25./26.10.2006Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria1 D11.22 DIP Project Presentation V5 Oct 2006 Presented at Final Review Innsbruck, 25 - 26 Oct, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Web Service Modelling Ontology (WSMO)
Advertisements

The Next Generation Grid Kostas Tserpes, NTUA Beijing, 22 of June 2005.
ISWC Doctoral Symposium Monday, 7 November 2005
16/11/ IRS-II: A Framework and Infrastructure for Semantic Web Services Motta, Domingue, Cabral, Gaspari Presenter: Emilia Cimpian.
1 Intention of slide set Inform WSMOLX of what is planned for Choreography & Orhestration in DIP CONTENTS Terminology Clarification / what will be described.
1 st Review Meeting, Brussels 5/12/12 – Technical progress (P. Paganelli, Bluegreen) iCargo 1st Review Meeting Brussels 5/12/12 Technical.
 Copyright 2005 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. WSMX and its Applications Current Status and Future Plans Tomas.
 Copyright 2005 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. SemanticGov Project Overview and Objectives
OASIS Reference Model for Service Oriented Architecture 1.0
Reasoning Tasks and Mediation on Choreography and Orchestration in WSMO Michael Stollberg WIW 2005, June 6-7, Innsbruck, Austria.
 Copyright 2006 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. Web Services eXecution Environment (WSMX) (A ‘What not the How’
1 The Fourth Summer School on Ontological Engineering and the Semantic Web (SSSW'06) Semantic Web Services Hands-On Session with IRS-III and WSMO Studio.
Semantic Web Fred Framework and Demonstration or ‘my PhD-Thesis in 30 min’ Michael Stollberg, 14-Dec-2004.
The WSMO / L / X Approach Michael Stollberg DERI – Digital Enterprise Research Institute Alternative Frameworks for Semantics in Web Services: Possibilities.
Kmi.open.ac.uk Semantic Execution Environments Service Engineering and Execution Barry Norton and Mick Kerrigan.
 Copyright 2006 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. WSMX: a Semantic Service Oriented Middleware for B2B Integration.
 Copyright 2005 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. Semantic Web Services Research, Standardization and Applications.
An Overview of MPEG-21 Cory McKay. Introduction Built on top of MPEG-4 and MPEG-7 standards Much more than just an audiovisual standard Meant to be a.
Copyright © 2004 DERI® 1 Web Service Modeling Ontology (WSMO) Christoph Bussler and Dieter Fensel DERI International 16th of February 2004.
Agent Model for Interaction with Semantic Web Services Ivo Mihailovic.
 Copyright 2005 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. Tomas Vitvar SemanticGov 4 rd Planetary.
Semantic Web Fred: Goal and Service Description Language Michael Stollberg - 05 June
Semantic Web Fred: Project Objectives & SWF Framework Michael Stollberg Reinhold Herzog Peter Zugmann - 07 April
Interfacing Registry Systems December 2000.
 Copyright 2005 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. Semantic Web Services and User Goal definition problems Andrej.
 Copyright 2005 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. Tomas Vitvar, Sanaullah Nazir SemanticGov.
 Copyright 2005 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. Semantic Web Services Research and Applications Tomas Vitvar.
10/18/20151 Business Process Management and Semantic Technologies B. Ramamurthy.
© DATAMAT S.p.A. – Giuseppe Avellino, Stefano Beco, Barbara Cantalupo, Andrea Cavallini A Semantic Workflow Authoring Tool for Programming Grids.
Using WSMX to Bind Requester & Provider at Runtime when Executing Semantic Web Services Matthew Moran, Michal Zaremba, Adrian Mocan, Christoph Bussler.
CLARIN work packages. Conference Place yyyy-mm-dd
 Copyright 2005 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. Semantic Web Services Future Plans Laurentiu Vasiliu,Tomas Vitvar,
An Ontological Framework for Web Service Processes By Claus Pahl and Ronan Barrett.
March 2005EC Presentation1 Data, Information and Process Integration with Semantic Web Services Technical Presentation IST Project Number : FP6 –
Towards a Choreography for IRS-III Stefania Galizia and John Domingue WSMO Workshop, September 2004.
Christoph Bussler, Laurentiu Vasiliu Digital Enterprise Research Institute (DERI) National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland SDK meeting.
15./ nd DIP Review, Walldorf, Germany1 Data, Information and Process Integration with Semantic Web Services IST Project Number : FP6 –
 Copyright 2005 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. Tutorial on the Web Services Modeling Ontology Organized for.
 Copyright 2005 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. Christoph Bussler Semantic Interfaces.
 Copyright 2005 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. Tomas Vitvar SemanticGov 3 rd Planetary.
A Logical Framework for Web Service Discovery The Third International Semantic Web Conference Hiroshima, Japan, Michael Kifer 1, Rubén Lara.
 Copyright 2005 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. Enabling Components Management and Dynamic Execution Semantic.
Issues in Ontology-based Information integration By Zhan Cui, Dean Jones and Paul O’Brien.
 Copyright 2006 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. Pan-European E-Government Services on the Semantic Web Services.
16/11/ Semantic Web Services Language Requirements Presenter: Emilia Cimpian
Towards Semantic Interoperability: In-depth Comparison of Two Approaches to Solving Semantic Web Service Challenge Mediation Tasks Tomas Vitvar, Marco.
 Copyright 2006 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. WSMO-PA: Formal Specification of Public Administration Service.
WSDL – Web Service Definition Language  WSDL is used to describe, locate and define Web services.  A web service is described by: message format simple.
A Mediated Approach towards Web Service Choreography Michael Stollberg, Dumitru Roman, Juan Miguel Gomez DERI – Digital Enterprise Research Institute
Qusay H. Mahmoud CIS* CIS* Service-Oriented Computing Qusay H. Mahmoud, Ph.D.
Dr. Rebhi S. Baraka Advanced Topics in Information Technology (SICT 4310) Department of Computer Science Faculty of Information Technology.
WSMO in Knowledge Web 2nd SDK cluster f2f meeting Rubén Lara Digital Enterprise.
MFI-7: Metamodel for Service Registration 1 Zaiwen Feng, Keqing He, Chong Wang, Jian Wang Peng Liang, Jianxiao Liu, Yangfan He SKLSE, Wuhan University,
© Drexel University Software Engineering Research Group (SERG) 1 The OASIS SOA Reference Model Brian Mitchell.
 Copyright 2005 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. Dynamic RosettaNet Integration on Semantic Web Services Tomas.
 Copyright 2006 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. Dynamic B2B Integration on the Semantic Web Services: SWS Challenge.
 Copyright 2005 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. Tomas Vitvar SemanticGov 4 rd Planetary.
Discussion about MFI-7: Metamodel for Service Registration Wang Jian, He Keqing, He Yangfan, Wang Chong SKLSE, Wuhan University, China
1 WSMO Studio – an Integrated Service Environment for WSMO Marin Dimitrov OntoText Lab. / Sirma WIW 2005, Innsbruck
WSMO 1st F2F meeting SDK cluster working group on Semantic Web Services Wiesbaden, Germany, Christoph Bussler and Dieter Fensel Digital Enterprise.
Universität Innsbruck Leopold Franzens  Copyright 2007 DERI Innsbruck Second TTF Technical Fair 12 December 2007 Mediation Component Second.
 Copyright 2008 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. Digital Enterprise Research Institute Semi-automatic Composition.
 Copyright 2005 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. SOA-RM Overview and relation with SEE Adrian Mocan
Conceptual Comparison WSMO/OWL-S 1st F2F meeting SDK cluster working group on Semantic Web Services Wiesbaden, Germany, Rubén Lara, (Dumitru.
WWW: WSMO, WSML, and WSMX in a Nutshell Dumitru Roman 1, Jos de Bruijn 1, Adrian Mocan 1, Holger Lausen 1,2, John Domingue 3, Christoph Bussler 2, and.
Semantic Web Services Research, Standardization and Applications
Tomas Vitvar, Maciej Zaremba, Mathew Moran
Web Service Modeling Ontology (WSMO)
Open Archival Information System
Business Process Management and Semantic Technologies
Presentation transcript:

25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria1 D11.22 DIP Project Presentation V5 Oct 2006 Presented at Final Review Innsbruck, Oct, 2006

25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria2 Contents DIP administrative details DIP 2 nd Year Review DIP framework DIP legacy and exit strategy DIP Movie

25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria3 DIP Administrative Details

25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria4 DIP Data, Information and Process Integration with Semantic Web Services (DIP)

25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria5 Management Sigurd Harand (DERI) –Project Coordinator John Domingue (OU) –Scientific Director

25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria6 Partners Research partners Industry partners Use case partners

25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria7 DIP 2 nd Year Review What did you say last time?

25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria8 2 nd Year Review Report “This is an excellent consortium which is well managed.”

25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria9 2 nd Year Review Report “This is a high quality, multidisciplinary, consortium that displays much evidence to demonstrate the value of knowledge sharing between their respective skills domains. Technically the work that the consortium plans to carry out represents a significant and ambitious advance in current capability. However, it is clear that the consortium has the required expertise and skills to carry out the proposed work. The consortium partners work well together and there is a great deal of commitment to the success of the project in evidence.”

25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria10 2 nd Year Review Report “The partners are working well together and there is clear evidence that some partners are prepared to ‘go the extra mile’ in order to ensure that the project is a success.”

