1 Portal Models Maarten Vissers 2012-03-12 v1. 2 DRNI Applicability DRNI model is applicable to many different portal types 1.PB Portal (S-DRNI) 2.BCB.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Link Selection and OAM Version 01 Stephen Haddock July 18,
Advertisements

Multi Domain Traffic Engineered Transport Networks (E-OTN, PTN) supporting P2P, P2MP, RMP and MP2MP Ethernet Services An overview of architecture and functionality.
Extending OTN Standards to Support Ethernet Services
1 Introducing the Specifications of the Metro Ethernet Forum.
1 Introducing the Specifications of the Metro Ethernet Forum MEF 17 Service OAM Framework and Requirements February 2008.
G : DCM Signaling Mechanism Using GMPLS RSVP-TE ITU-T Workshop on IP-Optical, Chitose, Japan 7/11/2002 Dimitrios Pendarakis, Tellium, Inc. ITU-T.
Network Protection and Restoration Session 5 - Optical/IP Network OAM & Protection and Restoration Presented by: Malcolm Betts Date:
Slide 111 May 2008 Point-to-Multipoint in 802.1Qay Nurit Sprecher, Nokia Siemens Networks Hayim Porat, Ethos Networks.
1 Transport Services Layer Protection Switching Types Interacting with DRNI Maarten Vissers
1 DRNI Examples and DAS position Maarten Vissers
1 DRNI Examples and DAS position Maarten Vissers Version 01.
1 Alternative solution for EC Type II support Maarten Vissers
1 Generalized EC Type 2 support EC Type 1&2 supporting bridges Maarten Vissers v01.
1 Distributed Network Protection (DNP) architecture study Maarten Vissers v4 v2: includes a few slides at the end illustrating segment protection.
802.1Qay PBB-TE Protection Switching Overview
1 DRNI and Distributed Protection Examples Maarten Vissers v01 Based on slides presented in IW meeting in Nanjing on Thursday Sept 22.
1 Distributed Network Protection (DNP) architecture study Maarten Vissers v3 v2: includes a few slides at the end illustrating segment protection.
Geneva, Switzerland, 13 July AX-REV – Link Aggregation Revision Panagiotis Saltsidis, Senior Specialist, Ericsson Joint IEEE-SA and ITU Workshop.
DRNI Examples, DAS position, MEP/MIP position
MPLS-TP PWE3 dual-homed protection (MPDP)
1 DRNI  Network Protection Interaction Some examples in which one or more faults in DRNI require a change in Network Protection Some examples in which.
1 Common network architectures for PBB, PBB-TE and EOTN networks version 01 Maarten Vissers v01 includes new slides 10 and 12: Slide 10 presents.
Computer Network 實踐資管 Wang-Jiunn Cheng 2004 PART V-1 Extending Networks (Repeaters, Bridges, Switches)
1 DRNI and G.8031 ETH SNCP interworking Maarten Vissers
Networking Components
1 Multipoint Ethernet Connection Protection
Abstraction and Control of Transport Networks (ACTN) BoF
1 DRNI Data Plane Model I/II Comparison & MAC Address Values in DRNI Maarten Vissers v00.
1 Data Plane Summary Maarten Vissers v1.
1 Supporting VUNI in DRNI Maarten Vissers v01 v01: added multiple virtual UNI with hairpin.
Connecting LANs, Backbone Networks, and Virtual LANs
Networking Hardware and Components By: Sean Bell.
NETWORKING COMPONENTS Zach Avis. Hub A hub is a low cost way to connect two computers. A hub can also act as a repeater. When a signal comes from one.
Basic Networking Components
Module CT2053N: Network Devices Lecture Week 1. Agenda Module Introduction  Your Module Leader  Your Lecturer and tutors  Module Aims/Objectives 
CECS 5460 – Assignment 3 Stacey VanderHeiden Güney.
Q description of G.8031 Ethernet Connection (EC) SubNetworkConnection (SNC) Protection “VLAN Segment Protection” Maarten Vissers v2.
1 Common network architectures for PBB, PBB-TE and EOTN networks Maarten Vissers
Common Devices Used In Computer Networks
Slide title In CAPITALS 50 pt Slide subtitle 32 pt PBB-TE Status Report Panagiotis Saltsidis.
Technical Refresher Session 3. Overview Difference between communication between devices on a single logical network and communication between different.
 Network Segments  NICs  Repeaters  Hubs  Bridges  Switches  Routers and Brouters  Gateways 2.
Rough Outline for a Intra-Portal Protocol Version 03 Stephen Haddock September 12,
Rough Outline for a Intra-Portal Protocol Version 02 Stephen Haddock August 23,
© 2008 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 Chapter 1: Introduction to Scaling Networks Scaling Networks.
NETWORK HARDWARE CABLES NETWORK INTERFACE CARD (NIC)
A machine that acts as the central relay between computers on a network Low cost, low function machine usually operating at Layer 1 Ties together the.
Omniran IEEE 802 Scope of OmniRAN Date: Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Max RiegelNSN
Session 10: Optical Switching and Equipment ITU-T Study Group 15, Q12 Michael Mayer Nortel Networks.
Cisco Confidential © 2010 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. 1 Multicasting within UCS Qiese Dides.
1 Introduction filtering-0710-v04.pdfhttp://
Computer Network Architecture Lecture 3: Network Connectivity Devices.
1 Generalized EC Type 2 support EC Type 1&2 supporting bridges Maarten Vissers
Portal Models Maarten Vissers v2
Kevin Harrison LTEC 4550 Assignment 3.  Ethernet Hub  An unsophisticated device that is used for connecting multiple Ethernet devices together.  Typically.
Precision Time Protocol over MPLS draft-ronc-ptp-mpls-00.txt PWE3 WG IETF Chicago 2007 Ron Cohen
Omniran IEEE 802 Scope of OmniRAN Date: Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Max RiegelNSN
1 Distributed Network Protection (DNP) architecture study Maarten Vissers v1.
Supporting VUNI in DRNI Maarten Vissers v00
MPLS-TP Survivability Framework
FRD Examples November 28, 2017 L. Ong.
ITU-T Study Group 15 Update to IETF CCAMP
Multi Domain Segmented network Protection (MDSP)
Alternative solution for EC Type II support
RNI Requirements Imposed by PBB-TE
E-OTN status update and service interface question [associated with ITU-T liaison statement liaison-itut-sg15-ols ] version 01 New slides:
Stephen Haddock September 13, 2012
IEEE 802 Scope of OmniRAN Abstract
DRNI and Distributed Network Protection Model Evolution: Maarten  Norm  Steve Maarten Vissers v1  
Service and Resource Resiliency
Presentation transcript:

1 Portal Models Maarten Vissers v1

2 DRNI Applicability DRNI model is applicable to many different portal types 1.PB Portal (S-DRNI) 2.BCB Portal (B-DRNI) 3.IB-BEB Portal (S-DRNI) 4.IB-BEB Portal (B-DRNI) 5.PEB Portal (C-DRNI) 6.PEB Portal (RCSI S-DRNI) 7.PEB Portal (S-DRNI) 8.PEB Portal (S-DRNI & C-DRNI) 9.EOTN TB Portal (S-DRNI) 10.EOTN TEB Portal (RCSI S-DRNI) 11.EOTN TEB Portal (C-DRNI) 12.MPLS(TP) S-PE Portal (S-DRNI) 13.MPLS(TP) T-PE (RCSI S-DRNI) 14.MPLS(TP) T-PE (C-DRNI) 15.IP Router Portal (C-DRNI) 16.IP Router Portal (S-DRNI) 17.Etc. Can be Ethernet, IP, MPLS(TP), OTN,..

3 DRNI Applicability These portal types have a common element, the “DRNI” The network side of these portal types however are portal specific and the  “network links” may be Ethernet links or other (e.g. Ethernet over Ethernet, OTN, MPLS(TP), IP) links  “intra portal link” may be an Ethernet link or other (Ethernet over XXX) link The functionality of these portals is described by the portal’s model, which is implementation independent A portal’s functionality may be implemented in different manners  As per model, with e.g. multiple switch fabrics  Different from the model, with e.g. a single switch fabric operating at the DRNI signal layer  Different from the model, with e.g. a single switch fabric operating at a different layer then the DRNI signal layer Should 802.1AX-REV address each of those Portal types and Portal implementation alternatives?

