ERP End-User Business Productivity: Field Study of SAP & Microsoft Keystone Strategy MOIS549 Presented to:Dr. Dina Rateb Presented by:Dina Wagdy
Agenda Productivity measures Measurement tools Global result Detailed result Conclusion
1) Identify Productivity Measures 2 major inputs: SUMI ERP user research Business productivity function of 6 factors.
2) Global survey Survey: 85 statements on software business productivity Covering the 6 categories of business productivity Statements with the standard 7 point Likert scale. 7 “strongly agreed” 4 “neither agreed nor disagreed” “didn’t know” or “was not applicable to their situation.” Respondents: Users of Microsoft Dynamics NAV, Microsoft Dynamics GP, SAP All-in-One, and SAP R/3 at approximately 100 companies (randomly selected) Sales & Marketing, Finance, and Operations departments double-blind: The sponsor of the survey was not revealed to respondents The individuals administering the survey did not know who the sponsor was.
Result: Global Microsoft scored higher than SAP in 80 of the 85 total questions. Higher business productivity impact
Result: Usability A study finds that only 15% of employees are licensed to use their company’s ERP system and furthermore that 46% of licensed ERP seats go unused. Usability Ease of use User ‘command’ of application User enjoyment with software
Result: Familiarity Familiarity Ease of learning User comfort with application
Result: Transactional Efficiency Transactional Efficiency User effectiveness in executing repetitive tasks Efficiency of user interface Speed and reliability of system
Result: Flexibility Flexibility Agility in handling unexpected issues Ease of completing infrequent or unusual tasks System adaptability to business needs
Result: Business Insight Business Insight Comprehensive reporting Real-time access to information Visibility across departments
Result: Collaboration Collaboration Ease of collaboration with colleagues Efficiency of application workflow Ease of communication with suppliers, partners & customers
Result: Detailed Microsoft scores are uniformly higher across all categories.
Conclusion EEase of use and business performance and to highlight the impact applications can have on end user productivity SSelection criteria for use as a basis for evaluating ERP systems 66 major dimensions: Usability, Familiarity, Transactional Efficiency, Flexibility, Business Insight, and Collaboration. RRespondents scored Microsoft applications higher than they did SAP applications.
Thank You Q & A