Downtown Berkeley Development Feasibility StudyCity of Berkeley City Council Meeting Downtown Berkeley Development Feasibility Study City of Berkeley City.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fifth-Forbes Economic Review Presentation to Downtown Planning Collaborative Fifth-Forbes Economic Review Presentation to Downtown Planning Collaborative.
Advertisements

Bae Housing Nexus Study Pinellas County and the Cities of Clearwater, Largo and St. Petersburg Prepared by Bay Area Economics.
TOD Toolkit: TOD potential at the Hi-Lake Station along Hiawatha Corridor Developed by Support from WORKING DRAFT.
Voluntary Action Camden Open Book Presentation. The Proposal – Open Book Policy To sell land owned by Camden Local Authority to generate funds to reinvest.
Artist Rendering VA Regional Outpatient Clinic On target to be completed in 2012… 1 Patriot Plaza Project Briefing Cape Coral Economic Development.
A Comparison of Residential and Commercial Real Estate Barry Gross Developers Research May 30, 2013.
SDHC City Linkage Fee Stakeholders Meeting November 19,
January 20, 2015 City Council Meeting. Purpose Council direction on moving forward with: Housing linkage fee in short term based on 2009 Study and existing.
Acct Chp 2: (Review in conjunction with Chapter 2 reading) Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution.
Connie Rizzolo Brown Mary Cay Lancaster Lesa Rozmarek Ryan Grabow
Size 2 Acres, sf 420 ft x 220 ft Existing Structure 4 floors underground parking: for 1,100 cars Column grid ~ 35’ Ramps, elevators, and ventilation.
Implementing State Density Bonus Law in Berkeley November 13, 2014 City of Berkeley Planning & Development Department.
Document 51 1 Lansdowne Partnership Plan Business Model Document 5.
Mill Creek Town Center A Proposed Mixed Use Development Mokena, Illinois.
Chapter 23 Commercial Brokerage and Leasing
Chapter 09: Income-Producing Properties: Leases, Rents, and the Market for Space McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
P. Gurstein & A. Lesnikowski, UBC Vancouver Presented At ACSP 2014 Conference.
National Leaders in Real Estate Research Streetcar Economic Development Impact and Projected Ridership Ken Danter The Danter Company Streetcar Working.
505 Congress Street South Boston R E C REATE, LLC Tim Johnson, Jennifer Balkcom, Scott Nguyen, Arvind Pai, Alison Novak, Charu Singh Re-imagining the Boston.
© Cornerstone Partnership 2013 Best Practices in Inclusionary Housing Policy Design.
Fundamental Managerial Accounting Concepts Thomas P. Edmonds Bor-Yi Tsay Philip R. Olds Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All.
Retro-fitting Commercial Buildings A Financing Perspective Date: April 2011 Prepared by: Carbon Solutions Group.
City Federation of Women’s organizations Redevelopment proposal 100 West Seneca Street Julianne Kwon John Norwood Chris Persheff Prajna Rao Affordable.
Parklands Development Agreement. SUBJECT SITE Approved Specific Plan, Annexation, General Plan Amendments & EIR Approved Affordable Housing as part of.
Ch. 4 Long term financial planning and growth. Increasing the market value of a firm will result in growth. and it needs supporting financial policy.
COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION: TECHNICAL STUDY RESULTS Peninsula Clean Energy September 24,2015.
Cost Behaviour, Operating Leverage, and Profitability Analysis Chapter 2.
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. 2008McGraw-Hill/Irwin CHAPTER 2 Cost Behavior, Operating Leverage, and Profitability Analysis.
Central Petaluma Specific Plan TOD Marketplace September 29, 2006.
F O R W A R D L A P O R T E What are the city’s top 3 economic development priorities? n=300.