4 DRNI Scope My suggestion is that:  the 802.1AX-REV DRNI specification is agnostic to the different portal types and different portal type implementations  there is a reference point between the DRNI Portal functionality and the network side portal functionality over which traffic and some limited amount of control information is exchanged  the portal type specific specifications for the distributed network side functionality, are specified in the appropriate standards, e.g.:  802.1Q for Ethernet PB, BCB, IB-BEB, PEB  SG15 recommendations for Ethernet over OTN  SG15 recommendations for EC protection  IETF RFCs for Ethernet over MPLS(TP)  IETF RFCs for IP over Ethernet  …  the portal type implementation specific aspects are outside the scope of the standards, but an example could be documented in an annex Can be Ethernet, IP, MPLS(TP), OTN,..

5 Basic DRNI model  The basic DRNI model on the left is derived from “Choices for Modeling IB- BEB DRNI”  This model is used as starting point for developing the models of the different portal types  This model can be used directly as model for the PB and BCB portals, as illustrated hereafter  This model requires extensions for the other portal types, some of which are also illustrated in this slide set  The model for the IB-BEB (S-DRNI) portal differs from the model in “Choices for Modeling IB-BEB DRNI” Relay System ASystem B Port MACPort MAC IPP MACLink Agg* MAC Distributed Relay Intra-Portal Link possible network link Gateway Link possible other network links Gateway Link Emulated System C * The two “Link Agg” state machines require coordination Link Aggregation Group (to Portal or Aggregation System) Relay System ASystem B Port IPP Link Agg* MAC Distributed Relay Intra-Portal Link possible network link possible other network links Link Aggregation Group (to Portal or Aggregation System)

6 Basic DRNI model with DRNI related MEP/MIP location  The MEP and MIP functions on the Link Agg Group ports are located in alignment with the location of those functions in clause 22/802.1Q as discussed in the Jan meeting  For the case the DRNI is supporting an E-NNI, the  E-NNI (or Internet-Network) ME just spans a single physical link  Network Operator ME monitors the Ethernet Connection up to the point where it will cross the E-NNI physical link (including the IPL, if in the path)  The Ethernet Connection MEP/MIPs on the two portals will be Active in one portal and Standby in the other Relay System ASystem B Port MACPort MAC IPP MAC Link Agg* MAC Distributed Relay Intra-Portal Link possible network link Gateway Link possible other network links Gateway Link Emulated System C * The two “Link Agg” state machines require coordination Link Aggregation Group (to Portal or Aggregation System) Relay System ASystem B Port IPP Link Agg* MAC Distributed Relay Intra-Portal Link possible network link possible other network links Link Aggregation Group (to Portal or Aggregation System)

7 Basic DRNI model with multiple DRNIs  A portal will typically connect the domain with more than one other domain  Multiple DRNI instances will be present in such case on a portal  Each DRNI instance is represented by an instance of the Emulated System C (C_1, C_2,..)  The multipoint nature of MP Ethernet Connections is assumed to be supported by the Relay functions in System A and B; each Emulated System C_i has one Active Gateway Link (other one is Stanbdy) Relay System ASystem B Port possible network link possible other network links MAC IPP MAC Link Agg* MAC Distributed Relay Intra-Portal Link Gateway Link Emulated System C * The two “Link Agg” state machines require coordination Link Aggregation Group (to Portal or Aggregation System) MAC IPP MAC Link Agg* MAC Distributed Relay Intra-Portal Link Gateway Link Emulated System C * The two “Link Agg” state machines require coordination Link Aggregation Group (to Portal or Aggregation System) MAC IPP MAC Link Agg* MAC Distributed Relay Intra-Portal Link Gateway Link Emulated System C_1 * The two “Link Agg” state machines require coordination Link Aggregation Group (to Portal or Aggregation System)