25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria11 2 nd Year Review Report 16 Recommendations Answers to ALL recommendations in this review

25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria12 The DIP Framework

25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria13 DIP Overview Client Services

25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria14 Grounded Research Framework/Theory Implementation Users

25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria15 Link to DIP Work Packages Framework Users Implementation Dissemination & Exploitation

25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria16 Key Objectives Open Source Architecture –DIP Architecture, DIP API, WSMO4J Tools (individual and comprehensive) –WSMX, IRS-III, WSMO Studio, Hybrid Reasoning tool Standards Impact –W3C Member Submissions, OASIS Real Use Case Implementations –Diverse scenarios

25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria17 Overall Framewok WSMO – Web Service Modelling Ontoogy WSML – Web Service Modelling Language WSMX – Web Service Execution Environment

25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria18 WSMO Top Level Notions Objectives that a client wants to achieve by using Web Services Provide the formally specified terminology of the information used by all other components Semantic description of Web Services: - Capability (functional) - Interfaces (usage) Connectors between components with mediation facilities for handling heterogeneities

25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria19 WSMO Top Level Notions Objectives that a client wants to achieve by using Web Services Provide the formally specified terminology of the information used by all other components Semantic description of Web Services: - Capability (functional) - Interfaces (usage) Connectors between components with mediation facilities for handling heterogeneities

25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria20 WSMO Web Service Description Web Service Implementation (not of interest in Web Service Description) Choreography --- Service Interfaces --- Capability functional description WS - Advertising of Web Service - Support for WS Discovery client-service interaction interface for consuming WS - External Visible Behavior - Communication Structure - ‘Grounding’ realization of functionality by aggregating other Web Services - functional decomposition - WS composition Non-functional Properties DC + QoS + Version + financial - complete item description - quality aspects - Web Service Management WS Orchestration

25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria21 WSMO Top Level Notions Objectives that a client wants to achieve by using Web Services Provide the formally specified terminology of the information used by all other components Semantic description of Web Services: - Capability (functional) - Interfaces (usage) Connectors between components with mediation facilities for handling heterogeneities

25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria22 Goals Ontological De-coupling of Requester and Provider Derived from task / problem solving methods/domain model Structure and reuse of requests –Search –Diagnose –Classify –Personalise –Book a holiday Requests may in principle not be satisfiable Ontological relationships & mediators used to link goals to web services

25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria23 VTA VTA WS ‘Trip Booking’ Capability provides Chor. Interf. Flight Request Hotel Request Book Flight Book Hotel if hotel = Øflight.arrivaltime = hotel.arrivaltime flight information if flight = Ø hotel information process (control + data flow) of goals Orchestration Definition

25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria24 VTA VTA WS ‘Trip Booking’ Capability provides Chor. Interf. Flight Request Hotel Request Book Flight Book Hotel if hotel = Ø if flight = Ø process (control + data flow) between “states” + communication behavior of orchestrating Web Service Flight WS Capability Interface (Chor.) 1)get request 2)provide offer 3)receive selection 4)send confirmation Orch... Hotel WS Capability Interface (Chor.) 1)get request 2)provide offer 3)receive selection 4)send confirmation Orch... flight request available flights hotel request available hotels book requestbooking confirmation book request booking confirmation Runtime Orchestration

25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria25 WSMO Top Level Notions Objectives that a client wants to achieve by using Web Services Provide the formally specified terminology of the information used by all other components Semantic description of Web Services: - Capability (functional) - Interfaces (usage) Connectors between components with mediation facilities for handling heterogeneities

25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria26 Mediation Heterogeneity … –For 1$ on programming, $5 - $9 on integration © IBM, Nelson Mattos –Mismatches on structural / semantic / conceptual / level –Assume (nearly) always necessary Description of role –Components that resolve mismatches –Declarative description of arbitrary web service Types of Mediation within Semantic Web Services: (1) Data: mediate heterogeneous Data Sources (2) Protocol: mediate heterogeneous Communication Patterns (3) Process: mediate heterogeneous Business Processes

25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria27 WSMO Mediators Overview

25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria28 Implementations QoSTrust Ontologies Architecture APIs Reasoners B2B Telco Applications Editing Infrastructure

25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria29 Year 2Year 1 DIP Status Framework/Theory Implementation Users QoS Trust B2B Telco QoS Trust Year 3

25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria30 DIP Legacy and Exit Strategy

25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria31 DIP Legacy and Exit Strategy Industrial Exploitation Use case exploitation Academic publications New EU projects Creation of new W3C and OASIS standards

25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria32 Future Projects using DIP LUISASALEROSEEMPSemanticGovMUSING LION

25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria33

25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria34 Living Human Digital Library

25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria35 Living Human Digital Library

25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria36 Super Architecture

25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria37 DIP Exploitation via Standards DIP creates semantic Web Service standards Standards are basis for industrial exploitation Standards are basis of new projects WSMO W3C Submission WSML W3C Submission WSML Rule W3C RIF Submission WSMX OASIS SEE TC –DIP API -> SEE API SAWSDL –Semantic annotations to WSDL –Grounding for WSMO

25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria38 DIP Movie