ATF2 ILC Final Focus Test Beam Line at KEK-ATF References : ATF2 Proposal, KEK Report 2005-2 ATF2 Proposal Vol.2, KEK Report 2005-9 ホームページ:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ATF2 Interaction Point Beam Size Monitor (Shintake Monitor) Status T. Yamanaka, M. Oroku, Y. Yamaguchi, S. Komamiya ( Univ. of Tokyo ), T. Suehara, Y.
Advertisements

Summary of the discussion for the commissioning session 2 nd ATF2 Project Meeting KEK, Tsukuba, Japan 6/ 1/ 2006 T.Okugi (KEK)
MONALISA: Interferometric Position Monitor at the Nanometre Scale David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Oxford University.
Accelerator and Beam Delivery The LC-ABD (Linear Collider: Accelerator and Beam Delivery) consortium is a group of UK institutes aiming to develop new.
-brief report of October runs and some inputs for the Nov/Dec planning – Nobuhiro Terunuma, KEK, ATF ATF session on LCWS13, Tokyo Univ., Nov. 13, 2013.
ATF2 Progress Report For CLIC Workshop Kiyoshi KUBO.
Progress towards nanometre-level beam stabilisation at ATF2 N. Blaskovic, D. R. Bett, P. N. Burrows, G. B. Christian, C. Perry John Adams Institute, University.
ATF2 Status and Plan K. Kubo ATF2, Final Focus Test for LC Achievement of 37 nm beam size (Goal 1) – Demonstration of a compact final focus.
1.Beam Tuning Simulation 2.IP Beam Position Stability 2-1 ) Magnet Vibration 2-2 ) IP position jitter subtraction for 2 nd bunch with FONT feedback 2-3.
1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett*, Talitha Bromwich, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Colin Perry.
High Resolution Cavity BPM for ILC final focal system (IP-BPM) ILC2007/LCWS 2007 BDS, 2007/6/1 The University of Tokyo, KEK, Tohoku Gakuin University,
Accelerator R&D on LC - Activities of ATF & STF - 1. Introduction 2. ATF 3. STF 4. Summary Seiya Yamaguchi, KEK The US/Japan Collaboration in High Energy.
ATF2 Javier Resta Lopez (JAI, Oxford University) for the FONT project group 5th ATF2 project meeting, KEK December 19-21, 2007.
IPBSM status and plan ATF project meeting M.Oroku.
David Urner, Oxford University, RHUL – June StaFF Stabilization of Final Focus Motion Stabilization with Nano-Meter Precision David Urner Paul Coe.
A.Jeremie LAViSta: Laboratories in Annecy working on Vibration Stabilization Some information on the Stacis 2000 Table from CERN, currently in Annecy B.Bolzon,
ATF2 optics … 1 3 rd Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF ATF2 optics, tuning method and tolerances of initial alignment, magnets, power supplies etc.
UK/EU Plans for ATF2 G.A. Blair ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-0ff meeting, Annecy, 8 th October 2006 Overview EUROTeV UK.
Philip Burrows ECFA LC Workshop, Warsaw, 10 June Philip Burrows John Adams Institute Oxford University G. Christian, C. Clarke, B. Constance, H.
European Plans for ATF2 G.A. Blair LCPAC, KEK 24 th March 2006 Overview CERN + LAPP EUROTeV UK France DESY.
Stabilization of Focus at ATF2 David Urner University of Oxford.
Summary of Commissioning and Tuning session Philip Bambade LAL-Orsay 5 th ATF2 project meeting KEK, 21 December 2007.
Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Robert Apsimon, Philip Burrows, Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Davide Gamba,
Commissioning Status of Shintake Monitor (IP-BSM) T. Yamanaka, M. Oroku, Y. Yamaguchi, Y. Kamiya, S. Komamiya (Univ. of Tokyo), T. Okugi, N. Terunuma,
3/25/2006 KEK LCPAC Marc Ross - SLAC 1 Results of Beam Instrumentation Studies at ATF 1.Nanometer resolution Beam Position Monitors 2.High resolution readout.
Special Lecture- ATF The unique test facility for ILC with a low emittance beam. Junji Urakawa, KEK ILC School at KEK History and Machine.
Development of a Low-latency, High-precision, Intra-train Beam Feedback System Based on Cavity Beam Position Monitors N. Blaskovic Kraljevic, D. R. Bett,
Mark Woodley, SLACATF2 Project March 20-21, Summary of Tuning, Corrections, and Commissioning.
ATF2 Kiyoshi KUBO Accelerator Test Facility (ATF) at KEK ATF – Designed as a prototype of damping ring and injector of LC – Achieved low vertical.
Welcome to MONALISA A brief introduction. Who we are... David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Electronics support from CEG Central Electronics.
1 FONT R&D status Philip Burrows Douglas Bett, Neven Blaskovic, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford University.
Philip Burrows ALCPG11, Eugene 21/03/111 Performance of FONT at ATF2 Philip Burrows John Adams Institute Oxford University.
1 FONT IP Feedback System Implications of increase of L* Philip Burrows John Adams Institute Oxford University.
ATF2 Commissioning Toshiyuki Okugi 2008 / 7 /9 ATF2 beam commissioning meeting, KEK.
Design of the ATF2 FB/FF Systems Javier Resta Lopez (JAI, Oxford University) for the FONT project group Final EUROTeV Scientific Workshop Uppsala, 25-27th.
Philip Burrows ATF2 project meeting 14/1/111 Plans for ATF2 IP Feedback Philip Burrows, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford University.
Production and Installation Policy of IP-BPM ATF2 Project Meeting, 2006/12/18 Y. Honda, Y. Inoue, T. Hino, T. Nakamura.
Status of ATF Collaboration The unique test facility for ILC with a low emittance beam. Junji Urakawa, KEK LCPAC at KEK
1 H. Hayano ATF Status June/2004 H. Hayano ATF: emittance status beam study status plan nm-project collaboration & plan ATF review 6/17/2004.
1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett*, Talitha Bromwich, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Colin Perry.
1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry John.
Initial beam size commissioning for ATF2 T.Okugi 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, KEK 12/ 19/ 2006.
IP BPM’s for ATF2 Vladimir Vogel KEK May30, 2005 Third Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF.
1/13 Tatsuya KUME Mechanical Engineering Center, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-off meeting (Oct. 9, 2006) Mount.
Mark Woodley, SLACATF2 Project March 20-21, Next version of MAD decks (v3.7): what needs to be added/deleted?
ATF2 Report ALCW Kiyoshi KUBO, for ATF2 Collaboration.
ATF2: Summary of Scheduling Strategy Session Grahame Blair Feedback and Feedforward systems Fast Kicker for ILC bunch train structure Laser-wire Shintake.
ILC R&D at KEK Beam Control Technology –ATF –ATF2 Acceleration Technology –High-gradient Cavities L-band R&D Stand –Linac System  STF –Construction of.
Summary of Tuning, Corrections, and Commissioning ( Short summary of ATF2 meeting at SLAC in March 2007 ) and Hardware Issues for beam Tuning Toshiyuki.
1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry John.
ATF2: final doublet support Andrea JEREMIE B.Bolzon, N.Geffroy, G.Gaillard, J.P.Baud, F.Peltier With constant interaction with colleagues from KEK, SLAC.
IoP HEPP/APP annual meeting 2010 Feedback on Nanosecond Timescales: maintaining luminosity at future linear colliders Ben Constance John Adams Institute,
1 1 H. Hayano and ATF group ATF Status August/2004 H. Hayano and ATF group Multibunch emittance Instrumentation developments Plans for run Multibunch.
Taikan SUEHARA, Joint Meeting of PRPPC in Honolulu, Hawaii, 2006/10/30 Laser Fringe Stabilization of 35nm IP Beam Size Monitor (Shintake monitor) for ATF2/ILC.
Technical Board Summary Preliminary Philip Bambade Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur Linéaire Université Paris 11, Orsay, France ATF2 project meeting, Technical.
ILC R&D Activities at KEK Superconducting Linac Development Beam-handling Technology Development.
ATF2 Status Background for the installation planning of Collimator
Hardwares for commissioning 2 nd ATF2 Project Meeting KEK, Tsukuba, Japan 5/ 31/ 2006 T.Okugi (KEK)
Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT) Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Talitha Bromwich, Glenn Christian, Colin Perry, Rebecca Ramjiawan John Adams Institute,
Fast Beam Collision Feedbacks for luminosity optimisation at next-generation lepton colliders Philip Burrows John Adams Institute Oxford University.
Nanometer stabilisation at ATF2 within FJPPL and FKPPL
Summary FD Support System
Expected hardware status and Priority of the commissioning task
In collaboration with P. N. Burrows, A. Latina and D. Schulte
Intra-Pulse Beam-Beam Scans at the NLC IP
Progress towards nanometre level beam stabilisation
ATF ICB meeting, LCWS08, UIC, Chicago, 11/18/2008
IP configuration session
Presentation transcript:

