Stock Option Backdating and Practices Conference Presented by: Barry H. Genkin, Esquire September 21, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Building on Our Core Values Building on Our Core Values © 2003 by the AICPA The Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Advertisements

Chapter 17 Completing the Audit Engagement McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
ASX Corporate Governance Council
Forces of Change Don H. Hansen Health Care Services Partner
COMPLIANCE AND INTEGRITY IN GOVERNMENT AND NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS Michael E. Nawrocki, CPA Managing Partner Nawrocki Smith LLP, CPA’s Historical Perspective.
R. Todd Johnson, Partner in Charge Jones Day Menlo Park January 17,2003 The New Audit Committee -- Risks, Realities and Responses.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of Benefits of Act Three quarters of the financial executives in the Oversight Systems survey said that their company had realized.
Chapter Twelve Financial Reporting and the Securities and Exchange Commission Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction.
Completing the Audit Engagement
©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Completing the Audit.
NAIC Oversight of Corporate Governance Commissioner Susan Donegan Vermont Department of Financial Regulation.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act. 2 What Is It? Act passed by Congress in response to the recent and continuing corporate scandals. Signed into law July 30, Established.
1 Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 June 29,  SOX 404 Background 3  SOX 404 Goals 4  SOX 404 Requirements 5  SOX 404 Assertions 6  SOX 404 Compliance.
Third ICAC Symposium The New York Stock Exchange – A Regulator and a Listed Company James F. Duffy Executive Vice President & General Counsel NYSE Regulation,
Sarbanes Oxley Act. WHY? Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 Response to a number of major corporate and accounting scandals.
WELCOME Annual Meeting & Compliance Seminar. Code of Conduct - Impact on Corporate Culture by Andy Greenstein Knight Capital Group, Inc.
Chapter 17 Completing the Engagement McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved.
© 2004 Ceridian Corporation. All rights reserved. Corporate Integrity and The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Victoria Nemerson Vice President Compliance, Ceridian.
1. 2 CVM’s OBJECTIVES u to stimulate the creation of savings and their investment in securities; u to promote the expansion and regular and efficient.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Ernesto G. Rodriguez EC 521 Winter 2007.
Sarbanes Oxley Act. WHY? Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection.
Internal Control. COSO’s Framework Committee of Sponsoring Organizations 1992 issued a white paper on internal control Since this time, this framework.
> > > > The Financial System Chapter 17. Learning Goals Outline the structure and importance of the financial system. List the various types of securities.
3rd session: Corporate Governance
Emerging Issues in Management (Mgmt 440) Professor Charles H. Smith Corporate Governance (Chapter 18) Summer 2009.
(1) Represent shareholders and create shareholder value. (2) Align the interests of management with those of shareholders while protecting the.
 Corporate governance is based on three interrelated components: corporate governance principles, functions and mechanisms.
Identifying Good Stock Investments Investment and Finance 12 Ms. Stewart.
XBRL Voluntary Program on the EDGAR System April 2005 Brigitte Lippmann Attorney Division of Corporation Finance Jeffrey Naumann Enabling Technologies.
Copyright © 2008 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Ltd.1 Chapter Twelve Corporate Governance Canadian Business and Society: Ethics & Responsibilities.
SEC Financial Reporting Issues NARUC Subcommittee on Accounting and Finance Jackson Hole, Wyoming October 8, 2007.
2012 Governance & Leadership Institute January 29 – 30, 2012.
Nonprofit Revitalization Act of 2013 Fred M. LaMarca CPA, CFP® Zoltan Kemeny, CPA.