8 PB and BCB Portals

9 PB/BCB Portal  Basic DRNI model applies to PB and BCB portals  This model specifies the DRNI aspects  This model does not specify the network side aspects  Network side includes an additional “Emulated PB/BCB D”  Functionality of such Emulated PB/BCB D depends on deployed survivability method in network  S-VLAN EC restoration via MSTP/MVRP  S-VLAN EC protection via G.8031 EC SNCP  See next two slides S Relay PB/BCB APB/BCB B PNP MACPNP MAC PNP MACLink Agg* MAC Distributed S Relay Intra-Portal Link possible network link Gateway Link possible other network links Gateway Link Emulated PB/BCB C * The two “Link Agg” state machines require coordination Link Aggregation Group (to Portal or Aggregation System) S Relay PB/BCB APB/BCB B PNP Link Agg* MAC Distributed S Relay Intra-Portal Link possible network link possible other network links Link Aggregation Group (to Portal or Aggregation System)

10 PB/BCB Portal with G.8031 EC SNC protection  EC SNC protection adds an Emulated PB/BCB D to the model  It consists of Distributed S Relay functions, PNP port functions, an Intra- Portal Link and SNCP functions which connect via a Gateway Link to an S Relay function  The distributed S Relay functions either relay the incoming EC signal, or present the W and P EC segment signals to the SNCP function  EC SNCP MEP functions are located between SNCP function and Distributed S Relay function; the two sets operate in Active/Standby mode S Relay PB/BCB B PNP MACPNP MAC PNP MACLink Agg* MAC Distributed S Relay Intra-Portal Link possible network link Gateway Link possible other network links Gateway Link Emulated PB/BCB C * The two “Link Agg” state machines require coordination Link Aggregation Group (to Portal or Aggregation System) MAC PNP MAC PNP Distributed S Relay Intra-Portal Link Gateway Link Emulated PB/BCB D * The two “SNCP” state machines require coordination EC Protection Group (to Portal or SNCP endpoint) SNCP* PB/BCB A

11 PB/BCB Portal with MSTP/MVRP EC restoration  EC restoration with MSTP/MVRP restores “EC segments”, like EC SNC protection  Does this imply that EC restoration adds an Emulated PB/BCB D to the model as illustrated on the right?  Is the model on the right a correct model? S Relay PB/BCB A PB/BCB B PNP MACPNP MAC PNP MACLink Agg* MAC Distributed S Relay Intra-Portal Link possible network link Gateway Link possible other network links Gateway Link Emulated PB/BCB C * The two “Link Agg” state machines require coordination Link Aggregation Group (to Portal or Aggregation System) MAC PNP MACPNP Distributed S Relay Intra-Portal Link Gateway Link Emulated PB/BCB D * The two “SNCP” state machines require coordination S/B-VLAN EC Restoration Group ?

12 EOTN TB Portal

13 EOTN TB Portal  EOTN TB Portal is very similar to PB/BCB Portal for the DRNI functionality  Main difference is the type of ports used: ONP versus PNP S Relay TB ATB B ONP MACONP MAC ONP MACLink Agg* MAC Distributed S Relay Intra-Portal Link possible network link Gateway Link possible other network links Gateway Link Emulated TB C * The two “Link Agg” state machines require coordination Link Aggregation Group (to Portal or Aggregation System) S Relay TB ATB B ONP Link Agg* MAC Distributed S Relay Intra-Portal Link possible network link possible other network links Link Aggregation Group (to Portal or Aggregation System)

14 EOTN TB Portal with G.8031 EC SNC protection  EC protection adds an Emulated TB D to the model, similar to the PB/BCB case S Relay TB A TB B ONP MACONP MAC ONP MACLink Agg* MAC Distributed S Relay Intra-Portal Link possible network link Gateway Link possible other network links Gateway Link Emulated TB C * The two “Link Agg” state machines require coordination Link Aggregation Group (to Portal or Aggregation System) MAC ONP MAC ONP Distributed S Relay Intra-Portal Link Gateway Link Emulated TB D * The two “SNCP” state machines require coordination EC Protection Group (to Portal or SNCP endpoint) SNCP* S-VLAN MEP function pairs are Active on one port and Standby on the other

