Erez Ribak 1,3 and Szymon Gladysz 2,3 1 Physics, Technion, Haifa, Israel 2 European Southern Observatory 3 Research performed at NUI, Galway Thanks to.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Standard stars for the ZIMPOL polarimeter
Advertisements

Observation of beam halo with corona graph
C. Beichman, Dimitra Touli, Gautam Vasisht, Roger Smith Tom Greene
last dance Chapter 26 – diffraction – part ii
Diffraction of Light Waves
Optical Astronomy Imaging Chain: Telescopes & CCDs.
Anthony Boccaletti Observatoire de Paris LESIA. Several instruments dedicated to Exoplanet detection and characterization with High Contrast Imaging since.
Optical Imaging in Astronomy 1st CASSDA School for Observers Observatorio del Teide, 20 – 25 April 2015 Franz Kneer Institut für Astrophysik Göttingen.
1 Key Types Introduction Michelson Summer School on High-Contrast Imaging Caltech, Pasadena July 2004 Wesley A. Traub Harvard-Smithsonian Center.
Multimedia Data Introduction to Image Processing Dr Mike Spann Electronic, Electrical and Computer.
Pupil Remapping for high dynamical range imaging Olivier Guyon Subaru Telescope National Astronomical Observatory of Japan Hilo, HI Michelson.
Amplitude Control: Closing the Loop in a Zero Path Length Difference Michelson Interferometer Michael G. Littman, Michael Carr , Laurent Pueyo, Jeremy.
Recent & planned high-contrast work on the WCS and P3K Gene Serabyn Nov. 12, 2007.
Phase and Amplitude Control Ability using Spatial Light Modulators and Zero Path Length Difference Michelson Interferometer Michael G. Littman, Michael.
COrE+ Optics options.
Chapter 25: Interference and Diffraction
Circumstellar disk imaging with WFIRST: not just for wide field surveys any more... Tom Greene (NASA ARC) & WFIRST Coronagraph Team AAS / WFIRST Session.
An Optimized Pupil Coronagraph: A New Way To Observe Extrasolar Planets This work was performed for the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute.
Imaging Planets in the Thermal Infrared Phil Hinz University of Arizona Outline: Observations of HR 8799 and Fomalhaut Survey of FGK stars in the thermal.
Diffraction vs. Interference
Some large-telescope design parameter considerations: Distributed pupil telescopes J.R.Kuhn Institute for Astronomy, UH How to “distribute the glass” in.
14 Sep 1998R D Ekers - Synth Image Workshop: INTRODUCTION 1 Synthesis Imaging Workshop Introduction R. D. Ekers 14 Sep 1998.
Direct Imaging of Exoplanets
Science Impact of Sensor Effects or How well do we need to understand our CCDs? Tony Tyson.
The LSST Exposure Time Calculator was developed to model the effects of LSST design changes on signal-to-noise ratio and survey depth. The ETC utilizes.
RAS E-ELT meeting 9th May 08 Fraser Clarke Towards EPICS; high contrast spectroscopy Fraser Clarke N Thatte, G Salter, M Tecza C Verinaud, M Kasper (EPICS.
Telescopes & recent observational techniques ASTR 3010 Lecture 4 Chapters 3 & 6.
Clio: 3-5  m planet-finding AO camera Ari Heinze (Steward Observatory) Collaborators: P. Hinz (Steward), S. Sivanandam (Steward), M. Freed (Optical Sciences),
“Twinkle, Twinkle Little Star”: An Introduction to Adaptive Optics Mt. Hamilton Visitor’s Night July 28, 2001.
1 A. Boccaletti Pasadena, Sept th Imaging EGPs with JWST/MIRI and VLT/SPHERE valuable experiences for TPF-C A. Boccaletti, P. Baudoz D. Rouan + coronagraphic.
Astronomy 1020-H Stellar Astronomy Spring_2015 Day-21.
Optical principles of diffraction focussing, Preparing the way to space borne Fresnel imagers NiceSeptember 23-25, Laurent Koechlin Laboratoire.
Optical diagnostics for beam halo (I) Coronagraph (II) OTR halo monitor for J-PARC T. Mitsuhashi, KEK.
6/11/2012 Building on NEAT concept - M. Gai - INAF-OATo 1 Building on NEAT concept M. Gai – INAF-OATo (a) Extension of science case (b) Payload implementation.
Multimedia Data Introduction to Image Processing Dr Sandra I. Woolley Electronic, Electrical.
High Contrast Imaging with Focal Plane Wavefront Sensing and PIAA for Subaru Telescopes Olivier Guyon Basile Gallet
Eusoballoon optics test Baptiste Mot, Gilles Roudil, Camille Catalano, Peter von Ballmoos Test configuration Calibration of the light beam Exploration.
Hubble Space Telescope Coronagraphs John Krist JPL.
Digital Imaging. Digital image - definition Image = “a two-dimensional function, f(x,y), where x and y are spatial coordinates, and the amplitude of f.
1 High-order coronagraphic phase diversity: demonstration of COFFEE on SPHERE. B.Paul 1,2, J-F Sauvage 1, L. Mugnier 1, K. Dohlen 2, D. Mouillet 3, T.
PHYS 2022: Observational Astronomy Properties of Light and Optical Observations from the Earth.
September 16, 2008LSST Camera F2F1 Camera Calibration Optical Configurations and Calculations Keith Bechtol Andy Scacco Allesandro Sonnenfeld.
First On-sky Test of an Optical Vortex Coronagraph (OVC) Mary Anne Peters Undergraduate research advisor : Laird M. Close Matt Rademacher, Tom Stalcup.
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Optics 2----by Dr.H.Huang, Department of Applied Physics1 Diffraction Introduction: Diffraction is often distinguished.
Congresso del Dipartimento di Fisica Highlights in Physics –14 October 2005, Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Milano An application of the.
SITE PARAMETERS RELEVANT FOR HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGING Marc Sarazin European Southern Observatory.
Adaptive Optics for Astronomy Kathy Cooksey. AO Basics Photons –Travel in straight lines Wavefront –Line perpendicular to all photons’ paths Atmospheric.
The HESSI Imaging Process. How HESSI Images HESSI will make observations of the X-rays and gamma-rays emitted by solar flares in such a way that pictures.
Physics 114: Lecture 20 2D Data Analysis Dale E. Gary NJIT Physics Department.
The Self-Coherent Camera: a focal plane wavefront sensor for EPICS
Development of Coronagraphs for Exoplanet Detection with SPHERE - direct detection and characterization of Extrasolar Giant Planets in the NIR among nearby.
Charts for TPF-C workshop SNR for Nulling Coronagraph and Post Coron WFS M. Shao 9/28/06.
Digital Aperture Photometry ASTR 3010 Lecture 10 Textbook 9.5.
Parameters characterizing the Atmospheric Turbulence: r0, 0, 0
Why do we need interferometry? Measuring the gas distribution and rotation in disk galaxies: radio observations with interferometer arrays and aperture.
In conclusion the intensity level of the CCD is linear up to the saturation limit, but there is a spilling of charges well before the saturation if.
Page 1 Lecture 16 Extreme Adaptive Optics: Exoplanets and Protoplanetary Disks Claire Max AY 289 March 7, 2016 Based in part on slides from Bruce Macintosh.
Page 1 Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era François Wildi Observatoire de Genève Credit for most slides : Claire Max (UC Santa Cruz) Basics of AO.
Diffraction Limit What is the best angular resolution a telescope would achieve in idealised conditions? Circular aperture: θ min ≈ 1.22 λ/d For the HST:
Lecture 14 AO System Optimization
Terrestrial Planet Finder - Coronagraph
Extra Solar Planet Science With a Non Redundant mask
Institute of Cosmos Sciences - University of Barcelona
Fourier Transform.
Diffraction vs. Interference
Fourier Optics P47 – Optics: Unit 8.
He Sun Advisor: N. Jeremy Kasdin Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
Modern Observational/Instrumentation Techniques Astronomy 500
“Twinkle, Twinkle Little Star”: An Introduction to Adaptive Optics
Angular Resolution 1. 1.
Presentation transcript:

Erez Ribak 1,3 and Szymon Gladysz 2,3 1 Physics, Technion, Haifa, Israel 2 European Southern Observatory 3 Research performed at NUI, Galway Thanks to Ruth Mackay for helping with the lab experiment and to Chris Dainty for his full support

 They are too faint  They are too close to their mother suns  They are too far away, we get only the nearby ones  Many excuses, but we still want to see them  Most planets detected by photometry, not imaging 2

 The dynamic range sun/planet is very high:  The atmosphere scatters stellar light onto planet  First method: adaptive optics ◦ Reducing atmospheric phase errors ◦ Second-order effects still disturbing  Second method: extreme adaptive optics ◦ Correcting for amplitude errors ◦ Employing more deformable mirrors  More degrees of freedom  Correction for atmospheric depth effects 3

 Removing all stellar flux within 2.44λ/D ◦ Blocking stellar central spot ◦ Scattering light out by optical vortices ◦ Nulling on-axis interferometry  Blocking diffraction from aperture, spider ◦ Simple Lyot stop downwards from scatterer ◦ Advanced aperture design: edges, spider, more 4 fffff planet Star (on axis) telescope pupil1st focuspupil imagefinal focus apodizerLyot stop / adaptive optics

 First brought into play by Herschel  Hexagonal pupil shape  Discovery of Sirius B (Barnard, 1909)  van Albada (1930s) used shaped pupils  Watson et al, Nisenson and Papaliolios (~1991) re-examined square apertures  Star light is concentrated along axes  Planet best visible along diagonals ◦ Stellar signal drops as (sin r / r) 4 5 Euro 50 design