City of Carrollton Transit Oriented Development January 5, 2008 Peter J. Braster TOD Manager.
Victoria Place Redevelopment Area Paradise Park Downtown Commercial Corridor Professional / Medical Office School Government Offices HOUSING RESOURCE.
+ Parkview Personal Care Home Micheline Gaudet. + Welcome Home.
Alex Lin Emily Schwartz Sarah Snider Kate Wittels.
Affordable Housing Impact Mitigation Program Robert Feldstein, Mayor’s Office of Policy and Innovation September 10, 2015.
Essex Planning Skills 5 Chris Marsh FRICS MRTPI Daniel Kaye BSc (Hons) MRICS 02/12/2015.
WHITE FLINT SECTOR PLAN Financial Analysis, Infrastructure Financing & Economic Benefits.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved CHAPTER7CHAPTER7 CHAPTER7CHAPTER7 Single Family Housing: Pricing, Investment, and.
LCP Amendment No. MAJ-2-12, Item Th15b. Zoning Designations 2007 DTSP City Approved CTO 2007 DTSP Coastal Commission Approved in 2010.
City of Seattle Mandatory Housing Affordability Program A program of Seattle’s Housing Affordability and Livability Agenda.
Chapter Eleven Cost Behavior, Operating Leverage, and Profitability Analysis © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education.
(Crash-Course in understanding the Allen Weiss Excel Pro Forma Model) J. Gunderson Dec12.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Development Appraisal Day 1 Exercises – Part I
Presentation By: OLSON LEE MAYOR’S OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT April 10, 2014.
Planning Commission Work Session February 19, 2015.
Affordable Housing Impact Fees City Council Hearing, Redwood City October 26, 2015.
Form & Function of Metropolitan America WALKABLE URBAN DRIVABLE SUB-URBAN WALKUPS: (Walkable Urban Places) DRVABLE EDGE CITIES WALKABLE NEIGHBORHOODS.
But-For Determination Report & Cost-Benefit Analysis October 14, 2015 Tom Denaway – Assistant Vice President Springsted Incorporated 9229 Ward Parkway,
Building Acquisition Financing 400 East Main Street Public Hearing Stockton City Council/ Stockton Public Financing Authority November 6, 2007 Agenda Item.
Fiscal Impact Analysis – City of Norwalk, Connecticut October 5, 2006 Prepared by:RKG Associates, Inc. Economic, Planning and Real Estate Consultants 277.
Waterfront and Marinship Steering Committee Form Based Zoning A Petaluma Experience 05 March 2009.
Thriving communities, affordable homes. HCA Area Wide Viability Model PAS Viability Skills for Planners – Workshop B January 2011 Graeme Geddes – Planning.
Rezoning Application No Wilson Trailer Park and adjacent parcels: 5, 11, 11B, 13, 13B & 15 Old Fox Hill Road; 16 Severn Street; and 1212, 1224,1226,
ULI Symposium: Central City Commercial Development 1988.
Washington County Market Summary January Morley & McConkie Introduction: - Southern Utah commercial market is tied to new housing construction activity.
if the Housing Commissioner determines that the residential project was not feasible because of the number of inclusionary units and could.
Financing Ekurhuleni Strategic Land Parcels
Creekside Village: MICA, LLC
Commercial Linkage Fee Research
Agenda 15th and Race Project Summary Current Requests
Updates to the Traffic Reduction and Transportation Improvements Fee (TR/TIF) City Council July 24, 2017.
Valley & Third Streets Redevelopment
MARKET ASSESSMENT.
Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. January 30, 2018
City Council Meeting February 26, 2018
Affordable Housing Fees Study
Planning Commission.
EASTERN placer COUNTY NEXUS-BASED AFFORDABLE/Workforce HOUSING FEE
Streetcar Working Group November 13, 2006
Presentation transcript:

Downtown Berkeley Development Feasibility StudyCity of Berkeley City Council Meeting Downtown Berkeley Development Feasibility Study City of Berkeley City Council Meeting October 11, 2011

Downtown Berkeley Development Feasibility StudyCity of Berkeley City Council Meeting Contents Purpose Methodology Assumptions Findings

Downtown Berkeley Development Feasibility StudyCity of Berkeley City Council Meeting Contents Purpose Methodology Assumptions Findings

Downtown Berkeley Development Feasibility StudyCity of Berkeley City Council Meeting Purpose of Study To inform policy debate on the extent to which new development can contribute financial resources to support a range of public benefit programs, while remaining financially viable. Policy makers have expressed interest in establishing impact fees for: – Affordable housing – Street and open space improvements – Transportation demand management – Parking

Downtown Berkeley Development Feasibility StudyCity of Berkeley City Council Meeting Contents Purpose Methodology Assumptions Findings

Downtown Berkeley Development Feasibility StudyCity of Berkeley City Council Meeting Prototypes Tested Development Type LocationLot SizeBuilding Height Condo Rental Housing Office Mid-Block Corner 13,000 sft 20,000 sft 60’ 180’ 120’ 1234

Downtown Berkeley Development Feasibility StudyCity of Berkeley City Council Meeting Rental HousingCondos 32 Scenarios Office Mid- Block Corner 60’ 120’ 180’ 13k20k13k20k13k20k 60’ 120’ 180’

Downtown Berkeley Development Feasibility StudyCity of Berkeley City Council Meeting Static Pro-Forma Analysis Feasibility analysis performed using static pro- formas A static pro-forma analysis estimates future cash flows based on stabilized point in time Results in net residual value of parcel Net residual value = Amount available to contribute to public benefits

Downtown Berkeley Development Feasibility StudyCity of Berkeley City Council Meeting Sample Development Scenario 20,000 SF Mid-Block Parcel 180 Feet Height 60 Feet Height

Downtown Berkeley Development Feasibility StudyCity of Berkeley City Council Meeting Sample Site Configuration 13,000 SF Development 20,000 SF Development

Downtown Berkeley Development Feasibility StudyCity of Berkeley City Council Meeting Contents Purpose Methodology Assumptions Findings

Downtown Berkeley Development Feasibility StudyCity of Berkeley City Council Meeting Key Development Assumptions Developer Land Cost and Return Land cost = $100/SF Developer profit = 8% of total cost before leverage provided by financing Market rents and sales prices as of Q Inclusionary Housing 20% of condo units $20,000 per rental unit Parking Requirements Rental residential = 0.33 space / unit Condo = 0.8 space / unit Office = 1 space / 1,000 SF Retail = 1 space / 1,000 SF

Downtown Berkeley Development Feasibility StudyCity of Berkeley City Council Meeting Land Cost Land cost = $100/SF A nominal, baseline value Land values vary dramatically by site across Downtown Berkeley, and contingent on: Economic use Site configuration Zoning / Regulations Historic transactions have been higher, but include existing structures on-site In 2008, Strategic Economics found land prices to be from $80 to $200/SF in Downtown Berkeley

Downtown Berkeley Development Feasibility StudyCity of Berkeley City Council Meeting Revenue Assumptions Rental Housing Average rent per square foot is approximately $3.35 per square foot of living area. Condominiums $550 / Square Foot 5% View Premium on units located at heights between 60’ and 120’ 10% View Premium on units located at heights between 120’ and 180’ Office $3.00 / Sq. Ft. / Full Service Retail $2.35 / Sq. Ft. Triple Net (NNN)

Downtown Berkeley Development Feasibility StudyCity of Berkeley City Council Meeting Public Benefit Fee Assumptions Adopted 20% inclusionary housing or in-lieu fee for condominium projects $4/SF affordable housing mitigation fee for commercial space $1/SF child care fee for commercial space Not Adopted (as of Oct 2011) Affordable housing mitigation fee for rental housing (proposed at $20,000/unit) Parking in-lieu fee (proposed at $35,000/space)

Downtown Berkeley Development Feasibility StudyCity of Berkeley City Council Meeting Contents Purpose Methodology Assumptions Findings

Downtown Berkeley Development Feasibility StudyCity of Berkeley City Council Meeting Public Benefit Estimate for Rental Housing Development in Downtown Berkeley (Per Unit Estimate)

Downtown Berkeley Development Feasibility StudyCity of Berkeley City Council Meeting Public Benefit Estimate for Condo Development in Downtown Berkeley (Per Unit Estimate)