Implementation Issues of Sarbanes-Oxley CASE Presentation September 23, 2004 By Denise Farnan.
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP | ATTORNEYS AT LAW | National Association of Corporate Directors October 5, 2006 Paul Berkowitz Shareholder Greenberg.
v2 Climate Change Disclosure for Canadian Public Companies Barbara Hendrickson Corporate Reporting: Climate Change & Related Environmental Disclosures.
Summary of the Investor Protection, Auditor Reform, and Transparency Act of 2002 (Sarbanes-Oxley Act)
Scandals (in the public and private sector)  Enron  Worldcom  Livent  Nortel  HRDC  Sponsorship Scandal.
COPYRIGHT © 2010 South-Western/Cengage Learning..
Issues in Corporate Governance: Board Structures and Functions Based on a Student Presentation by Joshua Shullaw and Matthew Domeyer.
1 Today’s Presentation Sarbanes Oxley and Financial Reporting An NSTAR Perspective.
Chapter 17 Completing the Audit Engagement McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Sarbanes Oxley Act. The Sarbanes Oxley Act consists of 11 Sections I – Public Company Accounting Oversight Board II – Auditor independence III – Corporate.
By: 1. Kenneth A. Kim John R. Nofsinger And 2. A. C. Fernando.
Chapter 19-1 Chapter 19 BUSINESS & SOCIETY Ethics and Stakeholder Management Carroll & Buchholtz 6e Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management,
Ensuring the Integrity of Financial Information Ensuring the Integrity of Financial Information C H A P T E R 5.
Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 17-1 Chapter Seventeen Completing the Engagement Chapter Seventeen.
Communicating and Interpreting Accounting Information Chapter 5 McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2008 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Principles of Accounting (Accounting 1 for BBA - Undergraduate) SBS Victor Yerris, PhD
Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) John H. Messing, Esq. Law-on-Line,Inc. Providing 3 E’s -- E-Security, Encryption, E-Signatures 3900 E. Broadway Blvd., Suite 201 Tucson,
1 Sarbanes-Oxley Overview. 2 Sarbanes-Oxley Act Summary The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 §201Prohibited Non-Audit Services §202Audit Committee Pre-Approval.
COPYRIGHT © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson Corporation. Thomson, the Star logo, and South-Western are trademarks used herein under license.
Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP World Trade Center West 155 Seaport Boulevard Boston, Massachusetts Telephone Massachusetts.
Chapter 4 Corporate Governance: Foundational Issues © 2012 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning 1.
The New SEC Auditor Independence Rules: Implications for Audit Committees and Management
Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar General Session II September 9, 2003 Section 302/404 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act What Actuaries Need to Know Jan A. Lommele, FCAS,
By Abdur Rashid Mirza University of Lahore School of Accountancy and Finance.
Cutlip & Center's Effective Public Relations, Tenth Edition Glen Broom Copyright ©2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Upper Saddle.
Building on Our Core Values Building on Our Core Values © 2003 by the AICPA The Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Lecture 5 Control and AIS Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education 7-1.
©2012 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley The Demand for Audit and Other Assurance Services Chapter 1.
Accounting Seminar 1 Professor: Bonita Daly, PhD Accountancy Office: Room 423 Office Hours: By appointment.
©2012 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley Completing the Audit Chapter 24.
UNITED ADVISORY PARTNERS.
Governance of High-Tech Startups
Corporate Governance Corporate governance is the set of processes that provides an assurance of a fair return to outside investors. Resolve the conflict.
The Demand for Audit and Other Assurance Services
William “Bill” McGinnis
Board of Directors Roles and Responsibilities
Presentation transcript:

Stock Option Backdating and Practices Conference Presented by: Barry H. Genkin, Esquire September 21, 2006

Page 2 IT’S THAT TIME AGAIN  Every several years “Corporate America” experiences an integrity gut check:  Foreign Corrupt Practices Act  Insider trading  Enron, WorldCom, Adelphia  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  *Option Backdating*

Page 3 The Harsh Reality  Governmental investigations of over 100 companies  Average loss in market value of companies implicated in scandal is 8%, or $500 million per company  Investors wary because of unanswered questions:  major disruption (including possible delisting)  restatement of financials  cash overlays for taxes  prospect of executives being forced out  significant unknowns

Page 4 What is Option Backdating?  Centers around timing of option grants  Did grants occur on the dates stated, or before or after?  Was exercise price of stock options retroactively set to correspond with market prices on date stock price was low, claiming these dates as the grant dates?  Do patterns suggest discrepancies between stated and actual grant dates?

Page 5 Types of Option Backdating  Open and notorious backdating – (Intentional)  Backdating with a reason  Sloppy backdating  Unintended backdating – (unanimous consent)  Lack of documentation  Springloading (grant option in advance of good news)  Bullet dodging (delay grant because of expected bad news)

Page 6 Was Backdating Intended or Not?  Was there an intentional or unintentional incorrect recording of stock option grants (e.g. unanimous consent and “as of” dates)?  In either case – result is understatement of stock option expense in financial statements

Page 7 What are the Hallmarks of Option Backdating?  Opportunity for SEC to flex its muscle  1,050,000 Google hits (and growing)  Display poster children  Shelf life  Commissioner Campos Speech (8/15/06)  “How to be an Effective Board Member”  Option backdating matters are like icebergs  Part above water  Change grant date of option to a date when stock trading at a low level  Part below water

Page 8 The Part Below the Water  Possible false financial statements (restatements)  9/19/06 letter from office of Chief Accountant of SEC  Possible adverse tax consequences  Possible internal control weaknesses (404 of SOX)  SEC investigation  U.S. Attorney investigation  Incorrect Section 16 reports Page 8

Page 9  Inaccurate 34 Act disclosure – 10Qs and 8Ks (financials)  Current registration statements (33 Act) inaccurate  §11 and 12(a)  Violations of plan documents  Possible voiding of option grants  Class action suits The Part Below the Water Page 9

Page 10  Scalps of officers/directors (who dropped the ball)  Governance failures  Violate Exchange rules  Rating agency (Moody’s and S&P) downgrades  CEO and CFO certifications problematic  302 certifications - financial statement accurately reflect financial condition  Investor confidence  Stock price hit The Part Below the Water Page 10

Page 11  DON’T ASK/DON’T TELL POLICY (put on the blinders) Wait for SEC to come knocking OR  Be proactive and make inquiry  Director oversight obligations (fiduciary duties)  Climate demands it  If not, management must be proactive and raise issue with directors Do You Have a Problem or Not?

Page 12 Who Manages the Inquiry?  full board  audit committee - preference  governance committee  compensation committee  Fact gathering  role of officers  what was role of existing inside and outside counsel?

Page 13 Who Manages the Inquiry?  What was role of existing outside auditors?  Tension between independent auditors and management  What is role of in-house/outside counsel?  What is role of outside auditors?

Page 14 What Gets Reviewed in Inquiry?  Match grant dates to stock price information  Review governing plan documents, employment agreements and option grant agreements providing for stock option grants  Board of committee minutes  Unanimous consents and process  Examine the grant process

Page 15 What Gets Reviewed in Inquiry?  Analysis of accounting treatment  Analysis of tax treatment  Review of Section 16 reports  Review of communications to optionees  Public disclosure  Proxy statement disclosure

Page 16 What Gets Reviewed in Inquiry?  Interview management, board committee members and administrators  Preservation of documents  review – Smoking Gun  Identification of issues  Securities law ramifications  FD issues – re: inquiries  Regulatory, tax and accounting ramifications  Assess litigation risks  Loan documents and debt instruments  Director and Officer Policy - Restatement

Page 17 What You Do Depends Upon What You Find  Clean bill of health – nothing  Report to Board  Still evaluate best practices – (always room for improvement)  If find something:  Analyze what went wrong and why – fix it  Adopt best practices (avoid future issues)

Page 18 What You Do Depends Upon What You Find  Focus on:  Financials (restatement)  Item 4.02 of Form 8-K – Non–reliance on previously issued financial statements and press release  Corrective disclosure  Amend 33 and 34 Act documents  Shelf and other registration statements, securities offerings  Tax return amendments  Enhanced governance processes  Internal controls enhancement  Notification of regulators (SEC and Exchange)  Revising practices

Page 19 Best Practices  Correctly date option grants  Grant options at in person or telephonic meetings, as opposed to by unanimous written consent  Consider granting options on a pre- established fixed grant date schedule (quarterly, annually, etc.)

Page 20 Best Practices  Avoid grant delegations  Fully document all grants contemporaneously with the actual grant  Do not grant “discounted” options that have an exercise price less than the fair market value of the underlying common stock

Page 21 Best Practices  Identify lines of responsibility among those involved in administering option grants – (Manual)  Consider designating one or two employees (in the finance area) with responsibility for overseeing and monitoring the documentation and grant process

Page 22 Best Practices  Know and adhere to the requirements of the option plans, board and committee charters, employment agreements and procedural requirements  Avoid committees of one!  Keep current on the technical requirements applicable to options, including accounting, tax, disclosure, SEC and exchange rules  Full and complete disclosure – transparency - Key

Page 23 Final Word  Take Ownership – Instill comfort that something like this will not happen again – Restore Confidence