15 EOTN TB Portal with ODU SNC protection EOTN supports also other network side survivability methods, e.g.:  ODU SNC protection (which is an ODU segment protection)  ODU restoration For the ODU SNC protection case, a similar Emulated System D is present, now operating at the ODU level (instead of the S-VLAN EC level) [see next slide]. Emulated System D connects to two ODU Relay functions (providing the OTN System A and B functionality). The ODU Relay functions connect via ONP functions with the S Relay and Distributed S Relay functions. This Emulated system (SWXC) D consists of  Distributed ODU Relay functions,  OTN port functions,  an Intra-Portal Link,  ODU SNCP related MEP functions  SNCP functions which connect via a Gateway Link to an ODU Relay function

16 EOTN TB Portal with ODU SNC protection ODU Relay SWXC A SWXC B Port ONP possible network link possible other network links S Relay TB ATB B ONP Intra-Portal Link possible network link Port Distributed ODU Relay Intra-Portal Link Gateway Link Emulated SWXC D * The two “SNCP” state machines require coordination ODU Protection Group (to Portal or SNCP endpoint) SNCP* MAC ONP MACLink Agg* MAC Distributed S Relay Intra-Portal Link Gateway Link Emulated TB C * The two “Link Agg” state machines require coordination Link Aggregation Group (to Portal or Aggregation System) ODU MEP functions are Active on one port and Standby on the other ODU MEP function pairs are Active on one port and Standby on the other

17 IB-BEB (S-DRNI) Portal

18 IB-BEB (S-DRNI) Portal with ESP/TESI segment protection ESP Segment protection is the functional equivalent of ODU SNC protection A similar model – in which ODU is replaced by ESP – is applicable [see next slide] Note: The model on the next slide describes the required behaviour of the portal. Implementations will typically provide only a single switch fabric, which implies that the behaviour of the second Relay function has to be emulated in the implementation. This emulation is assumed to be outside the scope of the standard. Question: is there a need for a possible network link between the S Relay functions in systems A and B?

19 possible network link? IB-BEB (S-DRNI) Portal with ESP/TESI Segment protection B (ESP) Relay B-component A B-Component B PNP possible network link possible other network links S Relay I-Component AI-Component B PIP?? Intra-Portal Link MAC PNP MAC PNP Distributed B (ESP) Relay Intra-Portal Link Gateway Link Emulated B-Component D * The two “SegP” state machines require coordination SegP* MAC PIP MACLink Agg* MAC Distributed S Relay Intra-Portal Link Gateway Link Emulated I- Component C * The two “Link Agg” state machines require coordination Link Aggregation Group (to Portal or Aggregation System) CBP ESP Segment Protection Group (to Portal or endpoint) ESP MEP functions are Active on one port and Standby on the other ESP MEP function pairs are Active on one port and Standby on the other Implementation “shortcut”

20 IB-BEB (S-DRNI) Portal with B-VLAN restoration (MSTP/MVRP) B-VLAN restoration by means of MSTP/MVRP provides also a segment like survivability method A similar model – in which ESP is replaced by B-VLAN – is assumed to be applicable [see next slide] Note: The model on the next slide describes the required behaviour of the portal. Implementations will typically provide only a single switch fabric, which implies that the behaviour of the second Relay function has to be emulated in the implementation.

21 possible network link? ?? IB-BEB (S-DRNI) Portal with B-VLAN restoration (MSTP/MVRP) B Relay B-component A B-Component B Port PNP possible network link possible other network links S Relay I-Component AI-Component B PIP Intra-Portal Link MAC PNP MACPNP Distributed B Relay Intra-Portal Link Gateway Link Emulated B-Component D * The two “SegP” state machines require coordination B-VLAN Restoration Group (to Portal or endpoint) MAC PIP MACLink Agg* MAC Distributed S Relay Intra-Portal Link Gateway Link Emulated I- Component C * The two “Link Agg” state machines require coordination Link Aggregation Group (to Portal or Aggregation System) CBP ? B-VLAN MEP functions are Active on one port and Standby on the other

22 IB-BEB (S-DRNI) Portal with ESP/TESI protection ESP/TESI protection switching is performed at the other side of the B Relay compared to ESP/TESI Segment protection Also in this case an Emulated System D is present, but now located between B Relay functions and I-component functions [see next slide] Note: The model on the next slide describes the required behaviour of the portal. Implementations will typically provide only a single switch fabric, which implies that the behaviour of the second Relay function has to be emulated in the implementation.