 Spergel, Kasdin and Vanderbei (2003-4) optimised aperture shape  Scatter even less light along diagonals  Lossy in light, efficient in reordering it 6 power spectrum pupilpoint-spread function

 Ground and space observations suffer from wave front phase errors  Relatively easy to fix by adaptive optics ◦ Strong, nearby reference signal  Extreme adaptive optics correct amplitude errors and second order phase errors  Even combining coronagraphy and adaptive optics still leaves residual but detrimental stellar light leakage 7

 The nearby star creates a fixed pattern (even after adaptive optics correction)  The pattern still shows traces of Airy rings  The pattern has high rotational symmetry 8 Polishing errors, Subaru Fixed diffraction pattern (log scale) 14 nm phase errors corrigible by extreme adaptive optics

 If the symmetry is created by the aperture shape, modify this shape  If the modification is insufficient, modify the modification ◦ Turn the modified pupil around ◦ If turning is not enough, remodify pupil shape  We chose a mechanically simple solution ◦ Block the side of the telescope pupil (or its copy) ◦ Rotate the occluding mask 9

 The PSF is the power spectrum of the pupil  By breaking the pupil symmetry, the PSF loses rotational symmetry  By rotating the occluding mask, the PSF rotates  Laboratory experiment 10 collimated laser beam spatial light modulator binary grid beam blocker +1 0 camera σ φ ≈λ

 Notice shape of diffraction rings  Phase errors (system + atmosphere) σ φ ≈λ log (magnitude) scale aperture 11

 As the pupil rotates, Airy rings shrink/expand  The zero intensity rings sweeps in/out  As a zero ring passes by planet, it will become visible 12

The intensity at image position x, y, time (frame) t is 13 planet signal stellar signal unknown position phase angle mask rotation angle

 The modulated intensity at x, y is 14 planet signal stellar signallocal position angle rotation angle I a I b I c I d sine term cosine termshot noise

 Divide the planet by stellar signal in each pixel ◦ Different statistics (atmosphere, Poisson) ◦ Median-filtered image  Only good when planet>modulation, at the rim  Other options? 15

 Look at specific pixels during rotations: 1.Not a single period 2.Not a single shape 3.Not a single phase 4.Noisy a.Atmosphere b.Sky background c.Poisson noise d.Read noise 16 off-planet bright planet 40 steps/revolution

sky planet  suggested methods ◦ Fit typical period, subtract  Time domain  Frequency domain ◦ Search for different statistics  Rely on atmosphere vs. Poisson vs. Gaussian ◦ Wait until minima occur, at whatever angle  Only sky background and planet will show  Similar to dark speckle (but with active nudge) 17

 Modelled SPHERE, the planet finder for the VLT, with the PAOLA AO package  Created AO-corrected wave fronts  Added static aberrations from a mirror error map, σ = 20 nm  Added a realization of an f -2 spectrum from additional optical components, σ = 10 nm  The coronagraphic module was not included  λ =1600±15 nm (methane band), but Spectral Differential Imaging was not employed  The global tip and tilt were left in  Generated 200 short (dt = 0.1 s or 0.5 s) exposures  Between exposures the eccentric aperture was rotated by 9°, total 5 cycles per data-cube  Asterism of a primary star and 36 planets, all with same PSF  The star was magnitude 4, the planets dropping from 12 to 20 outwards  Added Poisson, background (14 mag arcsec -2 ) and readout noise (10 e - )  The focal-plane sampling was 0.25λ/D (D = 8.2 m)  The planets were placed in a central cross, spaced by 10 pixels, or 2.5λ/D, or 0.1'‘  Planets locations nearly coincide with the Airy rings 18

 31% side obscuration  Integrations of 100ms, 9° steps, total 200 steps  Data-cube is 200×200×200. In each (x, y) pixel: 19 average (~long exposure) faintest average of 3 faintest (limitation of dark speckle: the ensemble faintest can be too faint, even zero)

 This 31% side obscuration did not uncover all pixels  Repeat with other values: 11%, 16%, 21%, 26%, 31%  Now data-cube has 200×200×1000 values  For weakest occurrence: keep only 200×200 minima 20 average (~long exposure) faintest (31%) faintest (11%-31%)

21

22 fffff planet Star (on axis) telescope pupil1st focuspupil imagefinal focus apodizerLyot stop / adaptive optics Changing the occulting aperture size and rotating it at the same time The blocked portion grows from 0 up to 24% of the diameter The cycle repeats at 7/3 times the rotation speed Employ planetary gear: non-circular or axis-displacing

23 A simple rotating mask removes symmetries of the pupil Main limitation is short exposure Data analysis: Averaging over cycles (yet) unsuccessful Finding data-cube minima is prone to statistics of extrema Higher contrast achievable with star apodiser (not included) Next: Combine Airy ring wobble by aperture and by λ (Thatte) Laboratory white-light experiments Observatory tests with AO system