Downtown Berkeley Development Feasibility StudyCity of Berkeley City Council Meeting Public Benefit Estimate for Office Development in Downtown Berkeley (Per SF Estimate)

Downtown Berkeley Development Feasibility StudyCity of Berkeley City Council Meeting Rental HousingCondos Total of 8 Feasible Scenarios -$66k Office Mid- Block Corner 60’ 120’ 180’ -$41k-$72k-$7k-$51k-$13k-$45k-$21k-$43k-$2k-$41k-$5k-$16k$26k-$15k$32k-$12k$19k-$3k$27k$4k$10k-$5k$33k-$151-$248-$506-$694$13-$281-$583 13k20k13k20k13k20k 60’ 120’ 180’ -$592 * Public Benefit/unit * Public Benefit/sft

Downtown Berkeley Development Feasibility StudyCity of Berkeley City Council Meeting Findings Land Use Only rental housing shows financial feasibility Site Configuration Corner parcels more profitable than mid-block parcels Heights Mixed results – greater heights generally result in higher profitability Size 20,000 SF parcel significantly more profitable than 13,000 SF parcel

Downtown Berkeley Development Feasibility StudyCity of Berkeley City Council Meeting Land Costs What happens when land costs increase from $100/SF to $200/SF?

Downtown Berkeley Development Feasibility StudyCity of Berkeley City Council Meeting Rental HousingCondos From 8 Feasible Scenarios -$66k Office Mid- Block Corner 60’ 120’ 180’ -$41k-$72k-$7k-$51k-$13k-$45k-$21k-$43k-$2k-$41k-$5k-$16k$26k-$15k$32k-$12k$19k-$3k$27k$4k$10k-$5k$33k-$151-$248-$506-$694$13-$281-$583 13k20k13k20k13k20k 60’ 120’ 180’ -$592 * Public Benefit/unit * Public Benefit/sft

Downtown Berkeley Development Feasibility StudyCity of Berkeley City Council Meeting Rental HousingCondos To 5 Feasible Scenarios (all large site rental housing) -$110k Office Mid- Block Corner 60’ 120’ 180’ -$72k-$91k-$20k-$62k-$22k-$88k-$21k-$60k-$2k-$52k-$5k-$54k-$.5k-$32k$22k-$22k$12k-$39k$27k-$10k$10k-$15k$33k-$258-$356-$614-$802-$95-$281-$691 13k20k13k20k13k20k 60’ 120’ 180’ -$592 * Public Benefit/unit * Public Benefit/sft

Downtown Berkeley Development Feasibility StudyCity of Berkeley City Council Meeting Setting Public Benefit Fee Levels Setting public benefit fees at appropriate level is critical to facilitating more development, which in turn would generate more public benefit revenue potential What happens when the rental affordable housing mitigation fee is set to $10,000 instead of $20,000?

Downtown Berkeley Development Feasibility StudyCity of Berkeley City Council Meeting Rental HousingCondos From 8 Feasible Scenarios -$66k Office Mid- Block Corner 60’ 120’ 180’ -$41k-$72k-$7k-$51k-$13k-$45k-$21k-$43k-$2k-$41k-$5k-$16k$26k-$15k$32k-$12k$19k-$3k$27k$4k$10k-$5k$33k-$151-$248-$506-$694$13-$281-$583 13k20k13k20k13k20k 60’ 120’ 180’ -$592 * Public Benefit/unit * Public Benefit/sft

Downtown Berkeley Development Feasibility StudyCity of Berkeley City Council Meeting Rental HousingCondos -$66k Office Mid- Block Corner 60’ 120’ 180’ -$41k-$72k-$7k-$51k-$13k-$45k-$21k-$43k-$2k-$41k-$5k-$4k$39k-$3k$45k$.2k$32k$9k$40k$16k$23k$7k$45k-$151-$248-$506-$694$13-$281-$583 13k20k13k20k13k20k 60’ 120’ 180’ -$592 * Public Benefit/unit * Public Benefit/sft To 11 Feasible Scenarios

Downtown Berkeley Development Feasibility StudyCity of Berkeley City Council Meeting Thank you! Q + A / Discussion