ATF2 ILC Final Focus Test Beam Line at KEK-ATF References : ATF2 Proposal, KEK Report ATF2 Proposal Vol.2, KEK Report ホームページ:

110 authors (25 reseach institutes) in the proposal

ATF2 Final Goal Ensure collisions between nanometer beams; i.e. luminosity for ILC experiment FACILITY construction, first result ATF2/KEK ? FFTB/SLAC Optics Local chromaticity correction scheme; very short and longer L* (β * y =100μm, L tot =36.6m) Conventional (separate) scheme; non-local and dedicated CCS at upstream; high symmetry; i.e. orthogonal tuning (β * y =100μm, L tot =185m) Design beam size 34nm / 2.2μm, aspect=65 (γε y =3 x m) 60nm / 1.92μm, aspect=32 (γε y =2 x m) Achieved ? 70nm ( beam jitter remains !) Reduction of Risk at ILC Optics and bean tuning Stabilization

Mode-I A. Achievement of 37nm beam size A1) Demonstration of a new compact final focus system; proposed by P.Raimondi and A.Seryi in 2000, A2) Maintenance of the small beam size (several hours at the FFTB/SLAC) Mode-II B. Control of the beam position B1) Demonstration of beam orbit stabilization with nano-meter precision at IP. (The beam jitter at FFTB/SLAC was about 20nm.) B2) Establishment of beam jitter controlling technique at nano-meter level with ILC-like beam (2008 -?)

