21Km ground track distance) 2.Support the Safe Sol for the entire mission timeline with OD = 2, or until the Baseline Reference Mission is concluded 3.Support the Hibernation Sol for the entire mission timeline (180 sols) with OD = 2

Page Sample Fetching Rover All rights reserved, 2013, Thales Alenia Space MISSION FEASIBILITY Locomotion Sol Power Modelling X has been computed for all the SA configuration and for the entire mission duration as the minimum value between:  the time window during the sol when the power generated is above the power needed for travelling (+20% Margin) and the coldest wheel temperature is above -60 o C, thus allowing travelling without discharging the Battery and without the need of Locomotion SS heaters  the value computed from the energy budget maximising the X in order to have power consumption = power generated

Page Sample Fetching Rover All rights reserved, 2013, Thales Alenia Space MISSION FEASIBILITY Mission Feasibility Req. 1 Nominal Mission feasibility (both 15Km and 21Km ground track travelling requirement considered) have been assessed Conclusion 1: The Nominal Reference Mission, with the current SFR Design, can be completed within the Mission Lifetime (180 sols) with a SA area of 1.6m 2. However the end of the Mission (sol 149) will be after the Solar Conjunction, introducing problems on Safe Sol sustainability. A SA area of 1.8m 2 is thus the preferred option (Mission ends on sol 111).

Page Sample Fetching Rover All rights reserved, 2013, Thales Alenia Space MISSION FEASIBILITY Safe Sol Power Modelling Mission Feasibility Req. 2 Conclusion 2: The Safe Sol cannot be sustained for the entire lifetime even with 2.0m 2 of Solar Array Area. However the main derived requirement is to sustain the Safe Sol until mission completation, that for SA Area of 1.8m 2 is Sol 111. Thus the requirement is met with a SA Area of 1.8m 2.

Page Sample Fetching Rover All rights reserved, 2013, Thales Alenia Space MISSION FEASIBILITY Hibernation Sol Power Modelling Mission Feasibility Req. 3 Conclusion 3: The Hibernation Sol can be sustained for the entire lifetime with a SA panel area >= 1.8m 2 Note: Battery capacity taken in account for the last sols when the energy need is more than energy generated

Page Sample Fetching Rover All rights reserved, 2013, Thales Alenia Space MISSION FEASIBILITY Conclusions Conclusion 1: The Nominal Reference Mission, with the current SFR Design, can be completed within the Mission Lifetime (180 sols) with a SA area of 1.6m2. However the end of the Mission (sol 149) will be after the Solar Conjunction, introducing problems on Safe Sol sustainability. A SA area of 1.8m2 is thus the preferred option (Mission ends on sol 111). Conclusion 2: The Safe Sol cannot be sustained for the entire lifetime even with 2.0m2 of Solar Array Area. However the main derived requirement is to sustain the Safe Sol until mission completation, that for SA Area of 1.8m2 is Sol 111. Thus the requirement is met with a SA Area of 1.8m2. Conclusion 3: The Hibernation Sol can be sustained for the entire lifetime with a SA panel area >= 1.8m2. The Nominal Reference Mission, with the current SFR Design, can be completed before the Solar Conjunction (sol 111) with a SA area of 1.8m2, while being safe since the Safe Sol can be sustained for all the 111 sols. The SFR will be however able to survive the entire mission lifetime (180 sols) in hibernation mode (with 2 communications per day).

Page Sample Fetching Rover All rights reserved, 2013, Thales Alenia Space CRITICAL TECHNOLOGIES Critical Technologies In the frame of this contract several technologies have been identified which are needed for the SFR development but which have low Technology Readiness Level. A priority has been assigned to each of the technologies, with the following meaning: High: TRL 5 shall be reached by 2014/2015. Critical technology to be developed for SFR since they are part of the design Medium: TRL 5 should be reached by 2014/2015. This is considered a goal as would increase rover capabilities, but not a critical technology blocking the SFR development (not baselined) Low: technologies which should probably bring an increase of rover performances and/or increase of the understanding and confidence on the design and analyses done in this study

Page Sample Fetching Rover All rights reserved, 2013, Thales Alenia Space CRITICAL TECHNOLOGIES Critical Technologies

Page Sample Fetching Rover All rights reserved, 2013, Thales Alenia Space CRITICAL TECHNOLOGIES Critical Technologies

Page Sample Fetching Rover All rights reserved, 2013, Thales Alenia Space CRITICAL TECHNOLOGIES Critical Technologies

Page Sample Fetching Rover All rights reserved, 2013, Thales Alenia Space CRITICAL TECHNOLOGIES Critical Technologies

Page Sample Fetching Rover All rights reserved, 2013, Thales Alenia Space CRITICAL TECHNOLOGIES Critical Technologies

Page Sample Fetching Rover All rights reserved, 2013, Thales Alenia Space CRITICAL TECHNOLOGIES Critical Technologies