1 Flat Lining Technology Investment Peter Saxena CIO, Roberts Wesleyan College, Rochester NY

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Model for Common Services Process Approach Assessment Planning Decision-Making Management.
Advertisements

Linkages Between NPoA and MTEF
Strategic Planning Current Status ---- For the cycle, the strategic planning process identified four key priorities: Columbia State.
Quality, Improvement & Effectiveness Unit
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
1 The Florida International University Faculty Senate Meeting Operating Budget FY07-08 & Budget Reduction Plan September 18, 2007.
Office of the Legislative Auditor State of Minnesota MnSCU System Office February 10, 2010 Presentation to the MnSCU Board of Trustees Audit Committee.
Five-year Fiscal Sustainability Plan October 2014.
ESRC Key Priorities & Future Strategy Adrian Alsop 2 nd Feb 2011.
IT Strategic Planning Project – Hamilton Campus FY2005.
Program Review: Beyond Compliance to Program Improvement Kathleen Gorski, Ed.D.
3/20/20071 IT Strategy and Leadership in Higher Education: Two Case Studies Case 1: Roberts Wesleyan College. Presented by Pradeep (Peter) Saxena, CIO.
1 Provost’s Report to the Board of Trustees The Pennsylvania State University Strategic Plan: through PRESENTED BY Nicholas P. Jones,
Public Finance Reform in Slovakia Roland Clarke World Bank Ministry of Finance Slovak Republic September 6, 2005.
Company LOGO Leading, Connecting, Transforming UNC… …Through Its People Human Capital Management.
Update on the California Dairy Future Task Force and moving forward December 5, 2012 CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY Any use of this material without specific.
In Pursuit of Zero Waste A Strategy For Greening Your Campus Sarah Kaylor Higher-Education, National Program Manager Waste Management, Inc. March 28, 2013.
November 5th, 2014 Charting a Path for the Future: Facing challenges with innovative solutions Anne D. Neal, President American Council of Trustees and.
EVCA Guidelines and Good Practice in the Management of Privately Held Companies in the Private Equity and Venture Capital Industry 28 June 2005 Second.
Higher Education Branch Campuses in Washington State Annie Pennucci and Jim Mayfield Washington State Institute.
Sustainability and Total Cost of Ownership Strategies for Higher Education.
2009 AICAD BOARD MEETING NYCDebera Johnson
University Strategic Resource Planning Council Budget.
Provost’s IT Task Force January – March Objectives Assess the information technology organizational requirements to support cost effective infrastructure.
University of North Carolina OURTIME OURFUTURE STRATEGIC DIRECTIONS
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
1 SHEEO Summer 2004 Financing Online Education: Building Sustainable Enterprises Laura M. King Vice Chancellor of Finance Minnesota State Colleges and.
Second Nature Strategic Framework Second Nature is the supporting organization of the American College & University Presidents’ Climate Commitment Board.
Information Technology Alignment, Strategy & Governance, and Efficiency CSG Winter 2011.
UCSF IT Update November 2013 Presenter: Joe Bengfort.
Student Learning as a Priority Faculty Development Leadership Development Instructional Plan Implementation Decision Making.
Education for the Future Bradley J. Geise Using Data for Continuous School Improvement.
A Glance Back  We have made significant progress in spite of significant financial challenges created from:  Declining state appropriations  Pressure.
Summer Sessions Enrollment Management Revenue Source Student Service.
1 How and Why to Share Governance at a College A Faculty Council of Community Colleges Presentation By Tina Good, FCCC President.
EDUCAUSE 2014 Top Ten IT Issues. Today’s Agenda Introduction to EDUCAUSE IT Issues History & Methodology 2014 Top Ten IT Issues Selected Issues Reviewed.
Stephanie Curry-Reedley College James Todd- ASCCC Area A Representative.
All the Moving Parts: Designing a Merged Library/IT Organization EDUCAUSE Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference January 10, 2006.
Institutional Snapshot Undergraduate students: 10,346 Graduate students: 543 International students: 141 Multicultural students: 630 Faculty and academic.
International Institute for Developing Engineering Academics I I D E A
Superintendent’s Vision In the following slide show I will share information that I believe will give you a picture of what I believe will get us to excellence.
The Role and Contribution of Independent Illinois Colleges & Universities Illinois Board of Higher Education June 3, 2008 St. John’s College, Springfield,
. Stakeholders and Ownership Consistency and change Staff/Admin/Parents/Students/Governance/ Programs Promise, expectations, evolution.
ELearning Committee Strategic Plan, A Brief History of the ELC Committee Developed and Charged (2004) CMS Evaluation and RFP Process (2004)
Total Cost of Ownership for Technology Resources at Mission College Description and Recommendations.
$86,388,741.  Chancellor %  Academic Affairs 70.43%  Student Affairs %  Advancement and External Affairs- 3.08%  Administration and Finance.
Transforming Patient Experience: The essential guide
PROGRAM PRIORITIZATION for Administrative and Service Units.
Learning Goals at St. John Fisher College Peter J. Gray, Ph.D. Director of Academic Assessment United States Naval Academy May 2004.
Why Community-University Partnerships? Partnerships Enhance quality of life in the region Increase relevance of academic programs Add public purposes to.
Public Universities and the Challenge of Budgeting in a Recession Teresa A. Sullivan Provost and Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs University.
Capabilities Analysis Briefing for Chancellor and Senior Leaders.
Where Are We After a Decade of Community College Reforms? Vanessa Smith Morest Dean of Institutional Effectiveness and Interim Academic Dean Norwalk Community.
Foundation of the Future A Process of Program Review and Prioritization Update provided by Sharon L. Vasquez, Provost Arosha Jayawickrema, VP of Finance.
Time to answer critical and inter-related questions: Whom will we serve? What will we offer? How will we serve them?
Focus for the Future Technology-Related Proposals Daniel Ewart, CIO.
1 Introduction Overview This annotated PowerPoint is designed to help communicate about your instructional priorities. Note: The facts and data here are.
Supporting measurement & improvement of primary health care (PHC) at the facility and community levels Dr. Jennifer Adams, Deputy Assistant Administrator,
NEW CHALLENGES: NEW METRICS Drexel University. Today’s Discussion The Continuing Need to Demonstrate Results in Our Academic Programs Eight Trends in.
Strategic Planning Committee Review of New Strategic Goals and formative community and committee input.
BUDGET UPDATE FY14 and BUDGET PLANNING FY15. BUDGET Basic Principles for Budget Planning and Development (not Prioritized) Meets Core Values/Goals College.
IT Governance and Management Structure
GOVERNANCE COUNCILS AND HARTNELL’S GOVERNANCE MODEL
Data-Driven Instructional Leadership
Zanzibar Education Development Plan ZEDP II (2017/18 – 2021/22)
Capex to Opex: Are You Ready?
Assistant Vice President and Chief Technology Officer
Hope International School November 14-17, 2016
From The Outside Looking In To The Inside Looking Out
A two-phase, faculty and staff driven process
Presentation transcript:

1 Flat Lining Technology Investment Peter Saxena CIO, Roberts Wesleyan College, Rochester NY

2 Flat Lining Predictable IT Budgets Predictable IT Budgets Stability in IT Investment Stability in IT Investment

3 Flat Lining Positive pressure to create good management practices and Positive pressure to create good management practices and To continually depend on innovation and best practices To continually depend on innovation and best practices

4 Flat Lining Creates a need for IT, Academic and Administrative leaders to work together Creates a need for IT, Academic and Administrative leaders to work together Decisions are based on Institutional Priority versus Individual priority Decisions are based on Institutional Priority versus Individual priority

5 Flat Lining Creates a need for institutional “appropriate assessment” of technology in education Creates a need for institutional “appropriate assessment” of technology in education Technology is not lacking in its value to education, education is lagging in its assessment of technology to education. Technology is not lacking in its value to education, education is lagging in its assessment of technology to education. - Educause publication on assessment

6 HE Leaders’ Goals are: 1. Create and support Evolutionary Growth in the use of technology on the campus (curriculum + admin) 2. Manage, foster and support the Exponential growth that will come as a result of goal 1.

7 Flat lining: 1. Manage the investment while supporting your mission of evolutionary and exponential growth in usage. 2. Hopefully for a Short Term (1-3 yrs).

8 Challenge: To manage Escalating demands for technology and support with Stable (not static) Funding and Resources. To manage Escalating demands for technology and support with Stable (not static) Funding and Resources.

9 Technology Stewardship CIO: Clear visibility and control of all elements of IT spending (resources and technology). CIO: Clear visibility and control of all elements of IT spending (resources and technology). CIO and Institution Leaders: CIO and Institution Leaders: 1.Strong commitment to work together 2.Institutional priorities vs. individual priorities. 3.Focus on overall cost of ownership

10 Process IT Spending across the Institution Resources Annual Contracts Annual Technology Replacement Cycles Projects Planned growth Protect and perpetually maintain current investment in technology. 80% to 90% Invest in the future. 10% to 20% Budget Adjustments Protect at all cost. Adjust as needed. Prioritize Investment based on current and future value

11 Step 1: CIO IT Spending across the Institution Resources Annual Contracts Annual Technology Replacement Cycles Projects Planned growth Map IT Spending to finite, pre- defined categories Value: Managing a handful of buckets versus the every line item. $1 to $30 Million Depending on the size of the institution

12 Step 2: CIO Resources Annual Contracts Annual Technology Replacement Cycles Projects Planned growth Look for savings: How can we do these in a different way? Process efficiencies Weed, Re-Negotiate Look for volume discounts, process efficiencies, options Prioritize based on Value Prioritize, create Phases

13 Step 3: IT Task Force Small IT Leadership Task Force of CIO and key Academic and Administrative leaders. Small IT Leadership Task Force of CIO and key Academic and Administrative leaders. Leaders must have Leaders must have –Institutional Focus –Have decision making roles –Must be respected by the Faculty

14 Step 4: Prioritization with the Task Force Resources Annual Contracts Annual Technology Replacement Cycles Projects Planned growth 1.Prioritize based on value to the Institution. 2.Weed / Mark what can be delayed 3.Add what needs to happen

15 Year over year IT Spending across the Institution Resources Annual Contracts Annual Technology Replacement Cycles Projects Planned growth Protect and perpetually maintain current investment in technology. 80% to 90% Invest in the future. 10% to 20% Budget Adjustments Protect at all cost. Adjust as needed. Prioritize Investment based on current and future value

16 Flat Lining 1. Creates a controlled and stable IT environment. –Predictable IT Budgets –Good management practices –Lean budget 2. Creates an institutional discipline to manage technology infusion in the Academic side –Academic Leaders partnering together to determine institutional priorities –Institutional assessment Tremendous value to the future of technology in within the institution.