Optics v3.5, 1 July m reduction of dispersionfinal focusdiagnostic west テキスト

ATF2 beam line and ATF extraction line ATF2 beam lineATF extraction line ATF2 beam line and ATF extraction line

5 Wire Scanners or Laserwires 5 Strip-line BPMs 3 Screen Monitors BSM CLIC table H V VHV 5 Steering (V,H) Magnets SF5 H 53 m 22 Quadrupoles(Q), 5 Sextupoles(S), 3 Bends(B) in downstream of QM16 QM16 SD4SF6B5B2 B1 QD0 QF1 SD0 SF1 All Q- and S-magnets have cavity-type beam position monitors (QBPM). 3.5m IP Shintake Monitor ( beam size monitor, BSM with laser interferometer ) QBPMs (100nm ) and IPBPM ( 2nm ) at IP MONALISA ( nanometer alignment monitor with laser interferometer ) Laserwire ( beam size monitor with laser beam ) IP intra-train feedback system with latency of less than 150ns Magnet movers for Beam Based Alignment (BBA) High Available Power Supply (HA-PS) system for magnets Magnets and Instrumentation at ATF2

Optics at ATF2 IP electron beam D F SF6SF5 SD4 SF1 SD0 B1B2B5

Q-magnet Mover Concrete Support QBPM in a Q-magnet (IHEP, SLAC KEK) (SLAC) (KEK) (KEK, PAL, SLAC)

Example : a power system with Ethernet control that will provide 200A in a 4 out 5 redundant module configuration. HA-PS system ( SLAC ) for a bend 200ms ΔB=-100G B=3.1kG Voltage Test result with 3+1 system (150A) switch off 1 module short time : 2-3ppm long time : 5ppm temperature : 2.5ppm/ ℃

A.Jeremie Bloc:61 Foot:26.5 Total:87.5 Length:240 Width:90 Values are in cm and measured directly on the table with a tape-measure. Static load capacity per foot (there a 4) 182 kg to 1590 kg. Honeycomb bloc has a weight of 731kg. CERN Stacis 2000 (CLIC) table currently in Annecy, France. (LAPP, CERN)

IP-BPM Wave guide X Port Y Port Sensor Cavity Beam Pipe Slot Rectangular cavity for X-Y isolation (-50dB) 2 Cavities in 1 block 2 Y ports and 2 X ports in 1 Cavity 11 cm 14 cm (61.45 x x 6mm 3 ) (6 x 12 mm 2 ) Goal : 2nm position resolution Residual vs Time Residual of (Y2I – Y2I predicted ) 1h Preliminary beam test result : Position resolution for 1 hour run (stat.) (sys.) nm ( ICT = 0.68 x e - /bunch, dynamic range = 4.96 um ) (KEK, KNU)

Schematics of Shintake Monitor Measure beam size using phase (=position and period) of interference fringe as a reference Interference fringes as a reference Electron beam to be measured Scanning electron beam  -ray modulated by interference fringes (Univ. of Tokyo, KEK)

IP intra-train feedback system (Oxford) Last line of defence against relative beam misalignment Measure vertical position of outgoing beam and hence beam- beam kick angle Use fast amplifier and kicker to correct vertical position of beam incoming to IR FONT – Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales

( RHUL, Oxford) Laserwire

MONALISA Need 2 tools, both with nm type resolutions over a few m. –Straightness Monitor measuring motion perpendicular to line of sight. Main tool to measure the relative motion of objects –Distance meter: Frequency scanning interferometer Can also provide perpendicular measurements if several measurements are combined to do triangulation. –Combine both measurements into one system! MONALISA to monitor the relative displacement between QD0 and Shintake monitor at Nanometer (Oxford) Interference pattern sensitive to perpendicular motion of retro-reflector distance meter Retro-reflector Monitoring of Alignment and Stabilization with high Accuracy

Cost Breakup, 26 Jan.07 magnets power supplies magnet supports including movers alignment vacuum control feedback Q-BPMs laserwire Shintake monitor CF :Infrastructure CF:floor, shield etc. Total 5.7 Oku-yen commissioning tools Monalisa

ATF2 Schedule PresentATF2 ON 1. International Construction and Operation; Mini-ILC 2. Forefront of Accelerator Technological R&D 3. Human Resource Development for ILC 4. Commissioning in October 2008