23 possible network link? ?? IB-BEB (S-DRNI) Portal with ESP/TESI protection B (ESP) Relay B-component A Port PNP possible network link possible other network links S Relay I-Component A I-Component B PIP Intra-Portal Link B-Component B MAC CBP*MAC CBP*MAC Distributed B (ESP) Relay Intra-Portal Link Gateway Link Emulated B- Component D * The two “CBP” state machines require coordination ESP Protection Group (to Portal or endpoint) MAC PIP MACLink Agg* MAC Distributed S Relay Intra-Portal Link Gateway Link Emulated I- Component C * The two “Link Agg” state machines require coordination Link Aggregation Group (to Portal or Aggregation System) CBP MAC ESP MEP function pairs are Active on one port and Standby on the other

24 PEB (C-DRNI) Portal

25 PEB (C-DRNI) Portal with EC SNC protection A similar model as described for the IB-BEB case – in which S-VLAN is replaced by C-VLAN and ESP by S-VLAN – is assumed to be applicable [see next slide] Note: The model on the next slide describes the required behaviour of the portal. Implementations will typically provide only a single switch fabric, which implies that the behaviour of the second Relay function has to be emulated in the implementation.

26 PEB (C-DRNI) Portal with EC SNC protection S Relay S-Component A S-Component B PNP possible network link possible other network links C Relay C-Component AC-Component B CNP PEP CNP Intra-Portal Link PNP Distributed S Relay Intra-Portal Link Gateway Link Emulated S-Component D * The two “SNCP” state machines require coordination EC Protection Group (to Portal or SNCP endpoint) SNCP* MAC PEP MACLink Agg* MAC Distributed C Relay Intra-Portal Link Gateway Link Emulated C-Comp. C * The two “Link Agg” state machines require coordination Link Aggregation Group (to Portal or Aggregation System) CNP MAC S-VLAN MEP function pairs are Active on one port and Standby on the other S-VLAN MEP functions are Active on one port and Standby on the other Implementation “shortcut”

27 PEB (S-DRNI & C-DRNI) Portal A PEB Portal might have DRNI active on both the UNI and the (E)NNI sides On a C-Tagged UNI this will be a C-DRNI On the (E)NNI this will be a S-DRNI

28 PEB (S-DRNI & C-DRNI) Portal S Relay S-Component A S-Component B PNP possible network link possible other network links C Relay C-Component AC-Component B CNP PEP CNP Intra-Portal Link MAC PEP MACLink Agg* MAC Distributed C Relay Intra-Portal Link Gateway Link Emulated C-Comp. C * The two “Link Agg” state machines require coordination Link Aggregation Group (to Portal or Aggregation System) CNP MAC S-VLAN MEP functions are Active on one port and Standby on the other Implementation “shortcut” Intra-Portal Link MAC Link Agg* MAC Distributed S Relay Intra-Portal Link Gateway Link * The two “Link Agg” state machines require coordination Link Aggregation Group (to Portal or Aggregation System) Emulated S-Comp. D MAC PNP

29 PEB (RCSI S-DRNI) Portal To be added

30 Conclusion and Questions

31 Conclusion and Questions The portal examples in the previous slides illustrate that the same basic DRNI model with “emulated system C” can be used in the different portal types to describe the DRNI behaviour The examples also illustrate that at the network side an additional “emulated system D” is present to represent the distributed network protection/restoration functionality These emulated systems C and D are interconnected via either one pair of system A/system B Relay functions, or via two (or more) pairs of system A/system B Relay functions and interconnecting ports Proposal: Include some or all of those portal examples in Annex D or Z/802.1AX-REV Question 1: Should 802.1AX-REV specify both the emulated system C (DRNI) and the emulated systems D (network side protection/restoration) functionality, or should 802.1AX- REV be restricted to the DRNI functionality? If the latter, where can we specify the emulated system D functionality? In 802.1Q for the Ethernet specific cases? Question 2: Should the emulated system C and emulated system D interconnecting architectures be in the scope of 802.1AX-REV? If not, should this be in the scope of 802.1Q, which is specifying the architectures of the different nodes (PB, PEB, IB-BEB, BCB)?

32 Thank you